Literature DB >> 34854976

Impacts of bioreactor operating parameters on removal efficiency, biodegradation rate, molecular distribution, and toxicity of commercial naphthenic acids.

Hamid Zanjani1, Jafar Soltan1, Mehdi Nemati2.   

Abstract

Effects of naphthenic acids (NAs) concentration (50-200 mg NA L-1; 35-140 mg TOC L-1) and loading rate (1.4-1249 mg NA L-1 h-1; 1-874 mg TOC L-1 h-1) on removal efficiency, removal rate, and molecular distribution of NAs, and effluent toxicity were evaluated for biodegradation of commercial NAs mixture in circulating packed bed bioreactors (CPBBs). Increase of NAs concentration and loading rate (shorter residence times) increased the removal rate, while removal efficiency initially declined and then stabilized. The maximum biodegradation rates for 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg NA L-1 were 128.0, 321.7, 430.2, and 630.0 mg TOC L-1 h-1 at loading rates of 218.5, 455.6, 673.5 and 874.0 mg TOC L-1 h-1, respectively, with removal efficiencies of 58.6, 70.6, 63.9 and 72.1%. Analysis of influent and treated effluents with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry showed that molecular weight and cyclicity (C and Z numbers) affected the biodegradation, with low molecular weight acyclic NAs (C = 6-12) were the most amenable to biodegradation and those with intermediate and high molecular weights (C = 13-22) and moderate cyclicity (Z = - 4, - 6) were the most recalcitrant. In the biofilm, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were the most abundant phyla, and Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria were the dominant classes. Toxicity analyses with Artemia salina and Vibrio fischeri (Microtox) showed that high influent concentrations and loading rates (short residence times) led to higher NAs residual concentration and effluent toxicity. To design and operate large-scale CPBBs, intermediate loading rates and residence times that result in high removal efficiency, reasonable removal rates, and low toxicity are recommended.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotreatment; Circulating packed-bed bioreactor; Microbial diversity; Oil sands process water; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34854976     DOI: 10.1007/s00449-021-02669-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng        ISSN: 1615-7591            Impact factor:   3.210


  21 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of oil sands process-affected water using moving bed biofilm reactors: With and without ozone pretreatment.

Authors:  Yijing Shi; Chunkai Huang; Ketley Costa Rocha; Mohamed Gamal El-Din; Yang Liu
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 9.642

2.  Biodegradation of naphthenic acids in oils sands process waters in an immobilized soil/sediment bioreactor.

Authors:  Natalie McKenzie; Siqing Yue; Xudong Liu; Bruce A Ramsay; Juliana A Ramsay
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Biodegradation of a surrogate naphthenic acid under denitrifying conditions.

Authors:  Yetty Gunawan; Mehdi Nemati; Ajay Dalai
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Photocatalytic degradation of commercially sourced naphthenic acids by TiO2-graphene composite nanomaterial.

Authors:  Juncheng Liu; Lin Wang; Jingchun Tang; Jianli Ma
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Batch and continuous biodegradation of three model naphthenic acids in a circulating packed-bed bioreactor.

Authors:  Jeff Huang; Mehdi Nemati; Gordon Hill; John Headley
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Application of UV-irradiated Fe(III)-nitrilotriacetic acid (UV-Fe(III)NTA) and UV-NTA-Fenton systems to degrade model and natural occurring naphthenic acids.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Pamela Chelme-Ayala; Nikolaus Klamerth; Mohamed Gamal El-Din
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Co-biodegradation of naphthenic acids in anoxic denitrifying biofilm reactors.

Authors:  Wen Wang; Mehdi Nemati
Journal:  Environ Technol       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 3.247

8.  Photocatalytic degradation kinetics of naphthenic acids in oil sands process-affected water: Multifactorial determination of significant factors.

Authors:  Tim Leshuk; Diogo de Oliveira Livera; Kerry M Peru; John V Headley; Sucharita Vijayaraghavan; Timothy Wong; Frank Gu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Impact of ozonation pre-treatment of oil sands process-affected water on the operational performance of a GAC-fluidized bed biofilm reactor.

Authors:  Md Shahinoor Islam; Tao Dong; Kerry N McPhedran; Zhiya Sheng; Yanyan Zhang; Yang Liu; Mohamed Gamal El-Din
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Inhibition and biotransformation potential of naphthenic acids under different electron accepting conditions.

Authors:  Teresa Misiti; Madan Tandukar; Ulas Tezel; Spyros G Pavlostathis
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 11.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.