| Literature DB >> 34848958 |
Songwei Lv1, Ran Jing2, Xiaowu Liu3,4, Honglei Shi3,4, Yunfeng Shi3,4, Xugang Wang3,4, Xiubo Zhao1,5, Kai Cao3,4, Zhong Lv3,4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cancer of the bladder is one of the most common and life-threatening. Compared with traditional delivery methods, intravesical administration reduces the amount of drugs required, increases the amount of drugs reaching the lesion site, and minimizes systemic exposure to therapeutic agents. To overcome the limitations of urinary voiding, low urothelium permeability, and intermittent catheterization for large dilution and irrigation of drugs in the bladder, magnetic and photothermal-responsive folate receptor-targeted thermal liposomes (FA-TMLs) were designed for the targeted delivery of doxorubicin (DOX) to bladder cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: bladder cancer; drug delivery; folate-targeted; magnetic response; photothermal effect; thermo-sensitive liposomes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34848958 PMCID: PMC8627283 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S329621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Scheme 1A schematic illustration of the one-step microfluidic fabrication of magnetic and photothermal-responsive liposomes (FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX).
Figure 1Preparation and characterization of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and gold nanorods (GNRs). (A) TEM image of MNPs (scale bar = 50 nm). (B) Particle size of MNPs. (C) XRD patterns of MNPs. (D) TEM image of GNRs (scale bar = 20 nm). (E) UV−vis−NIR spectra of GNRs. (F) Temperature-responsive curves of a GNRs solution treated with different NIR irradiation.
Figure 2Preparation and characterization of folate-modified thermosensitive liposomes (FA-TMLs). (A) Effect of different flow rate ratio (MeOH solution: aqueous solution) on liposome size and PDI. (B) Effect of different total flow rate (MeOH solution: aqueous solution) on liposome size and PDI. (C) TEM image of FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs. (D) DSC curve of FA-TMLs. (E) Stability of FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX (4 °C). (F) Magnetic hysteresis loop of the MNPs and FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX. (G) The effects of DOX concentration on encapsulation efficiency and loading efficiency of DOX in FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX. (H) The effects of MNPs concentration on encapsulation efficiency and loading efficiency of DOX in FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX.
Figure 3In vitro drug release and cellular uptake of FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX. (A) Temperature controlled DOX release from FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX. (Black: 24 °C; Red: 45 °C). (B) Photo-thermal controlled DOX release from FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX. (C and D) Cytotoxicity of FA-TMLs (C) and MNPs (D). (E) Cell viability with FA-TMLs; FA-TMLs + 980 nm laser irradiation; FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs; FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs + 980 nm laser irradiation; FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX; FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX + 980 nm laser irradiation. (F) Cytotoxicity of control group, TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX, FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX, DOX, to folate-negative A549 cells (gray) and folate-positive bladder cancer cells (red). Significant differences are represented as **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; no significant difference is represented as ns.
Figure 4Fluorescence images of cells stained with calcein AM (green) and PI (red) incubated with the FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX without and with 980 nm NIR laser irradiation.
Figure 5Localization of DOX in subcellular organelles of bladder tumor cells. The triple-labelling with the nucleus-selective dye (DAPI, blue), the fluorescent drug (DOX, red), and dyes selective for acidic endolysosomes (LysoTracker, green). (A) 1h; (B) 4h.
Cytotoxicity for Bladder Cancer 5637 Cells and A549 Cells Treated with DOX, FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX, FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX + Irradiation
| Drugs | IC50 (μM)/5637 Cells | IC50 (μM)/A549 Cells |
|---|---|---|
| DOX | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 3.0 ± 0.5 |
| TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX | 6.3 ± 1.2 | 6.0 ± 1.4 |
| FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX | 4.4 ± 0.8 | 5.9 ± 1.1 |
| FA-TMLs@MNPs-GNRs-DOX + irradiation | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 4.2 ± 0.9 |