D B Sanders1, U Khan2, S L Heltshe3, M Skalland2, N E West4, D R VanDevanter5, C H Goss6, P A Flume7. 1. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States. Electronic address: dbsand@iu.edu. 2. CFF Therapeutics Development Network Coordinating Center, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States. 3. CFF Therapeutics Development Network Coordinating Center, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. 4. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States. 5. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States. 6. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. 7. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the STOP2 (Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations-2) study, intravenous (IV) antimicrobial treatment duration for adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) experiencing pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) was determined based on initial treatment response. The impact of home vs hospital care remains an important clinical question in CF. Our hypothesis was that STOP2 participants treated at home would have less improvement in lung function compared to those treated in the hospital. METHODS: Treating clinicians determined PEx treatment location, which was a stratification factor for STOP2 randomization. Lung function, weight, and symptom recovery were evaluated by treatment location. Propensity scores and inverse probability treatment weighting were used to test for differences in clinical response by treatment location. RESULTS: In all, 33% of STOP2 participants received IV antimicrobials in the hospital only, 46% both in the hospital and at home, and 21% at home only. Mean (95% CI) ppFEV1 improvement was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for those treated at home only, 5.0 (3.5, 6.5), compared with at home and in the hospital, 7.0 (5.9, 8.1), and in the hospital only, 8.0 (6.7, 9.4). Mean weight (p < 0.001) and symptom (p < 0.05) changes were significantly smaller for those treated at home only compared to those treated in the hospital only. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PEx treatment at home only, treatment in the hospital was associated with greater mean lung function, respiratory symptom, and weight improvements. The limitations of home IV therapy should be addressed in order to optimize outcomes for adults with CF treated at home.
BACKGROUND: In the STOP2 (Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations-2) study, intravenous (IV) antimicrobial treatment duration for adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) experiencing pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) was determined based on initial treatment response. The impact of home vs hospital care remains an important clinical question in CF. Our hypothesis was that STOP2 participants treated at home would have less improvement in lung function compared to those treated in the hospital. METHODS: Treating clinicians determined PEx treatment location, which was a stratification factor for STOP2 randomization. Lung function, weight, and symptom recovery were evaluated by treatment location. Propensity scores and inverse probability treatment weighting were used to test for differences in clinical response by treatment location. RESULTS: In all, 33% of STOP2 participants received IV antimicrobials in the hospital only, 46% both in the hospital and at home, and 21% at home only. Mean (95% CI) ppFEV1 improvement was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for those treated at home only, 5.0 (3.5, 6.5), compared with at home and in the hospital, 7.0 (5.9, 8.1), and in the hospital only, 8.0 (6.7, 9.4). Mean weight (p < 0.001) and symptom (p < 0.05) changes were significantly smaller for those treated at home only compared to those treated in the hospital only. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PEx treatment at home only, treatment in the hospital was associated with greater mean lung function, respiratory symptom, and weight improvements. The limitations of home IV therapy should be addressed in order to optimize outcomes for adults with CF treated at home.
Authors: J Michael Collaco; Deanna M Green; Garry R Cutting; Kathleen M Naughton; Peter J Mogayzel Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Michael W Konstan; Wayne J Morgan; Steven M Butler; David J Pasta; Marcia L Craib; Stefanie J Silva; Dennis C Stokes; Mary Ellen B Wohl; Jeffrey S Wagener; Warren E Regelmann; Charles A Johnson Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2007-06-22 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: A Termoz; S Touzet; S Bourdy; E Decullier; L Bouveret; C Colin; R Nove-Josserand; P Reix; C Cracowski; I Pin; G Bellon; I Durieu Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2008-09
Authors: Patrick A Flume; Peter J Mogayzel; Karen A Robinson; Christopher H Goss; Randall L Rosenblatt; Robert J Kuhn; Bruce C Marshall Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Emily A Knapp; Aliza K Fink; Christopher H Goss; Ase Sewall; Josh Ostrenga; Christopher Dowd; Alexander Elbert; Kristofer M Petren; Bruce C Marshall Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-07