Literature DB >> 34847841

Comparison of rapid molecular testing methods for detecting respiratory viruses in emergency care: a prospective study.

Dagfinn Lunde Markussen1, Harleen M S Grewal2,3, Siri Tandberg Knoop1,3, Sondre Serigstad1,2,4, Øyvind Kommedal2,3, Marit Ebbesen3, Elling Ulvestad2,3, Rune Bjørneklett1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) caused by contagious viruses are common among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Early detection of these viruses can help prevent nosocomial transmission. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of three rapid molecular methods, namely FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (FAP plus), ID NOW™ Influenza A and B 2 (ID NOW2) point-of-care test, and an in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, to identify patients with viral RTIs requiring isolation in an emergency setting.
METHODS: We included a FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus in the initial workup of patients with suspected RTIs during a flu season. The RT-PCR and the influenza point-of-care test were performed as part of routine diagnostics, on demand from the treating physicians. We compared viral detections and compared time to positive test results for each method.
FINDINGS: The FAP plus significantly reduced the turnaround time and was able to identify 95% patients with potential contagious viral RTI. Routine diagnostics ordered by the treating physician had a turnaround time of a median 22 h and detected 87% of patients with potential contagious viral RTI. In patients that had all three tests, the ID NOW2 detected 62% of patients with influenza.
CONCLUSIONS: The FAP plus was able to rapidly and reliably identify patients with potential contagious viral RTIs; its use was feasible in the ED setting. Failing to test patients with viral RTI and using tests with long turnaround time may lead to nosocomial transmission of viral infections and adverse patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Respiratory tract infection; contagious disease; emergency department; influenza virus; nosocomial transmission

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34847841     DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2021.2003857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)        ISSN: 2374-4243


  1 in total

1.  Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings.

Authors:  Alexander Domnich; Andrea Orsi; Carlo-Simone Trombetta; Elisabetta Costa; Giulia Guarona; Miriana Lucente; Valentina Ricucci; Bianca Bruzzone; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.