A Sarcopenia-Based Prediction Model for Postoperative Complications of ex vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation to Treat End-Stage Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia and visceral adiposity have been shown to be associated with postoperative complications in numerous diseases. However, their effects on the postoperative complications of end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE) patients undergoing ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation (ELRA) remain unclear.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 101 end-stage HAE patients who underwent ELRA from January 2014 to August 2020. We measured the skeletal muscle and adipose tissue of all patients at the level of the third lumbar vertebra on plain abdominal computed tomography (CT) images and subsequently derived an equation via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis to calculate the sarcopenia score. Univariate and multivariate regression were performed to reveal the relationship between major postoperative complications and perioperative clinical data, and the obtained nomogram was validated with the bootstrapping method.
RESULTS: The sarcopenia score was constructed as a personalized indicator to evaluate sarcopenia and visceral adiposity in each patient. Logistic regression analysis finally selected duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms (OR=1.024, 95% CI, 1.007-1.042), surgical time (OR=1.003, 95% CI, 0.999-1.007) and sarcopenia score (OR=4.283, 95% CI, 1.739-10.551) as independent risk factors for predicting major postoperative complications following ELRA for end-stage HAE patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.807 (95% CI, 0.720-0.895) and the calibration curve for this prediction model were satisfactory.
CONCLUSION: The sarcopenia score, which systematically evaluates the skeletal muscle and adipose tissue of end-stage HAE patients, was a significant predictive factor for major postoperative complications of ELRA. Relevant interventions should be conducted for those who have a high risk of postoperative complications according to the nomogram.

Introduction

Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE), a zoonotic disease caused by Echinococcus multilocularis (Em) infection with approximately 18,235 new cases per year in China, Central Asia, Europe and some other areas, is potentially lethal to humans and is also called a “parasitic cancer”.1–4 HAE, especially end-stage HAE, is frequently characterized by infiltrative growth that results in invasion into crucial intrahepatic structures, such as vascular invasion and bile duct invasion. In general, surgical resection and oral albendazole therapy are recommended for HAE.5 However, as a result of the occult onset and infiltrative growth of this condition, most patients usually lose the opportunity to undergo radical surgery and need to receive complex liver surgery or palliative treatment.

Ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation (ELRA), a complicated surgery that includes complete hepatectomy, ex vivo liver resection and autologous transplantation, has been considered an effective treatment for end-stage HAE in recent years.6–8 In 1988, Pilchmayr et al9 first reported extracorporeal liver surgery and its application for advanced malignant tumors. However, the outcome of the surgical technique was unsatisfactory.10 In contrast, end-stage HAE, as a benign disease, has become a potential indicator for ELRA.11 ELRA involves the precise resection of lesions, meticulous repair of hepatic vessels and complex reconstruction of conduits, together with complicated maintenance anesthesia and ex vivo organ perfusion, making the surgical procedure stressful and challenging. The difficulty of ELRA for end-stage HAE raises great concern regarding the occurrence of postoperative complications, which greatly impact the quality of life and overall survival of patients.

In modern surgical operations, surgeons and researchers pay increasing attention to the role of nutritional status in the preoperative assessment, and malnutrition has been proven to be a risk factor for postoperative complications.12,13 Sarcopenia, a malnutrition-related muscle disease characterized by low muscle strength, low muscle quantity and quality and poor physical performance, mainly occurs in older people and is possibly caused by disordered energy metabolism.14 Several studies have reported that sarcopenia, myosteatosis, visceral adiposity and other malnutrition-related indicators play vital roles in the development of postoperative complications.15–28 The Clavien-Dindo classification29 of surgical complications is widely recognized and current studies have found that common postoperative complications of liver surgery include biliary leakage, surgical site infections, ascites, etc.30–32 However, there is no research on the impact of sarcopenia on ELRA complications or on prediction models for postoperative complications of ELRA.

As our hospital is the nearest medical center from one of the main HAE epidemic areas in the world, we conducted a series of analyses based on our ELRA cases for end-stage HAE to fill these gaps. In this study, we analyzed a large amount of patient information, explored possible risk factors for postoperative complications of ELRA, revealed the relationship between sarcopenia combined with adipose tissue and postoperative complications, and developed a nomogram to offer a convenient and quantitative approach to predict and estimate the risk of complications after ELRA for end-stage HAE patients.

