Literature DB >> 34849626

Striatal BOLD and Midfrontal Theta Power Express Motivation for Action.

Johannes Algermissen1, Jennifer C Swart1, René Scheeringa1,2, Roshan Cools1,3, Hanneke E M den Ouden1.   

Abstract

Action selection is biased by the valence of anticipated outcomes. To assess mechanisms by which these motivational biases are expressed and controlled, we measured simultaneous EEG-fMRI during a motivational Go/NoGo learning task (N = 36), leveraging the temporal resolution of EEG and subcortical access of fMRI. VmPFC BOLD encoded cue valence, importantly predicting trial-by-trial valence-driven response speed differences and EEG theta power around cue onset. In contrast, striatal BOLD encoded selection of active Go responses and correlated with theta power around response time. Within trials, theta power ramped in the fashion of an evidence accumulation signal for the value of making a "Go" response, capturing the faster responding to reward cues. Our findings reveal a dual nature of midfrontal theta power, with early components reflecting the vmPFC contribution to motivational biases, and late components reflecting their striatal translation into behavior, in line with influential recent "value of work" theories of striatal processing.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motivational biases; simultaneous EEG-fMRI; striatum; theta

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34849626      PMCID: PMC9290551          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   4.861


  95 in total

1.  6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens, but not of the caudate nucleus, attenuate enhanced responding with reward-related stimuli produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine.

Authors:  J R Taylor; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Closed-Loop Theta Stimulation in the Orbitofrontal Cortex Prevents Reward-Based Learning.

Authors:  Eric B Knudsen; Joni D Wallis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer effects in the nucleus accumbens relate to relapse in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Maria Garbusow; Daniel J Schad; Miriam Sebold; Eva Friedel; Nadine Bernhardt; Stefan P Koch; Bruno Steinacher; Norbert Kathmann; Dirk E M Geurts; Christian Sommer; Dirk K Müller; Stephan Nebe; Sören Paul; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Ulrich S Zimmermann; Henrik Walter; Michael N Smolka; Philipp Sterzer; Michael A Rapp; Quentin J M Huys; Florian Schlagenhauf; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  Spurious correlations in simultaneous EEG-fMRI driven by in-scanner movement.

Authors:  M-C Fellner; G Volberg; K J Mullinger; M Goldhacker; M Wimber; M W Greenlee; S Hanslmayr
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Internal and external influences on the rate of sensory evidence accumulation in the human brain.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Intermittent Absence of Control during Reinforcement Learning Interferes with Pavlovian Bias in Action Selection.

Authors:  Gábor Csifcsák; Eirik Melsæter; Matthias Mittner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Neural prediction errors reveal a risk-sensitive reinforcement-learning process in the human brain.

Authors:  Yael Niv; Jeffrey A Edlund; Peter Dayan; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jill X O'Reilly; Mark W Woolrich; Timothy E J Behrens; Stephen M Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Neural Correlates of Decision Thresholds in the Human Subthalamic Nucleus.

Authors:  Damian M Herz; Baltazar A Zavala; Rafal Bogacz; Peter Brown
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Dissociable dopamine dynamics for learning and motivation.

Authors:  Ali Mohebi; Jeffrey R Pettibone; Arif A Hamid; Jenny-Marie T Wong; Leah T Vinson; Tommaso Patriarchi; Lin Tian; Robert T Kennedy; Joshua D Berke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cortical dopamine reduces the impact of motivational biases governing automated behaviour.

Authors:  Samuel R Chamberlain; Hanneke E M den Ouden; Vanessa Scholz; Roxanne W Hook; Mojtaba Rostami Kandroodi; Johannes Algermissen; Konstantinos Ioannidis; David Christmas; Stephanie Valle; Trevor W Robbins; Jon E Grant
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 8.294

2.  Comparing Discounting of Potentially Real Rewards and Losses by Means of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Mathieu Pinger; Janine Thome; Patrick Halli; Wolfgang H Sommer; Georgia Koppe; Peter Kirsch
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.