Literature DB >> 34857042

The clinical features of pulmonary artery involvement in Takayasu arteritis and its relationship with ischemic heart diseases and infection.

Hiroki Mukoyama1, Mirei Shirakashi1, Nozomi Tanaka1, Takeshi Iwasaki1, Toshiki Nakajima2, Hideo Onizawa3, Hideaki Tsuji1, Koji Kitagori1, Shuji Akizuki1, Ran Nakashima1, Kosaku Murakami1, Masao Tanaka3, Akio Morinobu1, Hajime Yoshifuji4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary artery involvement (PAI) in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) can lead to severe complications, but the relationship between the two has not been fully clarified.
METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 166 consecutive patients with TAK who attended Kyoto University Hospital from 1997 to 2018. The demographic data, clinical symptoms and signs, comorbidities, treatments, and imaging findings were compared between patients with and without PAI. TAK was diagnosed based on the American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria (1990) or the Japanese Clinical Diagnostic Criteria (2008). PAI was identified using enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or lung scintigraphy.
RESULTS: PAI was detected in 14.6% (n = 24) of total TAK patients. Dyspnea (25.0% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.043), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (16.7% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (IHD) (29% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.018), respiratory infection (25.0% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.009), and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection (20.8% vs. 0.8%; p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent, and renal artery stenosis (0% vs. 17%; p = 0.007) was significantly less frequent in TAK patients with PAI than in those without PAI. PAI and biologics were risk factors for NTM.
CONCLUSIONS: TAK patients with PAI more frequently have dyspnea, PAH, IHD, and respiratory infection, including NTM, than TAK patients without PAI.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infection; Ischemic heart diseases; Pulmonary artery involvement; Takayasu arteritis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34857042      PMCID: PMC8641170          DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02675-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther        ISSN: 1478-6354            Impact factor:   5.156


Introduction

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is an idiopathic vasculitis predominantly affecting the aorta and its branches. However, TAK can also affect the carotid, subclavian, renal, iliac, coronary, and pulmonary arteries (PA). Vessel wall inflammation leads to arterial wall thickening, dilation, stenosis, and occlusion. PA involvement (PAI) occurs in 5.7–25.93% of all cases [1-10]. TAK with PAI is occasionally complicated with pulmonary hypertension (PH), resulting in the risk of early mortality [8, 11]. The early detection of PAI in TAK patients is important for preventing disease progression. However, as the disease is rare, the previously reported data, including several cohort studies, remains insufficient, and the clinical features of TAK with PAI are not fully clarified. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the clinical features of TAK with PAI.