Methods

Patients

This retrospective study consecutively enrolled a total of 101 end-stage HAE patients (age ≥ 18 years) who underwent ELRA at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2014 to August 2020. The diagnostic standard of HAE and its PNM staging system comply with the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO).33 It is worth mentioning that end-stage HAE was defined as HAE with vascular invasion, including into the inferior vena cava (IVC), portal vein (PV) and hepatic arteries, with or without adjacent organ invasion and distant metastasis (P4, N0 or N1, M0 or M1). All 101 patients were strictly evaluated by a multidisciplinary team including hepatobiliary surgeons, a vascular surgeon, a radiologist, and an anesthetist, and the following key features of all patients undergoing ELRA were noted: (1) involvement of the hepatic hilar region, IVC, and 3 hepatic veins (HVs) or invasion into the secondary or tertiary branches of the PVs and hepatic arteries requiring complicated reconstruction with an extended ischemic time that the liver might not tolerate; (2) good physiological status and relatively normal liver and kidney function (total bilirubin level lower than twice the upper limit of normal) with or without extrahepatic echinococcosis lesions that could be controlled by albendazole or be completely removed by surgery; and (3) an estimated remnant liver volume (RLV)/standard liver volume (SLV) ratio greater than 0.4.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (No. 2017–38). The requirement for informed consent was waived because the study was retrospective, and the data were anonymized.

Preoperative Evaluation and Image Analysis

We evaluated the characteristics of the HAE lesions, relevant incidences of vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The RLV was calculated by a three-dimensional (3D) imaging analysis system34 (CAS; Qingdao Hisense Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Qingdao, P. R. China), and the SLV was calculated according to the method described by Tongyoo et al35 and Urata et al.36 The classification of vascular infiltration (invasion into the IVC, HV and PV) followed the definitions in a previous study by Qiu et al.6

We specifically collected plain abdominal CT images of all patients within one month before ELRA. Then, analyses of the image data and measurements of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue were performed at the level of the third lumbar vertebra with three-dimensional visualization software28 (Mimics Interactive Medical Image Control System, Version 25.0, Materialize Company, Belgium). To divide out skeletal muscle and adipose tissue at the level of the third lumbar vertebra, skeletal muscle areas, which included the psoas, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum, transversus abdominis, and internal and external obliques, were quantified using −29 to 150 Hounsfield units (HU), and adipose tissue areas, which included the subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue, were quantified using −190 to −30 HU.37 The sarcopenia status of all patients could be measured and calculated by the following parameters: psoas muscle mass index (PMI), skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR), and intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC). The calculations were as follows: PMI=left and right psoas muscle area (cm2)/patient’s height2 (m2); SMI=skeletal muscle area (cm2)/patient’s height2 (m2); and VSR=visceral adipose tissue area (cm2)/subcutaneous adipose tissue area (cm2). IMAC was calculated as the CT value of the multifidus muscles (HU)/CT value of the subcutaneous fat (HU). The average CT value of two regions of interest (ROIs) placed on the multifidus muscles at the L3 level was defined as the CT value of the multifidus muscles. The average CT value of four ROIs placed on the subcutaneous fat at the L3 level was defined as the CT value of subcutaneous fat.28

The patients’ demographic data, basic lesion information, medical history data, surrounding invasions, distant metastases, vascular infiltrations, liver function, and estimated RLV and SLV were collected.

ELRA Procedures

The surgical procedures mainly consisted of three parts. The first part included exploratory surgery and combined resection of the entire liver and invaded surrounding organs or tissues. In the second part, ex vivo liver resection of the HAE lesions and repair of the major conduits were performed with 0–4 °C organ perfusion. At the same time, we temporarily reconstructed the IVC and established a portocaval shunt. Finally, the autograft was reimplanted, and the conduits were reconstructed. The detailed steps of ELRA have been reported by Yang et al.7

During surgery, data on the combined resection, blood transfusion volume, time that each step of the surgery took and actual RLV were recorded. The hemodynamic instability time was defined as the time of IVC and PV occlusion.

Postoperative Follow-Up

Follow-up abdominal CT and other routine inspections were performed every 3–6 months after hospital discharge to detect potential complications and recurrence. Postoperative morbidity was measured by Clavien-Dindo grade38 and the comprehensive complication index (CCI).39

The length of stay in the hospital and in the intensive care unit (ICU) were recorded.

