| Literature DB >> 34850748 |
Dong-Won Seol1, Sang Hoon Joo2, Young-Hyun Kim3, Bong-Seok Song4, Bo-Woong Sim4, Sun-Uk Kim4, Soojin Park5, Gabbine Wee1, Ekyune Kim2.
Abstract
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored sperm hyaluronidases have long been believed to assist in sperm penetration through the cumulus-oocyte complex (COC); however, their role in mammalian fertilization remains unclear. Previously, we have shown that hyaluronidase 5 (Hyal5)/Hyal7 double-knockout (dKO) mice produce significantly fewer offspring than their wild-type (WT) counterparts because of defective COC dispersal. Male infertility is mainly caused by a low sperm count. It can be further exacerbated by the deficiency of sperm hyaluronidase, which disperses the cumulus cells of the outer layer of the COC. In the current study, we evaluated the effects of a low count of Hyal-deficient sperm and conditions of ovulated oocytes on the fertilization rate using a mouse model. Our results demonstrated that a low sperm count further decreases the in vitro fertilization (IVF) rate of Hyal-deficient dKO spermatozoa. In addition, the dKO spermatozoa resulted in a fertilization rate of 12.5% upon fertilizing COCs with a thick cumulus layer, whereas the IVF rate was comparable to that of WT spermatozoa when oocytes with a thin or no cumulus layer were fertilized. Finally, we proved that the IVF rate of dKO spermatozoa could be recovered by adding rat spermatozoa as a source of sperm hyal. Our results suggest that a deficiency of proteins involved in fertilization, such as sperm hyal, has a vital role in fertilization.Entities:
Keywords: HYAL5; HYAL7; cumulus–oocyte complex; fertilization; infertility; sperm hyaluronidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34850748 PMCID: PMC9295470 DOI: 10.4103/aja202176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Androl ISSN: 1008-682X Impact factor: 3.054
Fertility rate by sperm concentration
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 1×106† | 74.4±3.43 (38/52)* | 13.7±2.64 (8/64) |
| 1×105† | 45.6±1.60 (32/70)* | 6.5±0.98 (4/65) |
| 1×104† | 26.5±3.85 (15/59)* | 3.0±1.50 (2/61) |
†Within the same low, *Significantly different at P<0.05. Data are shown as mean (%)±SEM of three replications. SEM: standard error of mean; dKO: double-knockout
Fertility rate by cumulus–oocyte complex type
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| I† | 68.7±2.04 (23/34)* | 12.5±6.57 (4/28) |
| II† | 72.2±14.70 (21/29)* | 19.8±3.10 (6/30) |
| III† | 71.0±0.48 (22/31) | 63.1±8.06 (18/28) |
| IV† | 73.5±1.47 (24/33) | 67.9±8.54 (21/31) |
†Within the same low, *Significantly different at P<0.05. Data are shown as mean (%)±SEM of three replications. SEM: standard error of mean; dKO: double-knockout; COC: cumulus–oocyte complex
Fertility rate by sperm type
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 69.4±1.41 (29/42)d | 15.2±1.33 (9/60)b | 42.8±3.62 (20/46)c | 3.1±1.55 (2/49)a |
The different letters indicate P<0.05. Data are shown as mean (%)±SEM of three replications. SEM: standard error of mean; dKO: double-knockout
Heterozygous rate of double-knockout sperm mixed with wild-type sperm
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| 1:1 (1 × 105:1 × 105) | 19 | 11 | 0 (0) | 11 (100.0) |
| 1:2 (1 × 105:2 × 105) | 18 | 12 | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) |
| 1:3 (1 × 105:3 × 105) | 21 | 11 | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) |
| 1:10 (1 × 105:1 × 106) | 21 | 12 | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) |
dKO: double-knockout; WT: wild-type