Literature DB >> 34854348

COVID-19 Infection and Myocarditis: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review.

Vikash Jaiswal1, Zouina Sarfraz2, Azza Sarfraz3, Dattatreya Mukherjee4, Nitya Batra5, Gazala Hitawala6, Sadia Yaqoob7, Abhinav Patel8, Preeti Agarwala9, Muzna Sarfraz10, Shehar Bano2, Nishwa Azeem11, Sidra Naz12, Akash Jaiswal13, Prachi Sharma14, Gaurav Chaudhary14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 was initially considered to be a respiratory illness, but current findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is increasingly expressed in cardiac myocytes as well. COVID-19 may lead to cardiovascular injuries, resulting in myocarditis, with inflammation of the heart muscle.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review collates current evidence about demographics, symptomatology, diagnostic, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infected patients with myocarditis.
METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Google Scholar until August, 2021. A combination of the following keywords was used: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, myocarditis. Cohorts and case reports that comprised of patients with confirmed myocarditis due to COVID-19 infection, aged >18 years were included. The findings were tabulated and subsequently synthesized.
RESULTS: In total, 54 case reports and 5 cohorts were identified comprising 215 patients. Hypertension (51.7%), diabetes mellitus type 2 (46.4%), cardiac comorbidities (14.6%) were the 3 most reported comorbidities. Majority of the patients presented with cough (61.9%), fever (60.4%), shortness of breath (53.2%), and chest pain (43.9%). Inflammatory markers were raised in 97.8% patients, whereas cardiac markers were elevated in 94.8% of the included patients. On noting radiographic findings, cardiomegaly (32.5%) was the most common finding. Electrocardiography testing obtained ST segment elevation among 44.8% patients and T wave inversion in 7.3% of the sample. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging yielded 83.3% patients with myocardial edema, with late gadolinium enhancement in 63.9% patients. In hospital management consisted of azithromycin (25.5%), methylprednisolone/steroids (8.5%), and other standard care treatments for COVID-19. The most common in-hospital complication included acute respiratory distress syndrome (66.4%) and cardiogenic shock (14%). On last follow up, 64.7% of the patients survived, whereas 31.8% patients did not survive, and 3.5% were in the critical care unit.
CONCLUSION: It is essential to demarcate COVID-19 infection and myocarditis presentations due to the heightened risk of death among patients contracting both myocardial inflammation and ARDS. With a multitude of diagnostic and treatment options available for COVID-19 and myocarditis, patients that are under high risk of suspicion for COVID-19 induced myocarditis must be appropriately diagnosed and treated to curb co-infections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID–19; SARS-CoV-2; adverse events; biomarkers; cytokine storm; myocarditis; symptomatology; systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34854348      PMCID: PMC8647231          DOI: 10.1177/21501327211056800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health        ISSN: 2150-1319


Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to fright among populations worldwide since it was first reported. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was initially only considered to be a respiratory illness, but it is now recognized as a complex multi systems disease.[2,3] Current literature suggests that the increased expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors of SARS-CoV-2 in cardiac myocytes accounts for the relatively high cardiovascular involvement in COVID-19. Comorbidities such as pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, hypertension and diabetes mellitus have led to worse prognosis among patients infected with COVID-19. However, infected patients may experience added-on cardiovascular injuries, even in the absence of pre-existing cardiac disease. Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle with symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, and palpitations. A study identified 42 COVID-19 patients with myocarditis, where fever was the most common presenting sign in 57% patients, and hypertension was the most pervasive comorbidity. SARS-CoV-2 is posited to gain entry into human cells by binding the spike protein to the membrane protein angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).[9,10] As depicted in Figure 1, SARS-CoV-2 gains entry into the bloodstream, making its way to the heart and cardiac muscle. In the cardiomyocytes, the binding to ACE2 upregulates the receptor eventually leading to apoptosis, releasing viral and cardiac antigens. These antigens, when fixed to the antigen presenting cells (APCs), lead to the release of interleukins (IL1, IL6, IL12, TNF alpha), which when presented to CD4+ T helper cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells, lead to autoreactive virus specific antibodies. The entire mechanism is posited to lead to myocarditis, with elevated inflammatory biomarkers, cardiac biomarkers, EKG changes, and symptoms such as shortness of breath and chest pain (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

A schematic representation of the pathophysiology leading to COVID-19 induced myocarditis.

A schematic representation of the pathophysiology leading to COVID-19 induced myocarditis. While our systematic review does not delve into the myocardial effects of COVID-19 vaccines, a report in the New England Journal of Medicine identified 2 cases of histologically confirmed, fulminant myocarditis within 2 weeks of COVID-19 vaccination. As of September 1 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention writes that the risk of myocarditis is far higher after COVID-19 infection as opposed to the mRNA virus. Based on a study that identified 1.5 million inpatient records with COVID-19, myocarditis was uncommon among patients with or without COVID-19, however, there was a relatively higher risk in the 50 to 75 and over age groups. The under 16 age group could be more prone due to the related multisystem inflammatory syndromes. The paper also noted an 18-fold higher chance of developing myocarditis due to COVID-19. The objective of this systematic review is to collate evidence about demographics, symptomatology, diagnostic techniques, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infected patients with myocarditis.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted and reported in conformity with the Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines (Figure 2). A comprehensive literature search was done using the search engines PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science database from their inception up until August 31, 2021. The search terms included “SARS-CoV-2” and/or “COVID 19” and/or “myocarditis.” Reference lists of included studies were also manually screened to identify any relevant studies that may have been missed during the search (umbrella review).
Figure 2.

PRISMA flowchart.

PRISMA flowchart. Articles retrieved from the systematic search were exported to EndNote Reference Library software (Clarivate), where duplicates were removed. 2 authors (V.J. and S.Y.) carried out an independent search and screened the titles and abstracts of the identified articles for inclusion. Afterward, full-text articles were reviewed to validate if they satisfied the inclusion criteria. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion till consensus was achieved. Articles were included if they met all the prespecified eligibility criteria: (1) Patients with confirmed myocarditis in association with COVID-19; (2) Age groups > 18 years; (3) Cohorts, case series and case reports. Studies with post-mortem findings consistent with acute myocarditis were also included. All other studies were excluded. Data extracted from articles included publication related characteristics (i.e. author/s, study design, number of patients, year of publication, and country) and patient related characteristics. In specific, demographics (age in years, gender, comorbidities), and clinical characteristics along with laboratory findings (particularly, inflammatory markers and cardiac enzymes) were documented (Tables 1-3). Additionally, features of imaging modalities including Chest X-ray/CT scan, ECG, ECHO, CMR, and endomyocardial biopsy were noted. Management pertaining to both COVID-19 and myocarditis, complications, and final clinical outcomes were also recorded. All data was extracted onto a predesigned Excel spreadsheet.
Table 1.

Demographics, Comorbidities, and Presenting Symptoms Among all Patients.