Patients and methods

The medical records of 186 consecutive patients with TAK who visited Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan, from 1997 to 2018 were reviewed. Twenty patients were excluded due to insufficient information. The demographic data, clinical symptoms and signs, imaging findings, treatments, and comorbidities were reviewed and compared between TAK patients with and without PAI. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto University Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine (G412). All study procedures were performed following the Declaration of Helsinki principals. TAK was diagnosed based on the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria [12] or the 2008 Japanese Clinical Diagnostic Criteria [13]. PAI was screened using enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or lung scintigraphy and was defined as the presence of vascular involvement manifested as stenosis, occlusion, dilation, or aneurysm formation in either PA. Fever was defined as body temperature ≥ 38 °C. Hypertension was defined by systolic hypertension of ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic hypertension of ≥ 90 mmHg. Blood pressure discrepancy between arms was defined as that of ≥ 10 mmHg. Ischemic heart disease (IHD) was defined as angina pectoris and myocardial infarction that could be confirmed on the medical record. All patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) were diagnosed using right heart catheterization (RHC), based on a mean PA pressure of > 20 mmHg with a PA wedge pressure of ≤ 15 mmHg, a pulmonary vascular resistance of > 3.0 Wood Unit, and exclusion of other types of PH [14]. Six systemic artery involvement subtypes were classified considering the classification criteria proposed by Hata et al. (Types I, IIa, IIb, III, IV, and V) [15]. Serious infection was defined as viral, bacterial, or fungal infections requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics. Tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections were also considered serious infections because they can cause significant disability and sequela. Respiratory infection was defined as a serious infection of respiratory systems, including pneumonia and NTM pulmonary disease. NTM pulmonary disease was diagnosed using criteria proposed by the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America in 2007 [16]. All lung lesions including PAI and NTM were confirmed by radiologists. Continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations, and Student’s t test was used to compare the groups. Qualitative variables were presented as numbers and percentages, and Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the groups. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to detect factors independently associated with NTM infection. The data analysis was conducted using JMP ® 14 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism version 7.0b for Mac OS X, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients’ backgrounds and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1; 166 TAK patients were included. PAI was detected in 14.6% (n = 24). Representative images of PAI are presented in Fig. 1. Of those with PAI, the mean age was 54.5 ± 17.0 years, duration from the onset was 20.7 ± 14.6 years, and the observation period was 7.8 ± 6.8 years, which did not differ from patients without PAI. Dyspnea (25.0% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.043), PAH (16.7% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001), and IHD (28.6% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.022) were significantly more frequent, and renal artery stenosis (0.0% vs. 17.0%; p = 0.007) was significantly less frequent in TAK patients with PAI than in those without. Echocardiography was performed in all the TAK patients. In our hospital, RHC was performed when the peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity was 2.9 m/s or higher [17], as possible, if there were no contraindications. Based on this criterion, 8/166 patients underwent RHC and 4/8 were proven to have PAH. Respiratory infection (25.0% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.009) and NTM infection (20.8% vs. 0.8%; p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in TAK patients with PAI than in those without. In this study, all patients with NTM infection had pulmonary NTM disease, and none had extra-pulmonary NTM disease. Further, all patients had received immunosuppressive treatment when the infection was diagnosed (Table 2). Representative images of patients with NTM infection are presented in Fig. 2. The predictors of NTM in patients with TAK were analyzed by univariate analysis with the Cox proportional-hazards model, which showed that PAI and biologics were risk factors for NTM (Table 3). Kaplan-Meier graphs depict the rate of developing serious infection, respiratory infection, and NTM infection in Fig. 3. Based on the log-rank test, TAK patients with PAI were at a significantly higher risk of these infection than those without.
Table 1

Patients’ characteristics and clinical symptoms

PAI (n = 24)Without PAI (n = 142)P value
Patients’ characteristics
 Duration from onset (years)20.7 ± 14.621.4 ± 15.60.835
 Observation period (years)7.8 ± 6.89.1 ± 6.80.355
 Onset age33.5 ± 13.130.1 ± 15.80.325
 Age at surveillance54.5 ± 17.052.2 ± 17.70.564
 Female22 (91.7%)130 (91.6%)1.000
Symptoms
Systemic manifestation
 Fever2 (9.5%)33 (25.8%)0.163
 General fatigue7 (33.3%)54 (42.5%)0.481
 Hypertension8 (38.1%)53 (40.8%)1.000
Head and neck
 Dizziness8 (38.1%)48 (37.2%)1.000
 Headache7 (33.3%)36 (27.9%)0.610
 Syncope0 (0.0%)8 (6.3%)0.602
Eyes
 Eye symptoms4 (20.0%)26 (20.5%)1.000
 Visual disorder2 (9.5%)13 (10.1%)1.000
Heart and lung
 Dyspnea5 (25.0%)11 (8.6%)0.044
 Chest compression6 (30.0%)16 (12.5%)0.082
 Hemosputum1 (4.8%)2 (1.6%)0.368
 Heart murmur8 (40.0%)40 (31.8%)0.455
 Ischemic heart disease6 (28.6%)12 (9.2%)0.022
 Aortic valve regurgitation12 (57.1%)55 (41.3%)0.236
 PAH4 (16.7%)0 (0.0%)<0.001
Upper limbs
 Pulselessness5 (23.8%)31 (24.6%)1.000
 BP discrepancies between arms5 (25.0%)44 (34.1%)0.610
 Fatigue of upper limbs5 (25.0%)41 (32.3%)0.611
Aorta
 Aortic aneurysm1 (4.8%)14 (10.9%)0.696
Kidney
 Renal artery stenosis0 (0.0%)22 (18.5%)0.043
 Renal disorder2 (9.5%)18 (13.9%)0.741
Infection
 Serious infection7 (29.2%)17 (12.7%)0.059
 Respiratory infection6 (25.0%)8 (6.0%)0.009
 Nontuberculous mycobacterium5 (20.8%)1 (0.8%)<0.001
Treatment
 Glucocorticoid21 (87.5%)110 (77.5%)0.416
 Maximum glucocortioid (PSL)31.1 ± 3.233.4 ± 1.40.508
 Immunosuppressants6 (26.1%)54 (38.9%)0.351
 Biologics5 (22.7%)17 (12.2%)0.206
 GC only11 (47.8%)55 (39.6%)0.455
 GC + IS3 (12.5%)37 (26.1%)0.200
 GC + biologics2 (8.7%)1 (0.7%)0.009
 GC + IS + biologics3 (13.0%)15 (10.8%)0.750
 Antiplatelet therapy11 (52.4%)86 (68.8%)0.210
 Anticoagulation therapy8 (38.1%)21 (17.1%)0.038
 Cardiovascular surgery2 (11.1%)33 (25.8%)0.242
 Catheter treatment3 (15.8%)25 (21.2%)0.764

