Literature DB >> 34849984

Effects of restricting energy during the gilt development period on growth and reproduction of lines differing in lean growth rate: responses in reproductive performance and longevity.

Rodger K Johnson1, Melanie D Trenhaile-Grannemann1, Roman Moreno1, Daniel C Ciobanu1, Phillip S Miller1.   

Abstract

Longevity and reproductive performance are economically important traits in the swine industry that are largely influenced by nutrition and other environmental factors. Reproductive performance and longevity through 4 parities was assessed in gilts of 2 genetic lines developed on ad libitum access to feed or restricted to 75% of ad libitum intake. A total of 661 gilts were used in a 2 × 2 factorial with half of the gilts allocated to an ad libitum diet (AL; n = 330), while the other half were energy restricted by 25% (R; n = 331) from 123 to 235 d of age. All gilts were sired by an industry maternal line. Dams of the gilts were from either a Large White (W) by Landrace (L) industry maternal line or Nebraska Selection Line 45X, producing gilts designated as W × L (n = 355) and L45X (n = 306), respectively. Daily estrus detection began at 140 d of age to obtain age at puberty (AP). Gilts (n = 510) were mated on their second or later estrus, beginning at 240 d of age. Sow weight and backfat were recorded at 110 d of gestation and weaning of each parity. Number of live-born, stillborn, and mummified pigs per litter and piglet birth and weaning weights were recorded through 4 parities. More L45X than W × L and more AL than R gilts reached puberty by 230 d of age (P < 0.01). Dietary treatment did not affect probability to produce parities 1 to 4 or any litter trait analyzed. The L45X females tended to be more likely to produce parities 1 (P < 0.08) and 3 (P < 0.06), while W × L had heavier litters at birth (P < 0.01) and weaning (P = 0.01). Treatment by parity interactions (P < 0.01) existed for weight and backfat prior to farrowing and backfat at weaning, and weight at weaning exhibited a line by treatment by parity interaction (P = 0.04) as R sows had lower weights and backfats in earlier parities, but caught up to AL sows in later parities. A treatment by parity interaction (P < 0.01) was also present for backfat loss from farrowing to weaning as R gilts lost less backfat than AL in parities 1 and 2, but more in parities 3 and 4. No significant differences were detected between lines or treatments for lifetime production traits. The populations of pigs and data presented here provide a framework for a diverse array of further studies. Alternative approaches to restrict energy have been assessed in addition to methods of marker-assisted and genomic selection for improvement of litter size and sow longevity.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  energy restriction; longevity; pig; reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34849984      PMCID: PMC8722756          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  23 in total

1.  Effect of prepubertal feeding regimen on reproductive development and performance of gilts through the first pregnancy.

Authors:  J Klindt; J T Yen; R K Christenson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Level of dietary energy during prepubertal growth and reproductive development of gilts.

Authors:  J Klindt; J T Yen; R K Christenson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size.

Authors:  R K Johnson; M K Nielsen; D S Casey
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Bioeconomic evaluation of sow longevity and profitability.

Authors:  S L Rodriguez-Zas; B R Southey; R V Knox; J F Connor; J F Lowe; B J Roskamp
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Having it all: historical energy intakes do not generate the anticipated trade-offs in fecundity.

Authors:  S L Johnston; T Grune; L M Bell; S J Murray; D M Souter; S S Erwin; J M Yearsley; I J Gordon; A W Illius; I Kyriazakis; J R Speakman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Genome-wide prediction of age at puberty and reproductive longevity in sows.

Authors:  J K Tart; R K Johnson; J W Bundy; N N Ferdinand; A M McKnite; J R Wood; P S Miller; M F Rothschild; M L Spangler; D J Garrick; S D Kachman; D C Ciobanu
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Analysis of 28 generations of selection for reproduction, growth, and carcass traits in swine.

Authors:  W L Hsu; R K Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms linking calorie restriction and longevity.

Authors:  B J Merry
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.085

9.  Life-long moderate caloric restriction prolongs reproductive life span in rats without interrupting estrous cyclicity: effects on the gonadotropin-releasing hormone/luteinizing hormone axis.

Authors:  T M McShane; P M Wise
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.

Authors:  S J Moeller; R N Goodwin; R K Johnson; J W Mabry; T J Baas; O W Robison
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gilt development to improve offspring performance and survivability.

Authors:  Jamil E G Faccin; Mike D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Joel M DeRouchey; Jason C Woodworth; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.