| Literature DB >> 34850356 |
Paul J Mann1, Jens Strauss2, Juri Palmtag3, Kelsey Dowdy4, Olga Ogneva5, Matthias Fuchs2, Michael Bedington6, Ricardo Torres6, Luca Polimene6, Paul Overduin2, Gesine Mollenhauer5, Guido Grosse2,7, Volker Rachold2, William V Sobczak8, Robert G M Spencer9, Bennet Juhls2.
Abstract
Arctic warming is causing ancient perennially frozen ground (permafrost) to thaw, resulting in ground collapse, and reshaping of landscapes. This threatens Arctic peoples' infrastructure, cultural sites, and land-based natural resources. Terrestrial permafrost thaw and ongoing intensification of hydrological cycles also enhance the amount and alter the type of organic carbon (OC) delivered from land to Arctic nearshore environments. These changes may affect coastal processes, food web dynamics and marine resources on which many traditional ways of life rely. Here, we examine how future projected increases in runoff and permafrost thaw from two permafrost-dominated Siberian watersheds-the Kolyma and Lena, may alter carbon turnover rates and OC distributions through river networks. We demonstrate that the unique composition of terrestrial permafrost-derived OC can cause significant increases to aquatic carbon degradation rates (20 to 60% faster rates with 1% permafrost OC). We compile results on aquatic OC degradation and examine how strengthening Arctic hydrological cycles may increase the connectivity between terrestrial landscapes and receiving nearshore ecosystems, with potential ramifications for coastal carbon budgets and ecosystem structure. To address the future challenges Arctic coastal communities will face, we argue that it will become essential to consider how nearshore ecosystems will respond to changing coastal inputs and identify how these may affect the resiliency and availability of essential food resources.Entities:
Keywords: Arctic rivers; Carbon cycle; Carbon fluxes; Erosion
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34850356 PMCID: PMC8692538 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01666-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ambio ISSN: 0044-7447 Impact factor: 5.129
Fig. 1Future response of nearshore environments to climate change, and potential impacts to ecosystem processes and coastal biogeochemistry. Terrestrial permafrost thaw causes landscape collapse and changing resources, affecting terrestrial infrastructure (drawn as house and pipeline) and distributions of food and traditional lands (represented by reindeer on land). Permafrost thaw on land can affect terrestrial gas fluxes, or be mobilised into freshwaters, affecting OC reactivity and carbon budgets from the river, delta or gulf regions (input/output arrows). Changing terrestrial OC supply (black arrows) may influence nearshore carbon, nutrient budgets, and food web dynamics, altering air-sea gas fluxes (coastal inputs/outputs/processes) or essential coastal food resources (represented as fish/whale). Drawn by Yves Nowak (AWI)
Fig. 2Permafrost (after Obu et al. 2019) and Yedoma permafrost (Strauss et al. 2021a, b) distribution (map) with two sites of rapidly eroding cliffs as examples. Site 1: Mamontovy Khayata cliff on the Bykovsky Peninsula near the coast of the Lena Delta (credit: P.P. Overduin) and, Site 2: the Duvanny Yar exposure (site 2) on the Kolyma river (credit: A. Stubbins). Freshwater discharge measurement stations at Kusur (Lena) and Kolymskoye (Kolyma) are shown (orange dots). Drawn by S. Laboor
First-order OC degradation rates (day−1) and OC lifetimes for each fraction determined in our experiments (Rapid OC) and in previous literature (Slow OC)
| OC degradation rate (day−1) | OC lifetime (year−1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid OC fraction ( | ||
| Mean | 0.0139 | 0.20 |
| Median | 0.0095 | 0.29 |
| Stdev | 0.0152 | 0.18 |
| Min | 0.0022 | 1.25 |
| Max | 0.0632 | 0.04 |
| Slow OC fraction ( | ||
| Mean | 0.0029 | 0.95 |
| Median | 0.0024 | 1.14 |
| Stdev | 0.0021 | 1.34 |
| Min | 0.0013 | 2.11 |
| Max | 0.0098 | 0.04 |
Fig. 3Upper panel: Hydrograph of a Kolyma River for all years from 1927 to 2020 and b Lena River from 1936 to 2020. Lower panel: Observed and projected freshwater discharge (km3 year−1) for c the Kolyma and, d Lena Rivers. Blue line on each plot represents the decadal running mean and filled blue colour the second standard deviation of the observed discharge. Red dashed lines show different projection scenarios to 2100 against the baseline period from 1971 to 2000 (black line). Filled red colour indicates the observed second standard deviation applied on chosen minimum and maximum projection scenarios
Fig. 4OC degradation rates in carbon-normalised Kolyma River waters with increasing percent permafrost-derived OC contributions. Fast and slow rates relate to OC losses measured over 14 and 28-day incubation periods, respectively. 0% permafrost input (= 100% Kolyma) represents contemporary mainstem waters, whereas 100% permafrost are permafrost and thaw stream derived waters. OC degradation rates have been normalised to September Kolyma mainstem in situ water temperature of 7.3 °C
OC degradation rates in experimental incubations of waters with up to 25% permafrost-thaw OC. Rapid OC fraction determined using oxygen loss measurements over 5-days. Fast and Slow OC pools are determined via dissolved OC loss over 14 or 28-days, respectively. All degradation rates were normalised to 15 °C, enabling comparison between experiments
| Permafrost OC (%) | OC biodegradation rate (day−1) | OC lifetime (year−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid OC pool | ||
| 0 | 0.0093 ± 0.0008 | 0.30 ± 0.02 |
| 1 | 0.0223 ± 0.0010 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| 10 | 0.1029 ± 0.0056 | 0.03 ± 0.001 |
| Fast OC pool | ||
| 0 | 0.0091 ± 0.0010 | 0.31 ± 0.03 |
| 0.5 | 0.0103 ± 0.0003 | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
| 1 | 0.0112 ± 0.0007 | 0.25 ± 0.02 |
| 10 | 0.0163 ± 0.0047 | 0.18 ± 0.06 |
| 25 | 0.0239 ± 0.0020 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| Slow OC pool | ||
| 0 | 0.0046 ± 0.0005 | 0.60 ± 0.06 |
| 0.5 | 0.0056 ± 0.0008 | 0.50 ± 0.08 |
| 1 | 0.0058 ± 0.0007 | 0.48 ± 0.06 |
| 10 | 0.0093 ± 0.0025 | 0.31 ± 0.09 |
| 25 | 0.0132 ± 0.0004 | 0.21 ± 0.01 |
Fig. 5OC degradation rates in Kolyma River waters a calculated across all permafrost addition experiments with contributions up to and including 25% permafrost contributions (n = 55; normalised to 15 °C), and b determined in unamended waters and plotted on a log scale against river discharge. All rates have been corrected to in-situ temperature on sample date and discharge normalised to site location. All linear relationships shown are significant (R2 > 0.8, p < 0.0001). Full detail on linear regression fits provided in Table S4)
Fig. 6Observed and projected OC degradation rates (day−1) calculated using Eq. 2 for: a the Kolyma River and, b Lena River. OC degradation rates for the Lena River are scaled by calculating a scale factor (0.164) correcting for relative differences in discharge