Data are expressed as mean ± SD, or number (percentage). The difference of continuous variables was tested by Student’s t test, and that of qualitative variables was tested by Fisher’s exact test. PAI pulmonary artery involvement, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, BP blood pressure, PSL predonisolone (mg/day), GC glucocorticoid, IS immunosuppressants. The percentage is calculated as a ratio of the number of cases for which clinical information was available

Fig. 1

Representative pulmonary artery involvement images. Occlusion of the right upper pulmonary artery branches on enhanced computed tomography (CT) (a). Occlusion of the left main pulmonary artery on magnetic resonance angiography (b). The right main pulmonary artery vessel wall thickness (c) and stenosis of the lower pulmonary artery branches (d) on enhanced CT. Dilation of the right main pulmonary artery (e). Occlusion of the right pulmonary artery branches on enhanced CT (f) and angiography (g). A perfusion defect in the right lung (h)

Table 2

Clinical features and treatments of the patients complicate with NTM infection

CasePAIAge, genderSpeciesTypeTreatment when infection was diagnosedMaximum PSL doseTAK disease duration (months) at diagnosis of NTMTreatments for NTM
1Yes30FM. aviumFCPSL 15 mg6041RFP, EB, CAM, SM, and operation
2Yes55FM. aviumFCPSL 7 mg, TCZ 162 mg s.c./week40241RFP, EB, CAM
3Yes31FM. aviumFCPSL 5 mg, MTX 8 mg/w, TCZ 8 mg/kg DIV/4 weeks2071RFP, EB, CAM, SM, and operation
4Yes72FM. intracellulareNBPSL 2.5 mg20592Observation
5Yes42FNot identifiedNBPSL 12.5 mg3069RFP, EB, CAM
6No64FM. intracellulareNBPSL 5 mg3033Observation

PAI pulmonary artery involvement, NTM nontuberculous mycobacteria, PSL predonisolone (mg/day), TAK Takayasu arteritis, F female, M. avium mycobacterium avium, M. intracellulare mycobacterium intracellulare, FC fibrocavitary type, NB nodular/bronchiectatic type, PSL prednisolone, TCZ tocilizumab, MTX methotrexate, s.c subcutaneous infusion, DIV drip infusion in vein, RFP rifampicin, EB ethambutol, CAM clarithromycin, SM streptomycin

