| Literature DB >> 34858837 |
Bi-Ming He1, Wei Xue2, Wei-Gang Yan3, Lei Yin4, Bai-Jun Dong2, Zhi-En Zhou3, Heng-Zhi Lin5, Yi Zhou3, Yan-Qing Wang2, Zhen-Kai Shi5, Hai Zhou1, Shuai-Dong Wang1, Shan-Cheng Ren4, Xu Gao5, Lin-Hui Wang5, Chuan-Liang Xu5, Hai-Feng Wang1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The classical pathway for the therapy of low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer is radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, which has shown a high incidence of complications, including erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and bowel injury. An alternative pathway is to perform an ablation by some energy to the localized lesion, known as focal therapy. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) is nonthermal energy that can be used in cancer ablation to deliver pulsed high-voltage but low-energy electric current to the cell membrane and to invoke cell death. An H-FIRE pathway has been reported to be tissue-selective, which leads to fewer side effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicenter and single-arm objective performance criteria (OPC) study, in which all men with localized prostate cancer are allocated to H-FIRE ablation. This trial will assess the efficacy and safety of the H-FIRE ablation for prostate cancer. Efficacy will be assessed by prostate biopsy 6 months after treatment while safety will be assessed by adverse event reports and questionnaires. The main inclusion criteria are moderate to low-risk prostate cancer in NCCN risk classification and had no previous therapy for prostate cancer. A sample size of 110 participants is required. The primary objective is to determine whether the detection rate of clinically significant cancer by prostate biopsy is less than 20% after the H-FIRE ablation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has obtained ethical approval by the ethics committee of all participating centers. The results of the study will be submitted for dissemination and publication in peer-reviewed journals.Entities:
Keywords: H-FIRE = High-frequency irreversible electroporation; clinical trial; multicenter analysis; prostate cancer; protocol
Year: 2021 PMID: 34858837 PMCID: PMC8631513 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.760003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Trial flowchart.
Patients inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Inclusion criteria |
|---|
| Age range from 40 to 85 years old |
| Prostate cancer must be detected by template-guided mapping biopsy or targeted plus template-guided mapping biopsy |
| Serum PSA < 20 ng/ml |
| Suspected stage ≤ T2c (organ confined) |
| Biopsy Gleason score ≤ 4 + 3 |
| No prostatic calculus or prostatic calculus ≤ 5 mm |
| Fully understand the clinical trial protocol and sign the informed consent |
|
|
| Previous history of radical prostatectomy, hormonal therapy, or radiotherapy |
| Previous surgery within 3 months |
| Long-term medication with anticoagulant or stop taking anticoagulant less than 1 months |
| Not fit for anesthesia or surgery |
| With cardiac pacemaker and/or with metal implants which are located in the range from the first lumbar vertebra (L1) to the middle of femurs. |
| Previous history of epilepsy |
| Any other malignant tumor or HIV |
Participant timeline in the study.
| Contact with patient | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vist 1 | Vist 2 | Vist 3 | Vist 4 | Vist 5 | Vist 6 | |
| Pre H-FIRE | H-FIRE | 1-week post H-FIRE | 1-month post H-FIRE | 3-month post H-FIRE | 6-month post H-FIRE | |
| Time | -30~0 days | 0 | 7~10 days | 4~6 weeks | 12~14 weeks | 6~7 months |
| Consent | × | |||||
| Screening | × | |||||
| Baseline characteristic | × | |||||
| PSA | × | × | × | × | ||
| Routine blood test | × | × | × | × | × | |
| Routine urine test | × | × | × | × | × | |
| Blood biochemistry test | × | × | × | × | × | |
| ECT | × | |||||
| Performance status | × | |||||
| MRI | × | × | × | |||
| Prostate biopsy | × | × | ||||
| Pathological assessment | × | × | ||||
| NCCN risk assessment | × | |||||
| Clinical stage assessment | × | |||||
| Pad usage record | × | × | × | × | ||
| IIEF–5 scoring questionnaire | × | × | × | × | ||
| IPSS scoring questionnaire | × | × | × | × | ||
| Urinary catheter removed | × | |||||
| Withdrawal | Complete as required at any time following registration | |||||
| SAE | Complete as required at any time following registration | |||||
Figure 2Ablation strategy. Ablation every lesions; every ablation area includes the tumor and some surrounding benign tissues (the safety margin is >1 cm).
Figure 3The composite steep pulse therapeutic apparatus (REMEDINE, Shanghai, China).
Figure 4Electrode needles are placed through a brachytherapy template grid and the perineum.
Figure 5Electrode needle placement. (A) Coronal view: one needle is positioned in the center of the targeted lesion, and three to four needles are positioned around the lesion; the distance between each needle ranges 0.5–2.0 cm. (B) Sagittal view: maximum electrode exposure length covers the whole length of the prostate (from apex to base).