| Literature DB >> 34858788 |
Kunlong Xiong1,2, Wenwen Sun1,2, Yayi He2,3, Lin Fan1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We systematically review the molecular mechanism of the interaction between lung cancer (LC) and tuberculosis (TB), and put forward the existing problems in order to provide suggestions for early intervention and future research direction.Entities:
Keywords: PD-1; Tuberculosis (TB); epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); inflammation; lung cancer; microflora
Year: 2021 PMID: 34858788 PMCID: PMC8577982 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res ISSN: 2218-6751
Published studies about epidemiology correlations between tuberculosis and lung cancer
| Investigator (year) | Cohort size/number of controls | Methods | Results | Conclusions | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leung (2020) | 52,480 cancer cases | Meta-analysis | LC RR was 1.7 (95% CI: 1.5–2.0) in TB patients. | TB was associated with lung cancer. | ( |
| Everatt (2016) | 21,986 TB patients | Retrospective study | 477 TB patients developed LC, and 3.5-fold increase risk of LC in subjects with a history of TB. | The excess risk of LC in the TB cohort is associated with multiple factors. | ( |
| Oh (2020) | 2,640 patients with pre-existing TB, 17,612 controls | Retrospective cohort study | LC HR was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.9‒5.6) in PTB patients. | A higher risk of LC was found in pre-existing TB patients. | ( |
| Wu (2011) | 5,657 patients with pre-existing TB, 23,984 controls | Retrospective cohort study | LC IRR was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3‒2.3) in PTB patients. | PTB is associated with an increased risk of LC. | ( |
| Yu (2011) | 4,480 TB patients, 712,392 controls | Prospective longitudinal study | TB patients had a nearly 11-fold higher incidence than controls (26.3 | TB patients had an increased LC risk. | ( |
| Zheng (1987) | 1,405 LC patients, 1,495 controls | Prospective longitudinal study | LC OR was 1.5 in TB cohort and remained 2.5-fold higher after the TB diagnosis within the past 20 years. | TB may predispose to LC. | ( |
| Shiels (2011) | 273 male smokers with TB, 28,860 male smokers with non-TB | Prospective longitudinal study | LC HR was 2 in TB patients (95% CI: 1.5–2.7), and LC risk was highest at about 2 years after TB diagnosis (HR: 5.0; 95% CI: 3.0–8.5), but the risk remained raised at the longer latencies (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.2). | TB is associated with increased LC risk in male smokers. | ( |
| Liang (2009) | 19,143 TB cases, 118,191 controls | Meta-analysis | LC RR was 1.7 (95% CI: 1.5–2.0) in TB patients, and passive smoking or exposure of the environmental smoke did not confound the association [RR was 1.8 (95% CI:1.4–2.2) and 2.9 (95% CI: 1.6–5.3), respectively]. | TB had a direct relation with LC, especially adenocarcinomas. | ( |
| Brenner (2011) | 30 studies, 82,716 cases | Meta-analysis | LC RR was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.5–2.1) in pre-existing TB patients. | PTB is associated with an increased risk of LC. | ( |
| Littman (2004) | 17,698 smokers | Prospective longitudinal study | Pre-existing of pulmonary emphysema or chronic bronchitis, rather than TB, was more likely to be associated with LC in smoking subjects. | Pre-existing TB had no correlation with LC. | ( |
| Engels (2009) | 246 TB patients, 42,176 no-TB cases | Retrospective cohort study | LC HR was 9.7 (95% CI: 4.8–19) in TB patients within 5 years after TB diagnosis, the mortality of LC was higher in TB patients than in LC patients without a history of TB (25 | TB was an important risk factor for LC, and LC mortality was higher in TB patients. | ( |
| Heuvers (2012) | 214 LC patients, 7,769 subjects without LC | Retrospective cohort study | 13 of the 214 LC patients was reported to have a history of TB, and the survival of the LC patients with pre-existing TB was significantly shorter (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1–4.9) than those without with a difference in means of 311 days. | Pre-existing TB may be an important prognostic factor for the survival of LC. | ( |
| Su (2016) | 11,522 LTBI subjects, 46,088 matched subjects | Retrospective cohort study | LC HR was 2.7 in TB contacts. | LTBI cohorts had an increased lung cancer incidence. | ( |
TB, tuberculosis; LC, lung cancer; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IRR, incidence rate ratio; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection.
Figure 1Chronic inflammation elicited by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) may be involved in the development of lung cancer (LC) through exhausted T cell phenotype, DNA damage and repair, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, tuberculosis (TB) granuloma, tuberculous fibrosis formation and IMs infiltration. In the early stage of infection, the endocytosed infected MTB escape the phagosome of alveolar macrophages leads to the formation of granuloma, which vascularizes surrounding tissues and recruits immune cells, contributes to the prolonged inflammation. The exhausted T cells enriched in granuloma and the chronic inflammation induced ROS and chemical irritants releasing promote the occurrence of LC. There are a large number of immune checkpoints expression in exhausted T cells, which play a central role in inhibiting the T cell response and facilitating tumor progression. LC can also develop from fibrotic scar induced by MTB-induced lengthy pulmonary inflammation through mechanisms like NOX4-autophagy axis enhances the tumorigenic potential of lung cells. The TB patients have an increased expression level of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (CCL-2), which can recruit inflammatory monocytes (IMs). IMs can differentiate into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and IMs-derived TAMs contribute to tumorigenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), IL-6 and epidermal growth factor (EGF) or Factor XIIIA.
Figure 2M2 polarization of macrophages induced by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in lung cancer (LC): macrophages are generally categorized to M1 or M2 phenotype. M1-like macrophages, induced by Th1 cytokines such as colony stimulating factor (CSF)-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, are associate with pro-inflammatory and response against infected pathogens and cancer cells through ROS, TNF-α, IL-6, NO, etc. M2-like macrophages, induced by Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13, contribute to angiogenesis and increased expression of immunosuppressive molecules to promote tumor cell growth, invasion, metastases. The M2 phenotype dominates in the intermediate and late phases of tuberculosis (TB), and raised levels of type-2 inflammatory response signals such as IL-4, IL-13 or IL-10 raised in TB patients, leading to the occurrence and progression of LC. MTB develops a relevant strategy to block M1 polarization through IL-6 involved bystander effect-mediated inhibition of the transcription of IFN-γ. While combining anti-Her2/neu antibody with targeted delivery of can skew M2-like macrophages to M1 phenotypes, and anti-TB therapy can shift the inflammatory atmosphere type-2 back to type-1, thus increase M1-like macrophages in PTB patients.
Figure 3Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations induced by tuberculosis (TB) in lung cancer (LC): EGFR autophosphorylates at their tyrosine residues after binding to their ligands. The activated EGFR activates many downstream signaling pathways, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and survival. EGFR mutations can generate continuously activated EGFR, which leads to tumorigenesis. Patients with pre-existing tuberculosis (TB) have an increased frequency of EGFR mutations, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-infected macrophages play a role in the production of epiregulin, a most potent ligand for EGFR, thus promote the occurrence of LC.