| Literature DB >> 34854786 |
Man Zhang1,2,3, Yang Bai4, Chang Xu4, Jinti Lin1,2,3, JiaKang Jin1,2,3, Ankai Xu1,2,3, Jia Nan Lou1,2,3, Chao Qian1,2,3, Wei Yu1,2,3, Yulian Wu4, Yiying Qi1,2,3, Huimin Tao1,2,3.
Abstract
Effective and accurate delivery of drugs to tissue with spinal cord injury (SCI) is the key to rehabilitating neurological deficits. Sustained-release microspheres (MS) have excellent degradability and can aid in the long-term release of drugs. However, the burst release phenomenon can cause unexpected side effects. Herein, we developed and optimized an injectable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) MS loaded with melatonin(Mel), which were mixed further with Laponite hydrogels (Lap/MS@Mel, a micro-gel compound) in order to reduce the burst release of MS. Thus, these MS were able to achieve stable and prolonged Mel release, as well as synergistic Lap hydrogel in order to repair neural function in SCI by in situ injection. In clinical practice, patients with SCI have complicated conditions and significant inter-individual differences, which means that a single route of administration does not meet actual clinical needs. Thus, the nanospheres are synthesized and subsequently coated with platelet membrane (PM) in order to form PM/MS@Mel (nano-PM compound) for sustained and precision-targeted delivery of Mel intravenously in the SCI. Notably, optimized microsphere delivery systems have improved Mel regulation polarization of spinal microglial/macrophages, which can reduce loss of biomaterials due to macrophage-induced immune response during implantation of spinal cord tissue. These two new delivery systems that are based on MS provide references for the clinical treatment of SCI, according to different requirements.Entities:
Keywords: Laponite hydrogel; Spinal cord injury; control release; microsphere; neuroprotection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34854786 PMCID: PMC8648032 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2021.2009937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Figure 1.(A) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Lap/MS@Mel. (B,D) SEM images of Lap/MS@Mel and MS@Mel. (C) The particle size of MS@Mel. (E) Zeta potential MS@Mel, Lap and Lap/MS@Mel. (F) Release of Mel from Lap/MS@Mel complexes.
Figure 2.(A) TEM images of PM/MS@Mel nanoparticles. (B) The absorbance changes of nanoparticles at different wavelengths. (C) FT-IR spectra for Mel, PLGA, MS@Mel and PM/MS@Mel. (D) The particle size and zeta potential of PLGA, MS@Mel and PM/MS@Mel nanoparticles. (E) The Coomassie blue staining results of PLGA, MS@Mel and PM/MS@Mel nanoparticles. (F) Western blotting. (G) In vitro melatonin release from PM/MS@Mel nanoparticles.
Figure 3.(A) Basso Beattie Bresnahan (BBB) score across different groups. (B) Schematic diagram of spinal cord injury in rats and images of harvested spinal cord tissue across different groups.(C) H&E staining of spinal cord tissue across different groups. (D) Footprint analyses. (n = 5 per group; *p < .05 versus SCI group; ***p < .001 or **p < .01 versus SCI + Mel group; *p < .05 versus SCI + MS@Mel group).
Figure 4.(A) Basso Beattie Bresnahan (BBB) score across different groups. (B) Schematic diagram of spinal cord injury in rats and in vivo spectrum imaging system (IVIS) images of spinal cord injected with MS-conjugated Cy7.5 after spinal cord injury (SCI).(C) H&E staining of spinal cord tissue across different groups. (D) Footprint analyses. (E) Images of harvested spinal cord tissue across different groups (n = 5 per group; **p < .01 versus SCI group; **p < .01 versus Mel group; *p < .05 versus SCI + PM/MS@Mel group).
Figure 5.(A,B) Immunofluorescence and intensity co-staining of NeuN (green) and c-caspase3 (red) of the respective groups.(C-F) The protein expression and densitometric quantification of c-caspase3 across the respective groups (n = 5 per group).
Figure 6.(A–F) The SOD, MDA and GPx levels of spinal cord tissue across different groups (n = 5 per group).
Figure 7.(A,B,G,H) The ELISA analysis of IL-6 and TNF-α in the spinal cord tissue of respective groups.(C,D) Immunofluorescence and intensity co-staining of Iba-1 (green) and iNOS (red) of the respective groups. (E,F) Immunofluorescence and intensity co-staining of Iba-1 (green) and Arginase1 (red) of the respective groups. (n = 5 per group).