| Literature DB >> 34852815 |
Tao Yuan1,2, Weigang Zhao3,4, Shixuan Liu5, Shuoning Song5, Shi Chen5, Linjie Wang5, Yong Fu5, Yingyue Dong5, Yan Tang6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and islet β-cell function in patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS) and hyperglycemia.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic therapy; Insulin resistance; Klinefelter syndrome
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34852815 PMCID: PMC8638221 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-021-00893-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 2.763
Clinical data of patients with Klinefelter Syndrome in PUMCH center
| Characteristics | KS ( | THG-KS ( | NGT-KS ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 18.6 ± 5.4 | 19.6 ± 6.9 | 17.5 ± 2.7 |
| Height (cm) | 176.9 ± 11.4 | 180.7 ± 11.4 | 172.5 ± 9.5 |
| Body weight (kg) | 72.2 ± 19.8 | 76.2 ± 19.3 | 67.6 ± 19.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.76 ± 4.48 | 23.00 ± 3.77 | 22.49 ± 5.17 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 128.9 ± 22.4 | 144.7 ± 22.45 | 115.1 ± 13.3 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 78.5 ± 20.0 | 89.9 ± 21.7 | 68.5 ± 11.1 |
| Testes size (ml) | 2.9 ± 1.6 | 1.5 ± 1.5 | 2.4 ± 1.5 |
| T (ng/ml) | 1.84 ± 1.22 | 2.24 ± 1.52 | 1.43 ± 0.57 |
| FSH (IU/L) | 25.88 ± 16.84 | 23.30 ± 12.13 | 29.32 ± 25.71 |
| LH (IU/L) | 29.23 ± 19.72 | 30.37 ± 13.48 | 27.72 ± 25.71 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.95 ± 2.00 | 5.39 ± 2.30 | 4.34 ± 1.22 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.22 ± 1.26 | 2.57 ± 1.41 | 1.73 ± 0.77 |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | 2.79 ± 1.09 | 2.94 ± 1.27 | 2.61 ± 0.79 |
| HDL-c (mmol/L) | 1.02 ± 0.21 | 1.05 ± 0.22 | 0.99 ± 0.19 |
| Clinical features | |||
| Decreased testosterone levels | 14/14 (100.0%) | 7/7 (100.0%) | 7/7 (100.0%) |
| Increased gonadotropin levels | 11/13 (84.6%) | 4/6 (66.7%) | 7/7 (100.0%) |
| Infertility | 4, others were not considering fertility when collecting the data | 4 | 0 |
| Small testicles (adults) | 4/7 (57.1%) | 1/3 (33.3%) | 3/4 (75.0%) |
| Decreased pubic hair (adults) | 7/8 (87.5%) | 3/4 (75.0%) | 4/4 (100.0%) |
| Gynecomastia | 5/11 (45.5%) | 3/7 (75.0%) | 2/4 (50.0%) |
| Behavioral and intelligence problems | 2/13 (15.4%) | 1/8 (12.5%) | 1/5 (20.0%) |
| Delayed secondary sexual characteristics | 10/13 (76.9%) | 4/7 (57.1%) | 6/6 (100.0%) |
| Cryptorchidism | 4/12 (33.3%) | 1/7 (14.3%) | 3/5 (60.0%) |
| Obesity | 4/13 (30.8%) | 1/7 (14.3%) | 3/6 (50.0%) |
| Hypertension | 5/17 (29.4%) | 4/7 (57.1%) | 1/8 (12.5%) |
| Dyslipidemia | 8/12 (66.7%) | 6/7 (85.7%) | 2/5 (40.0%) |
| Kayotype | 10/10 (100%) 47 XXY | ||
| Insulin resistance | 8/17 (47.1%) | ||
Abbreviations: PUMCH Peking Union Medical College Hospital; BMI body mass index; SBP systolic blood pressure; DBP diastolic blood pressure; T testosterone; FSH follicle stimulating hormone; LH luteinizing hormone. TC total cholesterol; TG triglyceride; LDL-c low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Insulin resistance was defined as HOMA ≥2.5. HOMA was calculated as a measure of insulin resistance as follows: [fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) × fasting insulin (μIU/mL)]/22.5
Characteristics of patients of hyperglycemia with or without KS and normal glucose tolerance subjects