AuthorsStudy designCountrySample sizeAge (y)GenderComorbiditiesPresenting symptoms
Cizgic et al 13 Case reportTurkey178MHTNChest pain, shortness of breath
Yokoo et al 14 Case reportBrazil181MHTN, Ischemic StrokeFever, shortness of breath
Pietsch et al 15 Case reportGermany159FNoneARDS and dyspnea
Pavon et al 16 Case reportSwitzerland164MIsolated pulmonary sarcoidosis and epilepsyFever, chest pain, shortness of breath, cough
Khatri et al 17 Case reportUSA150MHTN, Ischemic strokeFever with chills, malaise, shortness of breath, cough, syncope
Hussain et al 18 Case reportUSA151MHTNCough, shortness of breath, fatigue, fever
Dalen et al 19 Case reportNorway155FNoneFatigue, myalgia, syncope, chest pain
Zeng et al 20 Case reportChina163MNoneFever, cough, shortness of breath, chest pain
Doyen et al 21 Case reportFrance169MHTNFever, cough, shortness of breath, vomiting, diarrhea
Faircloth et al 22 Case reportUSA160MMultiple sclerosisFever, tachycardia, hypotension, shortness of breath, tachypnea, hypoxia
Coyle et al 23 Case reportUSA157MHTNFever, myalgia, cough, shortness of breath, decrease appetite, nausea, diarrhea
Luetkens et al 24 Case reportGermany179MAsthmaFatigue, syncope, shortness of breath, wheeze
Jain et al 25 Case reportIndia160MHTN, DM IICough, shortness of breath, hypoxia (75% SpO2)
Mustafa et al 26 Case reportUSA156MNoneFatigue, myalgia, chest pain, cough, shortness of breath
Mansoor et al 27 Case reportUSA172FHTNMyalgia, fever, tachycardia, cough, cold, tachypnea, hypoxia (60% Sp02)
Al-assaf et al 28 Case reportUAE158MHTNAsymptomatic
Khalid et al 29 Case reportUSA176FHTN, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidismFever, dyspnea, cough, tachycardia, tachypnea, hypoxia (79%SpO2)
Inciardi et al 30 Case reportItaly153FNoneFatigue, fever, hypotension, cough
Fried et al 31 Case reportUSA164FHTN, hyperlipidemiaAsymptomatic
Wehit et al 32 Case reportArgentina168MHTN, obesity, DM IIFever, fatigue
Butler et al. 33 Case reportUSA150MHTN, DM IITachycardia, shortness of breath, hypoxia, confusion
Lagana et al. 34 CohortItaly1276( Mean)5M,7F75%—Systemic HTN, 66.7% Cardiac,Fever, cough, shortness of breath
Kallel et al 35 Case reportUSA156MDiabetes, obesityFever, myalgia, chest pain, cough, hypoxia
Ghurge et al. 36 Case reportCanada162MHTN, dyslipidemiaFever, fatigue, cough, shortness of breath, tachypnea, lethargy
Fath et al 37 Case reportUSA161MHTN, obesity, hyperlipidemiaFatigue, myalgia, hypotension, tachypnea, hypoxia (spO2 85%), shortness of breath
Dabbagh et al 38 Case reportUSA167MNon-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF of 40%Cough, shortness of breath, left shoulder pain
Irabien-Ortiz et al 39 Case reportSpain159FHTN, lymph node tuberculosis diagnosed by presence of erythema nodosum, and migraineFever, squeezing chest pain
Albert et al 40 Case reportUSA149MNoneFever, dyspnea
Escher et al 41 Case reportGermany139MNoneFever, dyspnea
Ford et al 42 Case reportUSA153MDyslipidemiaMalaise, fever, chest pain
Gauchott et al 43 Case reportFrance169MDM II, HTN, IHDFever, fatigue, abdominal pain
Hua et al 44 Case reportUK147FNoneFever, dry cough, chest pain, shortness of breath
Jacobs et al 45 Case reportBelgium148MHTNDiarrhea, cough, dyspnea
Labani et al 46 Case reportFrench171FBreast CancerFlu-like symptoms, chest pain
Spano et al 47 Case reportSwitzerland149MNoneDyspnea, fatigue, intermittent epigastric pain, nocturia
Tavazzi et al 48 Case reportItaly169MNoneCough, dyspnea, weakness
Trogen et al 49 Case reportUSA169MObesity, asthma, spondylolysisFever, neck pain, diarrhea, vomiting
Varga et al 50 Case reportN/A171MRenal transplant, CAD, HTNDyspnea, fever, tachycardia, confusion
Warchoł et al. 51 Case reportPoland174MAtrial fibrillation, arterial HTNNew-onset ventricular tachycardia
Sardari et al 52 Case reportIran131MNoneDyspnea, fever,
Dahl et al 53 Case reportNorway137MNoneFever, headache, unilateral left painful neck swelling
Hu et al. 54 Case ReportChina137MNoneChest pain, dyspnea, diarrhea
Volis et al 55 Case reportIsrael121MSmokingChest pain, cough, dyspnea, fever
Besler et al. 56 Case reportTurkey120MNoneChest pain, fever
Gaine et al 57 Case reportIreland158MSmokingPalpitations, dyspnea
Sheikh et al 58 Case reportUSA128MNoneChest pain, cough, dyspnea
Salamanca et al 59 Case reportSpain144MNoneDyspnea, syncope
Naneishvili et al 60 Case reportUK144MNoneSyncope, fever, lethargy
Kim et al 61 Case reportKorea121FNoneFever, dyspnea, cough
Nikoo et al 62 Case reportIran138FNoneChest pain, nausea, vomiting, malaise
Sala et al 63 Case reportItaly143FUnremarkableDyspnea, fever, chest pain.
Yuan et al 64 Case reportChina133MN/RFever, chest pain
Warchol et al. 51 Case reportPoland174MAtrial fibrillation, atrial HTN, type II DM, hypothyroidismNo symptoms
Asif and Ali 65 Case seriesUSA264,71P1:M, P2: FP1: HTN, Hyperlipidemia, P2: Multiple MyelomaP1: dyspnea, hypotension. P2: Fever, cough, dyspnea
Khalid et al 66 Case seriesUSA248, 34P1: M, P2: FP1: Obesity, Diabetes, Obstructive sleep apnea. P2: NoneP1: Fever, chills, myalgias, diarrhea, nonproductive cough and shortness of breath. P2: Fever, chills, body ache
Ng et al. 67 CohortChina16689M,7FNoneAll have chest pain, cough, shortness of breath
Jirak et al 68 CohortEurope7666.853M,23FArterial hypertension—56.6%CAD—13.2%PVD—5.3%DM II- 26.3%N/A
Xu yan et al. 69 CohortChina276910M, 17FCHD-11%Fever (82.4%), chest pain (7,6%), cough (68.1%), shortness of breath (40.3%), diarrhea (31.1%)
Kunal et al. 70 CohortIndia2860.9 ± 15.114M,14FDiabetes = 71.4%, HTN = 64.3%,Myalgia, fever, fatigue, chest pain, cold, cough, shortness of breath, confusion, headache, diarrhea
Table 2.

Biomarkers, Radiographic, Electrocardiography, Echocardiography, and Biopsy Findings.

