| Literature DB >> 34846922 |
Kosuke Matsuzono1, Yusuke Ishiyama2, Ayuho Higaki3, Katsunari Namba3, Yutaka Aoyama2, Takeshi Igarashi1, Kumiko Miura1, Tadashi Ozawa1, Takafumi Mashiko1, Reiji Koide1, Ryota Tanaka1, Kenji Harada2, Kazuomi Kario2, Kensuke Kawai4, Shigeru Fujimoto1.
Abstract
Recent reports suggest that Staphylococcus haemolyticus can cause infective endocarditis (IE). However, no data are available regarding infectious intracranial aneurysm (IIA) following S. haemolyticus endocarditis. Endovascular coiling is a challenging approach for the treatment of IIA. We describe the case of a 63-year-old woman who suddenly developed aphasia and dysarthria following an acute cerebral infarction in her left insular and temporal cortex. After a total hysterectomy at the age of 39, the patient had suffered from recurrent bacterial pyomyositis in her legs. At admission, there was no evidence of cerebral aneurysm, as assessed by magnetic resonance angiography, and no vegetation, as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), resulting in an incorrect diagnosis. However, subarachnoid hemorrhage and development of cerebral aneurysm in the left middle cerebral artery occurred within 1 week of hospitalization. Continuous positive blood culture results and a second TEE finally revealed that IE was caused by S. haemolyticus. Coil embolization of the IIA was successful on day 26 after symptom onset; after this procedure, the patient began to recover. This case demonstrates that S. haemolyticus-induced endocarditis can cause IIA. Endovascular coiling is a potentially effective approach to treat IIA.Entities:
Keywords: Staphylococcus haemolyticus; endovascular coiling; endovascular therapy; infectious cerebral aneurysm; infectious endocarditis; infectious intracranial cerebral aneurysm
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34846922 PMCID: PMC8674480 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211058857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.(a) Axial DW, (b) FLAIR, and (c) MRA images on day 0 of hospitalization. Arrows show an acute infarction in the left middle cerebral artery lesion, but no aneurysm. (d) Axial DW, (e) FLAIR, and (f) MRA images on day 7 of hospitalization. The lesion was expanded (yellow arrows). In addition, SAH (arrowheads) and a novel aneurysm (red arrow) appeared. (g) Axial DW, (h) FLAIR, and (i) MRA images on day 17 of hospitalization. The lesion diminished in the DW image but expanded in the FLAIR image (yellow arrows). An aneurysm developed (red arrow in yellow circle).
DW, diffusion-weighted; FLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; MRA, magnetic resonance angiography; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Figure 3.(a) 3D-CTA on day 23 showing an aneurysm at the M2/M3 bifurcation (arrow). (b) Cerebral angiography on day 26 showing the developed aneurysm (arrow). (c) Coil embolization was completed and there was no arterial flow into the aneurysm (arrow).
3D-CTA, three-dimensional computed tomography angiography.
Figure 2.(a) TEE on day 19 showing mitral valve vegetation (arrow) and (b) severe mitral valve retardation (arrowhead).
TEE, transesophageal echocardiography.
Figure 4.Clinical course of the present case.
TEE, transesophageal echocardiography; mPSL, methylprednisolone.