Literature DB >> 34853992

Validation and comparison of five preference-based measures among age-related macular degeneration patients: evidence from mainland China.

Yanhui Si1,2, Shunping Li3,4,5, Yanjiao Xu6, Gang Chen7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the psychometric properties of five preference-based measures (PBMs) among patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in mainland China, including three health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures [the 15D, the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-7D, and EQ-5D-5L] and two capability wellbeing measures [the ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) and ICECAP measure for Older people (ICECAP-O)].
METHODS: A convenience sampling framework was used to successively recruit inpatients with AMD who attended a large ophthalmic hospital in Jinan, China. Psychometric properties (known-group validity, concurrent validity, and sensitivity) were assessed. The agreements between PBMs were reported.
RESULTS: A valid sample of 210 AMD inpatients (median duration: 12 months) was analyzed. Overall, the AQoL-7D had the best performance based on the psychometric tests been conducted. Sufficient evidence was found on psychometric properties for other 2 preference-based HRQoL measures. The ICECAP-A outperformed ICECAP-O on known-group validity and concurrent validity whereas opposite results were found on sensitivity. The Bland-Altman plots indicate that there was no pair of PBMs that could be used interchangeably.
CONCLUSIONS: The AQoL-7D had shown better psychometric properties than other four PBMs based on Chinese AMD inpatients. The EQ-5D-5L demonstrated sufficient psychometric properties and given the availability of a Chinese-specific tariff and the recommendations of China guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluations, it may be prioritized to be used in China. Capability wellbeing instruments could also be considered given they provide information that goes beyond health. Further evidence on responsiveness and reliability for all five PBMs among AMD patients is required.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-related macular degeneration; Capability wellbeing; Health-related quality of life; Preference-based assessment; Psychometric properties

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34853992     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03047-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  40 in total

Review 1.  The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications.

Authors:  H Sintonen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Health-related quality of life in type 1 diabetes without or with symptoms of long-term complications.

Authors:  J Hahl; H Hämäläinen; H Sintonen; T Simell; S Arinen; O Simell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Patients With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hugo Senra; António Filipe Macedo; Nuno Nunes; Konstantinos Balaskas; Tariq Aslam; Emilia Costa
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Mihir Gandhi; Marcus Ang; Kelvin Teo; Chee Wai Wong; Yvonne Chung-Hsi Wei; Rachel Lee-Yin Tan; Mathieu F Janssen; Nan Luo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Health utility values associated with diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  A Lloyd; B Nafees; S Gavriel; M D Rousculp; K S Boye; A Ahmad
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 6.  Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wan Ling Wong; Xinyi Su; Xiang Li; Chui Ming G Cheung; Ronald Klein; Ching-Yu Cheng; Tien Yin Wong
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 7.  A Review of Generic Preference-Based Measures for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Models.

Authors:  John Brazier; Roberta Ara; Donna Rowen; Helene Chevrou-Severac
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Utility weights for the vision-related Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-7D instrument.

Authors:  Jeff Richardson; Angelo Iezzi; Stuart Peacock; Kompal Sinha; Munir Khan; RoseAnne Misajon; Jill Keeffe
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.648

Review 9.  A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan Tosh; John Brazier; Philippa Evans; Louise Longworth
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 10.  The national and subnational prevalence and burden of age-related macular degeneration in China.

Authors:  Peige Song; Yuhang Du; Kit Yee Chan; Evropi Theodoratou; Igor Rudan
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.413

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.