AuthorsInflammatory markersCardiac markersRadiographic findingsElectrocardiographyEchocardiographyCMRMyocardial biopsy
Cizgic et al 13 C reactive protein 94.6 mg/LTroponin-998.1 ng/LCT chest-small pericardial effusion and ground-glass opacification with consolidationAtrial fibrillation besides heart rate of 150 bpm, concave ST elevation except for aVR leadN/AN/AN/A
Yokoo et al 14 N/ATroponin T-33 pg/mlChest CT-small round ground-glass opacities, with multifocal distribution on both lungsN/AReduction in the ejection fraction to 35%Late enhancement areas with an ischemic pattern on the left ventricle base septum wall, with diffuse hypokinesis, and global systolic functionN/A
Pietsch et al 15 NATroponin-83.6 ng/LCK-MB-7.14 ng/mlNANASevere diastolic dysfunction III with an increased wall thickness (inter-ventricular septum, 14 mm), and pericardial effusionNAEMB: Intra-myocardial inflammation with absence of signs of necrosis. Increased no. of CD45R0+ T memory cells (96.15 cells/mm2), CD3+ cells (20.54 cells/mm2), CD11a+ cells (24.36 cells/mm2), CD11b+ cells (91.56 cells/mm2), and CD54+ cells (area fraction 1.91%), histology: hypertrophied myocytes (diameter 31 μm)
Pavon et al 16 C-reactive protein-466 mg/L, D-dimer-1210 ng/mLTroponin (peak)- 1843 ng/LChest x-ray bilateral reticulation and ill-defined opacities, indicative of interstitial edemaN/AModerately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of 47%( 72 h after CMR)Reduced left-ventricular (LV) systolic function (42%), mild hypokinesia of the lateral wall. T2-mapping sequences showed myocardial edema (segmental T2 = 55-57 ms)N/A
Khatri et al 17 D-dimer-1068 ng/mL, procalcitonin-8.16 ng/mL, C-reactive protein110.85 mg/dL, Ferritin 66 ng/mLTroponin- 544 ng/L, CK-MB54.3 ng/mLN/ASinus tachycardia along with ST elevation in leads II, III, aVF, and ST depression in I, aVLSevere global left ventricular systolic dysfunction, right ventricular (RV) enlargement causing its systolic dysfunction, and moderate-to-large pericardial effusion anterior to the Right ventricleN/AN/A
Hussain et al 18 Troponin-18 ng/mL and CKMB-14.7 ng/mLN/ADiffuse ST elevationEnlarged heart, marked decrease in ventricular systolic function with an ejection fraction of 20%N/AN/A
Dalen et al 19 C-reactive protein 11 mg/dlTroponin T-108 ng/L, NTproBNP-1025 ng/LN/ASinus tachycardia, insignificant ST elevation in inferior leads with a T-wave inversion in precordial leadsLeft ventricular concentric hypertrophyT1-mapping exhibited relaxation times of 1260-1270 ms in the anterolateral wall contrasted with 1090 ms in the septum. Late gadolinium enhancement in the anterolateral wall.N/A
Zeng et al 20 Interleukin-6(peak)- 272.40 pg/mLTroponin I (peak)- 11.37 g/L, myoglobin (peak) > 390.97 ng/mL, NTpr(peak)- 22 500 pg/mLChest X-ray-Typical ground glass changes indicative of viral pneumoniaSinus tachycardia without ST elevation and left axis deviationEnlarged LV, diffuse myocardial dyskinesia, LVEF reduced to 32%, pulmonary hypertension, and normal RV functionN/AN/A
Doyen et al 21 N/ATroponin I-9002 ng/LChest CT-bilateral crazy paving pattern, ground glass opacities and condensationDiffuse T-wave inversion with the sign of left ventricular hypertrophyMild left ventricle hypertrophy, with normal left ventricular ejection fraction and nomal wall motionSub-epicardial late gadolinium enhancement of the apex and inferolateral wallN/A
Faircloth et al 22 C-reactive protein- 20.02 mg/dl,Ferritin-757 ng/mlESR—78 mm/hTroponin-25 000 ng/LNANANANANA
Coyle et al 23 NATroponin I(peak) -7.33 on day 3,N/ASinus tachycardia, with normal ST/T waveDiffuse hypokinesis with relative apical sparing, with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35–40%, no pericardial effusionDiffuse edema of both atria and both ventricles along with small foci of late gadolinium enhancementN/A
Luetkens et al 24 C-reactive protein (pea k)—64.23 mg/LTroponin T63.5 ng/L, NTproBNP—1178.0 pg/mlChest CT pulmonary ground glass peripheral infiltrates in the left upper lobe and discreet pleural and pericardial effusionNormalN/RDiffuse interstitial myocardial edema with an increased T2 signal intensity ratio. T2 mapping showed diffuse myocardial inflammation( on day 10)N/R
Jain et al 25 Elevated inflammatory markersElevated troponinChest X-ray showed bilateral diffuse opacitiesAge indeterminate inferior infarct versus left anterior fascicular blockEF <30% along with akinesis of the mid to apical myocardial segmentsN/AN/A
Mustafa et al 26 C-reative protein—160 mg/LTroponin I: 8.6 ng/mlChest x-ray was suggestive of increased interstitial prominenceNormal sinus rhythm with ST elevations in the antero-lateral distributionN/AN/AN/A
Mansoor et al 27 C-reactive protein: 27 mg/dlFerritin: 928 ng/dlESR: 82 mm/hWBC: 24000/μl,D-dimer: 3455ng/mlNT-proBNP: 4639 pg/ml,troponin T (hsTt): 118 ng/LN/ASinus tachycardia, PR elevation in aVR and PR depression in leads II and aVF on admissionMildly decreased left ventricular function but no significant segmental wall motion abnormalities, mild mitral regurgitation, mildly enlarged right ventricle with normal right ventricular function, no tricuspid regurgitation, and no pericardial effusion.N/AN/A
Al-assaf et al 28 Normal ranges of inflammatory markers and cardiac biomarkers.N/ANormalSinus bradycardia, no ST-T changesUnremarkable study showing only a mildly dilated ascending aortaT1 mapping showing a high value of 1062.T2 mapping showing an abnormal value of 57N/A
Khalid et al 29 C-reactive protein 23.10 mg/L, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) 781.46 mg/L, elevated lactate dehydrogen 334U/L and ferritin 457 ng/mlTroponin 503 ng/l, proBNP35,000 pg/mLChest X-ray-diffuse bilateral pulmonary edema vs infiltratesNormal sinus rhythm with a short PR intervalSevere left ventricular systolic dysfunction with segmental wall motion anomaliesN/RN/R
Inciardi et al 30 C reactive protein- 1.3 mg/dl mg/dl, D dimer- 500 U/FTroponin T(peak)- 0.89 ng/mL, CKMB(peak)- 39.9 ng/mL, BNP(peak)—8465 pg/mLN/AMinimal diffuse ST elevation, low voltage in limb leads, ST depression, and T wave inversion in V1 and aVIncreased left ventricular wall thickness with diffuse hypokinesis, and LVEF of 40%. Large circumferential pericardial effusion of size 11 mm with the absence of tamponadeDiffuse biventricular apical hypokinesis, severe LV dysfunction (LVEF of 35%), Short tau inversion recovery and T2-mapping sequences showed marked biventricular myocardial interstitial edema.N/A
Fried et al 31 C reactive protein: 0.0054 mg/dl, ferritin: 967ng/mlESR: 166 ng/mlTroponin- 7900 ng/L,N/ASinus tachycardia, ST segment elevation in leads I, II, aVL, V2-V6, and PR elevation and ST depression in aVR. Low voltage QRS complexes in the limbs leads.EF: 30% (reduced)Severe concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, and a dilated, severely hypokinetic right ventricle. Pericardial effusionN/AN/A
Wehit et al 32 LDH-198 UI/l, ferritin- 723 ng/mL, Dimer D- 300 ng/mLTroponin T- 16 pg/mL, BnP 370 pg/mLChest radiography revealed right basal opacitiesN/ADeterioration in both global and segmental longitudinal strainN/AN/A
Butler et al 33 N/ATroponin: 67 ng/L, NT-proBNP: 4529 pg/mlN/RN/RN/RN/AN/A
Lagana et al 34 N/ATroponin:39.9 pg/ml, NT-proBNP: 1557.6 pg/mlN/RIschemic alteration (66.66%)Diffuse left ventricular hypokinesis 66.66%, 25%QTc prolongationN/AN/A
Kallel et al 35 C-reactive protein: 315 mg/l, WBC count: 17 940/UL, Creatinine: 45 mg/l, D-dimer: 1.04 mg/lTroponin I: 677 ng/L,CPK-MB: 19 UI/lCT chest showed typical findings of COVID-19 with ground-glass opacificationDiffuse ST elevation and simple monomorphic supraventricular extrasystolesNormal systolic functionN/AN/A
Ghurge et al 36 NANANANANANormal left ventricular (LV) and right ventricle (RV) size and function, LV ejection fraction was 62%, area of mid myocardial/subepicardial late enhancement in the basal inferolateral wall in a non-ischemic pattern most consistent with a myocarditis type pattern, abnormal hyperintense MRI relaxation associated with the presence of edema, abnormal T2 hyperintense relaxation associated with the presence of edema.N/A
Fath et al 37 Creatinine-1.16 mg/dLINR-1.5CRP- 306.8 mg/LLDH- 707U/LIL-6- 23 pg/mLD-dimer-32 563 ng/mLFerritin-2831.22 ng/mLCK-86U/LElevated Troponin I7.454 ng/mlNADiffuse, mainly anterolateral, ST elevationReduced ejection fractionNAMultiple microscopic sites of myocardial ischemia together with thrombi in the left atrium and pulmonary vasculature and, scattered microscopic cardiomyocyte necrosis. Autopsy also revealed an adherent organizing left atrial thrombus (1.5 cm) and marked thromboembolism of the left pulmonary artery
Dabbagh et al 38 C-reactive protein-15.9 mg/dl, ferritin-593 ng/ml, D-dimer- 6.52 μg/ml and interleukin 6(IL-6)- 8 pg/mlTroponin I < 18 ng/L, pro-BNP-54 pg/mLChest X-ray enlarged cardiac silhouetteShallow voltage in limb leads, non-specific ST alterationA decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to 40%, massive peripheral pleural effusion, an indication of early right ventricular diastolic collapse, dilated but collapsing inferior vena cavaN/AN/A
Irabien-Ortiz et al 39 C reactive protein- 10 mg/LTroponin T(peak)- 1100 ng/dL, NTproBNP - 4421 ng/LChest X-ray- mild signs of vascular redistribution, with no infiltrationsDiffuse ST elevation and PR-segment depressionConcentric hypertrophy, diminished LV volumes, preserved LVEF, moderate pericardial effusion, absence of tamponade. After 2 h severe biventricular failure and diffuse myocardial edemaN/AN/A
Albert et al 40 N/AElevated troponin, NT-proBNPNo pathological featuresSinus tachycardia, no ST-T changesGlobally depressed LVEFof 20% with LVEDD of 5.8 cm, increased wall thicknessN/AInflammatory infiltrates with visualization of viral particles
Escher et al 41 N/ATroponin-3264 pg/mL, BNP- 12232(pg/mL)-N/AN/ALVEF = 22%N/AActive myocarditis with CD3+ 106 cell/mm2
