Literature DB >> 34849445

Association of 17q22 Amplicon Via Cell-Free DNA With Platinum Chemotherapy Response in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Katharine A Collier1, Sarah Asad2, David Tallman2, Janet Jenison2, Andrei Rajkovic3, Elaine R Mardis3, Heather A Parsons4, Sara M Tolaney4, Eric P Winer4, Nancy U Lin4, Gavin Ha5, Viktor A Adalsteinsson6, Daniel G Stover1,2,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether specific somatic copy-number alterations detectable in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) are associated with sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this secondary analysis of a large cohort of patients with mTNBC whose ctDNA underwent ultralow-pass whole-genome sequencing, tumor fraction and somatic copy-number alterations were derived with the ichorCNA algorithm. Seventy-two patients were identified who had received a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting. Gene-level copy-number analyses were performed with GISTIC2.0. Cytobands were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) to platinum chemotherapy using Cox proportional hazards models. The Cancer Genome Atlas and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium data sets were interrogated for frequency of significant cytobands in primary triple-negative breast cancer (pTNBC) tumors.
RESULTS: Among 71 evaluable patients, 17q21 and 17q22 amplifications were most strongly associated with improved PFS with platinum chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic features or (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with 17q22 amplification. Patients with 17q22 amplification (n = 17) had longer median PFS with platinum (7.0 v 3.8 months; log-rank P = .015) than patients without 17q22 amplification (n = 54), an effect that remained significant in multivariable analyses (PFS hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.84; P = .02). Among 39 patients who received the nonplatinum chemotherapy agent capecitabine, there was no association between 17q22 amplification and capecitabine PFS (log-rank P = .69). In The Cancer Genome Atlas and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium, 17q22 amplification occurred in more than 20% of both pTNBC and mTNBC tumors, whereas 17q21 was more frequently amplified in mTNBC relative to pTNBC (16% v 8.1%, P = .015).
CONCLUSION: The 17q22 amplicon, detected by ctDNA, is associated with improved PFS with platinum chemotherapy in patients with mTNBC and warrants further investigation.
© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34849445      PMCID: PMC8624042          DOI: 10.1200/PO.21.00104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol        ISSN: 2473-4284


INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined by the absence of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein, makes up 10%-15% of all breast cancers, yet disproportionately accounts for more than one third of breast cancer–related deaths.[1-3] TNBC is characterized by genomic instability, frequent loss of TP53, and widespread somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs).[2,4] Metastatic TNBCs (mTNBCs) shed high amounts of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) relative to other tumors, allowing for minimally invasive genomic profiling.[5-7] We previously published the largest genomic characterization to date of mTNBCs (n = 164) via low-coverage (0.1×) whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of ctDNA. Using our published ichorCNA algorithm, we evaluated the fraction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in circulation attributable to the tumor, or tumor fraction (TFx), and SCNAs.[5,7] We demonstrated that copy number is highly concordant between ctDNA and metastatic tissue biopsies, compared the copy-number landscape of mTNBC relative to primary TNBC (pTNBC) tumors, and found a significant association of TFx with metastatic survival, independent of clinicopathologic features.[7] We previously investigated the association of SCNAs with survival, and amplification of 17q21 was among the five regions most strongly associated with improved survival in mTNBC,[7] with amplification of 17q22 and 17q23 also associated with improved survival. However, the association of specific SCNAs with response to defined treatment regimens has not previously been investigated in mTNBC to our knowledge.