| HG-KS ( | HG ( | NGT ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HG-KS vs HG | HG-KS vs NGT | ||||
| Age (y) | 16.2 ± 3.3 | 41.2 ± 2.1 | 34.0 ± 6.2 | 0.008* | 0.009* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.68 ± 2.97 | 24.82 ± 2.00 | 22.08 ± 2.50 | 0.600 | 0.754 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.90 ± 2.04 | 7.54 ± 3.21 | 5.22 ± 0.37 | 0.251 | 0.754 |
| FINS (μIU/ml) | 29.22 ± 26.00 | 12.66 ± 7.01 | 8.89 ± 2.62 | 0.076 | 0.009* |
| HOMA-IR | 7.47 ± 7.05 | 5.22 ± 5.47 | 2.10 ± 0.75 | 0.175 | 0.032* |
| HOMA-β | 346.24 ± 202.59 | 76.64 ± 28.69 | 103.56 ± 20.07 | 0.047* | 0.047* |
| ISImatsuda | 35.98 ± 13.87 | 61.17 ± 23.05 | 88.29 ± 29.67 | 0.076 | 0.009* |
| QUICKI | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.175 | 0.028* |
| IAI | 0.01 ± 0.005 | 0.02 ± 0.008 | 0.02 ± 0.008 | 0.175 | 0.028* |
| AUCIns | 423.89 ± 254.66 | 146.06 ± 62.23 | 179.62 ± 69.83 | 0.175 | 0.175 |
| AUCGlu/AUCIns | 0.17 ± 0.25 | 0.31 ± 0.17 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 0.117 | 0.175 |
Statistical difference is along the row and p<0.05 was considered significant
*represents significant difference between two groups
Abbreviations: KS Klinefelter syndrome, HG hyperglycemia, NGT normal glucose tolerance, BMI body mass index, FBG fasting blood glucose, FINS fasting serum insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-β homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function, ISI insulin sensitivity index proposed by Matsuda et al., QUICKI quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, IAI insulin action index, AUC area under curve of insulin, AUC/AUC ratio of area under curve of glucose and insulin
Fig. 1The increment curves of serum glucose (A) and insulin (B) during OGTT in HG-KS group, HG group and NGT group. Abbreviations: OGTT Oral glucose tolerance test, KS Klinefelter syndrome, HG hyperglycemia, NGT normal glucose tolerance, AUC area under curve, Glu glucose, Ins insulin
Fig. 2Boxplots of HOMA-IR (A), IAI (B), QUICKI (C), ISImatsuda (D) and HOMA-β (E) in HG-KS group, HG group and NGT group. * represented significant difference (p<0.05) between two groups. HOMA-IR (A) (p = 0.032) was significantly increased in HG-KS group compared to NGT group, IAI (B) (p = 0.028), QUICKI (C) (p = 0.028) and ISImatsuda (D) (p = 0.009) was significantly decreased in HG-KS group compared to NGT. HOMA-β (E) was significantly increased in HG-KS group compared to both HG (p = 0.030) and NGT (p = 0.044) groups. Abbreviations: KS Klinefelter syndrome, HG hyperglycemia, NGT normal glucose tolerance, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-β homeostasis model assessment of β -cell function, ISImatsuda insulin sensitivity index proposed by Matsuda et al., QUICKI quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, IAI insulin action index
Literature review of studies evaluating diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance in Klinefelter syndrome
| Author, year (ref.) | Number of patients | Age (year) | BMI (kg/m2) | DM (%) | IFG (%) | IR (%) | Diagnosed criteria of IR | Karyotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Han, 2016 [ | 376 | 32 | 24.7 ± 3.9 | 28 (12.8%) | 57 (26.0%) | – | – | 47 XXY, 354; 48 XXXY, 2; 48 XXYY, 1; 46 XY/47 XXY, 13; 47 XXY/ 48 XXXY/ 46 XY, 3; 47 XXY/46 XY/46 XX, 1; 47 XXY/48 XXXY, 1; 47 XX, inv. (Y), 1 |