Fig. 2

Pulmonary artery involvement (PAI) and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) disease imaging on computed tomography. Patient 1: occlusion of the right upper and middle pulmonary arterial branches (a) and a large opacity with a cavity in the right lower lobe and ill-defined nodules in bilateral lungs (b). Patient 2: occlusion of the right main pulmonary artery (c) and a large opacity in the right lower lobe (d). Patient 3: occlusion of the right upper and middle pulmonary artery branches (e) and a large opacity with a cavity in the right lung (f). Patient 4: dilation of the left pulmonary artery branches (g) and ill-defined nodules in the left upper lobe (h). Patient 5: occlusion of the left main pulmonary artery before developing NTM disease (i) and ill-defined nodules in the left lung (j). The left and right images of patients 2, 3, and 4 were taken simultaneously, since the previous images were not available. Patient 6 did not have PAI. Therefore, the images are not presented

Table 3

Predictors of NTM infection in patients with TAK (Univariate analysis)

VariablesHR (95% CI)P value
Age0.99 (0.94–1.04)0.577
Duration from onset0.99 (1.00–1.01)0.104
Maximum PSL dose1.00 (0.95–1.05)0.982
Immunosuppressants0.92 (0.17–5.00)0.920
Biologics8.44 (1.67–42.67)0.010
PAI34.86 (4.07–298.53)0.001

Univariate analysis with the Cox proportional-Hazards model for the risk for NTM infection. NTM nontuberculous mycobacterium, TAK Takayasu arteritis, PSL predonisolone (mg/day), PAI pulmonary artery involvement, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

Fig. 3

Serious infection, respiratory infection, and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection during the observation period. Kaplan-Meier graphs show the rate of developing serious infection, respiratory infection, and NTM infection in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients with or without pulmonary artery involvement (PAI) during the observation period. The y-axis represents the cumulative incidence of infection. Hazard ratio (HR) represents comparison of survival curves (PAI/without PAI) using log-rank test. CI: confidence interval

Patients’ characteristics and clinical symptoms Data are expressed as mean ± SD, or number (percentage). The difference of continuous variables was tested by Student’s t test, and that of qualitative variables was tested by Fisher’s exact test. PAI pulmonary artery involvement, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, BP blood pressure, PSL predonisolone (mg/day), GC glucocorticoid, IS immunosuppressants. The percentage is calculated as a ratio of the number of cases for which clinical information was available Representative pulmonary artery involvement images. Occlusion of the right upper pulmonary artery branches on enhanced computed tomography (CT) (a). Occlusion of the left main pulmonary artery on magnetic resonance angiography (b). The right main pulmonary artery vessel wall thickness (c) and stenosis of the lower pulmonary artery branches (d) on enhanced CT. Dilation of the right main pulmonary artery (e). Occlusion of the right pulmonary artery branches on enhanced CT (f) and angiography (g). A perfusion defect in the right lung (h) Clinical features and treatments of the patients complicate with NTM infection PAI pulmonary artery involvement, NTM nontuberculous mycobacteria, PSL predonisolone (mg/day), TAK Takayasu arteritis, F female, M. avium mycobacterium avium, M. intracellulare mycobacterium intracellulare, FC fibrocavitary type, NB nodular/bronchiectatic type, PSL prednisolone, TCZ tocilizumab, MTX methotrexate, s.c subcutaneous infusion, DIV drip infusion in vein, RFP rifampicin, EB ethambutol, CAM clarithromycin, SM streptomycin Pulmonary artery involvement (PAI) and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) disease imaging on computed tomography. Patient 1: occlusion of the right upper and middle pulmonary arterial branches (a) and a large opacity with a cavity in the right lower lobe and ill-defined nodules in bilateral lungs (b). Patient 2: occlusion of the right main pulmonary artery (c) and a large opacity in the right lower lobe (d). Patient 3: occlusion of the right upper and middle pulmonary artery branches (e) and a large opacity with a cavity in the right lung (f). Patient 4: dilation of the left pulmonary artery branches (g) and ill-defined nodules in the left upper lobe (h). Patient 5: occlusion of the left main pulmonary artery before developing NTM disease (i) and ill-defined nodules in the left lung (j). The left and right images of patients 2, 3, and 4 were taken simultaneously, since the previous images were not available. Patient 6 did not have PAI. Therefore, the images are not presented Predictors of NTM infection in patients with TAK (Univariate analysis) Univariate analysis with the Cox proportional-Hazards model for the risk for NTM infection. NTM nontuberculous mycobacterium, TAK Takayasu arteritis, PSL predonisolone (mg/day), PAI pulmonary artery involvement, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval Serious infection, respiratory infection, and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection during the observation period. Kaplan-Meier graphs show the rate of developing serious infection, respiratory infection, and NTM infection in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients with or without pulmonary artery involvement (PAI) during the observation period. The y-axis represents the cumulative incidence of infection. Hazard ratio (HR) represents comparison of survival curves (PAI/without PAI) using log-rank test. CI: confidence interval PAI angiographic features are presented in Table 4. Right PA lesions were more frequent than the left. Occlusion was the most frequent type of PAI. The systemic artery subtypes [15] are presented in Table 5. In all patients and patients without PAI, Type V was the most frequent, followed by Type I. Types IIa and IIb were more frequent in patients with PAI than in those without but was statistically insignificant. Descending aorta involvement was less frequent in patients with PAI than patients without, and there were no Type IV patients or patients with renal artery stenosis with PAI.
Table 4