Statistical Analysis

Parametric continuous data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and nonparametric continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile ranges. Categorical data are presented as numbers and percentages. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was used to explore and show the correlation between postoperative complications and sarcopenia. Logistic regression analysis was utilized for multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI)]. A nomogram to predict major postoperative complications containing sarcopenia score and other risk factors was constructed using stepwise selection and the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The stepwise selection method was used to select variables and determine model fit. AIC was used for model evaluation and model selection. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were utilized to analyze the predictive performance of the model. The calibration curve was derived from regression analysis, and the number of bootstrap resamples was 500. Median values in each tertile and quartile were used to test for a linear trend. All the reported p values are 2-tailed, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Empower® (, X&Y Solutions Inc., Boston MA).

Results

Patient Characteristics

A total of 101 end-stage HAE patients, including 38 male and 63 female patients, underwent ELRA after receiving a comprehensive evaluation; their mean age was 37 years. All the required preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The clinical data and perioperative characteristics are shown in Table 1. In this study, the mean preoperative PMI, SMI, VSR and IMAC were 5.56 cm2/m2, 41.35 cm2/m2, 0.28 and −0.57, respectively. The median CCI of all patients was 20.92. Postoperative complications developed in 57 patients (56.44%; grade I=3, grade II=15, grade III=28, grade IV=0, grade V=11), and major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) occurred in 39 patients (38.61%). Among all patients, the three most common postoperative complications were biliary leakage (n=21), pleural effusion (n=9) and ascites (n=9).

Table 1

Clinical Data and Surgical Characteristics of the 101 Patients

Variable	Value
Baseline data
Number of patients, n	101
Age (years), mean ± SD	37.00 ± 9.97
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD	22.05 ± 3.21
Duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms (months), mean ± SD	30.80 ± 33.05
Male sex, n (%)	38 (37.62%)
Previous use of oral albendazole, n (%)	65 (64.36%)
History of jaundice, n (%)	18 (17.82%)
Preoperative data of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue
PMI (cm2/m2), mean ± SD	5.56 ± 2.07
SMI (cm2/m2), mean ± SD	41.35 ± 8.47
VSR (cm2/cm2), mean ± SD	0.28 ± 0.18
IMAC (HU/HU), mean ± SD	−0.57 ± 0.18
Preoperative data of the lesions
Lesion diameter (cm), mean ± SD	15.17 ± 2.72
Surrounding invasion, n (%)	68 (67.33%)
Distant metastasis, n (%)	16 (15.84%)
Number of lesions, n (%)
Single	59 (58.42%)
Multiple	42 (41.58%)
Inferior vena cava invasion, n (%)
I	8 (7.9208%)
II	77 (76.24%)
III	16 (15.84%)
Hepatic vein invasion, n (%)
I	43 (42.57%)
II	58 (57.43%)
Portal vein invasion, n (%)
I	7 (6.93%)
II	68 (67.33%)
III	26 (25.74%)
Preoperative data of liver volume and quality
ERLV (mL), mean ± SD	712.85 ± 198.65
SLV (mL), mean ± SD	1147.62 ± 109.17
ERLV/SLV, mean ± SD	0.62 ± 0.17
Child-Pugh classification, n (%)
Class A	95 (94.06%)
Class B	6 (5.94%)
Albumin-bilirubin grade, n (%)
Grade 1 (≤-2.60)	23 (22.77%)
Grade 2 (>-2.60, ≤-1.39)	76 (75.25%)
Grade 3 (>-1.39)	2 (1.98%)
Intraoperative data
ARLV (mL), mean ± SD	723.01 ± 207.78
ARLV/SLV, mean ± SD	0.63 ± 0.18
Surgical time (min), mean ± SD	744.74 ± 137.11
Anhepatic time (30 min), mean ± SD	10.34 ± 2.62
Hemodynamic instability time (min), mean ± SD	148.87 ± 35.30
Liver graft reimplantation time (10 min), mean ± SD	5.96 ± 2.42
Blood loss (mL), mean ± SD	2608.91 ± 1273.88
Autologous blood transfusion (100 mL), mean ± SD	9.35 ± 9.78
RBC suspension transfusion (U), mean ± SD	7.76 ± 6.85
Fresh frozen plasma transfusion (mL), mean ± SD	930.99 ± 1013.55
Combined resection, n (%)	22 (21.78%)
Length of stay and postoperative complications
Length of stay in the hospital (days), median (range)	20.00 (15.00–31.00)
Length of stay in the ICU (days), median (range)	4.00 (3.00–5.00)
Postoperative complication, n (%)	57 (56.44%)
Postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa), n (%)	39 (38.61%)
CCI, median (range)	20.92 (0–26.22)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; PMI, psoas muscle mass index; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; VSR, visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio; IMAC, intramuscular adipose tissue content; ERLV, estimated remnant liver volume; SLV, standard liver volume; ARLV, actual remnant liver volume; RBC, red blood cell; ICU, intensive care unit; CCI, comprehensive complication index.

