Literature DB >> 34857091

Evolution of Late Right Heart Failure With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Association With Outcomes.

J Eduardo Rame1, Francis D Pagani2, Michael S Kiernan3, Guilherme H Oliveira4, Edo Y Birati5, Pavan Atluri6, Ann Gaffey6, E Wilson Grandin7, Susan L Myers8, Craig Collum8, Robert L Kormos9, James K Kirklin8, Jeffrey J Teuteberg10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A revised definition of right heart failure (RHF) for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) was introduced in June 2014.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of RHF over time and the association of RHF status at 3 months with 12-month outcomes after LVAD.
METHODS: All patients in Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs with follow-up and supported at least 3 months with a continuous flow LVAD implanted between June 2, 2014 and March 31, 2017 without a simultaneous RVAD. RHF was defined as both documentation and manifestations of elevated central venous pressures.
RESULTS: There were 6,118 patients included with an incidence of RHF at 3, 6, and 12 months postimplant categorized as mild in 5%, 6%, and 6% and moderate in 5%, 3%, and 3%, respectively. For those with no RHF at 3 months, there was a low incidence of subsequent RHF at 6 and 12 months. The lack of RHF at 3 months, compared with mild and moderate RHF, was associated with a lower 12-month cumulative incidence of mortality (6.9% vs 16.7% vs 28.1%; P < 0.0001) and a lower 12-month cumulative incidence of stroke (7.4% vs 9.5% vs 11.0%; P = 0.0095), gastrointestinal bleeding (14.8% vs 24.2% vs 23.6%; P < 0.0001), and rehospitalization (65.2% vs 73.2% vs 71.2%; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients surviving 3 months with LVAD support alone, mild or moderate RHF occurred in nearly 1 of 10 patients at 12 months. Patients with late RHF had worse survival and a higher cumulative incidence of major adverse events.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mechanical circulatory support; outcomes; quality of life; right heart failure; ventricular assist

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34857091     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

Review 1.  Novel Approaches to Imaging the Pulmonary Vasculature and Right Heart.

Authors:  Fawaz Alenezi; Taylor A Covington; Monica Mukherjee; Stephen C Mathai; Paul B Yu; Sudarshan Rajagopal
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 23.213

2.  Ventricular and Atrial Pressure-Volume Loops: Analysis of the Effects Induced by Right Centrifugal Pump Assistance.

Authors:  Beatrice De Lazzari; Attilio Iacovoni; Massimo Capoccia; Silvia Papa; Roberto Badagliacca; Domenico Filomena; Claudio De Lazzari
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

3.  The "Right" Definition for Post-Left Ventricular Assist Device Right Heart Failure: The More We Learn, the Less We Know.

Authors:  Shelley A Hall; Hannah Copeland; Amit Alam; Susan M Joseph
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 4.  Mechanical circulatory support devices and treatment strategies for right heart failure.

Authors:  Taiyo Kuroda; Chihiro Miyagi; Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Jamshid H Karimov
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-23

5.  When Nothing Goes Right: Risk Factors and Biomarkers of Right Heart Failure after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Thomas Schlöglhofer; Franziska Wittmann; Robert Paus; Julia Riebandt; Anne-Kristin Schaefer; Philipp Angleitner; Marcus Granegger; Philipp Aigner; Dominik Wiedemann; Günther Laufer; Heinrich Schima; Daniel Zimpfer
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.