CONTEXT

Key Objective Is there a somatic copy-number alteration detectable in circulating tumor DNA from patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer that is associated with response to platinum chemotherapy? Knowledge Generated Among 71 patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, amplifications on chromosome 17 at 17q21 and 17q22 were most strongly associated with longer progression-free survival with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. This remained significant in a multivariable model when accounting for BRCA1/2 mutation status, percent of genome altered, line of platinum therapy, and bone-only metastases, among other covariates. Relevance Detection of 17q22 amplification on ultralow-pass whole-genome sequencing of circulating tumor DNA is a potential noninvasive biomarker to select for patients who will benefit from platinum chemotherapy. Further investigation and validation is warranted. There is a lack of predictive biomarkers in mTNBC, where the treatment paradigm primarily involves the use of sequential single-agent chemotherapy, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The only widely adopted predictive biomarkers in clinical practice are programmed death-ligand 1 expression in tissue to predict benefit from treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus atezolizumab[8] and germline BRCA1/2 mutations to predict benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.[9-11] A predictive biomarker of response to a particular chemotherapy regimen would allow a more refined precision oncology approach. In particular, the role of platinum chemotherapy remains a critical outstanding question in the clinical management of both early-stage and advanced TNBC. In early-stage TNBC, multiple trials of platinum-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens have shown higher pathologic complete response rates with a possible disease free survival benefit, but at the cost of higher toxicity with no evidence for overall survival benefit.[12-18] In the metastatic setting, platinum chemotherapy is active in an unselected patient population with mTNBC, but patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations particularly benefit.[19,20] An inclusive predictive biomarker of response to platinum chemotherapy in either the neoadjuvant or metastatic setting would be valuable to ensure that all patients who would benefit receive platinum chemotherapy. Here, we report a secondary analysis of SCNAs in ctDNA from a cohort of patients with mTNBC to identify chromosomal cytobands associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) with platinum-based chemotherapy to identify a novel, minimally invasive biomarker for sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy. We further characterize the frequency of the significant cytoband amplifications in breast cancer in publicly available data sets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cohort Identification

Patients with metastatic biopsy-proven TNBC enrolled on clinical data and biospecimen banking protocols for metastatic breast cancer were identified for analyses, as described previously.[7] TNBC was defined as < 5% staining for the ERs and PRs, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 to 1+ and/or HER2:Cep17 fluorescent in situ hybridization ratio < 2.0. Clinicopathologic data were abstracted from the medical record. PFS was determined as time from treatment initiation to progression or therapy switch. If patients received multiple lines of platinum chemotherapy, we used the PFS of the earliest platinum-containing regimen. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ohio State University and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written consent.

Ethics Declarations

Patients provided consent for under approval by local human research protections programs and institutional review boards at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ohio State University, and studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Blood Sample Collection, Processing, and Sequencing

As described previously,[7] venous blood samples were processed to component parts within 4 hours of collection, cfDNA was extracted from plasma, and DNA quantification was performed. Three to 20 ng of cfDNA input (median 5 ng), or approximately 1,000-7,000 haploid genome equivalents, was used for ultralow-pass WGS (ULP-WGS). Constructed sequencing libraries were pooled (2 μL of each × 96 per pool) and sequenced using 100 bp paired-end runs over 1 × lane on a HiSeq2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) to average genome-wide fold coverage of 0.1×. Segment copy number and TFx were derived with ichorCNA.[5] Samples were excluded if the median absolute deviation of copy ratios (2log2 ratio) between adjacent bins, genome-wide, was > 0.20 suggesting poor quality sequencing data. We previously demonstrated that high-confidence SCNAs are detectable in samples with TFx > 10%,[5,7] so only patients with at least one ctDNA sample with TFx > 10% were considered for analyses (n = 101).

Cytoband-Level Copy-Number Analyses

GISTIC2.0[21] output was used for all gene-level copy-number analyses. Segmented data files derived from ichorCNA for mTNBC ctDNA for the single highest TFx and publicly available segmented data for Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC)[1] were purity- and ploidy-corrected and then input into GISTIC2.0[21] with amplification–deletion threshold log2ratio > 0.3, confidence level 0.99, and Q-value threshold 0.05. Publicly available GISTIC2.0[21] data were used from The Cancer Genome Atlas. (TCGA)[4] Cytobands were defined as amplification (GISTIC value 1, corresponding to three copies or GISTIC value 2, corresponding to 4+ copies) versus diploid (GISTIC value 0).

Identification of Patients in Publicly Available Data Sets

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer were identified in TCGA[4] (n = 156) and METABRIC[1] (n = 277) based on study-reported negative for ER and PR via IHC, and HER2-receptor copy number diploid (GISTIC2.0 value of 0) or IHC 0-1.