LASSO Logistic Regression for the Relationship Between Sarcopenia and Postoperative Complications

The LASSO logistic regression analysis initially included sex, age, weight, PMI, SMI, VSR and IMAC and finally selected four significant variables: SMI, VSR, IMAC and age. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to select the tuning parameters, and the minimum mean cross-validated error was calculated. Based on the coefficients obtained from the LASSO algorithm when value of λ gives minimum mean cross-validation error [log(λ) = −3.317], we finally constructed the formula as follows: sarcopenia score = 0.287–0.024 × SMI + 1.761 × VSR + 1.703 × IMAC + 0.018 × age (sarcopenia score calculator shown later). The AUROC, mean cross-validation error and standard deviation of mean cross-validation error were 0.723, 1.283 and 0.061 for log(λ) = −3.317. The LASSO coefficient profiles of these variables and their related partial likelihood deviance are plotted in Figure 1. The sarcopenia score indicated a regression relationship between major postoperative complications and the physical condition of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. A higher sarcopenia score denoted a lower quantity and quality of skeletal muscle and a larger amount of adipose tissue.

Figure 1

(A) Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) coefficient profiles of four sarcopenia-associated variables. IMAC, VSR, age and SMI were finally selected as significant variables by LASSO logistic regression. The blue line represents IMAC, the green line represents VSR, the black solid line represents age, and the bottom red line represents SMI. A dashed vertical line is drawn at log(λ) = −3.317, which was chosen by 10-fold cross-validation. IMAC, intramuscular adipose tissue content; VSR, visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index. (B) The partial likelihood deviance (binomial deviance) for the LASSO coefficient profiles. The red dots represent the average partial likelihood deviances for every model with a given lambda. A dotted vertical line represents the partial likelihood deviance error at log(λ) = −3.317.

Logistic Regression Analyses and Construction of a Prognostic Nomogram to Predict Postoperative Complications of ELRA

To identify the risk factors for major postoperative complications, we performed univariate regression analyses (Table 2). The analysis showed that the duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms, distant metastasis, surgical time, anhepatic time and sarcopenia score were associated with the odds of major postoperative complications of ELRA. Then, these five variables were included in a multivariate regression analysis (Table 2), from which duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms (OR=1.024, 95% CI, 1.007–1.042), surgical time (OR=1.003, 95% CI, 0.999–1.007) and sarcopenia score (OR=4.283, 95% CI, 1.739–10.551) were selected as the variables for the final logistic regression model based on stepwise selection and AIC values.

