Literature DB >> 34846672

Evaluation of target autocrop function in nasopharyngeal carcinoma SIB IMRT plan.

Xiaojuan Duan1, Lu Chen1, Yibing Zhou2.   

Abstract

A new target autocrop function was introduced in the Varian Eclipse™ treatment planning software (version 15.5 above) (Lohynská in Klin Onkol 33(4):288-294, 2020). The study aimed to evaluate this new target autocrop impact on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) plan quality and delivery efficiency. Randomly 66 approved NPC simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans were retrospectively studied. The manual cropping-based plans served as reference and were designed using sliding-window IMRT. Reference plans were re-optimized with identical plan parameters following the institutional clinical protocol, except for the redundant optimization objective of the manual cropping targets deleted. Additionally, each target within 5 mm of another had one minimum objective at 100% volume and one maximum objective at 0% volume for the autocrop plans. Plan quality was assessed based on selected parameters, including TCP (tumor control probability), NTCP (normal tissue complication probability), conformality index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and dose-volume characteristics. Additionally, the delivery efficiency, the total plan treatment time defined as a sum of monitor units (MUs) for each treated field, and delivery accuracy, γ passing rate of treatment plan quality assurance (QA) also were compared. Both the manual cropping plans and the autocrop plans could be approved by an experienced oncologist. Overall, the autocrop plans could provide approximately a 13% reduction in linac MU while maintaining comparable plan quality, radiobiological ranking, and accuracy to the manual cropping plans. The new target autocrop tip facilitated the SIB IMRT plans for nasopharyngeal cancer patients. The autocrop could guarantee the quality and delivery accuracy of the radiotherapy plan and improved the planning efficiency, treatment efficiency, and reduced machine wear and tear. It was a promising tool for optimal plan selection for NPC SIB IMRT.
© 2021. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery accuracy; Dosimetric and radiobiological parameters; Plan quality; Planning and treatment efficiency; Target autocrop

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34846672     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01082-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  2 in total

1.  A quantitative measure for radiation treatment plan quality.

Authors:  Anna Laura Licon; Dewayne Defoor; John Ford; Richard Crownover; Ying Li; Chul Ha; Tony Eng; William Jones; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Niko Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Impact of Multi-leaf Collimator Parameters on Head and Neck Plan Quality and Delivery: A Comparison between Halcyon™ and Truebeam® Treatment Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Taoran Li; Ryan Scheuermann; Alexander Lin; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo; Wei Zou; Samuel Swisher-McClure; Michelle Alonso-Basanta; John N Lukens; Alireza Fotouhi Ghiam; Chris Kennedy; Michele M Kim; Dimitris Mihailidis; James M Metz; Lei Dong
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-11-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.