Statistical Analyses and Data Visualization

All statistical analyses and data visualizations were performed in R version 3.3.1. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test and medians of continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Cox proportional hazards models were calculated using the survival package[22] and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test were plotted with packHV.[23]

RESULTS

From 101 patients with mTNBC who had ULP-WGS performed on ctDNA samples as previously published,[7] 72 patients were identified who had received a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting (n = 40 single-agent platinum, n = 32 platinum in combination), and had a ctDNA sample collected with a TFx > 10% (adequate for high confidence SCNA calls[5,7]). The specific chemotherapy regimens are listed in the Data Supplement. We evaluated the association of SCNAs with PFS on platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. Seventy-one of 72 patients were evaluable for PFS (flowchart diagram; Fig 1). Of the 71 evaluable patients, 21 (30%) had the cfDNA collected before starting platinum chemotherapy and 50 (70%) had cfDNA collected after starting a platinum-containing regimen. Across the genome, 17q21 and 17q22 amplification were the copy-number gains most strongly associated with improved PFS with first platinum chemotherapy (Fig 2A). Although the amplicon may extend from 17q21 into 17q22, within chromosome 17, amplifications of 17q22 were most strongly associated with improved PFS with first platinum chemotherapy (Fig 2B); so, 17q22 was used for all further analyses. Patients with 17q22 amplification (n = 17) had significantly longer median PFS with first platinum (7.0 v 3.8 months; log-rank P = .015; Fig 2C) than patients without 17q22 amplification (n = 54). Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient cohorts with and without 17q22 amplification that received a platinum agent. There were no significant differences in baseline clinicopathologic features (germline BRCA1/2 status, age at primary tumor diagnosis, stage at primary diagnosis, or receipt or regimen of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy) or metastatic clinicopathologic features (age at metastatic diagnosis, sites of metastatic disease, or number of lines of therapy before platinum chemotherapy).
FIG 1.

Flowchart diagram. ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; mTNBC, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; SCNA, somatic copy-number alteration.

FIG 2.

Association of 17q amplicon in circulating tumor DNA with platinum chemotherapy benefit in mTNBC. (A) Volcano plot of hazard ratio significance versus log2 hazard ratio for PFS of first platinum chemotherapy in the metastatic setting by chromosomal cytoband from highest tumor fraction blood draw. Only cytobands with gain in at least 10% of patients with mTNBC or primary TNBC are plotted, as determined by gene-level GISTIC gain/Amp. Size of point indicates the frequency altered among patients with mTNBC. Black circle indicates 17q21 and 17q22. (B) Association of Amp along chromosome 17 with PFS of platinum chemotherapy in patients with mTNBC (n = 101), visualized as log-rank negative log10 P value (y-axis). Each point represents an individual gene based on GISTIC output. x-axis indicates chromosome 17 loci, with the pink region indicating the centromere; chromosome graphic from National Center for Biotechnology Information Genome Decoration Page. (C and D) Kaplan-Meier curve of PFS of (C) platinum chemotherapy and (D) capecitabine for patients with mTNBC stratified by presence or absence of 17q22 Amp. Amp, amplification; CNA, copy-number alteration; mTNBC, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; PFS, progression-free survival.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of Patients Who Received Platinum Chemotherapy With and Without 17q22 Amplicon