Table 2

Logistic Regression Analyses for Major Postoperative Complications

Variable	Univariate Regression			Multivariate Regression
	OR	95% CI	P	OR	95% CI	P
Baseline data
Duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms (months)	1.026	1.010–1.042	0.001	1.024	1.007–1.042	0.006
Previous use of oral albendazole (yes vs, no)	1.421	0.607–3.327	0.418
History of jaundice (yes vs no)	1.767	0.633–4.933	0.277
Preoperative data of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue
Sarcopenia score	4.872	2.060–11.525	0.000	4.283	1.739–10.551	0.002
Preoperative data of the lesions
Lesion diameter (cm)	1.009	0.870–1.169	0.909
Surrounding invasion (yes vs no)	1.710	0.706–4.141	0.234
Distant metastasis (yes vs no)	3.218	1.064–9.737	0.039	2.326	0.571–9.484	0.239
Number of lesions (multiple vs single)	0.963	0.427–2.173	0.928
IVC invasion
II vs I	1.007	0.224–4.530	0.993
III vs I	1.296	0.228–7.379	0.770
HV invasion (II vs I)	1.875	0.816–4.306	0.138
PV invasion
II vs I	1.364	0.246–7.567	0.723
III vs I	2.500	0.409–15.293	0.321
Preoperative data of liver volume and quality
ERLV (mL)	1.001	0.999–1.003	0.230
SLV (mL)	0.999	0.995–1.003	0.636
ERLV/SLV	6.216	0.570–67.747	0.134
Child-Pugh classification (class B vs class A)	0.784	0.137–4.496	0.785
ALBI grade
Grade 2 vs grade 1	2.763	0.929–8.215	0.068
Grade 3 vs grade 1	3.600	0.190–68.344	0.394
Intraoperative data
ARLV (mL)	1.001	0.999–1.003	0.513
ARLV/SLV	2.869	0.287–28.686	0.370
Surgical time (min)	1.004	1.001–1.008	0.009	1.003	0.999–1.007	0.106
Anhepatic time (30 min)	1.251	1.056–1.482	0.009	1.057	0.817–1.369	0.672
Hemodynamic instability time (min)	0.993	0.981–1.005	0.222
Liver graft reimplantation time (10 min)	0.851	0.711–1.019	0.079
Blood loss (mL)	1.000	1.000–1.001	0.073
Autologous blood transfusion (mL)	1.038	0.995–1.082	0.087
RBC suspension transfusion (U)	1.039	0.979–1.103	0.206
Fresh frozen plasma transfusion (mL)	1.000	1.000–1.000	0.683
Combined resection (yes vs no)	2.311	0.885–6.032	0.087

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IVC, inferior vena cava; HV, hepatic vein; PV, portal vein; ERLV, estimated remnant liver volume; SLV, standard liver volume; ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; ARLV, actual remnant liver volume; RBC, red blood cell.

Based on LASSO logistic regression and the multivariate regression analysis, a prognostic nomogram for predicting the occurrence of major postoperative complications in ELRA patients was built (Figure 2). Internal validation was performed via the bootstrapping method (resample: 500), and the relevant ROC curve and calibration curve were generated (Figure 3). The ROC curve is displayed in Figure 3A, with a relatively satisfactory AUROC of 0.807 (95% CI, 0.720–0.895). In addition, the calibration curve in Figure 3B shows close agreement between the predictions of the nomogram and actual major postoperative complications. The calculator of sarcopenia score and predicted risk of major postoperative complications is available in the .

Figure 2

Nomogram for predicting major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa). The nomogram represents the predicted probability of major postoperative complications on a scale of 0 to 180. For each predictor, draw a vertical line straight up to the point axis and note the corresponding points. Sum the points from each predictor, and the total score corresponding to a predicted probability of major postoperative complications can be found at the bottom of the nomogram.

Figure 3

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve for predicting major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa). (A) ROC curve for the prediction model obtained by the bootstrapping method (resample: 500), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.807 (95% CI, 0.720–0.895). (B) Calibration curve for the prediction model. The X-axis represents the predicted probability of major postoperative complications according to the prediction model. The vertical black lines on the X-axis represent the distribution of the samples. The Y-axis represents the observed probability of major postoperative complications. The red line shows an ideal prediction corresponding to the actual observations. The black line represents the performance of the calibration curve with the bootstrapping method (resample: 500).

To assess nonlinearity, we experimented with different transformations of duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms, surgical time and sarcopenia score (specifically, using a logarithm or a quadratic term). Despite these transformations, the results did not change (data not shown). The linearities of the three variables were tested by a triple-term (p for trend=0.006 for duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms; p for trend=0.033 for surgical time; p for trend=0.008 for sarcopenia score) and quartic-term (p for trend=0.008 for duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms; p for trend=0.044 for surgical time; p for trend=0.002 for sarcopenia score) transformation.

According to the ROC curves, we classified patients into the low-risk group and the high-risk group with a predicted probability of 0.3298 as the optimal cut-off value. 52 patients (51.49%) were classified into the low-risk group and 49 patients (48.51%) were classified into the high-risk group (Table 3). As expected, duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms (15.65 vs 46.88 months, p<0.001), surgical time (677.52 vs 816.08 min, p<0.001) and sarcopenia score (−0.88 vs −0.09, p<0.001) showed significant differences between the two groups. In addition, significant between-group differences were observed in age, PMI, SMI, VSR, IMAC, surrounding invasion, portal vein invasion, anhepatic time, hemodynamic instability time, fresh frozen plasma transfusion, length of stay in the ICU, CCI and postoperative complication. No other between-group differences were found.

