| Literature DB >> 34853657 |
Vandana M Sagar1,2, Kathyrn Herring3,2, Stuart Curbishley1, James Hodson4, Peter Fletcher5, Salil Karkhanis6, Homoyon Mehrzad6, Pankaj Punia3, Tahir Shah7, Shishir Shetty1,7,8, Yuk Ting Ma1,3,8.
Abstract
Prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence II (PIVKA-II) has recently been validated internationally as a diagnostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as part of the GALAD model. However, its role as a treatment response biomarker has been less well explored. We, therefore, undertook a prospective study at a tertiary centre in the UK to evaluate the role of PIVKA-II as a treatment response biomarker in patients with early, intermediate and advanced stage HCC. In a cohort of 141 patients, we found that PIVKA-II levels tracked concordantly with treatment response in the majority of patients, across a range of different treatment modalities. We also found that rises in PIVKA-II levels almost always predated radiological progression. Among AFP non-secretors, PIVKA-II was found to be informative in 60% of cases. In a small cohort of patients undergoing liver transplantation, pre-transplant PIVKA-II levels predicted for microvascular invasion and poorer differentiation. Our results demonstrate the potential utility of PIVKA-II as a treatment response biomarker and in predicting microvascular invasion, in a Western population. PIVKA-II demonstrated improved performance over AFP but, as a single biomarker, its performance was still limited. Further larger prospective studies are recommended to evaluate PIVKA-II as a treatment response biomarker, within the GALAD model. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: PIVKA-II; biomarker; hepatocellular carcinoma
Year: 2021 PMID: 34853657 PMCID: PMC8629402 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Baseline characteristics grouped by BCLC stage
| Early stage HCC
| Intermediate stage HCC
| Advanced stage HCC
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | |
|
| |||
| Age (Yrs) | |||
| Median | 63 | 62 | 68 |
| IQR | 56–69 | 52–64 | 55–73 |
| Sex (%) | |||
| Male | 66 (73%) | 12 (75%) | 28 (80%) |
| Female | 24 (27%) | 4 (25%) | 7 (20%) |
| Aetiology (%) | |||
| HBV/HCV | 22 (24%) | 5 (31%) | 8 (23%) |
| ALD | 35 (39%) | 5 (31%) | 5 (14%) |
| NAFLD | 18 (20%) | 1 (6%) | 6 (17%) |
| Other | 12 (13%) | 2 (13%) | 4 (11%) |
| Unknown | 3 (3%) | 3 (19%) | 12 (34%) |
| Treatment (%) | |||
| Ablation | 26 (29%) | 0 | 0 |
| Transplantation | 18 (20%) | 0 | 0 |
| Resection | 2 (2%) | 0 | 0 |
| TACE | 39 (43%) | 16 (100%) | 0 |
| Sorafenib | 0 | 0 | 35 (100%) |
| None | 5 (6%) | 0 | 0 |
| Child Pugh class (%) | |||
| A | 85 (94%) | 16 (100%) | 28 (80%) |
| B | 5 (6%) | 0 | 7 (20%) |
| C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Portal vein invasion (%) | |||
| Yes | 0 | 0 | 10 (29%) |
|
| |||
| AFP (ng/mL) | |||
| Median | 10.2 | 43.6 | 56.3 |
| IQR | 5.2–84.1 | 17.0–257.2 | 8.8–2115.3 |
| Non-secretors (%) | 54 (60%) | 5 (31%) | 8 (23%) |
| PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) | |||
| Median | 170.0 | 925.8 | 6430.2 |
| IQR | 48.9–591.4 | 179.2–3287.8 | 320.0–29306.4 |
| Non-secretors (%) | 15 (17%) | 1 (6%) | 0 |
Abbreviations: CLD: chronic liver disease; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; TACE: transarterial chemoembolisation; IQR: interquartile range; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; ALD: alcoholic liver disease; NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein.
Figure 1Boxplots of PIVKA-II and AFP by stage of HCC.
