| Literature DB >> 34858004 |
Yukun Huang1, Lu Liu1, Linna Chen1, Lin Zhou1, Xia Xiong1, Yongqiong Deng1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gut microbial dysbiosis and gender differences in the pathogenesis of acne vulgaris have long been postulated respectively. However, there was no data about a gender-related discrepancy in gut microbiota and microbial metabolism in acne.Entities:
Keywords: Acne vulgaris; Gastrointestinal microbiome; Gender differences; Metabolites
Year: 2021 PMID: 34858004 PMCID: PMC8577912 DOI: 10.5021/ad.2021.33.6.531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Dermatol ISSN: 1013-9087 Impact factor: 1.444
Summary of demographic information of study participants
| MAS | FAS | MCS | FCS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 26 | 17 | 26 | 17 | - |
| Age (yr) | 19.31±2.45 | 21.00±2.98 | 19.31±2.45 | 21.00±2.98 | 0.015 |
| BMI (kg/cm2) | 21.08±1.78 | 19.70±1.51 | 21.41±5.24 | 20.16±2.05 | 0.225 |
| Disease severity (S1, S2, S3, S4) | 2, 9, 7, 8 | 10, 3, 2, 2 | - | - | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±standard error of mean. p-value was calculated from the Kruskal-Wallis test. BMI: body mass index, MAS: man acne set, FAS: woman acne set, MCS: man control set, FCS: woman control set.
Fig. 1Comparisons of different diversity indices and microbiota structure in four samples. Participants were separated into four groups as the MAS, FAS, and their control sets (MCS, FCS). (A) Shannon diversity index (p=0.048) among four groups. (B) Simpson diversity index (p=0.047) among four group. (C) The difference among and within groups was assessed by ANOSIM analysis. (D) PCoA plot with different relative abundances of OTU among four groups. FAS: woman acne set, FCS: woman control set, MAS: man acne set, MCS: man control set.
Fig. 2The majority of microbes at phyla level in all samples, and the gender-based difference of taxa at phyla level in patients with acne vulgaris. (A) The majority of OTU were assigned to four main phyla, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. (B) The comparison of the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes between acne patients and their gender-matched controls. FAS: woman acne set, FCS: woman control set, MAS: man acne set, MCS: man control set.
Gender-based difference of metabolites between patients and healthy controls
| Metabolites | Group | Z-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acne set | Control set | ||||
| Man | |||||
| 3-Methylindole | 0.63±0.94 | 0.33±1.15 | 0.029 | –2.18 | |
| Alpha-linolenic acid | 39.44±48.74 | 35.93±20.90 | 0.046 | –2.00 | |
| Glyceric acid | 516.53±663.92 | 174.41±298.02 | 0.039 | –2.07 | |
| Hydroxypropionic acid | 25.61±39.27 | 17.23±32.45 | 0.039 | –2.07 | |
| L-asparagine | 19.07±32.05 | 17.35±57.91 | 0.037 | –2.09 | |
| L-tryptophan | 11.58±16.71 | 6.74±13.70 | 0.042 | –2.03 | |
| Linoleic acid | 124.66±120.85 | 62.47±52.79 | 0.022 | –2.29 | |
| N-acetyltryptophan | 21.14±31.97 | 12.00±26.23 | 0.044 | –2.01 | |
| Oxoglutaric acid | 48.06±57.30 | 17.49±29.14 | 0.013 | –2.47 | |
| Phenyllactic acid | 0.42±0.42 | 0.18±0.16 | 0.019 | –2.35 | |
| Purine | 1.62±2.38 | 1.07±1.45 | 0.021 | –2.31 | |
| Stearic acid | 11.07±7.10 | 7.92±6.26 | 0.035 | –2.11 | |
| Succinic acid | 28.89±31.97 | 13.84±18.99 | 0.046 | –2.00 | |
| Valeric acid | 4,506.14±1,841.31 | 5,499.25±1,502.47 | 0.017 | –2.38 | |
| Woman | |||||
| 2-Phenylglycine | 2.73±2.66 | 0.75±0.60 | 0.018 | –2.36 | |
| 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid | 1.77±1.42 | 0.91±0.32 | 0.007 | –2.70 | |
| Glycine | 5.51±3.43 | 2.77±2.01 | 0.008 | –2.67 | |
| L-alanine | 2.76±1.72 | 1.39±1.00 | 0.008 | –2.67 | |
| L-histidine | 6.78±3.82 | 3.80±3.36 | 0.015 | –2.43 | |
| L-leucine | 33.83±24.89 | 20.01±14.88 | 0.048 | –1.98 | |
| L-methionine | 74.60±53.23 | 38.71±28.07 | 0.022 | –2.29 | |
| L-serine | 12.90±7.88 | 8.22±6.89 | 0.031 | –2.15 | |
| L-tryptophan | 5.97±6.05 | 3.16±2.72 | 0.024 | –2.26 | |
| L-valine | 27.12±24.65 | 13.29±10.00 | 0.034 | –2.12 | |
| Methylsuccinic acid | 5.31±16.59 | 0.70±0.46 | 0.044 | –2.02 | |
| N-acetyltryptophan | 9.97±10.87 | 5.26±4.93 | 0.024 | –2.26 | |
| Ornithine | 3.21±10.37 | 0.34±1.13 | 0.031 | –2.15 | |
Values are presented as mean±standard error of mean.
Fig. 3Correlation between gut microbial taxa and metabolites was assessed by Person correlation test and displayed as a heat map. (A) For men patients; (B) for women patients.