| Literature DB >> 34853256 |
Yasuhisa Nakao1, Kazuki Yoshida2, Shinji Inaba1, Yuki Tanabe2, Akira Kurata2, Teruyoshi Uetani1, Teruhito Kido2, Katsuji Inoue1, Teruhito Mochizuki2, Osamu Yamaguchi1.
Abstract
Objective Coronary plaques with low attenuation on computed tomography (CT) angiography may indicate vulnerable plaques. However, plaque CT attenuation is reported to be significantly affected by intracoronary attenuation. Recently, the diluted-contrast injection protocol was established to facilitate more uniform intracoronary attenuation than can be achieved with the generally used body-weight-adjusted protocol. We validated the relationship between low-attenuation plaque on CT and lipid-rich plaque using integrated backscatter-intravascular ultrasound (IB-IVUS) as the standard reference. Methods Plaques were divided into tertiles (T1, T2, and T3) according to the plaque CT attenuation, calculated as the average of five intra-plaque regions of interest, and compared with the plaque characteristics noted on IB-IVUS. Patients Patients who underwent both CT angiography using a diluted-contrast injection protocol and IB-IVUS were retrospectively analyzed. Results Thirty-nine plaques in 32 patients were analyzed by CT angiography and IB-IVUS. The median plaque CT attenuation (Hounsfield units) of each tertile was 30 (T1), 48 (T2), and 68 (T3). Although no significant difference was noted in conventional quantitative IVUS parameters (e.g. plaque burden), the T1 with lowest plaque CT attenuation had the highest percentage lipid area by IB-IVUS [75.1% (T1), 57.8% (T2), and 50.8% (T3), respectively, p<0.01]. Furthermore, the plaque CT attenuation had a significant negative correlation with the percentage lipid area (r=-0.59, p<0.01). Conclusion CT angiography-based plaque characterization using a diluted-contrast injection protocol may aid in the quantitative detection of lipid-rich plaque.Entities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; computed tomography; coronary artery disease; coronary plaque; intravascular ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34853256 PMCID: PMC8710393 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6683-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Figure 1.Example of plaque assessments performed by CT angiography and IVUS. A: Cross-sectional image of CT angiography (left panel) using the diluted-contrast injection protocol. Average plaque CT attenuation was calculated with five intra-plaque ROIs (right panel). B: Grayscale IVUS image (left panel) and IB-IVUS image (right panel) corresponding to the CT section. The blue color (asterisk) indicates the large lipid pool, and the green color indicates the fibrous area on IB-IVUS. CT: computed tomography, HU: Hounsfield units, IB: integrated backscatter, IVUS: intravascular ultrasound, ROI: region of interest
Baseline Clinical and Lesion Features.
|
| ||
| Age, years old | 66 [60, 73] | |
| Male, sex | 29 (91%) | |
| Body weight, kg | 69 [57, 76] | |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24 [22, 27] | |
| Clinical presentation | ||
| Stable angina pectoris | 21 (66%) | |
| Unstable angina pectoris | 11 (34%) | |
|
| ||
| Hypertension | 20 (63%) | |
| Diabetes | 12 (38%) | |
| Dyslipidemia | 16 (50%) | |
| Smoking history | 21 (66%) | |
| Family history of coronary artery disease | 11 (34%) | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Right coronary artery | 6 (15%) | |
| Left anterior descending artery | 28 (72%) | |
| Left circumflex artery | 4 (10%) | |
| Left main coronary artery | 1 (3%) |
Values are expressed as median [IQR] or percentage (number of observations/total number of patients).
Computed Tomography Angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis.
| Overall 39 lesions | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Average plaque CT attenuation, HU | 48 [33, 64] | |
| Intra-coronary CT attenuation, HU (MLA site) | 278 [241, 335] | |
| Intra-coronary CT attenuation, HU (proximal of the plaque) | 348 [314, 372] | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| EEM CSA, mm2 | 12.3 [10.0, 17.0] | |
| Lumen CSA, mm2 | 2.1 [1.8, 2.7] | |
| Plaque & media CSA, mm2 | 9.4 [7.7, 14.6] | |
| %Plaque burden, % | 82.6 [74.4, 85.9] | |
|
| ||
| Plaque attenuation, % | 17 (44%) | |
| Attenuation arc, degree | 82 [0, 173] | |
| Positive remodeling, % | 11 (28%) | |
| Spotty calcification, % | 10 (26%) | |
| Lipid area, mm2 | 5.9 [4.3, 7.0] | |
| Percentage of lipid area, % | 63.5 [49.8, 74.6] | |
| Fibrous area, mm2 | 3.3 [1.8, 4.9] | |
| Percentage of fibrous area, % | 31.2 [22.7, 41.8] |
Values are expressed as median [IQR] or percentage (number of observations/total number of lesions). CSA: cross-sectional area, CT: computed tomography, HU: Hounsfield units, EEM: external elastic membrane, MLA: minimum lumen area
Figure 2.Relationship between the average plaque CT attenuation and plaque components: (A) percentage lipid area and (B) percentage fibrous area. CT: computed tomography, IVUS: intravascular ultrasound
Figure 3.CT angiography analysis results and IB-IVUS findings according to the tertile of average plaque CT attenuation. A: Distribution of average plaque CT attenuation in each tertile. B: A comparison of non-stenotic intracoronary CT attenuation. C, D: A comparison of the percentage lipid area (C) and fibrous area (D). *Box and whiskers plot showing the range and quartiles. CT: computed tomography, IB-IVUS: integrated backscatter-intravascular ultrasound
Clinical Presentation and Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis According to Tertile of Average CT Value.
| Tertile 1 (n=13) | Tertile 2 (n=13) | Tertile 3 (n=13) | p value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Target lesion responsible for unstable clinical presentation | 7 (54%) | 4 (31%) | 2 (15%) | 0.14 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| EEM CSA, mm2 | 10.8 [9.4, 17.1] | 12.5 [11.6, 13.0] | 11.9 [8.3, 18.7] | 0.80 | ||||
| Lumen CSA, mm2 | 2.0 [1.8, 2.7] | 2.4 [2.1, 3.2] | 1.9 [1.8, 2.2] | 0.18 | ||||
| Plaque & media CSA, mm2 | 8.8 [6.6, 14.7] | 9.4 [8.4, 10.9] | 9.9 [6.2, 16.4] | 0.92 | ||||
| %Plaque burden, % | 81.3 [74.5, 85.8] | 82.6 [74.1, 84.3] | 83.7 [75.1, 87.7] | 0.61 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Plaque attenuation, % | 10 (77%) | 6 (46%) | 1 (8%) | <0.01 | ||||
| Attenuation arc, degree | 149 [110, 211] | 86 [0, 172] | 0 [0, 0] | <0.01 | ||||
| Positive remodeling, % | 5 (38%) | 4 (31%) | 2 (15%) | 0.55 | ||||
| Spotty calcification, % | 5 (38%) | 3 (23%) | 2 (15%) | 0.54 |
Values are expressed as median [IQR] or percentage (number of observations/total number of lesions). CSA: cross-sectional area, CT: computed tomography, EEM: external elastic membrane, MLA: minimum lumen area
Figure 4.Frequency of high-risk plaque defined by (A) grayscale and (B) IB-IVUS according to the tertile of average plaque CT attenuation. CT: computed tomography, IB-IVUS: integrated backscatter-intravascular ultrasound