| Literature DB >> 34848932 |
Chongjun Huang1, Yurou Cai1, Xi Chen1, Yu Ke1.
Abstract
Cotton is one of the most important cellulose fibers, but the absence of antimicrobial capacity along with the self-cleaning, UV protection and electric conductivity often frustrates its wider applications in many fields. Nanotechnology has provided new insights into the development of functional nanomaterials with unique chemical and physical properties. Silver has been effectively incorporated into the cotton fabrics as the antimicrobial agents due to the strong inhibitory and antimicrobial effects on a broad spectrum of bacteria, fungi and virus with low toxicity to human being. In this review, a variety of strategies have been summarized to load silver on cotton fabrics in situ or ex situ and to fabricate high performance value-added cotton fabrics with self-cleaning, UV protection, electric conductivity and antimicrobial capability depending on the synthesis of silver coating or silver-based nanocomposite coating.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial; Coating; Cotton; Electric conductivity; Self-cleaning; UV protection
Year: 2021 PMID: 34848932 PMCID: PMC8612115 DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-04257-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cellulose (Lond) ISSN: 0969-0239 Impact factor: 5.044
Antibacterial cotton fabrics based on AgNO3 and Ag NPs
| Technique | Microbe | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Carboxymethylcellulose hydrogels/fumaric acid | Bozaci et al. ( | |
| Acryloyl sulfadiazine-methyl methacrylate copolymers/ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether | Cao et al. ( | |
| MRSA,VRE | ||
| Monochlorotrizinyl β-cyclodextrin | Ibrahim et al. ( | |
| Shahidi et al. ( | ||
| Vankar and Shukla ( | ||
| Perelshtein et al. ( | ||
| Gum tragacanth | Ranjbar-Mohammadi ( | |
1,2,3,4-Butanetetracarboxylic acid β-Cyclodextrin grafted polyacrylic acid/ephichlorphydrin Citric acid | Montazer et al. ( | |
| Hebeish et al. ( | ||
| El-Rafie et al. ( | ||
| El-Rafie et al. ( | ||
| Carboxymethyl chitosan | Xu et al. ( | |
| Acidic mixture including mercaptoacetic acid, acetic anhydride, acetic acid and concentrated sulfuric acid | Park et al. ( | |
| Xu et al. ( | ||
| Cysteine; Ag NPs/chitosan | Arif et al. ( | |
| Amino-terminated hyperbranched polymer | Zhang et al. ( | |
| Sodium periodate/sericin | Yue et al. ( | |
| Sodium periodate/amino-terminated hyperbranched polymer | Zhang et al. ( | |
| Ag NPs/Polystyrene-block-polyacrylic acid | Budama et al. ( | |
| Ag NPs/DNA | Takeshima et al. ( | |
| Argon glow discharge | S. | Li et al. ( |
| Electron beam irradiation | Chmielewska and Sartowska ( | |
| Butylamine, L-ascorbic, glucose/cetyl trimethyl ammonium | Lee et al. ( | |
| bromide, sodium borohydride/L-cysteine | Bacciarelli-Ulacha et al. ( | |
| Sodium borohydride/polyacrylic acid, maleic anhydride | El-Shishtawy et al. ( | |
| Trisodium citrate/carboxymethyl chitosan | Airoudj et al. ( | |
| Xu et al. ( | ||
| Wang et al. ( | ||
| Alkali hydrolyzed alginate | Zahran et al. ( | |
| Polydopamine | Xu et al. ( | |
| Poly(2-aminoethyl methacrylate)/γ irradiation | Liu et al. ( | |
| Reducing AgNO3 via heat reduction | Jiang et al. ( | |
| Reducing Tollens' reagent | Montazer et al. ( | |
Reducing AgNO3 under basic condition, sodium hydroxide | Tang et al. ( | |
| Emam et al. ( | ||
| Emam et al. ( | ||
| Aladpoosh et al. ( | ||
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of fabricating silver-decorated cotton fabric via bulk sorption, coating, binding and encapsulation of silver salts or silver nanoparticles
Fig. 2Schematic illustration of the surface modification of fabrics via single-sided or both-sided technique
Self-cleaning coatings of Ag-based nanocomposites on cotton fabrics
| Treatment of fabric | Microbe | Functions | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dipped sequentially with branched poly(ethylenimine), Ag NPs and fluorinated decylpolyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane | Water contact angle of ~ 169° and a sliding angle of ~ 3°; | Wu et al. ( | |
| Enhanced the color fastness to washing and rubbing; | |||
| Retained antibacterial ability of AgNPs/PEI-coated fabrics | |||