Ford et al 42 N/ABNP 588 pg/mL, TnT normalLeft lower lobe consolidationWide-complex, irregular tachycardia with a LBBB morphology, as well as a long QT intervalMild LV dilation with hypokinesis (EF 15%). New transthoracic echo revealed LV thrombus and worsening LV dilationLV dilation with global hypokinesis,increased T2 signal, hyperemia, and edemaN/A
Gauchotte et al 43 N/ATroponin I 8066 pg/mL and CK–MB 2103 UI/L)NormalNormalSevere and diffuse LV hypokinesia, LVEF = 30%N/APost mortem: Multifocal inflammatory infiltration, in both ventricles and septum, composed in its majority of macrophages and lymphocytes. The myocardium was edematous, containing dystrophic cardiomyocytes, without necrosis. Strong presence of anti-SARS-CoV nucleocapsidprotein antibody in the myocardium
Hua et al 44 N/ATroponin T (peak)-253 ng/LN/ASinus tachycardia, concave inferolateral ST elevationLeft ventricular ejection fraction was normal with pericardial effusion of size 11 mm and absence of cardiac tamponadeN/AN/A
Jacobs et al 45 Ferritin- 32 401 μg/L,interleukin 6 level- 281 pg/mLNTproBNP, 9,223 pg/mL, TnI 14 932 ng/LMultiple patchy ground-glass opacifications in all lung fieldsQRS widening and a positiveDeflection at the end of the T waveHyperdynamic ventricular function (inotropes). IVS 12mm, PW 11mm, LV EDD 48mmNAPost Mortem: HypertrophicCardiac tissue with patchy muscular, sometimes perivascular,and slightly diffuse interstitial mononuclear inflammatory infiltrates,dominated by lymphocytes. Positive immunohistochemicalstaining with E06 in morphologicallydegenerating and necrotic cardiomyocytes adjacent to theinfiltrate of lymphocytes
Labani et al 46 C-reactive protein 9 mg/LTnT: 60 ng/L, BNP: 474 ng/LMild bilateral peripheral lower pulmonary lobe ground-glass opacitiesDiffuse inverted T waves and elongated QTInfero-septal and infero-apical LV wall hypokinesia, LVEF 56% and a moderate pericardial effusionLV wall motion, normal LVEF 61% and persistence of a mild pericardial effusion. STIR and T2 map showed suggestive of myocardial edema in the basal inferior LV wall. LGE: multiple areas of inferior subepicardial and mid-wallN/A
Spano et al 47 Elevated C-reactive proteinElevated troponin and NT-proBNP levelsCT chest-left heart congestionDynamic T- wave inversionDiffuse hypokinesia with severely decreased left- and right-ventricular functionT2 weighted imaging and T2 mapping revealed diffuse thickening of the myocardium and pericardium attributable to edemaN/A
Tavazzi et al 48 C reactive - protein 52.7 mg/LTroponin I- 4332 ng/LN/AN/ADilated left ventricle, severe and diffuse LV hypokinesia with LV ejection fraction of 34%N/AN/A
Trogen et al 49 C-reactive protein- 167 mg/L, D-dimer 1218 ng/mL, ferritin 1274.6 ng/mLTroponin I: 2.97 ng/ml, BNP- 2124 pg/mLN/RSinus tachycardia and T-wave inversion particularly in the inferior leadsLeft ventricular ejection fraction mildly depressed without obvious intracardiac clots or pericardial effusionThe normal size of both ventricles along with slightly decreased systolic function. A segment of a mid-wall late gadolinium enhancement at the level of the inferior junction of both ventricles correlative to an area of increased T2 signal, along with an area of hypokinesiaN/R
Varga et al 50 C-reactive protein: 232 mg/lD-dimers: 2.42 mg/lTroponin T: 51 ng/l, NTproBNP: 10 456 ng/lBilateral infiltration and ground glass opacities with consolidations in the right lungN/APreserved left ventricular ejection fraction, but a severely enlarged left atrium (59ml/m2) indicating longstanding diastolic dysfunctionN/RPostmortem: accumulation of inflammatory cells associated with endothelium, as well as apoptotic bodies, in the heart
Warchoł et al 51 C-reactive protein levels-94 mg/l,D dimers:1.39 mg/l, lactate dehydrogenase: 369 U/lTroponin T ranged from 72 ng/l to 102 ng/l, NT-proBNP: 2451 ng/lN/RN/RN/RLeft atrial enlargement and global left ventricular hypokinesia with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of 20%. Inferior and inferolateral wall large, patchy, and linear non-ischemic pattern of fibrosis with late gadolinium enhancementN/R
Sardari et al 52 CRP = 105 mg/L, ESR = 70 mm/hTroponin T = <0.03ng/mlBilateral ground glass and consolidative opacitiesN/RLeft ventricular dysfunctionNormal LV size, EF of 50No
Dahl et al 53 CRP-230 mg/L, procalcitonin-2.1 μg/LTnT- 90 ng/L, NT-proBNP - 160 ng/Lbibasal consolidationssinus tachycardia with moderately flattened T-wavesdeterioration of the left ventricular function,EF-40%diffuse myocardial edema suggestive of significant acute myocardial injury.N/R
Hu H et al 54 N/ATroponin T-10 000 ng/L,CKMB 112.9 ng/L, BNP—21 025 ng/LCXR-cardiomegaly, CT-pulmonary infection, enlarged heartIII, AVF ST-segment elevationenlarged heart and a marked decrease in ventricular systolic function, LVEF-27%,trace 2 mm pericardial effusionN/RN/R
Volis et al 55 CRP-3.87 mg/dlTroponin-I-965 ng/Lchest CT-unremarkableminimal ST-depressions and T-wave inversions in lead IIINormal left ventricular ejection fraction-65%, normal function, no wall-motion abnormalities.N/RN/R
Besler et al 56 CRP-0.0812 g/LTroponin I-7.621 ng/mL,CKMB-21.92 μg/L,NT-proBNP-1525 ng/LCXR-focal consolidation on the upper zone of left lung, CHEST CT-subpleural consolidation with ground-glass opacification in the left upper lobeN/RN/RMyocardial wall edema, subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement of the posterolateral wall in the mid ventricle-suggestive of myocarditis,ef-64%N/R
Gaine et al 57 CRP-7 mg/LTroponin T -25 ng/L, NTproBNP-3428 pg/mLCXR-cardiomegaly, increased interstitial lung markingsatrial fibrillationseverely impaired LVEF of 20% and mitral regurgitationBiventricular oedema suggestive of generalized severe myocarditisN/R
Sheikh et al 58 CRP-32.5 mg/dL,ESR-88 mm/hTroponin-0.43 ng/mL, BNP-19 600 pg/mLCXR-patchy bibasilar opacitiesAccelerated junctional rhythm, non specific T wave changesLeft ventricular dysfunction-ejection fraction 30%N/RN/R
Salamanca et al 59 N/Rtroponin T-745 ng/l, CKMB-30 U/l, NTproBNP-24,167 pg/mlCXR-bilateral pneumoniaThird-degree atrioventricular blockseverely dysfunctional left ventricle,ejection fraction [LVEF] ∼15%Diffuse edema, negative Late gadolinium enhancementNo significant inflammatory infiltrates
Naneishvili et al 60 CRP-47 mg/L,D-dimer 579 ng/mLTroponin I-639 ng/L,CK-1403 U/LCXR-bilateral patchy air space shadowing consistent with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia,CHEST CT-1 cm rim of pericardial fluid and minimal bi-basal lung inflammatory changes.Atrial fibrillation converted to sinus rhythym by DC cardioversionModerate concentric biventricular hypertrophy, diffused left ventricular hypokinesia with moderate to severe left-ventricular systolic dysfunction EF-37% and pericardial effusion with no signs of tamponadeN/RN/R
Kim et al 61 N/RTroponin I-1.26 ng/mL,NT-proBNP-1929 pg/mLCXR-multifocal consolidation on both lung fields and cardiomegaly, CHEST CT-multifocal consolidation and ground-glass opacification in both lungs in the lower lobe.Multiple premature ventricular complexesSevere left ventricular systolic dysfunctionMyocardial edema, Extensive transmural late gadolinium enhancementN/R
Nikoo et al 62 CRP-23 mg/L,ESR-4 mm/hTroponin I 10.32 Mic gr/L),CKMB-83 IU/LN/RSustained ventricular tachycardiaBiventricular dilation and global hypokinesia with left ventricular ejection fraction-20–25%.CMR after discharge-normal ventricles size, EF of 52%, diffuse myocardial inflammation of the LV myocardiumN/R
Sala et al 63 CRP: 18 mg/lTroponin T: 135 ng/L, NT pro BNP: 512 pg/mlB/L opacity in lungsMild ST-segment elevation(V1-V2 and aVR), ST- depression (V4-V6), and diffuse U wavesLVEF = 43%, inferolateral wall hypokinesis and no pericardial effusionHypokinesia of left ventricle mid and basal segment, diffuse myocardial oedemaT lymphocytes inflammatory infiltrates and necrosis
Yuan et al 64 N/RN/RNo ground glass appearance in Lungs.Ventricular TachycardiaN/RIncreased left ventricular apical regionN/R
Warchol et al 65 CRP: 94 mg/l, D-dimer: 1.39 mg/lTrop I: 102 ng/L, NTpro BNP: 2451 ng/lN/R55%Left atrial enlargement, global left ventricular hypkinesia, myocardial edema with ejection fraction of 20%N/R
Asif and Ali 65 P1: N/R, P2: N/RP1: 0.17ng/ml. P2: 1.6 ng/mlP1: B/L Diffuse opacity, P2: B/L Diffuse lung opacityP1: ST- elevation in lead I, aVL and V1-V4 T wave change, P2: ST- elevation in lead V2-V6 and Q waves in lead V4-V6P1: 70%, P2: 65%P1: No regional wall abnormalities, P2: No regional wall abnormalitiesN/R
Khalid et al 66 P1: CRP: 8.5 mg/L, D-dimer: 0.73ug/mL, ESR: 29mm/h, Ferritin: 559 ng/mL. P2: NormalP1: Troponin-I(116 ng/mL), P2: Troponin-I( 2.7 ng/mL), NT pro- BNP(2917) pg/mlP1: N/R, P2: N/RP1: Sinus Rhythm,inferioposterior infarct without ST- elevation. P2: Sinus tachycardia, low amplitude QRS, and poor R- wave progressionP1: EF = 45% . P2: EF = 25%P1: N/R, P2: N/RN/R
Ng et al 67 Elevated CRP: 4, WBC: 4Elevated Troponin: 7 patientsN/R14 patients have ECG changes for Myocardial injuryN/R14 patients have abnormal CMR finding (High T1 and /or T2, +/- no ischemic LGE)N/R
Jirak et al 68 C-reactive protein: 27.5 ± 12.2 mg/dl,CK levels: 518 U/L,D-dimer: 6720 ng/ml,Procalcitonin: 1.59 ng/mlWBC count: 14820/μlTroponin: 354 ng/LCK-MB: 22 U/LNT-proBNP: 811 pg/ml35 Patient shownCardiomegaly (46%), 26 Patient shown Pulmonary venous congestion (34.2%)N/R24 patient shown LVEF, Pericardial effusion in 3 patients.N/RN/R
Yan et al 69 CK levels: 80 U/L,Creatinine: 0.72-0.92 mg/dl,Ferritin: 975ng/ml[Male]748 ng/ml [Female],ESR: 35mm/h,Procalcitonin: 5850/μl, D-dimer: 1.43ng/MLTroponin: 6.9 ng/L,CK-MB: 1.2 ng/ml,NT-proBNP: 221 pg/mlN/RN/RN/RN/RN/R
Kunal et al 70 D-dimer = 84.2% (elevated)Troponin T = 0.66 ± 1.28 ug/L, CK-MB(U/L) = 55.7 ±3 0.1N/RST- T change = 32.1%, Max QTc = 457.37 ± 32.7N/RN/RN/R
Table 3.

