Satoshi Okubo1,2, Masaji Hashimoto3,4, Kazutaka Kojima1, Mikio Makuuchi5, Yuta Kobayashi1,2, Junichi Shindoh1,2. 1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Tokyo, Minato-ku, 105-8470, Japan. 2. Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Tokyo, Minato-ku, 105-8470, Japan. masaji.hashimoto@gmail.com. 4. Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease, Tokyo, Japan. masaji.hashimoto@gmail.com. 5. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sannoudai Hospital, 4-1-38 Higashiishioka, Ishioka-city, Ibaraki, 315-0037, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The optimal pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) method for reducing pancreatic fistula (PF) incidence remains unclear. This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the "twin U-stitch method" and compared it with the conventional invagination method. METHODS: Data of 183 consecutive patients who underwent PG after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between January 2015 and November 2020 were evaluated. PF incidence was compared between patients who experienced twin U-stitch PG (twin U-stitch group) and those who experienced conventional invagination PG (conventional PG group). RESULTS: The twin U-stitch and conventional PG methods were performed in 97 and 86 patients, respectively. The time required for twin U-stitch PG was shorter than conventional PG (9.3 min vs 20.0 min, P < 0.001). The twin U-stitch group showed a lower incidence of PF than the conventional PG group (8% vs. 19%, P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis confirmed that twin U-stitch PG was significantly correlated with a decreased risk of PF (odds ratio, 0.23; P = 0.006), independent of the texture of the pancreas. Subgroup analysis of patients with soft-textured pancreas showed that the median drain amylase levels in the twin U-stitch group on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 were significantly lower than those in the conventional PG group (POD 1: 1,335 vs. 5,991 U/L, P < 0.001; POD 3: 212 vs. 518, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The twin U-stitch method was simple and preferable to the conventional method for preventing PF in patients with PD.
PURPOSE: The optimal pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) method for reducing pancreatic fistula (PF) incidence remains unclear. This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the "twin U-stitch method" and compared it with the conventional invagination method. METHODS: Data of 183 consecutive patients who underwent PG after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between January 2015 and November 2020 were evaluated. PF incidence was compared between patients who experienced twin U-stitch PG (twin U-stitch group) and those who experienced conventional invagination PG (conventional PG group). RESULTS: The twin U-stitch and conventional PG methods were performed in 97 and 86 patients, respectively. The time required for twin U-stitch PG was shorter than conventional PG (9.3 min vs 20.0 min, P < 0.001). The twin U-stitch group showed a lower incidence of PF than the conventional PG group (8% vs. 19%, P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis confirmed that twin U-stitch PG was significantly correlated with a decreased risk of PF (odds ratio, 0.23; P = 0.006), independent of the texture of the pancreas. Subgroup analysis of patients with soft-textured pancreas showed that the median drain amylase levels in the twin U-stitch group on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 were significantly lower than those in the conventional PG group (POD 1: 1,335 vs. 5,991 U/L, P < 0.001; POD 3: 212 vs. 518, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The twin U-stitch method was simple and preferable to the conventional method for preventing PF in patients with PD.