| Synthesized TiO2 by titanium tetrachloride/heat treatment; Prepared AgBr-TiO2 via TiO2 NPs and AgNO3/KBr; Coated AgBr-TiO2 on fabric in silane solution | Water contact angle of 145.8°; | Rana et al. ( | |
| Bacterial reduction ratio of 99.87% | |||
| Modified fabric by in situ polymerization of dopamine hydrochloride; Prepared Ag doped cotton through immersing dopamine modified fabric in AgNO3/glucose; Prepared Cu layer by immersing Ag doped cotton into Fehling B/formaldehyde; Nanoneedles of cupper hydroxide formed in sodium hydroxide/ammonium persulfate | Water contact angle of 168° | Belal et al. ( | |
| Synthesized TiO2 nanowire by hydrothermal treatment of TiO2 NPs; Photo-reduced Ag ions to Ag metal on the TiO2 nanoparticles or nanowires; Coated Ag/TiO2 nanocomposites on PVP treated cotton fabrics | Methylene blue stain on Ag/TiO2-PVP treated fabric completely degraded after 12 h exposure to direct sunlight; | Hebeish et al. ( | |
| Good bacterial and fungi inhibition | |||
| ZnO coated fabric via immersed in zinc nitrate hexahydrate/polyallylamine solution; Immersed ZnO coated fabric in AgNO3 solution | Degraded completely RhB within 2.5 h under visible light; | Manna et al. ( | |
| RhB degradation activities maintained up to 5 cycles; | |||
| Color stain on fabric completely removed after sunlight exposure for 15 h; | |||
| Complete reduction in viability for | |||
| Photoreduction of Ag+ on ZnO; Loaded Ag/ZnO and stabilized on cotton fabric | Decolorized safranin O within 225 min | Oda et al. ( | |
| Dipped amylase treated cotton fabric into ZnAc/ AgNO3 solution; Added Keliab dropwise and heated at 90 °C | Methylene blue degradation factor △E of 53.6; | Aladpoosh and Montazer ( | |
| Bacterial reduction of 93.5% and 99.7%, respectively for | |||
| Grafted MAPS onto cotton fabric via γ irradiation; In situ deposition of Ag@ZnO by zinc acetate/AgNO3 | Methylene blue degradation reached to 98% and remained 97% after 5 rounds; | Wang et al. ( | |
| Inhibition zone of 5.3 mm and 5.8 mm against | |||
| Prepared TiO2 hydrosol via tetrabutyl titanate/ isopropanol; Coated cotton fabric in TiO2 hydrosol/heat treatment; Ag/AgCl coating by silver nitrate/HCl and UV irradiation | – | Removed methyl orange after 60 min irradiation | Wu et al. ( |
| Dipped fabric into tetrabutyl titanate/tert-butanol and acetic acid; Immersed the treated fabric in aqueous AgBr; Hydrothermal treatment at 150 °C | – | Complete decoloration of methylene blue within ~ 90 min; | Boufi et al. ( |
| DMMP degradation of 95.5% under visible light for 2 h | |||
| Preparing Ag/AgCl/ZIF-8 via deposition-photoreduction method using AgNO3, ZIF and ZnCl2; Coating Ag/AgCl/ZIF-8 on cotton; Immersing the cotton fabric into tetrabutyl titanate, tertbutylacohol and acetic acid | – | Degradation of methylene blue reached 98.5% within 105 min under visible light; | Guan et al. ( |
| Degradation capacity maintained ~ 85% after 3 cycles |
Fig. 3Schematic mechanism of the photocatalytic reaction of Ag/AgCl heterostructure on methyl orange dye
UV protective coatings of Ag-based nanocomposites on cotton fabrics
| Treatment of fabric | Microbe | Functions | Ref | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In situ reduced AgNO3 by trisodium citrate | Reduction of UV transmittance of 90%; | Rehan et al. ( | ||
| Bacterial reduction rate of 98% after 20 washing cycles | ||||
| Reduced AgNO3 by carboxymethyl cellulose; Padded Ag-carboxymethyl cellulose composite via layer by layer technique | UPF value of 3.92 at Ag content of 3.31 g/kg for 10 layers compared to 2.85 for untreated cotton; | Ahmed and Emam ( | ||
| Total bacterial reduction for 6–10 layers | ||||
| Prepared Ag/ZnO nanorods via zince acetate/silver nitrate; Coated Ag/ZnO on cotton fabric and heat treatment | Water contact angle reached to 139°; | Gao et al. ( | ||
| Antibacterial rate of 91 ~ 96% and antifungal rate of 98% | ||||
| Ag colloids prepared via silver nitrate/trisodium citrate dehydrate/sodium borohydride; Ag/ZnO nanocomposite prepared via adding zinc oxide to Ag colloids; Coated Ag/ZnO nanocomposite onto cotton fabric | UPF values of 267, 269 and 274 for yellow, blue and scarlet nanocomposite; | Avazpour et al. ( | ||
| Total Bacterial reduction | ||||