| Yesilova, 2005 [ | 13 | 22 | 23.7 ± 4.9 | – | – | 38.5% | Glucose disposal rates < 4.53 mg/kg/min in hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp | All 47 XXY |
| Bojesen, 2006 [ | 70 (35 without TRT/35 with treatment) | 35/39 | 27.3/25.1 | 3 (8.5%)/4 (11.4%) | 6 (17.1%);7 (20.0%) | – | – | – |
| Falhammar, 2018 [ | 224 | 22 | 26.1 ± 5.3 | 9.10% | – | – | – | 47 XXY, 204; 47 XXY/46 XY, 6; 47 XXY/46 XX, 3; Others and unknown, 5; 46 XX testicular males, 6. |
| Ota, 2002 [ | 895 | 43 | 21.5 ± 4.44 | 61 (6.8%) | – | – | – | 47 XXY, 40; 46 XY/47 XXY, 9; 48 XXYY, 2; 47 XXY/48 XXXY/46 XY, 1; 47 XXY/46 XY/46 XX, 1; unknown, 8. |
Bardsley, 2011 [ | 89 Prepubertal Boys | 8 | – | 0 | 0 | 20 (24%) | HOMA ≥2.5 | 47 XXY, 84; 48 XXYY, 1; 47 XXY/46 XY, 2; 46 XX translocation, 1. |
| Jackson, 1966 [ | 8 | – | – | – | 1 (12.5%) | – | – | 47 XXY, 2; others unknown. |
| Becker, 1966 [ | 50 | 38 | – | 5 (10.0%) | – | – | – | – |
| Pasquali, 2013 [ | 69 | 31 | 27.5 | 3 | 16 | – | – | – |
| Nielsen, 1969 [ | 31 | – | – | 12 (39%); especially 47 XXY/46XY, 4; 47 XXY, 5; 48 XXXY, 3. | – | – | – | 47 XXY/46 XY, 4; 47 XXY, 24; 48 XXXY, 3. |
| Davis, 2016 [ | 96 Prepubertal Boys | – | – | 0 | 0 | 9 (33.3%), only 27 patients calculated for HOMA | HOMA ≥2.5 | 47 XXY, 88; 46 XY/47XXY, 2; 48 XXXY, 1; 48 XXYY, 1; 46 XX + SRYtrans, 1. |
| Davis, 2017 [ | 93 Prepubertal Boys | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | 47 XXY, 89; 46 XY/47 XXY, 2; 48 XXXY or 48 XXYY, 3. |
Abbreviations: TRT testosterone replacement therapy, T testosterone, FSH follicle stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, BMI body mass index, DM diabetes mellitus, IFG impaired fasting glucose, FBG fasting blood glucose, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c, HOMA homeostatic model assessment, IR insulin resistance. Continuous variables were expressed as mean or mean ± standard deviation (SD). HOMA was calculated as a measure of insulin resistance as follows: [fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) × fasting insulin (μIU/mL)]/22.5
Abnormalities associated with Klinefelter syndrome and hyperglycemia combined PUMCH center and previous case reports
| Characteristics | Patients ( |
|---|---|
| Age | 27.75 ± 11.8 |
| Clinical features | |
| Decreased testosterone levels | 16 out 16 (100.0%) |
| Increased gonadotropin levels | 15 out 16 (93.8%) |
| Infertility | 7 adults with recording |
| Small testicles (adults) | 10 out 12 (83.3%) |
| Decreased pubic hair (adults) | 8 out 9 (88.9%) |
| Gynecomastia | 4 out 14 (28.6%) |
| Behavioral and intelligence problems | 5 out 16 (31.3%) |
| Delayed secondary sexual characteristics | 7 out 11 (63.6%) |
| Cryptorchidism | 3 out 15 (20.0%) |
| Obesity | 9 out 18 (50.0%) |
| Hypertension | 8 out 15 (53.3%) |
| Hyperglycemia | 9 out 13 (69.2%) |
| Karyotype | 10 out 14 (71.4%), 47 XXY; 2/14 (14.3%), 46 XY/47 XXY; 2 out 14 (14.3%), 49 XXXXY |
| Prediabetes | 3 out 21 (14.3%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 18 out 21 (85.7%) |
| Insulin resistance parameters | 8 out 10 (80.0%) |
Abbreviations: PUMCH Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Insulin resistance was defined as HOMA≥2.5. HOMA was calculated as a measure of insulin resistance as follows: [fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) × fasting insulin (μIU/mL)]/22.5