A log10 scale has been used for the PIVKA-II and AFP values on the y-axis. Jonckheere-Terpstra tests found both markers to increase significantly with the stage of HCC (PIVKA-II: p < 0.001, AFP: p = 0.002).
Figure 2Associations between size of lesions and PIVKA-II and AFP in early HCC.
A log10 scale has been used for the PIVKA-II and AFP values. Trend lines are from linear regression models, with the log10-transformed values of the markers as dependent variables. The largest lesion size was found to be significantly correlated with PIVKA-II (Spearman’s rho:0.295, p = 0.005), but not AFP (rho:0.045, p = 0.676) (A). The total tumour diameter was also significantly correlated with PIVKA-II (Spearman’s rho: 0.256, p = 0.015), but not AFP (rho: 0.017, p = 0.874) (B).
Associations between explant histology findings and pre-transplant PIVKA-II and AFP
|
| PIVKA-II
|
| AFP
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microvascular Invasion | 0.036 | 0.635 | |||
| No | 10 | 50.6 (28.7–205.6) | 16.0 (5.8–202.8) | ||
| Yes | 4 | 380.5 (206.5–7343.5) | 14.2 (3.8–26.0) | ||
| Number of Lesions | 0.364 | 0.240 | |||
| 1 | 9 | 205.6 (46.4–472.7) | 8.0 (4.2–19.8) | ||
| >1 | 5 | 54.8 (28.7–124.6) | 24.1 (23.9–27.9) | ||
| HCC Differentiation | 0.026 | 0.198 | |||
| Well | 2 | 50.6 (46.4–54.8) | 9.0 (5.8–12.1) | ||
| Moderately | 8 | 62.8 (28.0–165.1) | 13.9 (4.3–25.9) | ||
| Poorly | 4 | 2199.1 (256.5–9162.1) | 133.6 (14.2–1001.4) |
Data are reported as median (IQR), with p-values from Mann-Whitney U tests for comparisons across two groups, or Jonckheere-Terpstra tests for three groups.
Figure 3(A) Spider plots of longitudinal PIVKA-II levels in ablation patients. A log10 scale has been used for the PIVKA-II values. The broken vertical line represents the timing of the ablation. Patients with red triangles are those where recurrence was diagnosed after the final measurement. (B) Kaplan-Meier curves of recurrence by pre-ablation PIVKA-II and AFP levels. Pre-ablation PIVKA-II levels were dichotomised based on the median value. Pre-ablation AFP levels were dichotomised based on AFP secretor/non-secretor status. P-values are from log-rank tests.
Figure 4Spider plots of longitudinal PIVKA-II levels in TACE patients achieving a complete response.
A log10 scale has been used for the PIVKA-II values.
Figure 5(A) Spider plots of longitudinal PIVKA-II levels in Sorafenib patients: stable disease. A log10 scale has been used for the PIVKA-II values. (B) Spider plots of longitudinal PIVKA-II levels in Sorafenib patients: stable disease followed by progression. A log10 scale has been used for the PIVKA-II values. (C and D) Spider plots of longitudinal PIVKA-II and AFP levels in Sorafenib patients: progressive disease. A log10 scale has been used for the PIVKA-II and AFP values.
Summary of the tumour marker trends compared to radiological response
| Treatment | PIVKA-II | AFP | PIVKA-II & AFP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concordant
| Discordant
| Non-secretors (%) | Concordant
| Discordant
| Concordant
| Discordant
| |
| Ablation ( | 10 (77%) | 3 (23%) | 6 (46%) | 5/7 (71%) | 2/7 (29%) | 10 (77%) | 3 (23%) |
| TACE ( | 18 (64%) | 10 (36%)* | 16 (57%) | 8/12 (67%) | 4/12 (33%) | 19 (68%) | 9 (32%) |
| Sorafenib ( | 27 (77%) | 8 (23%) | 8 (23%) | 15/27 (56%) | 12/27 (44%) | 24 (69%) | 11 (31%) |
Analysis of trends in AFP excludes non-secretors; hence rates are based on the stated denominators. *includes 5 patients (18%) who demonstrated no change rather than a discordant change.