| Ag/ZnO NPs (10 ~ 35 nm) functionalized with GPTMS and TEOS; Prepared hybrid sol via suspending functionalized Ag:ZnO NPs in chitosan/acetic acid; Padded hybrid sol onto fabrics | UV absorption at 367 and 420 nm corresponding to Ag and ZnO; | Busila et al. ( | ||
| Antimicrobial activity of reducing up to 50 ~ 95% viability | ||||
| In situ deposited Ag and ZnO nanoparticles via microwave treatment/amino terminated hyperbranched polymer (reducing agent) | UPF value of 60 compared to 4.79 of untreated fabric; | Zhang et al. ( | ||
| Bacterial reduction reached to 99.99% | ||||
| Deposited fabrics with flower-like TiO2 micro-nanoparticles via hydrothermal deposition; In situ reduction of AgNO3 | UPF value of 56.39; | Li et al. ( | ||
| Inhibition rate higher than 99% | ||||
| Prepared TiO2 via acidic hydrolysis of TiCl4; Coated cotton fabric in TiO2 colloid/alanine; Immersed in AgNO3 under UV irradiation | UPF rating 50 + even after 10 washing cycles; | Milosevic et al. ( | ||
| Bacterial reduction of 99.9% | ||||
| Deposited TiO2 on cotton fabric using titanium tetra isopropoxide; Ag deposition on TiO2 decorated cotton fabric by hydrothermal treatment | UV protection with UPF over 60; | Mishra and Butola ( | ||
| Bacterial reduction of 99.5% against | ||||
| Pre-treated fabrics with reactive dyes; Loading Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite | Higher UPF for Ag/TiO2 fabrics; | Gorjanc and Sala ( | ||
| 100% Bacterial reduction even after 10 consecutive laundering cycles; | ||||
| Ag content on dyed cotton fabrics of 65.67 to 142.24 mg/kg compared with blank dyeing fabrics of 35.05 mg/kg | ||||
| Nanosol prepared from AgNO3/titanium isopropoxide/tetraethyl orthosilicate; Coating process | UPF of 50 + UPF before and after washing 5 times; | Onar et al. ( | ||
| Bacterial reduction of over 90% | ||||
Fig. 4Schematic mechanism of UV protective coating via absorbing or reflecting
Conductive coatings of Ag-based nanocomposites on cotton fabrics
| Treatment of fabric | Microbe | Functions | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electroless plating method using glucose as reducing reagent | – | Volume resistivity of 8.99 × 10−4
| Chen et al. ( |
| Modified fabrics with 3-mercaptopropyl triethoxysilane; Padded fabrics with silver 2-ethylhexylcarbamate/ methanol and heat treatment at 130 °C | Electric resistance as low as 3.92 Ω; | Kwak et al. ( | |
| Increasing inhibition zones of 22.0 mm ( | |||
| Padded with silver nitrate-epoxy composite coating | – | Shielding effectiveness of 50–69 dB in 60–15,000 MHz | Perumalraj et al. ( |
| Wet electroless deposition of Ag | – | EMI shielding effectiveness of ~ 111 dB; | Tan et al. ( |
| A few dB reduction in EMI shielding effectiveness after washing 20 times or bending 1000 times | |||
| Deposited Ag NPs using ammonia/silver nitrate and heat treatment; Cu electroless plating on Ag coated fabrics | Surface resistivity of Ag-fabrics of ~ 620 Ω, and decreased to 20 Ω after Cu electroless plating; | Ali et al. ( | |
| Inhibition zone of 16.5 mm ( | |||
| Surface temperature of 83.1 °C, higher than the conventional fabric of 69.6 °C | |||
| Deposited Cu on cotton fabric by copper acetate/hydrazine hydrate; Immersing Cu-coated fabric in silver nitrate and heat treatment at 120 °C | Water contact angle of 160.9°; | Suryaprabha and Sethuraman ( | |
| Sheet resistance of 0.15 Ω/sq; | |||
| Inhibition zone of 14 mm ( | |||
| Dipped cotton fabrics into GO suspension and microwave irradiation for 10 min; Immersed GO coated fabric in silver nitrate/trisodium citrate and microwave irradiation | – | Surface resistance with 5.61 Ω/sq; | Wang et al. ( |
| EMI SE more than 40 dB; | |||
| Water contact angle of 135.1° | |||
| Synthesized Ag decorated rGO sheets by in situ hydrothermal reduction of AgNO3; Coating Ag/rGO by using PVP as non-ionic polymer adhesive | EMI shielding effectiveness of 27.36 dB in 8.2–12.4 GHz; | Ghosh et al. ( | |
| Inhibition zone of 1.0 cm compared with ~ 0.1 cm of only GO coated fabric | |||
| Modified with rGO thin film by a dipping method via GO/hydrazine hydrate; Coated with Ag via magnetron sputtering | – | Average surface resistance is 2.71 Ω/sq | He et al. ( |
| Inkjet printing cotton fabric | – | Sheet resistance lower to ~ 2.11 Ω/sq | Karim et al. ( |
Fig. 5Schematic illustration of Ag/rGO conductive coating on cotton fabrics