| Literature DB >> 34855844 |
Paul Waliaula Wekunda1, Dickens S Omondi Aduda2, Bernard Guyah3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite robust Tuberculosis (TB) program with effective chemotherapy and high coverage, treatment interruption remains a serious problem. Interrupting TB treatment means that patients remain infectious for longer time and are at risk of developing drug resistance and death. This study was conducted to identify and describe predictors of TB treatment interruption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34855844 PMCID: PMC8638988 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sample size allocation.
| Treatment Zone | Percentage Contribution of TB Cases, 2014–2018 | Allocated Sample size (n) | Health facilities | Percentage Contribution of TB cases, 2014–2018 | Allocated Sample size (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14 | 40 | Sabatia SCH | 48 | 19 |
| Kegondi HC | 16 | 6 | |||
| Givudimbuli HC | 14 | 6 | |||
| Bugina HC | 13 | 5 | |||
| Nadanya Dis | 9 | 4 | |||
|
| 34 | 99 | Vihiga CRH | 60 | 59 |
| Mbale rural HC | 17 | 17 | |||
| Vihiga HC | 12 | 12 | |||
| Lyanaginga HC | 8 | 8 | |||
| Iduku Dis | 3 | 3 | |||
|
| 26 | 76 | Coptic Hospital | 44 | 33 |
| Emuhaya SCH | 23 | 18 | |||
| Ipali HC | 13 | 10 | |||
| Ebusiratsi HC | 12 | 9 | |||
| Esiarambatsi HC | 8 | 6 | |||
|
| 26 | 76 | Serem HC | 29 | 22 |
| Kaimosi Hospital | 18 | 14 | |||
| Tigoi HC | 18 | 14 | |||
| Hamisi SCH | 18 | 14 | |||
| Kaptech Dis | 17 | 12 | |||
|
|
|
|
*HC = Health Centre; Dis = Dispensary; SCH = Sub County Hospital; CRTH = County Referral Hospital.
Proportions extracted from TIBU with permission from NTLP.
Socio-demographic & clinical characteristics of TB patients by treatment interruption, probability of treatment completion and survival difference in Vihiga County.
| Character | Category | Total number (%) or median (IQR) | Number (%) Interrupted treatment | Probability of treatment completion (95%CI) | Log rank p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zone | Vihiga | 101 (34.7) | 9 (8.3) | 0.90 (0.84–0.96) | 0.81 |
| Emuhaya | 87 (29.9) | 11 (12.6) | 0.86 (0.79–0.94) | ||
| Hamisi | 63 (21.6) | 8 (12.7) | 0.86 (0.77–0.95) | ||
| Sabatia | 40 (13.7) | 4 (10) | 0.89 (0.79–0.99) | ||
| Sex | Male | 209 (71.8) | 24 (11.5) | 0.87 (0.82–0.92) | 0.74 |
| Female | 82 (28.2) | 8 (9.8) | 0.89 (0.82–0.97) | ||
| Age in years | Median (IQR) | 40(32–53) | 38.5 (32–49) | - | 0.042 |
| Education | Primary or lower | 172 (59.1) | 26 (15.1) | 0.83 (0.77–0.89) | 0.018 |
| Secondary | 95 (32.6) | 5 (5.3) | 0.94 (0.89–0.99) | ||
| Post-secondary | 24 (8.2) | 1 (4.2) | 0.96 (0.88–1 | ||
| Monthly income (KSH) | Median (IQR) | 3000 (1500–5000) | 3000 (1425–4000) | - | 0.078 |
| Treatment supporter | No | 141 (48.5) | 24 (17) | 0.81 (0.74–0.88) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 150 (51.5) | 8 (5.3) | 0.94 (0.91–0.98) | ||
| Alcohol consumption | No | 138 (47.4) | 5 (3.6) | 0.96 (0.93–0.99) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 153 (52.6) | 27 (17.6) | 0.79 (0.73–0.87) | ||
