Literature DB >> 34846762

Effective forest-based climate change mitigation requires our best science.

Kristina J Anderson-Teixeira1,2, Ethan P Belair3.   

Abstract

California's Cap-and-Trade Program sets a limit on the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions and allows a portion of excess emissions to be offset through purchase of credits for climate benefits accrued elsewhere. Badgley et al. (2021, Global Change Biology, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15943) describe how the use of mean forest carbon stocks from ecological supersections can create perverse incentives for project developers, potentially leading to over-crediting and nonadditional offsets. Carbon markets remain a valuable tool in combating climate change, but ensuring projects' additionality is of critical importance to effective carbon mitigation. Badgley's article should serve as a call to action to redouble efforts at integrating the latest carbon science into effective and timely policy solutions.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34846762     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  1 in total

1.  Carbon conundrums: Do United States' current carbon market baselines represent an undesirable ecological threshold?

Authors:  Anthony W D'Amato; Christopher W Woodall; Aaron R Weiskittel; Caitlin E Littlefield; Lara T Murray
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 13.211

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.