Literature DB >> 34851089

Molecular Mechanism of the Cytosine CRISPR Base Editing Process and the Roles of Translesion DNA Polymerases.

Guo Jiang1,2, Jie Wang2,3, Dongdong Zhao2, Xuxu Chen1,4,5, Shiming Pu1, Chunzhi Zhang3, Ju Li6, Yaqiu Li2,7,8, Jie Yang2,7,8, Siwei Li2,7,8, Xiaoping Liao2,7,8, Hongwu Ma2,7,8, Yanhe Ma2,8, Zuping Zhou1, Changhao Bi2,7,8, Xueli Zhang2,7,8.   

Abstract

CRISPR-mediated base editing causes damage to DNA, mainly uracil, apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites, and nicks, which require various DNA repair mechanisms to complete the base conversion process. Currently, there are only hypotheses explaining the base editing process, but the molecular mechanism and roles of the repair systems in the process are relatively unknown. To explore the mechanism of base editing repair, a base editor, nCas9-PmCDA1, was applied in the model eukaryote, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, either with the wild type or its derivatives with genes encoding translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerases knocked out. We found that C-to-G and C-to-A conversions resulted mainly from the repair of AP sites created by Ung and required Polζ as an extender. Rev1 is the main TLS polymerase for specifically incorporating Cs on the opposite position of AP sites to cause the dominant C-to-G conversion, while Polδ incorporates Ts or As on the opposite of AP sites, resulting in C-to-A and C-to-T conversions. Polη is not involved in the repair of AP sites caused by the base editor. Furthermore, our data suggested that the indels of base editing are mainly caused by the breakage of AP sites. Different from the current hypothesis model of the base editing mechanism, this work first elucidates the key roles of TLS polymerases in the cytosine base editing process. This work also suggests a new direction for the development of genomic and base editing techniques by employing, manipulating, and engineering TLS polymerases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-to-A; C-to-G; base editing; translesion DNA synthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34851089     DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Synth Biol        ISSN: 2161-5063            Impact factor:   5.110


  3 in total

Review 1.  Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jacob S Antony; John M Hinz; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 2.  CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing: From Precise Point Mutation to Genome-Wide Engineering in Nonmodel Microbes.

Authors:  Mengyuan Li; Yi-Xin Huo; Shuyuan Guo
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09

3.  Pioneer Factor Improves CRISPR-Based C-To-G and C-To-T Base Editing.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Xingxiao Dong; Zhenzhen Ma; Bo Li; Changhao Bi; Xueli Zhang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 17.521

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.