Literature DB >> 3484758

Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists' estimates and attitudes.

G A Maryniuk, S H Kaplan.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional survey of 571 clinicians was conducted to obtain information about expected and observed restoration longevity. Clinicians believed that average large amalgam, small amalgam, and cast restorations lasted 6, 11, and 13 years, respectively. Patients were thought to be responsible for 47%, dentists for 30%, and materials used for 23% of restoration failures. The clinicians perceived the restorations that they placed to be more long-lasting than those placed by other clinicians. Clinical measurements of restoration longevity were shown to be influenced by the judgment criteria used by clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3484758     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  4 in total

1.  What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; P M Dummer; F D Dunstan; A S Gilmour; R J Jones; C J Phillips; J Rees; S Richmond; J Stevens; E T Treasure
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

2.  Reasons for Placement and Replacement of Resin-based Composite Restorations in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-09-05

3.  Placement, replacement and longevity of composite resin-based restorations in permanent teeth in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Chrysanthakopoulos
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.607

4.  Decision criteria for replacement of fillings: a retrospective study.

Authors:  J Kirsch; J Tchorz; E Hellwig; T T Tauböck; T Attin; C Hannig
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2016-07-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.