Flowchart diagram. ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; mTNBC, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; SCNA, somatic copy-number alteration. Association of 17q amplicon in circulating tumor DNA with platinum chemotherapy benefit in mTNBC. (A) Volcano plot of hazard ratio significance versus log2 hazard ratio for PFS of first platinum chemotherapy in the metastatic setting by chromosomal cytoband from highest tumor fraction blood draw. Only cytobands with gain in at least 10% of patients with mTNBC or primary TNBC are plotted, as determined by gene-level GISTIC gain/Amp. Size of point indicates the frequency altered among patients with mTNBC. Black circle indicates 17q21 and 17q22. (B) Association of Amp along chromosome 17 with PFS of platinum chemotherapy in patients with mTNBC (n = 101), visualized as log-rank negative log10 P value (y-axis). Each point represents an individual gene based on GISTIC output. x-axis indicates chromosome 17 loci, with the pink region indicating the centromere; chromosome graphic from National Center for Biotechnology Information Genome Decoration Page. (C and D) Kaplan-Meier curve of PFS of (C) platinum chemotherapy and (D) capecitabine for patients with mTNBC stratified by presence or absence of 17q22 Amp. Amp, amplification; CNA, copy-number alteration; mTNBC, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; PFS, progression-free survival. Characteristics of Patients Who Received Platinum Chemotherapy With and Without 17q22 Amplicon In a multivariable analysis, 17q22 remained significantly associated with platinum chemotherapy PFS adjusting for BRCA mutation status, primary receptor status, stage at diagnosis, age at diagnosis, year the sample was collected, sample collection cohort, and percent of genome altered (PFS hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.84; P = .02; Table 2). Notably, we included percent of genome altered as a covariate to ensure that the effect seen with 17q22 and platinum PFS was not secondary to general genome instability. Furthermore, amplification of 17q22 remained significantly associated with longer PFS with platinum chemotherapy in additional sensitivity analyses of the base multivariable model with platinum chemotherapy as first-line therapy versus later (17q22 amplification P = .04), base multivariable model with bone-only metastatic status (17q22 amplification P = .03), and base multivariable model with both bone-only status AND platinum as first line versus later (17q22 amplification P = .03; Data Supplement). To evaluate whether this was a nonspecific effect of chemotherapy, we also evaluated PFS with capecitabine, an oral fluorouracil prodrug commonly used in the management of mTNBC. Among the 39 patients who had received capecitabine, there was no association between 17q22 amplification and median PFS from capecitabine (log-rank P = .69; Fig 2D). In our discovery data set, for predicting a PFS of at least 3 months, presence of 17q22 amplification has a sensitivity 0.349, specificity 0.929, positive-predictive value 0.883, and negative-predictive value 0.481. For predicting a clinically meaningful PFS of at least 6 months, presence of 17q22 amplification has a sensitivity 0.400, specificity 0.848, positive-predictive value 0.588, and negative-predictive value 0.722. Comprehensive biomarker performance metrics with 95% CIs and receiver operating characteristic curves are shown in the Data Supplement.
TABLE 2.

Multivariable Analysis of 17q22 Amplification With Platinum Chemotherapy Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic TNBC

Multivariable Analysis of 17q22 Amplification With Platinum Chemotherapy Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic TNBC In this mTNBC cohort, chromosome 17q22 amplifications were common, present in 21.8% (22/101) of patients. To more broadly assess the frequency of 17q22 amplification, we investigated the frequency of chromosome 17 amplifications in additional cohorts. Specifically, we compared pTNBC tissue SCNAs in the publicly available data sets METABRIC[1] and TCGA[4] (total n = 433) with all mTNBCs in our cohort (n = 101). Detailed analysis of chromosome 17 gains demonstrated that 17q22 amplification occurs in more than 20% of both pTNBC (Fig 3A) and mTNBC (Fig 3B). Among chromosome 17 cytobands, only 17q21 demonstrated significantly more frequent amplification in mTNBC relative to pTNBC (16% v 8.1%, genome-wide false discovery rate-corrected Fischer exact P = .015; Fig 3C). To evaluate for association of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) with 17q22 amplification, we compared the Van't Veer BRCA1 gene expression signature[24] between the groups with and without 17q22 amplification in METABRIC and found no association (t-test, P = .59; Data Supplement).
FIG 3.