Table 3

Clinical Data and Surgical Characteristics of the Patients in the Low-Risk Group and the High-Risk Group

Variable	Low-Risk Group	High-Risk Group	P
Baseline data
Number of patients, n (%)	52 (51.49%)	49 (48.51%)
Age (years), mean ± SD	33.27 ± 9.94	40.96 ± 8.42	<0.001
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD	21.98 ± 2.98	22.13 ± 3.46	0.813
Duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms (months), mean ± SD	15.65 ± 13.12	46.88 ± 39.76	<0.001
Male sex, n (%)	22 (42.31%)	16 (32.65%)	0.317
Previous use of oral albendazole, n (%)	31 (59.62%)	34 (69.39%)	0.305
History of jaundice, n (%)	8 (15.39%)	10 (20.41%)	0.510
Preoperative data of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue
PMI (cm2/m2), mean ± SD	6.25 ± 1.71	4.82 ± 2.17	<0.001
SMI (cm2/m2), mean ± SD	44.15 ± 6.69	38.38 ± 9.18	<0.001
VSR (cm2/cm2), mean ± SD	0.21 ± 0.10	0.35 ± 0.21	<0.001
IMAC (HU/HU), mean ± SD	−0.64 ± 0.17	−0.49 ± 0.16	<0.001
Sarcopenia score, mean ± SD	−0.88 ± 0.45	−0.09 ± 0.60	<0.001
Preoperative data of the lesions
Lesion diameter (cm), mean ± SD	14.77 ± 2.87	15.59 ± 2.51	0.129
Surrounding invasion, n (%)	30 (57.69%)	38 (77.55%)	0.033
Distant metastasis, n (%)	5 (9.62%)	11 (22.45%)	0.077
Number of lesions, n (%)			0.512
Single	32 (61.54%)	27 (55.10%)
Multiple	20 (38.46%)	22 (44.90%)
Inferior vena cava invasion, n (%)			0.714
I	5 (9.62%)	3 (6.12%)
II	38 (73.08%)	39 (79.59%)
III	9 (17.31%)	7 (14.29%)
Hepatic vein invasion, n (%)			0.454
I	24 (46.15%)	19 (38.78%)
II	28 (53.85%)	30 (61.22%)
Portal vein invasion, n (%)			0.049
I	4 (7.69%)	3 (6.12%)
II	40 (76.92%)	28 (57.14%)
III	8 (15.38%)	18 (36.73%)
Preoperative data of liver volume and quality
ERLV (mL), mean ± SD	680.67 ± 187.16	747.00 ± 206.61	0.094
SLV (mL), mean ± SD	1140.15 ± 107.89	1155.55 ± 111.07	0.482
ERLV/SLV, mean ± SD	0.60 ± 0.16	0.65 ± 0.19	0.125
Child-Pugh classification, n (%)			0.443
Class A	48 (92.31%)	47 (95.92%)
Class B	4 (7.69%)	2 (4.08%)
Albumin-bilirubin grade, n (%)			0.129
Grade 1 (≤-2.60)	15 (28.85%)	8 (16.33%)
Grade 2 (>-2.60, ≤-1.39)	37 (71.15%)	39 (79.59%)
Grade 3 (>-1.39)	0 (0.00%)	2 (4.08%)
Intraoperative data
ARLV (mL), mean ± SD	686.02 ± 185.46	762.27 ± 224.37	0.065
ARLV/SLV, mean ± SD	0.60 ± 0.15	0.66 ± 0.19	0.079
Surgical time (min), mean ± SD	677.52 ± 89.73	816.08 ± 143.23	<0.001
Anhepatic time (30 min), mean ± SD	9.20 ± 2.45	11.54 ± 2.24	<0.001
Hemodynamic instability time (min), mean ± SD	140.87 ± 28.82	157.37 ± 39.63	0.018
Liver graft reimplantation time (10 min), mean ± SD	5.63 ± 2.34	6.30 ± 2.48	0.169
Blood loss (mL), mean ± SD	2416.35 ± 1078.48	3088.78 ± 2245.63	0.056
Autologous blood transfusion (100 mL), mean ± SD	8.77 ± 7.42	9.96 ± 11.83	0.546
RBC suspension transfusion (U), mean ± SD	5.50 ± 4.10	42.49 ± 227.29	0.243
Fresh frozen plasma transfusion (mL), mean ± SD	654.23 ± 650.28	1224.69 ± 1232.82	0.004
Combined resection, n (%)	8 (15.38%)	14 (28.57%)	0.109
Length of stay and postoperative complications
Length of stay in the hospital (days), median (range)	20.00 (15.00–30.25)	22.00 (15.00–33.00)	0.671
Length of stay in the ICU (days), median (range)	4.00 (3.00–5.00)	4.00 (3.00–5.00)	0.014
Postoperative complication, n (%)	21 (40.38%)	36 (73.47%)	<0.001
Postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa), n (%)	8 (15.38%)	31 (63.27%)	<0.001
CCI, median (range)	0.00 (0.00–20.92)	26.22 (0.00–33.73)	<0.001