In-Hospital Management, Complications, and Outcomes of Patients.

AuthorsIn-hospital managementComplicationsOutcomes
Cizgic et al 13 Furosemide, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and, beta-blocker along with Covid-19 specific therapyARDSTransfer red back to Covid19 center
Yokoo et al 14 Antibiotics, steroidsDischarged
Pietsch et al 15 N/AN/RN/R
Pavon et al 16 Piperacillin-tazobactam, catecholamine, IntubatedN/RDischarged
Khatri et al 17 Hydroxychloroquine (400 mg twice on the first day, succeeded by 200 mg twice a day for 4 days), IV azithromycin, IV vancomycin, IV cefepime, and methylene blue infusion, IV methylprednisolone (200 mg/d) on 3 day, dobutamine, vasopressin, and norepinephrineCardiogenic and distributive shock, with multi-organ failureDied on day 4
Hussain et al 18 Remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, and Indomethacin 7th day, methylprednisolone and colchicine, mechanical ventilationARDS on 2nd dayN/R
Dalen et al 19 IV fluids, norepinephrine, and dobutamineCardiogenic shockRecovered
Zeng et al 20 High-flow oxygen, lopinavir-ritonavir, interferon α-1b, immunoglobulin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and continuous renal replacement therapy, IV methylprednisolone, vasopressors used from day 26, ECMO on day 11Cardiogenic shock on day 11, Septic shock on day 26, ARDS day 1Passed away on day 33
Doyen et al 21 Aspirin, fondaparinux, IV hydrocortisone for 9 days, Mechanical ventilationARDSDischarged from ICU after 3 weeks
Faircloth et al 22 Norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, and methylprednisoloneDischarged
Coyle et al 23 Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and tocilizumab, IV methylprednisolone 500 mg daily x 4 days, followed by decreasing dose and, colchicine, milrinone day 4, norepinephrine day 4, mechanical ventilation on day 3ARDS on day 3, Cardiogenic shock on day 4Discharged on day 19
Luetkens et al 24 N/RN/RN/R
Jain et al 25 Vasoactive drugs, vancomycin and cefepime, IVIG, pulse dose steroids, and mechanical ventilation.Cardiogenic shock and multi-organ failureDischarged on day 46
Renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury and N-acetylcysteine for acute liver injury,NANA
Mustafa et al 26 Aspirin, unfractionated heparin and nitroglycerin infusion for acute coronary syndrome.N/RImprovement in symptoms over the next few days
Azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine
Mansoor et al 27 Vancomycin, meropenem, chloroquine, and azithromycin, norepinephrine, phenylephrine, vasopressin, diuretics, and subcutaneous heparinMulti-organ system failure and pulseless electrical activity.Mortality on day 6 in ICU
Al-assaf et al 28 Enoxaparin, amlodipine, and scheduled a permanent pacemaker implant.Discharged in stable condition.
Khalid et al 29 Tocilizumab ( 2-dose of 480 mg and 240 mg), intravenous immunoglobulin (25 g for 5 days), ceftriaxone, cefdinir, and cefepime, norepinephrine, IntubatedCardiogenic shock, ARDSRecovered
Inciardi et al 30 Hydroxychloroquine (200 mg 2 times a day ), lopinavir/ritonavir (250 every 12 h), kanrenone (50 mg), furosemide(25-50 mg), and bisoprolo(2.5 mg)l, IV methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg for 3 days, dobutamineCardiogenic shock on day 1Recovered
Fried et al 31 Intraaortic baloon pump was inserted and dobutamine infusionCardiogwnic shockDischarge
Wehit et al 32 Ampicillin/sulbactam, liponavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine, orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilationOn day 15, bacteraemic sepsis and multi-organ failurePatient was still in the intensive care unit
Butler et al 33 RehabilitationN/RN/R
Lagana et al 34 Methyl prednisolone (100%), Ace Inhibitor (75%)Cardiogenic shock (33.33%)3(25%)
Kallel et al 35 Oxygen therapy with a high concentration mask (10 litters/minute) for acute respiratory failure on admission.Dobutamine (5 γ/kg/min) and noradrenaline (3 mg/h).One dose of 80mg of Tocilizumab), corticosteroid, and azithromycin; (500mg the first day then 25 mg/day for 4 days).N/RDischarged 7 days later in-patient management
Fath et al 37 Aspirin and ticagrelor, along with the heparin infusion and inotropic support with norepinephrine, vasopressin, and dobutamine for acute coronary syndrome.Cardiac arrestDied
Dabbagh et al 38 Hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoids, and colchicine; Intubated.Discharged
Irabien-Ortiz et 39 Immunoglobulins (80 mg/day), interferon-B (0.25 mg every 48 h) and ritonavir/lopinavir, IV methylprednisolone 500 mg daily at decreasing doses for 14 days, and norepinephrine, ECMOCardiogenic shock on day 1N/R
Albert et al 40 Tocilizumab, Methyprednizone, IV immunoglobulin, Inotropes, ECMO.Discharged
Escher et al 41 Cyclophosphamide and steroids.Recovered
Ford et al 42 Amiodarone load, ceftriaxone/azithromycin, tissue plasminogen activator, warfarin.Recovered and discharged
Gauchotte et al 43 Vasopressors, Inotropic support, ECMO, intubation.N/RDeceased at 6th day of hospitalization
Hua et al 44 VasopressorsCardiogenic shock day 1Recovered
Jacobs et al 45 Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, noradrenaline, adrenaline, and dobutamineRefractory shockDied
Labani et al 46 N/RRecovered and discharged
Spano et al 47 N/RN/RN/R
Tavazzi et al 48 Adrenaline (0.07 μg/kg/mi n), and noradren aline (0.1 μg/kg/mi n), ECMO and IABPCardiogenic shock on day 1 and septic shockDied
Trogen et al 49 Hydroxychloroquine, piperacillin/tazobactam, enoxaparinSeptic shockDischarged
Varga et al 50 N/RN/RDied
Warchoł et al 51 Azithromycin, oseltamivir, magnesium, and amiodaroneN/RN/R
Sardari et al 52 Bisoprolol and lisinoprilPlueritic chest painN/R
Dahl et al 53 Cefotaxime, clindamycin,3 L/min- oxygen, Furosemide, norepinephrine, Continuous positive airway pressurerespiratory distress,right side bell’s palsyDischarged on day 11
Hu et al 54 methylprednisolone,immunoglobulin,norepinephrine,toracemide,furosemidemilrinone,piperacillin,sulbactam, pantoprazolecardiogenic shock and pulmonary infectionDischarge
Volis et al 55 N/RPleuritic chest pain, dyspneaDischarge
Besler et al 56 Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, tigecycline, favipiravir, colchicinechest painDischarged on day 7
Gaine et al 57 Diuretics, rate-control agents, anticoagulants, ACE inhibitor, mineralocorticoid antagonistHeart failuredischarge
Sheikh et al 58 Metoprolol, lisinopril, low-dose aspirin, hydrochlorthiazide, desmopressinDiabetes insipidusDischarge
Salamanca et al 59 Dobutamine, norepinephrine, methylprednisolone, tocilizumab, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, lopinavir-ritonavir, temporary pacemaker, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, intra-aortic balloon pumpCardiogenic shockDischarge
Naneishvili et al 60 Methylprednisolone, dobutamine, amiodarone, milrinone, norepinephrine, antibioticscardiogenic shockDischarge
Kim et al 61 N/RN/RN/R
Nikoo et al 62 Amiodarone, dexamethasone, standard heart failure therapies (details n/r),therapeutic anticoagulation, temporary pacemakerCardiogenic shockDischarge
Long ma et al 3 NANANA
Sala et al 63 Lopinavir, HydroxychloroquineChest Pain, dyspnoeaDischarge
Yuan et al 64 N/RChest PainDischarge
Warchol et alAzithromycin, oseltamivirHemodynamically unstableN/R
Asif and Ali 65 P1: Aspirin, clopidogrel and heparin, azythromycin, hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, merooenum, norepinephrine. P2: Azythromycin, tocilizumab, nor epinephrine, midazolamP1: ARDS, P2: ARDSP1: Died, P2: ICI
Khalid et al 66 P1: Aspirin, clopidogrel and diuretics P2: Methylprednisone, colchicineP1: N/R. P2: Refractory shockP1: Discharge, P2: Discharge
Ng et al 67 N/RN/RN/R
Jirak et al 68 Catecholamine, extracorporeal membrane oxygen therapy, Antibiotics.ARDS,N/R
Yan et al 69 N/RN/RN/R
Kunal S et al 70 Hydroxychloroquine, AzithromycinN/R57.% Died
Demographics, Comorbidities, and Presenting Symptoms Among all Patients. Biomarkers, Radiographic, Electrocardiography, Echocardiography, and Biopsy Findings. In-Hospital Management, Complications, and Outcomes of Patients.