Frequency of 17q amplification in triple-negative breast cancer. (A and B) Proportion of patients with pTNBC in TCGA and METABRIC (total n = 433; A) and patients with mTNBC (total n = 101; B) with amplification on chromosome 17, based on gene-level copy number via GISTIC2.0. x-axis indicates chromosome 17 loci, with the pink region indicating the centromere; chromosome graphic from National Center for Biotechnology Information Genome Decoration Page. (C) Proportion of patients with pTNBC in TCGA and METABRIC (total n = 433; blue bars) and patients with mTNBC (total n = 101; red bars) with gain/amplification on chromosome 17 by cytoband, based on gene-level copy number via GISTIC2.0. *Fisher exact FDR P = .015. FDR, false discovery rate; METABRIC, Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium; mTNBC, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; pTNBC, primary triple negative breast cancer; TGCA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Frequency of 17q amplification in triple-negative breast cancer. (A and B) Proportion of patients with pTNBC in TCGA and METABRIC (total n = 433; A) and patients with mTNBC (total n = 101; B) with amplification on chromosome 17, based on gene-level copy number via GISTIC2.0. x-axis indicates chromosome 17 loci, with the pink region indicating the centromere; chromosome graphic from National Center for Biotechnology Information Genome Decoration Page. (C) Proportion of patients with pTNBC in TCGA and METABRIC (total n = 433; blue bars) and patients with mTNBC (total n = 101; red bars) with gain/amplification on chromosome 17 by cytoband, based on gene-level copy number via GISTIC2.0. *Fisher exact FDR P = .015. FDR, false discovery rate; METABRIC, Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium; mTNBC, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; pTNBC, primary triple negative breast cancer; TGCA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