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; PMI, psoas muscle mass index; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; VSR, visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio; IMAC, intramuscular adipose tissue content; ERLV, estimated remnant liver volume; SLV, standard liver volume; ARLV, actual remnant liver volume; RBC, red blood cell; ICU, intensive care unit; CCI, comprehensive complication index.

Discussion

HAE, as a lethal infectious disease caused by a parasite, necessitates further attention, especially in developing countries with a high prevalence of alveolar echinococcosis (AE).40 Due to tumor-like characteristics such as hidden onset and vascular invasions, the mortality rate of HAE has been reported to be as high as 90% if untreated for 10 to 15 years.11 Although radical resection surgery combined with albendazole is recognized as the best therapy strategy, especially for advanced HAE,41 approximately a quarter of HAE patients still lose the opportunity to undergo normal radical surgery due to the presence of end-stage lesions.11 For such patients who were diagnosed and treated late, palliative resection, oral albendazole and liver transplantation were the only three possible treatment methods. However, palliative treatment for end-stage HAE showed little success according to Kern,42 and the research from Qu et al43 showed that the five-year survival rate with long-term albendazole was only 10%-40%. On the other hand, liver allotransplantation provided a chance for survival for patients with “unresectable” HAE,44–46 but the results seemed to be underwhelming. Bressom-Handi et al47 summarized 47 cases of liver transplantation for HAE, and the five-year survival rate without recurrence was 58%. In a single-center experience including 10 living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) cases, Ozdemir et al44 showed that the local recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 10% and 20%, respectively. Furthermore, the shortage of donor organs, high surgical costs and lifetime of immunosuppressive treatment remain stumbling blocks for allotransplantation therapy for end-stage HAE. Because of these factors, the possibility of treating end-stage HAE with ELRA arose.

Since the surgical technique of ELRA was used to treat end-stage HAE in 2011,48 an increasing number of ELRA procedures for HAE have been reported by medical centers.7,11,49–52 For ELRA, the limitations of liver allotransplantation become strengths, including no need for donors and immunosuppressive drugs as well as lower therapy costs. As ELRA involves a series of complex surgical procedures, postoperative complications become more of a concern. This study is the largest scale analysis on postoperative complications of ELRA for end-stage HAE. In our study, major postoperative complications occurred in 38.61% of all patients, which is higher than the 22% reported by Qiu et al6 and 14% by Aji et al11 and we managed most complications well. We attribute the higher rate of major postoperative complications partly to the expanded indications and partly to the relatively later disease stage. Postoperative complications always cause distress to the patients, increase therapy costs and even affect prognosis.53 It is therefore necessary to pay more attention to the possible risk factors for postoperative complications.

A consensus definition of sarcopenia was first formally presented by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) in 2010.54 Sarcopenia has been shown to be a risk factor for postoperative complications in many diseases, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pancreatic cancer and other gastrointestinal cancers.55–58 In addition, many studies have revealed that sarcopenia plays a vital role in liver transplantation and is even associated with surgical morbidity.15–18 On the basis of the definition of sarcopenia, sarcopenia is closely associated with the amount of skeletal muscle, its function and its impacts on physical performance. As a result, PMI and SMI, which are easy to measure at the third lumbar vertebra and are not easily influenced by ascites fluid, have been widely utilized to evaluate the degree of sarcopenia.59–61 IMAC, representing the amount of adipose tissue in the multifidus muscles, can reflect the quality of skeletal muscle and was also calculated.62 Furthermore, VSR, which indicates visceral adiposity, was found to be an important factor for adverse outcomes in HCC by Fujiwara et al.19 Thus, we included PMI, SMI, IMAC and VSR coupled with baseline physical data, including age, sex and weight, to assess the sarcopenia score of each end-stage HAE patient. In addition, we adopted LASSO logistic regression to calculate the sarcopenia score, which was simultaneously assessed by sarcopenia-related indicators and visceral adiposity and thus avoided the inclusion of redundant parameters or overfitting of the model. It is noteworthy that the sarcopenia score was not merely an independent risk factor for major postoperative complications but could also evaluate the severity of sarcopenia and guide clinical practice to some extent. Our previous multicenter research revealed that the sarcopenia was a predictive factor for postoperative complications in HAE patients undergoing liver resection and applied the severity of sarcopenia as a classifier to divide all patients into two groups for prediction.28 In contrast, we retained the original sarcopenia score model to maintain a higher AUROC for the final nomogram for more accurate prediction.