Results

In total, 54 case reports and 5 cohorts were identified comprising 215 adult patients. Among the 59 studies, the following comorbidities were noted among 178 patients. Hypertension (n = 92, 51.7%), diabetes mellitus type 2 (n = 47, 46.4%), cardiac comorbidities (n = 26, 14.6%), hyperlipidemia (n = 6, 3.4%), obesity (n = 5, 2.8%), ischemic stroke (n = 2, 1.1%), asthma (n = 2, 1.1%), hypothyroidism (n = 2, 1.1%), smoking (n = 2, 1.1%), cancer (n = 2, 1.1%), sarcoidosis (n = 1, 0.6%), epilepsy (n = 1, 0.6%), multiple sclerosis (n = 1, 0.6%), tuberculosis (n = 1, 0.6%), migraine (n = 1, 0.6%), spondylitis (n = 1, 0.6%), renal transplant (n = 1, 0.6%), and sleep apnea (n = 1, 0.6%) (Table 1). Presenting symptoms on admission were acquired from 139 of 215 patients. They include cough (n = 86, 61.9%), fever (n = 84, 60.4%), shortness of breath (n = 74, 53.2%), chest pain (n = 61, 43.9%), diarrhea (n = 43, 30.9%), fatigue (n = 37, 26.6%), myalgia (n = 34, 24.5%), dyspnea (n = 17, 12.2%), hypoxia (n = 7, 5%), syncope (n = 6, 4.3%), tachycardia (n = 6 4.3%), hypotension (n = 4, 2.9%), tachypnea (n = 4, 2.9%), malaise (n = 4, 2.9%), vomiting (n = 4, 2.9%), ARDS (n = 1, 0.7%) (Table 1). Of 215, inflammatory markers were reported among 185 patients. The inflammatory markers were elevated among 181 (97.8%) patients, and were normal in the remaining 4 (2.2%) patients. The cardiac markers were documented in 212 patients, of which 201 (94.8%) had elevated levels, whereas, 11 (5.2%) patients had normal cardiac markers. The mean value of CRP was 91.6 mg/L (Normal: Less than 10 mg/L. High: Equal to or greater than 10 mg/L). The mean D-dimer value was 2419.2 ng/ml (reference concentration of D-dimer is < 500 ng/mL). Mean ferritin laboratory values of 908.9 ng/ml (the normal range for ferritin in blood serum is: 20 to 250 ng/mL for adult males. 10 to 120 ng/mL for adult females) ; and Interleukin 6 of 271.2 pg/mL (normal values: 5-15 pg/ml) were reported. Troponin values were reported as 44.85 ng/ml (normal range for troponin I is between 0 and 0.04 ng/mL but for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) normal values are below14ng/L). Radiographic imaging studies particularly, CT and Chest X-ray were indicated in COVID-19 patients (Table 2). Radiographic findings were obtained from 120 individuals with COVID-19 myocarditis. Variable features were noticed, of which cardiomegaly (32.5%) was the most prominent. Precisely, 120 patient radiographic findings were noted, of which cardiomegaly (n = 39, 32.5%) was the most common occurrence. This was followed by pulmonary venous congestion (n = 27, 22.5%), ground glass opacity (n = 23, 19.2%), consolidation (n = 9, 7.5%), pericardial effusion (n = 3, 2.5%), pleural effusion (n = 1, 0.83%), and no abnormal finding (n = 5, 4.2%) were noted in the cohort of included patient (Table 2). Electrocardiography (ECG) findings were obtained for 96 patients, which were normal in 2 (2%) patients while other patients had varied ECG findings comprising of ST segment elevation among 43 (44.8%) patients, T wave inversion in 7 (7.3%) patients, ST depression in 5 (5.2%) patients, sinus tachycardia in 11 (11.5%) patients, atrial fibrillation in 3 (3.1%) patients, sinus bradycardia in 1 (1%) patient, ventricular tachycardia in 2 (2%) patients, and finally LBBB was reported in 1 (1%) patient as well (Table 2). Echocardiography was conducted in 175 patients, where 9 (51.4%) patients showed normal ejection fractions while 55 (31.4%) patients demonstrated reduced ejection fraction with a mean EF% of 35. Pericardial effusion was demonstrated in 12 (6.9%) patients, left ventricular hypertrophy in 7 (4%) patients, cardiomegaly in 7 (4%) patients, myocardial dyskinesia in 19 (10.9%) patients, and LV thrombus in 1 (0.6%) patient (Table 2). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a non-invasive, gold standard test for diagnosing myocarditis. Our synthesis identifies that 42 of 215 patients underwent CMR and 36 of them were diagnosed with Myocarditis by the Lake Louis Criteria. The most common findings were increased signal intensity in T2 weighted imaging that is, myocardial edema (30/36; 83.3%) suggestive of myocardial inflammation and/or ischemia. Late Gadolinium enhancement was observed in 23/36 (63.9%) patients in both ischemic and non ischemic patterns. Hypokinesis and decreased systolic function were present in 8/36 (22.2%) and 6/36 (16.7%) patients respectively. Myocardial fibrosis was found in 1/36 (2.8%) patients. In total, 6 (14.3%) of 42 patients were found to have normal CMR findings (Table 2). On noting the biopsy and histopathological examination findings, and considering the invasive in nature, these findings were reported in 9 (4.2%) patients out of 215 (Table 2). The most common findings were multifocal or diffuse lymphocytic infiltrates in the myocardium and endothelium along with myocardial edema and necrosis. Other findings included positive myocardial anti-SARS COV nucleocapsid protein antibodies, cardiac hypertrophy, and multiple sites of ischemia and thrombosis with a left atrial and left pulmonary artery thrombus in one patient. Only 1 (11.1%) patient had normal findings on biopsy. The in-hospital management acquired from 165 patients comprised of azithromycin (n = 42, 25.5%), hydroxychloroquine (n = 41, 24.9%), methylprednisolone/steroid (n = 14, 8.5%), norepinephrine (n = 10, 6%), dobutamine (n = 7, 4.3%), tocilizumab (n = 6, 3.6%), and remdesivir (n = 1, 0.6%) (Table 3). Standard care of treatment for COVID-19 was used for majority of the patients. Complications during in-hospital stay reported in 128 patients included ARDS (n = 85, 66.4%), cardiogenic shock (n = 18, 14%), pleuritic chest pain (n = 6, 4.7%), multiorgan failure (n = 4, 3.1%), septic shock (n = 3, 2.3%), distributive shock (n = 2, 1.6%), sepsis (n = 2, 1.6%), bells palsy (n = 1, 0.8%) (Table 3). Of 85 patients, 55 (64.7%) survived, whereas 27 (31.8%) died. Three patients (3.5%) were in critical care unit on the last follow-up (Table 3).

