| Literature DB >> 34848523 |
Dragana Lovre1,2,3, Kristin Bateman4, Mya Sherman5, Vivian A Fonseca1,2, John Lefante6, Franck Mauvais-Jarvis7,2,3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: As of November 2021, COVID-19 has killed more than 5 million people globally, including over 750 000 in the USA. Apart from corticosteroids, most available therapeutic options are at best marginally efficient in reducing disease severity and are extremely expensive. The systematic investigation of clinically approved drugs is a priority to determine what does mitigate disease severity. Oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) produce a state of anti-inflammatory immune responses and immune tolerance, and enhanced antibody production. The goal of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a short E2 and P4 therapy, in addition to standard of care (SOC), in mitigating disease severity in COVID-19 hospitalised patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase 2, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre trial. Patients hospitalised for confirmed COVID-19, with scores 3-5 on the 9-point WHO ordinal scale are randomised between two arms: (1) Oestradiol cypionate intramuscular (IM) and micronised progesterone oral (PO), in addition to SOC, and (2) placebo, in addition to SOC. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients improving to scores 1 or 2 on the WHO scale through day 28. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, cause of death, readmission rates, change in inflammatory biomarkers between admission and occurrence of primary endpoint, and adverse events. Study sample size will be up to 120 participants. The trial is currently recruiting subjects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The sponsor of this study is the Center of Excellence in Sex-Based Biology & Medicine at Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Ethical approval was obtained from the Tulane institutional review board on 14 May 2021. The study was reviewed by the US Food and Drug Administration and granted Investigational New Drug #152 499. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04865029; Pre-results. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; general endocrinology; infectious diseases; sex steroids & HRT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34848523 PMCID: PMC8635865 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Study design. E2 5 mg IM injection will be administered once on day 1 and P4 200 mg will be administered daily orally (PO) day 1–5. Clinical status follow-up via electronic medical record (EMR) review will be performed day 14th and day 28th. Clinical status for the end of study visit will be on day 60 via telephone and EMR review. E2, oestradiol cypionate; IM; Intramuscular; P4, progesterone (oral); SOC, standard of care.
WHO 9 point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement
| Patient state | Descriptor | Score |
| Uninfected | No clinical or virological evidence of infection | 0 |
| Ambulatory | No limitation of activities | 1 |
| Limitation of activities | 2 | |
| Hospitalised mild disease | Hospitalised, no oxygen therapy | 3 |
| Oxygen by mask or nasal prongs | 4 | |
| Hospitalised severe disease | Non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen | 5 |
| Intubation and mechanical ventilation | 6 | |
| Ventilation +additional organ support-pressors, renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation | 7 | |
| Dead | Death | 8 |
*Table 1 was adapted from reference 26.
Figure 2Schedule of safety assessments. Study subjects will be monitored for symptoms daily while receiving the study drugs day 1–5. Relevant safety assessments otherwise will be performed via chart review on day 14th and 28th. End of study visit safety assessment will be on day 60 via telephone and EMR review. *Women in reproductive age. ** Patients with renal impairment. DVT, deep venous thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; EMR; electronic medical record; E2, oestradiol cypionate; P4, progesterone.
Sample size calculations
| Treatment | Per cent leading to a scale 1–2 | Sample size |
| SOC | 60 | 32 |
| SOC+E2+P4 | 90 | 32 |
| SOC | 60 | 22 |
| SOC+E2+P4 | 95 | 22 |
| SOC | 70 | 62 |
| SOC+E2+P4 | 90 | 62 |
| SOC | 70 | 36 |
| SOC+E2+P4 | 95 | 36 |
E2, oestradiol cypionate; P4, micronised progesterone; SOC, standard of care.
Interim analysis sample size calculation for a binary endpoint
| Stage | 1 | 2 |
| Information rate | 50% | 100% |
| Efficacy boundary (z-value scale) | 2.963 | 1.969 |
| Overall power | 0.1641 | 0.8000 |
| No of subjects | 61.8 | 123.7 |
| Cumulative alpha spent | 0.0031 | 0.0500 |
| Two-sided local significance level | 0.0031 | 0.0490 |
| Lower efficacy boundary (t) | −0.377 | −0.172 |
| Upper efficacy boundary (t) | 0.277 | 0.148 |
Sequential analysis with a maximum of 2 looks (group sequential design). The sample size was calculated for a two-sample test for rates (two sided), H0: pi(1) − pi(2) = 0, H1; treatment rate pi(1) = 0.9, control rate pi(2) = 0.7. (t): approximate treatment effect scale.