| Literature DB >> 34851359 |
Philipp Ken Roberts1, Markus Schranz1, Alice Motschi2, Sylvia Desissaire2, Valentin Hacker1, Michael Pircher2, Stefan Sacu1, Wolf Buehl1, Christoph Konrad Hitzenberger2, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth1.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate morphologic and microvascular differences between eyes with and without subretinal fibrosis (SF) caused by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34851359 PMCID: PMC8648059 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.14.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Figure 1.Post processing steps for quantitative microvascular analysis using optical coherence tomography angiography. The initial choriocapillaris en face map (a) does not show a clear border between the MNV and the surrounding choriocapillaris network. An individualized slab was chosen for every MNV lesion (b) with the anterior border aligned with the anterior border of the MNV complex and the posterior border aligned with Bruch's membrane. After manual delineation (c) of the MNV complex and Angiotool analysis, the program displays the vessels (highlighted in red) and junctions (highlighted as blue dots) as an overlay (d).
Figure 2.Right eye of a patient with type 2 MNV and subretinal fibrosis. Color fundus photography (a), polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) en face intensity image with segmented subretinal fibrosis shown in blue (b), PS-OCT intensity B-scan with segmented retinal pigment epithelium in red (c), OCTA en face image showing the MNV complex (d) and OCTA B-scan with flow highlighted in red (e) are presented. The location of the en face images is highlighted by a white dotted square in (a) and the location of B-scans is highlighted by dotted white lines in (b) and (d). The yellow-whitish material in (a), clinically diagnosed as subretinal fibrosis, overlaps with the area of automatically segmented fibrosis in PS-OCT (b).
Characteristics of Study Participants and Macular Neovascularization Features
| Subretinal Fibrosis | No Subretinal | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Characteristics | (n = 20) | Fibrosis (n = 40) |
|
| Age (years), median (min-max) | 77.0 (62.2–87.3) | 77.5 (59.6–87.0) | 0.546 |
| BCVA (ETDRS-Score), median (min-max) | 39 (6–79) | 78 (25–90) | <0.001 |
| BCVA (LogMAR), median (min-max) | 0.9 (0.1–1.6) | 0.2 (−0.1–1.1) | <0.001 |
| Time since first injection (years), median (min-max) | 2.2 (1.0–10.8) | 1.4 (1.0–10.8) | 0.331 |
| Number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections median (min-max) | 12 (7–43) | 10 (3–46) | 0.368 |
| Gender (f) | 14 (70%) | 23 (58%) | 0.408 |
| Reticular pseudodrusen | 7 (35%) | 18 (45%) | 0.581 |
| Hyperreflective foci | 7 (35%) | 30 (75%) | 0.004 |
| Outer retinal tubulation | 17 (85%) | 4 (10%) | <0.001 |
| MNV types | |||
| Type 1 MNV | 5 (25%) | 29 (73%) | <0.001 |
| Type 2 MNV | 5 (25%) | 1 (3%) | 0.013 |
| RAP | 1 (5%) | 7 (18%) | 0.249 |
| PCV | 2 (10%) | 2 (5%) | 0.595 |
| Mixed (type 1+2) | 7 (35%) | 1 (3%) | 0.001 |
| Subretinal MNV component | 12 (60%) | 2 (5%) | <0.001 |
BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; LogMAR, logarithm of minimal angle of resolution; RAP, retinal angiomatous proliferation; PCV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.
Statistically significant P values.
Figure 3.Color fundus photographs (a,e), choriocapillaris en face OCTA slabs (b,f), manually delineated MNV complexes (c,g) and Angiotool analysis results (d, h) are displayed. The top row (a-d) shows a typical example of a MNV lesion without SF. The bottom row (e-h) shows a typical case of a MNV lesion with SF.
Quantitative Microvascular Parameters Assessed By Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
| No subretinal Fibrosis | Subretinal Fibrosis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative MNV Features | (n = 31) | (n = 19) |
|
| Greatest vascular caliber (µm), median (min-max) | 109 (30–229) | 161 (67–268) | 0.001 |
| Greatest linear diameter (µm), median (min-max) | 2366 (415–4190) | 3010 (1594–5518) | 0.042 |
| Lesion area (mm2) | 3.62 (0.10–9.80) | 4.89 (1.33–17.42) | 0.026 |
| Vessel area (mm2) | 1.57 (0.07–4.82) | 2.16 (0.87–7.35) | 0.037 |
| Vessels percentage area (%) | 48.90 (20.12–71.26) | 44.91 (31.72–65.05) | 0.250 |
| Number of junctions (n) | 156 (4–514) | 242 (74–866) | 0.025 |
| Total vessel length (mm) | 32.88 (1.23–94.11) | 43.83 (14.47–161.05) | 0.027 |
| Vessel length density (mm/mm2) | 19.36 (15.74–23.79) | 20.46 (16.68–21.99) | 0.242 |
| Total number of endpoints (n) | 51 (2–215) | 96 (9–370) | 0.007 |
| Mean lacunarity | 0.19 (0.11–0.54) | 0.15 (0.09–0.37) | 0.250 |
| Junction density (n/mm) | 4.98 (3.25–6.92) | 5.12 (3.91–6.33) | 0.332 |
| Endpoint density (n/mm) | 1.41 (0.66–3.27) | 1.76 (0.62–3.10) | 0.047 |
Independent samples Mann Whitney U test was used.
Significant P values.