Sarah A Ibrahim1, Bianca Y Kang1, Emily Poon1, Murad Alam2,3,4,5. 1. Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. m-alam@northwestern.edu. 3. Department of Otolaryngology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. m-alam@northwestern.edu. 4. Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. m-alam@northwestern.edu. 5. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. m-alam@northwestern.edu.
Dear Editor:Clinical laser treatments are now so routine that it is only to be expected that some degree of standardization would emerge. A particular type of standard increasingly evident in clinical laser care is the clinical practice guideline. [1-3] Clinical practice guidelines are based on literature and expert opinion.[4-8] The purpose of such guidelines is to identify clinical questions that are important to patients and practitioners and then seek to provide relevant recommendations. These recommendations, which often pertain to the treatment of a particular disease or condition, help to guide physicians in developing treatment plans for individual patients while considering the amount of evidence supporting each clinical decision.While guidelines may be relatively concise, the developmental process that births them can be long and arduous. Indeed, there are guidelines for guideline development, notably Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) and Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE II).[9, 10] The first step is to constitute a group of experts, most of whom should not have relevant conflicts of interest. Before research can get underway, the guidelines group must identify important clinical questions that bear investigation. Solicitation of such questions may lead to the creation of a long list, which may be culled. Questions that remain are then formally investigated via a comprehensive literature search and, often, meta-analysis. Evidence is reviewed by groups of experts, who consider it in the context of their experience and other unpublished information. One or more recommendations may be offered pertaining to each question posed, with some such being weak or strong, depending on the underlying evidence. In some cases, the sum of evidence and expert opinion may not permit even a weak recommendation. Even when recommendations are provided, caveats and exceptions are typically discussed, as is the need to consider patient-specific factors. Blind adherence to clinical recommendations is neither expected nor appropriate.For clinical laser treatment, many sets of guidelines are available. Some are from professional societies, some from collaborations among such societies, and some from groups specially constituted to create guidelines. In response to the COVID-19 crisis, living guidelines have also been developed in record time. As the clinical laser community is of modest size, guidelines may even be international in scope when addressing very specific issues or treatment types.Though available, guidelines may not necessarily be routinely implemented into clinical practice. This may be particularly true in the case of laser and energy-based treatments, since patients often pay out of pocket for procedures with these devices. As a result, providers are not required to adhere to standards set forth by government or private insurance. Still, guidelines can help to facilitate care and foster the patient-physician relationship. By providing a concise summary of both expert opinion and literature review, guidelines are an efficient source of information. This information—which often includes specific recommendations for treatment protocols and patient selection, as well as details about expected outcomes, and management and prevention of adverse events—may help to guide the physician in clinical decision-making and also form the basis of conversation with patients.In summary, the purpose of guidelines is not to appropriate physician autonomy but rather to help patients and physicians benefit from accumulated wisdom. On the one hand, guidelines are derived from high level evidence carefully sifted by experts. However, much remains unknown, especially in rapidly advancing fields like laser medicine and surgery, and physicians must continue to exercise good judgment.[11] Even when guidance is available, it may not apply to patients with unusual presentations. It remains the physician’s purview to incorporate guideline recommendations when and if they are appropriate.
Authors: Joshua L Owen; Nour Kibbi; Brandon Worley; Ryan C Kelm; Jordan V Wang; Christopher A Barker; Ramona Behshad; Christopher K Bichakjian; Diana Bolotin; Jeremy S Bordeaux; Scott H Bradshaw; Todd V Cartee; Sunandana Chandra; Nancy L Cho; Jennifer N Choi; M Laurin Council; Hakan Demirci; Daniel B Eisen; Bita Esmaeli; Nicholas Golda; Conway C Huang; Sherrif F Ibrahim; S Brian Jiang; John Kim; Timothy M Kuzel; Stephen Y Lai; Naomi Lawrence; Erica H Lee; Justin J Leitenberger; Ian A Maher; Margaret W Mann; Kira Minkis; Bharat B Mittal; Kishwer S Nehal; Isaac M Neuhaus; David M Ozog; Brian Petersen; Veronica Rotemberg; Sandeep Samant; Faramarz H Samie; Sabah Servaes; Carol L Shields; Thuzar M Shin; Joseph F Sobanko; Ally-Khan Somani; William G Stebbins; J Regan Thomas; Valencia D Thomas; David T Tse; Abigail H Waldman; Michael K Wong; Y Gloria Xu; Siegrid S Yu; Nathalie C Zeitouni; Timothy Ramsay; Kelly A Reynolds; Emily Poon; Murad Alam Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Meghan Seago; Peter R Shumaker; Leah K Spring; Murad Alam; Firas Al-Niaimi; R Rox Anderson; Ofir Artzi; Ardeshir Bayat; Daniel Cassuto; Henry Hl Chan; Christine Dierickx; Matthias Donelan; Gerd G Gauglitz; Boncheol Leo Goo; Greg J Goodman; Geoffrey Gurtner; Merete Haedersdal; Andrew C Krakowski; Woraphong Manuskiatti; William B Norbury; Rei Ogawa; David M Ozog; Uwe Paasch; E Victor Ross; Matteo Tretti Clementoni; Jill Waibel Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Wiebke Hoffmann-Eßer; Ulrich Siering; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Anne Catharina Brockhaus; Ulrike Lampert; Michaela Eikermann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 3.240