DISCUSSION

Using shallow WGS of ctDNA in a large cohort of patients with mTNBC, we found that amplification of 17q22 is independently associated with improved platinum chemotherapy PFS. Analysis of the TCGA and METABRIC data sets shows that 17q21-22 amplifications are common, occurring in both pTNBCs and mTNBCs. Altogether, this study suggests that identification of 17q21-q22 amplification in ctDNA has the potential to be a blood-based biomarker of platinum sensitivity in mTNBC, and possibly also early-stage breast cancer. To date, potential biomarkers of platinum sensitivity in breast cancer have involved germline genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations or tissue-based DNA/RNA markers of HRD. In the metastatic setting, TNBC response to single-agent platinum chemotherapy has been associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and scores of genomic instability including HRD-loss of heterozygosity and HRD large-scale state transitions, but was not associated with p63/p73 expression, p53 mutations, PIK3CA mutations, PAM50 gene expression subtype, BRCA1 methylation, low BRCA1 messenger RNA levels, or a Myriad HRD assay.[19,20] In the neoadjuvant setting, TNBC response to platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens has been associated with HRD score (based on HRD loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, and HRD large-scale state transitions), but was not associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.[15,25-28] More recently, the HRDetect[29] algorithm, which incorporates single-nucleotide variant mutational signatures and SCNA features to predict BRCA1/2 deficiency, has been applied in breast cancer.[30,31] It has shown promise in assessing HRD in a population-based trial (SCAN-B: NCT02306096)[31] and a phase II window clinical trial of a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor for patients with pTNBC, the RIO trial (EudraCT 2014-003319-12).[30] However, there are conflicting reports in the neoadjuvant setting whether or not patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations benefit from adding platinum to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.[13,32-35] A better biomarker of platinum chemotherapy benefit in breast cancer is needed. Advantages of a ctDNA-based biomarker include being minimally invasive, feasible even if tissue is not available, and available for collection at the time of treatment decisions. An ULP-WGS ctDNA biomarker may capture a patient population who would differentially benefit from platinum chemotherapy, even in the absence of biopsy-accessible tumor tissue or a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Obtaining ctDNA and analyzing ULP-WGS is more feasible and affordable than bulk tissue DNA sequencing. Many studies have looked at whole-exome sequencing and targeted panel ctDNA assays as biomarkers of response to therapy, but few studies have explored the use of more affordable low-coverage WGS to analyze copy-number alterations (CNAs) as a predictive biomarker.[36,37] Low-coverage WGS of cfDNA has been used to characterize CNAs in many cancers including TNBC, and the burden of CNAs may be prognostic.[7,38-45] In some cancers, CNA burden may be predictive of response to checkpoint inhibitors.[46,47] But, to our knowledge, no previous study has associated a focal CNA detected by ctDNA ULP-WGS with response to a particular therapy for any cancer. Amplification of 17q21-q22 has been previously described in breast cancer.[48-55] Notably, HER2 is located on adjacent 17q12 and BRCA1 is located on 17q21. In this study, the association of 17q22 with platinum PFS appears to peak at KIF2B (Fig 1B), kinesin family member 2B, a microtubule-dependent motor required for spindle assembly and chromosome movement.[56] Of the many genes in 17q21-q22, several others may conceivably be related to the platinum sensitivity seen in our study, and deserve further investigation. Overexpression of TRIM37, a centrosomal ubiquitin ligase, delays centrosome maturation and separation in late G2 and M phase, promoting mitotic errors and genomic instability.[57,58] The G2/M checkpoint prevents progression of cells with damaged DNA from entering mitosis, and alterations in proteins associated with this cell-cycle checkpoint may make cancer cells more sensitive to DNA-damaging therapies. High expression of NR1D1 is associated with improved early-stage TNBC PFS and overall survival treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.[59] NR1D1 prevents DNA damage repair, inhibiting both nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination, which results in chemosensitivity.[60,61] DLX4 encodes BP1, a transcription factor, which binds to and suppresses BRCA1.[62,63] Overexpression of KIF2B, TRIM37, NR1D1, or DLX4 may contribute to TNBC sensitivity to DNA-damaging platinum chemotherapy. Given the well-established association of HRD with platinum sensitivity, exploration of the association between 17q21-22 amplification and HRD is warranted. Based on the lack of association with 17q22 with BRCA1/2 mutations in our ctDNA data set and the lack of association of a BRCA1 gene expression signature with 17q22 amplification in the METABRIC data set, 17q22 amplification does not appear to be related to BRCA1/2 mutation status. However, the association of other measures of HRD should be explored in the future, but unfortunately deeper whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing are needed to calculate such metrics.[64-67] Furthermore, 17q22 amplification presented here is a specific, but not optimally sensitive, potential biomarker of platinum response in mTNBC. Although specificity is a favorable characteristic in a predictive biomarker, future studies should consider combination of 17q22 amplification with other minimally invasive biomarkers of platinum response. Recently, Sipos et al[68] published biomarker analyses of the TNT study demonstrating that intermediate chromosomal instability measurements were most associated with platinum benefit. However, the association of individual amplicons such as 17q22 was not evaluated in that study and will be important to validate the findings from the current report in prospective studies, such as TNT. Limitations of our study include the retrospective design and a modest sample size; however, a modern cohort of patients with mTNBC were included, who had received current standard of care treatment. Confirmation of our findings in a validation cohort of patients with mTNBC is needed. We investigated potential validation cohorts such as the TNT trial and TBCRC009,[19,20,68] two completed clinical trials of platinum chemotherapy for mTNBC; copy number is not available for either but we anticipate may be in the future. Although we suspect based on previous work from our group that SCNAs are an early event in the natural history of a cancer and remain stable over time, it would be valuable in future work to show with serial ctDNA samples from each individual that 17q21-22 amplifications do not change with platinum chemotherapy or other treatments.[69] Finally, a similar analysis of ULP-WGS of ctDNA from patients with ER+/HER2– or HER2+ metastatic breast cancer or advanced ovarian cancer may also identify a potential biomarker for platinum chemotherapy benefit. In summary, we demonstrate an independent association of the 17q22 amplicon, detected via minimally invasive, shallow WGS of ctDNA, with improved platinum chemotherapy PFS in a large cohort with mTNBC. The role of the 17q22 amplicon as a biomarker of platinum sensitivity in breast cancer warrants further validation and prospective investigation.
  61 in total

1.  Genomic and expression profiling of chromosome 17 in breast cancer reveals complex patterns of alterations and novel candidate genes.