Discussion

This systematic review aimed to describe the symptomatology, prognosis, and clinical findings of patients with probable and confirmed COVID-19-related myocarditis. Frequent clinical findings of COVID-19 infection constitute fever, cough, shortness of breath, and fatigue. The World Health Organization has cited fever and cough as striking features of COVID-19. Fever, dyspnea, and/or chest pain are typical manifestations of myocarditis that tend to overlap with COVID-19 symptomatology, thus making the diagnosis challenging.[77,78] Laboratory investigations such as rising levels of cardiac biomarkers and electrocardiogram findings may assist in diagnosing COVID-19 induced myocarditis. Our systematic review finds hypertension was the most common comorbidity with prevalence among 51.7% patients. This was followed by diabetes mellitus type 2 (46.4%) and cardiac comorbidities (14.6%). Our synthesis also finds that the most common presenting symptoms on admission comprised of 61.9% patients with cough, 60.4% with fever, and 53.2% with shortness of breath. The inflammatory markers were elevated among 97.8% patients, and the cardiac markers were increased in 94.8% of patients. The mean CRP levels were 91.6 mg/L, mean D-dimer values were 2419.2 ng/ml, and mean ferritin was 908.9 ng/ml. Mean Interleukin 6 values were 271.2 pg/mL and troponin values were identified as 44.85 ng/ml. The most distinct radiographic findings were cardiomegaly noted in 32.5% patients, followed by pulmonary venous congestion (22.5%), and ground glass opacity (19.2%). On noting ECG findings, ST segment elevation was reported in 44.8% patients, sinus tachycardia in 11.5%, and T wave inversion in 7.3% patients. Echocardiography noted normal ejection fractions in 51.4% patients, but 31.4% had reduced ejection fraction with a mean percentage of 35%. CMR imaging identified increased signal intensity in T2 weighted imaging, with myocardial edema in 83.3% patients, suggesting myocardial ischemia/inflammation. Late gadolinium enhancement was observed in 63.9% patients. The biopsy and histopathological examination findings found multifocal or diffuse lymphocytic infiltrates in the myocardium and endothelium along with myocardial edema and necrosis. In-hospital management comprised of 22.5% patients treated with azithromycin, 24.9% with hydroxychloroquine, 8.5% with methylprednisolone/steroid and 6% with norepinephrine. Standard of care and treatment was used for the majority of patients. complications during in-hospital stay included 66.4% patients acquiring ARDS and 14% with cardiogenic shock, in addition to others. Overall, 64.7% patients survived. A summary of the findings obtained is depicted in Figure 3.
Figure 3.

A summary of COVID-19 infection induced myocarditis.

A summary of COVID-19 infection induced myocarditis. Pirzada et al elucidated the features of myocarditis found during the initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors write that while the exact pathophysiology of severe COVID-19 was still elusive, a consistent observation of the pro-inflammatory surge, namely the cytokine storm was made. Observations of elevated interleukins (IL-2R, IL-6, IL-10, TNF- α) were presented in a single-center cohort. Viral myocarditis may be considered a direct response of autoimmunity, inflammation, or both. Based on a cohort of 416 patients at the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University conducted from January 20, 2020 until February 10, 2020, 82 (19.7%) patients had cardiac injury. The cardiac involvement in the cohort of patients had a hazard ratio of 4.26, which is notably high. Mortality in the myocardial injury group versus the general group was significantly higher (51.2% vs 4.5%, P < .001). The symptoms of myocarditis among COVID-19 patients range from mild symptoms such as chest pain, fatigue, and palpitations to life-threatening symptoms such as sudden cardiac death associated with ventricular arrythmia or cardiogenic shock. Classically, myocarditis has a viral prodrome including myalgias, fever, and gastrointestinal/respiratory symptoms, with ranges of 10% to 80%. Sawalha et al identified COVID-19 related myocarditis focusing on management and outcomes until June 30, 2020, including a total of 14 cases. The authors found a male predominance (58%), with a median age of 50.4 years. One thirds of all cases were younger than 40 years, and a majority of patients did not have comorbidities (50%), but among those that did have pre-existing conditions, hypertension was the most prevalent (33%). Among the 14 patients, dyspnea/shortness of breath were the most common presenting features (75%), in addition to fever (75%). On noting the hemodynamic status, 64% patients were in shock, of which 71% of the patients had cardiogenic shock, whereas 29% had a mixed septic and cardiogenic shock. Around 42% of the patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome or developed it during the in-hospital period. ECG findings were variable with ST-segment depression, ST-segment elevation, and T wave inversion occurring at 25% each. Troponin was elevated in 91% of the cases, whereas pro-BNP and CK-MB were less frequently checked. Among the 14 patients, echocardiography was performed in 83% of the case and 60% had a reduced ejection fraction. Cardiac tamponade was reported in 20% of all echocardiograms, where diffuse hypokinesis was prevalent among 30% patients. None of the patients had obstructive coronary disease. Around 50% patients required vasopressor support, with 25% of them warranting inotropic support. Mechanical ventilation was utilized for 17% of the patients, of which ECMO was the most commonly used modality. Many treatment modalities were used to manage myocarditis of which glucocorticoids (58%) were mostly used, followed by immunoglobulin therapy (25%) and colchicine (17%). Therapies to mitigate cytokine storm were interferon and tocilizumab (17% each). Sawalha et al found that 81% survived to discharge whereas 19% did not survive; the patients who did not survive were noted to have both myocarditis and ARDS. Castiello et al identified 38 case reports of COVID-19 patients with myocarditis based on the WHO/IFSC or ESC criteria. Around 45% of the cases had fever or a mild temperature increase; 21.1% had gastrointestinal symptoms, and 10.5% had a presenting or previous syncope. Troponin levels varied substantially whereas BNP was raised in 57.9% patients. ECG findings were normal in 10.5% patients with variations among the rest. Of 34 patients, only 18.4% patients had no functional or structural abnormality. On noting CMR findings, myocardial inflammation and diffuse edema were captured in 50% patients. EMB was performed only in 21.2% patients, where only 1 case reported the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the cardiomyocytes. Histological data obtained from autopsies were available for 10.5% patients, of which inflammatory infiltrates, accumulated inflammatory cells in the endothelium and signs of ferroptosis were noted. The medical treatment was variable ranging from hydroxychloroquine (26.3%), tocilizumab (10.5%), lopinavir/ritonavir (7.9%), antibiotics (36.8%), steroids (34.2%), heart failure medications (36.8%), and anticoagulants (21.1%). Of 33 cases with reported outcomes, 84.8% patients survived, whereas 15.2% did not survive. Rathore et al present recent data, until January 5, 2021, of 42 patients with myocarditis and COVID-19, with 71.4% being males, and with a median age of 43.4 years. Hypertension was the most common finding in these patients, where cardiac biomarkers BNP and troponin were raised in 87% and 90% of the patients respectively. ECG findings were non-specific with T-wave and ST-segment changes noted. Echocardiogram commonly showed ventricular systolic dysfunction with cardiomegaly. The commonest histopathological feature was diffuse lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrates. Moreover, corticosteroids and antivirals were most frequently used. Around 40% of the patients required vasopressor support. Of 41 patients, 67% survived, whereas 33% died. Due to the sudden risk of worsening patient conditions and associations with myocarditis, knowledge of this cardiac complication due to COVID-19 is critical for healthcare workers across all settings. Kamarullah et al also conducted a search until January 2021 where 18 patients were included. The findings were suggestive of the beneficial effects of corticosteroids in treating myocarditis associated with COVID-19; the most commonly applied steroids were hydrocortisone (5.5%), methylprednisolone (89%), and prednisolone (5.5%), with the intravenous route being the most common and duration of treatment ranging from 1 to 14 days.[85,86]