Angiographic features of PAI

LateralityRight: 11 (45.8%), Left: 4 (16.7%), Bilateral: 9 (37.5%)
PA dilatation3 (12.5%)
PA stenosis8 (33.3%)
PA occlusion13 (54.2%)
PA wall thickening2 (8.3%)
Pulmonary thrombosis2 (8.3%)

Data are expressed as numbers (percentage). PA pulmonary artery, PAI pulmonary artery involvement

Table 5

Classifications of vascular involvement

Total (n = 166)PAI (n = 24)Without PAI (n = 142)
I37 (26.4%)3 (14.3%)34 (28.6%)
IIa25 (17.9%)7 (33.3%)18 (15.1%)
IIb14 (10.0%)5 (23.8%)9 (7.6%)
III7 (5.0%)1 (4.8%)6 (5.0%)
IV6 (4.3%)0 (0.0%)6 (5.0%)
V51 (36.4%)5 (23.8%)46 (38.7%)

Data are expressed as numbers (percentage). PAI pulmonary artery involvement

Angiographic features of PAI Data are expressed as numbers (percentage). PA pulmonary artery, PAI pulmonary artery involvement Classifications of vascular involvement Data are expressed as numbers (percentage). PAI pulmonary artery involvement Glucocorticoids were administered to 21 (87.5%) patients with PAI and 110 (77.5%) patients without PAI (Table 1; p = 0.416). Maximum glucocorticoid dose, immunosuppressant administration (40 patients were administered methotrexate, 27 azathioprine, 8 cyclophosphamide, 7 cyclosporines, 4 tacrolimus, and 1 mycophenolate mofetil), biologics administration (10 patients were administered tocilizumab, 7 infliximab, 3 ustekinumab, and 1 certolizumab pegol), a combination of the aforementioned therapies, antiplatelet therapy, cardiovascular surgery, and catheter treatment did not differ between the groups. Significantly more patients with PAI received anticoagulation therapy than patients without PAI (n = 8; 38.1% vs. n = 21; 17.1%; p = 0.038). Of those receiving anticoagulation therapy, 3 patients had deep venous thrombosis, 2 had atrial fibrillation, 1 had chronic heart failure, and 2 had only PAI. Patients who did not receive glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, or biologics were considered to have an inactive disease. One patient with PAI and seven without PAI died during the observation period. The patient with PAI died due to a urinary tract infection. The patients without PAI died due to pneumonia (n = 3), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 2), carbon dioxide narcosis (n = 1), and sudden death with an unspecified cause (n = 1). Mortality did not differ between the groups based on Kaplan-Meier analysis (data not shown).

