BACKGROUND: The relationship between office vs. ambulatory blood pressure (BP) indices are well-studied in patients with essential hypertension and based on these data, it is known that the average 24-h ambulatory BP is typically lower than office BP. However, emerging data show that office SBP underestimates arterial afterload in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA), and a minimal increase in stroke volume during low-intensity exercise results in an exaggerated rise in SBP as compared to those with essential hypertension. We hypothesized that COA patients will have higher ambulatory SBP and a higher prevalence of masked hypertension compared to patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Case-control study of 118 COA patients and 118 patients with essential hypertension matched by age, sex, BMI and office SBP. RESULTS: Although both groups had similar office SBP (132 ± 17 mmHg) by design, the COA group had paradoxical increases in 24-h ambulatory SBP (135 ± 14 vs. 126 ± 13; P < 0.001) and daytime ambulatory SBP (142 ± 16 vs. 130 ± 13; P < 0.001), and less nocturnal dipping (-3 ± 5 vs. -9 ± 4; P < 0.001). The COA group also had a higher prevalence of masked hypertension [36 (31%) vs 14 (12%); P < 0.001), and worse arterial function indices. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the potential limitations of relying on office SBP for screening/monitoring of hypertension in COA and potential pitfalls in extrapolating essential hypertension guidelines recommendations to the treatment of COA. It also provides the rationale for further studies to determine if pharmacologic BP interventions guided by ambulatory BP data will improve clinical outcomes in the COA population.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between office vs. ambulatory blood pressure (BP) indices are well-studied in patients with essential hypertension and based on these data, it is known that the average 24-h ambulatory BP is typically lower than office BP. However, emerging data show that office SBP underestimates arterial afterload in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA), and a minimal increase in stroke volume during low-intensity exercise results in an exaggerated rise in SBP as compared to those with essential hypertension. We hypothesized that COA patients will have higher ambulatory SBP and a higher prevalence of masked hypertension compared to patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Case-control study of 118 COA patients and 118 patients with essential hypertension matched by age, sex, BMI and office SBP. RESULTS: Although both groups had similar office SBP (132 ± 17 mmHg) by design, the COA group had paradoxical increases in 24-h ambulatory SBP (135 ± 14 vs. 126 ± 13; P < 0.001) and daytime ambulatory SBP (142 ± 16 vs. 130 ± 13; P < 0.001), and less nocturnal dipping (-3 ± 5 vs. -9 ± 4; P < 0.001). The COA group also had a higher prevalence of masked hypertension [36 (31%) vs 14 (12%); P < 0.001), and worse arterial function indices. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the potential limitations of relying on office SBP for screening/monitoring of hypertension in COA and potential pitfalls in extrapolating essential hypertension guidelines recommendations to the treatment of COA. It also provides the rationale for further studies to determine if pharmacologic BP interventions guided by ambulatory BP data will improve clinical outcomes in the COA population.
Authors: Helmut Baumgartner; Philipp Bonhoeffer; Natasja M S De Groot; Fokko de Haan; John Erik Deanfield; Nazzareno Galie; Michael A Gatzoulis; Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf; Harald Kaemmerer; Philip Kilner; Folkert Meijboom; Barbara J M Mulder; Erwin Oechslin; Jose M Oliver; Alain Serraf; Andras Szatmari; Erik Thaulow; Pascal R Vouhe; Edmond Walma Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: G Di Salvo; B Castaldi; L Baldini; S Gala; F del Gaizo; A D'Andrea; G Limongelli; A F D'Aiello; G Scognamiglio; B Sarubbi; G Pacileo; M G Russo; R Calabrò Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Bryan Williams; Giuseppe Mancia; Wilko Spiering; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Michel Azizi; Michel Burnier; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Giovanni de Simone; Anna Dominiczak; Thomas Kahan; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Redon; Luis Ruilope; Alberto Zanchetti; Mary Kerins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Reinhold Kreutz; Stephane Laurent; Gregory Y H Lip; Richard McManus; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Frank Ruschitzka; Roland E Schmieder; Evgeny Shlyakhto; Costas Tsioufis; Victor Aboyans; Ileana Desormais Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Gianfranco Parati; George Stergiou; Eoin O'Brien; Roland Asmar; Lawrence Beilin; Grzegorz Bilo; Denis Clement; Alejandro de la Sierra; Peter de Leeuw; Eamon Dolan; Robert Fagard; John Graves; Geoffrey A Head; Yutaka Imai; Kazuomi Kario; Empar Lurbe; Jean-Michel Mallion; Giuseppe Mancia; Thomas Mengden; Martin Myers; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Stefano Omboni; Paolo Palatini; Josep Redon; Luis M Ruilope; Andrew Shennan; Jan A Staessen; Gert vanMontfrans; Paolo Verdecchia; Bernard Waeber; Jiguang Wang; Alberto Zanchetti; Yuqing Zhang Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: D Edmund Anstey; Paul Muntner; Natalie A Bello; Daniel N Pugliese; Yuichiro Yano; Ian M Kronish; Kristi Reynolds; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 9.897