| Smoking | No | 155 (53.3) | 7 (4.5) | 0.95(<0.92–0.99) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 136 (46.7) | 25 (18.4) | 0.78 (0.71–0.86) | ||
| Clinical condition | Stable | 155 (53.3) | 18 (11.6) | 0.88 (0.83–0.93) | 0.82 |
| Unstable | 136 (46.7) | 14 (10.3) | 0.87 (0.81–0.94) | ||
| Clinical TB category | Bact confirmed | 227 (78.0) | 24 (10.6) | 0.88 (0.84–0.93) | 0.48 |
| Clinically Dx | 64 (22.0) | 8 (12.5) | 0.86 (0.77–0.95) | ||
| HIV Status | Positive | 101 (34.7) | 10 (9.9) | 0.88 (0.81–0.95) | 0.97 |
| Negative | 190 (65.3) | 22 (11.6) | 0.88 (0.83–0.93) | ||
| Type of TB | PTB | 269 (92.4) | 30 (11.2) | 0.88 (0.84–0.92) | 0.91 |
| EPTB | 22 (7.6) | 2 (9.1) | 0.89 (0.75–1.0) | ||
| Type of TB patient | New | 246 (84.5) | 26 (10.6) | 0.88 (0.84–0.93) | 0.055 |
| Relapse | 30 (10.3) | 2 (6.7) | 0.92 (0.83–1.0) | ||
| TLF | 13 (4.5) | 4 (30.8) | 0.66 (0.45–0.99) |
IQR = Interquartile range; KSH = Kenya shillings (110 KSH = 1 US dollar); Bact = bacteriologically; Dx = diagnosed; TLF = treatment after lost to follow up.
Fig 1Incidence of TB treatment interruption by time.
Fig 2Factors associated with time to TB treatment interruption.
Multivariable Cox regression analysis of predictors of TB treatment interruption among patients treated for TB in Vihiga County.
| Characteristic | Category | HR | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | Reference | — | |
| Female | 5.01 | 1.68–15.0 | 0.004** | |
| Age in Years | Age | 0.99 | 0.96–1.02 | 0.412 |
| Education Level | Secondary | Reference | — | |
| Primary or Lower | 3.09 | 1.13–8.49 | 0.029* | |
| Post-secondary | 1.65 | 0.17–16.0 | 0.667 | |
| Monthly income (KSH) | Monthly income | 1 | 1.00–1.00 | 0.797 |
| Treatment supporter | No | Reference | — | |
| Yes | 0.33 | 0.14–0.76 | 0.009** | |
| Alcohol consumption | No | Reference | — | |
| Yes | 9.2 | 2.60–32.5 | <0.001*** | |
| Clinical Condition | Stable | Reference | — | |
| Unstable | 0.69 | 0.31–1.53 | 0.362 | |
| Clinical TB Category | Bact confirmed | Reference | — | |
| Clinically Diagnosed | 2.43 | 0.91–6.53 | 0.077’ | |
| HIV status | Negative | Reference | — | |
| Positive | 0.64 | 0.28–1.49 | 0.299 | |
| Type of TB | PTB | Reference | — | |
| EPTB | 0.84 | 0.16–4.43 | 0.836 | |
| Type of patient | New | Reference | — | |
| Relapse | 0.55 | 0.13–2.40 | 0.425 | |
| TLF | 3.11 | 0.96–10.1 | 0.058’ |
1HR = Hazard Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval; TLF = treatment after lost to follow up (treatment after treatment interruption); Bact = bacteriologically; KSH = Kenya shillings (110 KSH = 1 US dollar).
Reasons the traced patients gave for interrupting TB treatment.
| Reason for treatment interruption | Percentage (n = 27) | Associated quotes from patients who interrupted treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Felt well before treatment completion | 26% | |
| Alcoholism | 19% | |
| Difficulty reaching health facility | 15% |
|
| Stigma | 15% | |
| Perception of not having TB | 11% | |
| Pill burden | 7% | |
| Lack of food | 7% |
*chang’aa = Locally prepared alcoholic drink.