Discussion

PAI is a rare TAK complication. The effect of PAI has not been fully elucidated. PAI is reported with TAK in 5.7 to 25.93% [1-10]. In this study, the presence of PAI was 14.6%, consistent with previous studies. Our results indicated that TAK patients with PAI had dyspnea more frequently than those without PAI, consistent with the report by He et al. [7], suggesting that PAI should be considered when TAK patients complain of dyspnea. Further examination may find PAI sooner, potentially increasing the precautions taken for cardiovascular disease and respiratory infections, including NTM. Wang et al. reported that right-sided PA lesions were more common than left-sided lesions in TAK patients with PH [18], and pulmonary arterial occlusions or near occlusions were found most frequently (88.9%), followed by pulmonary arterial stenosis (58.3%) and poststenotic dilation (27.8%). In this study, right-sided PAI was predominant, and occlusion (54.2%) was the most frequent finding, followed by stenosis (33.3%), and dilation (12.5%), similar to Wang et al. Our results suggest that the TAK subgroups have different vascular involvement preferences. For example, Types IIa and IIb were more frequent in patients with PAI than in those without, descending aorta involvement was less frequent in patients with PAI, and no PAI patient had Type IV TAK. Gribbons et al. reported that patients with TAK and giant cell arteritis could be divided into six clusters [19], one of which was more likely to have abdominal lesions and another to have bilateral subclavian and carotid artery lesions. TAK with PAI is often complicated with PH, resulting in a higher risk of early mortality [8, 11]. Mechanical obstruction of the pulmonary vasculature is a major cause of PH, and increased pulmonary vascular wall stiffness is also thought to be related [20]. In our study, PAH was a complication in 16.7% of TAK patients with PAI, and all PAH patients were diagnosed using RHC. This data regarding the PAH incidence in TAK patients is well-established because right heart overload detected by echocardiography does not always mean PAH. In our study, the presence of PAI did not lead to high mortality, perhaps because of the small sample size. Using several imaging modalities to complement each other is preferable for diagnosis. First, traditional angiography was the gold standard for diagnosing TAK and detecting PAI [21, 22]. However, angiography is invasive and was replaced by CT and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) [23]. CT and MRA also detect artery wall thickening [11, 24, 25]. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography is an even more sensitive modality to detect inflammation of artery, although it has lower power to detect lesions in small-diameter PAs [26, 27]. Pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy is also useful for PAI examinations. Perfusion defects indicate vascular occlusion, including small arteries that are sometimes not visible by CT [28-30]. Two patients were diagnosed with PAI by pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in our study. The treatment strategy for TAK patients with PAI is similar to that of TAK alone and includes immunosuppressive therapy, low-dose aspirin, and anticoagulative therapy. Reports suggest that the primary PAI treatment was immunosuppressive therapy [10]. Low-dose aspirin was used to prevent arterial ischemic events from TAK based on a single-center study that showed the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy [31]. Of the eight patients who received anticoagulation therapy, two patients received it for PAI and the others for deep venous thrombosis, atrial fibrillation, and chronic heart failure. No patients underwent PA stent implantation or surgery for PAs in the present study. Further research is needed to confirm the efficacy of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy for PAI. To our knowledge, this is the first report to show an association between PAI and IHD. TAK may cause coronary artery stenosis, leading to myocardial infarction, heart failure, and sudden death [32]. It is reported that the coronary artery is affected in 10 to 60% of TAK patients [33-36]. Despite the high frequency of coronary artery lesions, only 5 to 20% of the cases are symptomatic [36], and most were detected by angiography or by cardiac MRI. Thus, the prevalence is likely to be underestimated. IHD in TAK patients is associated with a lower survival rate, and cardiac disease is the most chief cause of mortality in TAK patients [33, 37]. An older age at TAK onset, a longer TAK course, and a higher rate of traditional factors associated with atherosclerosis are reported IHD risk factors [38].. This study suggests that PAI is also an IHD risk factor. Further, this study addressed the relationship between PAI and NTM infection. Sugiyama et al. reported a case of NTM disease concomitant with a PA occlusion caused by TAK, causing a pulmonary cavity lesion [39]. There were six reported pulmonary infarction cases with TAK, including two of cavitary lesions with chronic aspergillosis infections [40-43]. The etiology of pulmonary infections and cavitation is multifactorial. Destroyed lung construction, such as bronchiectasis, bronchiolitis, and interstitial lung disease, are known risk factors for pulmonary NTM disease [44]. Cases complicated with NTM infection and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension have also been reported [45]. A non-perfused lung may result in the poor delivery of inflammatory cells to the inflammation site [42, 45]. However, NTM infection itself causes cavitation. Therefore, it is difficult to clarify what develops first, pulmonary cavitation or NTM infection. In our study, all patients with NTM pulmonary disease received glucocorticoids before onset. Immunosuppressive treatment and poor lung perfusion are considered the main causes of NTM infection, but NTM infection sometimes renders patients with severe sequela, limiting the treatment options and making TAK treatment difficult. Thus, the early diagnosis of this complication is important. This study has several limitations. This is a retrospective single-center study with a relatively small sample size. The observation periods differed among patients, and some were lacking data. Further, the NTM incidence rate may not apply to other countries due to racial and socioeconomic differences. A prospective multi-center study is needed to investigate the clinical features of TAK with PAI. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that dyspnea, PAH, IHD, and respiratory infection, including NTM, were more frequently observed in TAK patients with PAI than in TAK patients without PAI. The early diagnosis and monitoring of PAI complications are required.
  45 in total