Strengths and Limitations

This systematic review synthesizes the most recent evidence of COVID-19 infection and myocarditis, until August 31, 2021. Published literature obtained during the systematic search presents data collected until January 2021, enabling our collated findings, obtained until August 2021, to be a critical piece of information for healthcare workers worldwide. We present key findings about demographics, COVID-19 and myocarditis symptomatology, essential diagnostic techniques of use to clinicians, and clinical outcomes of interest of COVID-19 infection and myocarditis. The findings further strengthen the benefits of evidence-based healthcare where we gather evidence from reliable published literature to inform healthcare decisions, and reduce variations in healthcare delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review has certain limitations. First, COVID-19 and myocarditis symptomatology may be overlapping, suggesting difficult clinical demarcations. Second, COVID-19 infections compounded with myocarditis were expected to be underreported as patients who did not previously have comorbidities presented with newly diminished ejection fractions and elevated myocardial markers. Thirdly, our systematic review presents that a low proportion of patents had confirmed myocarditis via MRI/endomyocardial biopsy. A plausible reason was the fear of contracting COVID-19 infection on undergoing MRI/endomyocardial biopsy. Fourthly, ECG and echocardiography were considered to be reliable screening tests, but not diagnostic tests, except for pericardial effusion. Lastly, while biomarkers such as troponin, BNP, and CK-MB were useful in diagnosing myocarditis, they are non-specific because the levels may also rise in other conditions such as demand ischemia and acute heart failure.

Conclusion

This systematic review presents findings about demographics, symptomatology, diagnostic techniques, and clinical outcomes of adult COVID-19 patients with myocarditis. A total of 229 patients were included in this analysis, who were diagnosed with myocarditis. The patients commonly presented with fever, cough, and shortness of breath making the clinical presentations difficult to differentiate. Elevated inflammatory and cardiac marker in addition to ECG and echocardiographic findings were useful indicators of myocardial disease. Gold standard testing such as MRI and endomyocardial biopsy were under-utilized suggesting that a definitive diagnostic approach may be required for those patients who fall under a high risk of suspicion for COVID-19 induced myocarditis. Due to the peaked risk of death among patients contracting both ARDS and myocardial inflammation, it is essential that healthcare workers are aware that myocarditis may be associated with COVID-19 infections. While the treatment approaches were variable across the cohort of patients included in this systematic review, further large-scale randomized controlled trials may help in establishing the best care of treatment for those with a definitive diagnosis of myocarditis with COVID-19.
  77 in total

Review 1.  At the heart of COVID-19.

Authors:  Inayat Hussain Khan; Syeda Anum Zahra; Sevim Zaim; Amer Harky
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Diffuse Myocardial Inflammation in COVID-19 Associated Myocarditis Detected by Multiparametric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Julian Alexander Luetkens; Alexander Isaak; Sebastian Zimmer; Annkristin Heine; Markus Velten; Georg Daniel Duerr; Jacob Nattermann; Alois Martin Sprinkart; Christoph Boesecke; Gereon Jonas Rieke; Christian Zachoval
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 3.  Myocarditis.

Authors:  Leslie T Cooper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Re: Letter to the editor of Public Health in response to 'Non-COVID-19 visits to emergency departments during the pandemic: the impact of fear'.

Authors:  G Mantica; N Riccardi; C Terrone; A Gratarola
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  First case of COVID-19 complicated with fulminant myocarditis: a case report and insights.

Authors:  Jia-Hui Zeng; Ying-Xia Liu; Jing Yuan; Fu-Xiang Wang; Wei-Bo Wu; Jin-Xiu Li; Li-Fei Wang; Hong Gao; Yao Wang; Chang-Feng Dong; Yi-Jun Li; Xiao-Juan Xie; Cheng Feng; Lei Liu
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Patients Recovered From COVID-19 Show Ongoing Subclinical Myocarditis as Revealed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ming-Yen Ng; Vanessa M Ferreira; Siu Ting Leung; Jonan Chun Yin Lee; Ambrose Ho-Tung Fong; Raymond Wai To Liu; Johnny Wai Man Chan; Alan Ka Lun Wu; Kwok-Cheung Lung; Andrew M Crean; Ivan Fan-Ngai Hung; Chung-Wah Siu
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-28

7.  The Variety of Cardiovascular Presentations of COVID-19.

Authors:  Justin A Fried; Kumudha Ramasubbu; Reema Bhatt; Veli K Topkara; Kevin J Clerkin; Evelyn Horn; LeRoy Rabbani; Daniel Brodie; Sneha S Jain; Ajay J Kirtane; Amirali Masoumi; Koji Takeda; Deepa Kumaraiah; Daniel Burkhoff; Martin Leon; Allan Schwartz; Nir Uriel; Gabriel Sayer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Rhythm, conduction, and ST elevation with COVID-19: Myocarditis or myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Amtul Mansoor; David Chang; Raman Mitra
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-12
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Robert J Henning
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 2.  Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Authors:  Benjamin J Behers; Genevieve A Patrick; Jared M Jones; Rachel A Carr; Brett M Behers; Julian Melchor; Delaney E Rahl; Timothy D Guerriero; Hongyu Zhang; Cuneyt Ozkardes; Nicholas D Thomas; Michael J Sweeney
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Lipocalin-2, S100A8/A9, and cystatin C: Potential predictive biomarkers of cardiovascular complications in COVID-19.

Authors:  Anamika Gupta; Abaher O Al-Tamimi; Rabih Halwani; Hend Alsaidi; Meganathan Kannan; Firdos Ahmad
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-04-23

Review 4.  COVID-19-Associated Myocarditis: An Evolving Concern in Cardiology and Beyond.

Authors:  Meg Fraser; Arianne Clare C Agdamag; Valmiki R Maharaj; Melinda Mutschler; Victoria Charpentier; Mohammed Chowdhury; Tamas Alexy
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vikash Jaiswal; Gaurav Nepal; Patricia Dijamco; Angela Ishak; Mehak Dagar; Zouina Sarfraz; Nishat Shama; Azza Sarfraz; Kriti Lnu; Saloni Mitra; Preeti Agarwala; Sidra Naz; David Song; Akash Jaiswal
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

Review 6.  Symptomatology, prognosis and clinical findings of STEMI as a ramification of COVID-19: A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vikash Jaiswal; Talal Almas; Song Peng Ang; Nishat Shama; Tatyana Storozhenko; Kriti Lnu; Garima Parmar; Saria Qaiser; Sidra Naz; Akash Jaiswal; Jahanzeb Malik
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-08

7.  Case Report: Successful Treatment of a Child With COVID-19 Reinfection-Induced Fulminant Myocarditis by Cytokine-Adsorbing oXiris® Hemofilter Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Phuc H Phan; Dung T Nguyen; Nam H Dao; Ha T T Nguyen; An V Vu; Son T Hoang; Lam V Nguyen; Tung V Cao; Dien M Tran
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.569

8.  Clinical outcomes of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in children and adolescents: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmad R Al-Qudimat; Raed M Al-Zoubi; Mai Elaarag; Abdulqadir J Nashwan; Afaf K Hamze; Hiba Bawadi; Aksam Yassin; Aseel Assim; Omar M Aboumarzouk; Ahmad Zarour; Abdulla A Al-Ansari
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 9.  COVID-19 Related Myocarditis in Adults: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Authors:  Szymon Urban; Michał Fułek; Mikołaj Błaziak; Gracjan Iwanek; Maksym Jura; Katarzyna Fułek; Mateusz Guzik; Mateusz Garus; Piotr Gajewski; Łukasz Lewandowski; Jan Biegus; Piotr Ponikowski; Przemysław Trzeciak; Agnieszka Tycińska; Robert Zymliński
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.