Authors:  Béatrice Orsetti; Mélanie Nugoli; Nathalie Cervera; Laurence Lasorsa; Paul Chuchana; Lisa Ursule; Catherine Nguyen; Richard Redon; Stanislas du Manoir; Carmen Rodriguez; Charles Theillet
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  TBCRC009: A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial of Platinum Monotherapy With Biomarker Assessment in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Isakoff; Erica L Mayer; Lei He; Tiffany A Traina; Lisa A Carey; Karen J Krag; Hope S Rugo; Minetta C Liu; Vered Stearns; Steven E Come; Kirsten M Timms; Anne-Renee Hartman; Darrel R Borger; Dianne M Finkelstein; Judy E Garber; Paula D Ryan; Eric P Winer; Paul E Goss; Leif W Ellisen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A randomized phase II trial of platinum salts in basal-like breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting. Results from the GEICAM/2006-03, multicenter study.

Authors:  E Alba; J I Chacon; A Lluch; A Anton; L Estevez; B Cirauqui; E Carrasco; L Calvo; M A Segui; N Ribelles; R Alvarez; A Sanchez-Muñoz; R Sanchez; J A Lopez Garcia-Asenjo; C Rodriguez-Martin; M J Escudero; J Albanell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  NR1D1 Recruitment to Sites of DNA Damage Inhibits Repair and Is Associated with Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Na-Lee Ka; Tae-Young Na; Hyelin Na; Min-Ho Lee; Han-Su Park; Sewon Hwang; Il Yong Kim; Je Kyung Seong; Mi-Ock Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Survival analysis of carboplatin added to an anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HRD score as predictor of response-final results from GeparSixto.

Authors:  S Loibl; K E Weber; K M Timms; E P Elkin; E Hahnen; P A Fasching; B Lederer; C Denkert; A Schneeweiss; S Braun; C T Salat; M Rezai; J U Blohmer; D M Zahm; C Jackisch; B Gerber; P Klare; S Kümmel; C Schem; S Paepke; R Schmutzler; K Rhiem; S Penn; J Reid; V Nekljudova; A-R Hartman; G von Minckwitz; M Untch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Association of Cell-Free DNA Tumor Fraction and Somatic Copy Number Alterations With Survival in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel G Stover; Heather A Parsons; Gavin Ha; Samuel S Freeman; William T Barry; Hao Guo; Atish D Choudhury; Gregory Gydush; Sarah C Reed; Justin Rhoades; Denisse Rotem; Melissa E Hughes; Deborah A Dillon; Ann H Partridge; Nikhil Wagle; Ian E Krop; Gad Getz; Todd R Golub; J Christopher Love; Eric P Winer; Sara M Tolaney; Nancy U Lin; Viktor A Adalsteinsson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 50.717

7.  Genome-wide profiling of circulating tumor DNA depicts landscape of copy number alterations in pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis.

Authors:  Tao Wei; Jian Zhang; Jin Li; Qi Chen; Xiao Zhi; Wei Tao; Jingjiao Ma; Jiaqi Yang; Yu Lou; Tao Ma; Xiang Li; Qi Zhang; Wei Chen; Risheng Que; Shunliang Gao; Xueli Bai; Tingbo Liang
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Tumor copy-number alterations predict response to immune-checkpoint-blockade in gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Zhihao Lu; Huan Chen; Shuang Li; Jifang Gong; Jian Li; Jianling Zou; Lihong Wu; Jianing Yu; Wenbo Han; Huaibo Sun; Xi Jiao; Xiaotian Zhang; Zhi Peng; Ming Lu; Zhenghang Wang; Henghui Zhang; Lin Shen
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 13.751

9.  OlympiAD final overall survival and tolerability results: Olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M E Robson; N Tung; P Conte; S-A Im; E Senkus; B Xu; N Masuda; S Delaloge; W Li; A Armstrong; W Wu; C Goessl; S Runswick; S M Domchek
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Assessment of structural chromosomal instability phenotypes as biomarkers of carboplatin response in triple negative breast cancer: the TNT trial.

Authors:  O Sipos; H Tovey; J Quist; S Haider; S Nowinski; P Gazinska; S Kernaghan; C Toms; S Maguire; N Orr; S C Linn; J Owen; C Gillett; S E Pinder; J M Bliss; A Tutt; M C U Cheang; A Grigoriadis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Role of ctDNA in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Marta Sant; Adrià Bernat-Peguera; Eudald Felip; Mireia Margelí
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.