1.  Pulmonary infarction as the initial manifestation of Takayasu's arteritis.

Authors:  Tomomi Nakamura; Shinichiro Hayashi; Mami Fukuoka; Naoko Sueoka; Kohei Nagasawa
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 1.271

2.  The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis.

Authors:  W P Arend; B A Michel; D A Bloch; G G Hunder; L H Calabrese; S M Edworthy; A S Fauci; R Y Leavitt; J T Lie; R W Lightfoot
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1990-08

3.  Cardiovascular manifestations of Takayasu arteritis and their relationship to the disease activity: analysis of 204 Korean patients at a single center.

Authors:  Ga Yeon Lee; Shin Yi Jang; Sung Min Ko; Eun Kyoung Kim; Sung Ho Lee; Hyejin Han; Seung Hyuk Choi; Young-Wook Kim; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Angiographic findings of Takayasu arteritis: new classification.

Authors:  A Hata; M Noda; R Moriwaki; F Numano
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Pulmonary hypertension in Takayasu's arteritis: Should be monitored closely.

Authors:  Haner Direskeneli
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Nitric oxide and molsidomine in the management of pulmonary hypertension in Takayasu's arteritis.

Authors:  S D Lee; D S Kim; T S Shim; C M Lim; Y Koh; W S Kim; W D Kim
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Pulmonary artery involvement in Takayasu's arteritis with lung infarction and pulmonary aspergillosis.

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Narita; Satoshi Ito; Masaki Terada; Yasuharu Saitoh; Ken-Ichi Igarashi; Masaaki Nakano; Eiichi Suzuki; Masaaki Arakawa; Fumitake Gejyo
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.517

8.  Current Clinical Features of New Patients With Takayasu Arteritis Observed From Cross-Country Research in Japan: Age and Sex Specificity.

Authors:  Yoshiko Watanabe; Tetsuro Miyata; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging detection of aortic and pulmonary artery wall thickening in the acute stage of Takayasu arteritis. Improvement of clinical and radiologic findings after steroid therapy.

Authors:  K Tanigawa; K Eguchi; Y Kitamura; A Kawakami; H Ida; S Yamashita; N Matsunaga; K Hayashi; S Nagataki
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-04

10.  Patterns of Arterial Disease in Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  K Bates Gribbons; Cristina Ponte; Simon Carette; Anthea Craven; David Cuthbertson; Gary S Hoffman; Nader A Khalidi; Curry L Koening; Carol A Langford; Kathleen Maksimowicz-McKinnon; Carol A McAlear; Paul A Monach; Larry W Moreland; Christian Pagnoux; Kaitlin A Quinn; Joanna C Robson; Philip Seo; Antoine G Sreih; Ravi Suppiah; Kenneth J Warrington; Steven R Ytterberg; Raashid Luqmani; Richard Watts; Peter A Merkel; Peter C Grayson
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.178

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.