Studies have reported that sarcopenia might be induced by complicated genetic and environmental factors. A study on an aged population showed that C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) increase the risk for loss of muscle mass and muscle strength due to the imbalance of muscle synthesis and increased protein catabolism.63 Recently, a study on twins showed that variations in muscle quantity was associated with the methylation of genes.64 It is generally believed that the poor basic physical state resulting from sarcopenia may reduce immune function and tolerance to large trauma or surgeries such as ELRA.65 Adipose tissue, which has been indicated to be related to chronic inflammation of the body and increased proinflammatory cytokines,66 was also included when evaluating the sarcopenia score in our study. It has been shown in a study about gastric carcinoma that visceral fat area is associated with multiple postoperative complications, especially abdominal abscess and pancreatic fistula.67 Some researchers regard visceral adipose tissue as an endocrine organ that can secrete IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and others to further cause a pro-inflammatory status.68

As expected, the surgical time of ELRA was selected as an independent risk factor for major postoperative complications. In 2020, Giustiniano et al69 and Cezar et al70 found that surgical time was associated with postoperative complications of liver resection and could predict acute kidney injury after liver transplantation, which is similar to our results. Therefore, we should strictly comply with aseptic principles and further improve our surgical efficiency to minimize postoperative complications. Interestingly, the duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms was also selected as a predictive factor for postoperative complications by multivariate logistic regression. As previously described, HAE has the characteristic of insidious onset and tends to reach an end stage before being diagnosed. Undoubtfully, invasion into crucial intrahepatic structures and local metastasis caused by disease progression often increase the difficulty of the operation and even affect patient prognosis. Hence, it is particularly important to focus on the early diagnosis and early treatment of HAE while exploring surgical methods.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study thus far that reports the relationship between sarcopenia and the postoperative complications of ELRA. Furthermore, our findings have important clinical implications. Specifically, the calculator () can provide clinicians and patients with sarcopenia score as well as predicted risk of major postoperative complications after ELRA for end-stage HAE patients, which can help and guide clinical decision making in this population. For high-risk end-stage HAE patients, preoperative nutritional status and physical fitness should be improved. In addition, technical efficiency and proficiency in performing ELRA are of crucial importance in the improvement of prognosis. Early diagnosis and early treatment of HAE should also be particularly valued.

However, this study should be interpreted in light of some inherent limitations. First, as a linear regression shrinkage method, LASSO regression shrinks the regression coefficient within a certain area and constructs a first-order punishment function to obtain a refined model. Whereas LASSO regression model does not fully reflect the significance of the included variables. The LASSO model of sarcopenia score only demonstrated that postoperative complications of ELRA were associated with SMI, VSR, IMAC and age in this study. Therefore, readers should interpret the results of LASSO regression with caution. Second, our conclusions are based on a special and relatively rare parasitic disease, and the number of cases is relatively small when compared with other hepatic diseases. Therefore, the selection of statistical methods and extrapolation of our results are subject to limitations, and selection bias is inevitable Third, this is a retrospective study that was conducted in a single center. Despite the limited number of patients and the high degree of difficulty of ELRA, further prospective and multicenter studies are required.

In conclusion, we analyzed the largest number of ELRA patients to date and provided a method to evaluate sarcopenia score that was an integrated preoperative assessment of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in end-stage HAE patients. A nomogram incorporating the duration from primary diagnosis to obvious symptoms, surgical time and sarcopenia score was then constructed to predict major postoperative complications of ELRA and thus provide hints for preoperative nutritional intervention and complication prevention.