Literature DB >> 34846612

The current situation in the approach to osteoporosis in older adults in Turkey: areas in need of improvement with a model for other populations.

Gulistan Bahat1, Nezahat Muge Catikkas2, Dilek Gogas Yavuz3, Pinar Borman4, Rengin Guzel5, Jean Yves Reginster6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The total number of older adults in Turkey is striking, amounting to around 8 million, and this translates into considerably higher numbers of cases of osteoporosis (OP) and fractures in older adults. In this article, we outlined the current situation of OP in older adults in Turkey and investigated the differences between Turkey and a representative developed European country (Belgium), in terms of the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of OP. Our intention in this regard was to identify areas in need of improvement and subsequently to make a clear call for action to address these issues.
METHODS: Herein, considering the steps related to the OP approach, we made a complete review of the studies conducted in Turkey and compared with the literature recommendations.
RESULTS: There is a need for a national osteoporotic fracture registry; measures should be taken to improve the screening and treatment of OP in older males, such as educational activities; technicians involved in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning should undergo routine periodic training; all DXA centers should identify center-specific least significant change values; all older adults should be considered for routine lateral dorsolumbar X-ray imaging for the screening of vertebral fractures while ordering DXA scans; the inclusion of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) software in DXA assessments should be considered; screening using a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) algorithm that is specific to Turkey should be integrated; the fortification of foods with vitamin D is required; the high fracture risk by country-specific FRAX algorithm and the presence of falls/high fall risk should be integrated in reimbursement terms; and finally, more "fracture liaison services" should be established.
CONCLUSION: We suggest that the practical consideration of our suggestions will provide considerable support to the efforts for combating with the adverse consequences of OP in society. This approach can be subsequently modeled for other populations to improve the management of OP globally.
© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Current situation; Improvement; Older; Osteoporosis; Turkey

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34846612     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-01038-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  60 in total

Review 1.  The burden of osteoporosis in four Latin American countries: Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina.

Authors:  Rima Aziziyeh; Mo Amin; Mohdhar Habib; Javier Garcia Perlaza; Kirk Szafranski; Rebecca K McTavish; Tim Disher; Ana Lüdke; Chris Cameron
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 2.  Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age.

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Risk of mortality following clinical fractures.

Authors:  J A Cauley; D E Thompson; K C Ensrud; J C Scott; D Black
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Incidence of hip fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis in Turkey: the FRACTURK study.

Authors:  S Tuzun; N Eskiyurt; U Akarirmak; M Saridogan; M Senocak; H Johansson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Comparison of morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures: Which one has the highest burden?

Authors:  Maroun Rizkallah; Falah Bachour; Mirvat El Khoury; Amer Sebaaly; Boutros Finianos; Rawad El Hage; Ghassan Maalouf
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-08-08

6.  Awareness of osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  Yeşim Gökçe Kutsal; Ayçe Atalay; Sule Arslan; Aynur Başaran; Ferhan Cantürk; Abdullah Cindaş; Merih Eryavuz; Jale Irdesel; Kiymet-Ikbal Karadavut; Yeşim Kirazli; Dilşad Sindel; Kazim Senel; Füsun Güler-Uysal; Kadir Yildirim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Factors impacting 1-year mortality after hip fractures in elderly patients: A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  M Gurger
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.968

Review 8.  Quality of life assessment in musculo-skeletal health.

Authors:  Charlotte Beaudart; Emmanuel Biver; Olivier Bruyère; Cyrus Cooper; Nasser Al-Daghri; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 9.  A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Odén; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; D A Wahl; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.