BACKGROUND: An association between specific endoscopic findings and high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤ 5 mm in size has not been reported. We sought to identify the endoscopic findings associated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in patients with superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤ 5 mm. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the data of 84 patients (88 lesions; low-grade dysplasia: n = 35, high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma: n = 53) with superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors who underwent initial treatment at a single center (from July 2009 to April 2021). All the patients had lesions sized ≤ 5 mm. We assumed that the endoscopic findings were independently associated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma and determined the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of a combination of independent factors for diagnosing high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma and low-grade dysplasia. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression of significant factors in the univariate analysis revealed that lesions with depressed morphology (odds ratio: 23.9, 95% confidence interval: 2.8-204.2; p = 0.0037) and a reddish color (odds ratio: 175.7, 95% confidence interval: 11.4-2697.1; p = 0.0002) were independently associated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. McNemar's test revealed that combining the macroscopic type and color provided significantly higher sensitivity for diagnosing high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma than color alone (98.1%, 95% confidence interval: 90.1-99.7 vs. 71.7%, 95% confidence interval: 58.4-82.0; p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Reddish and depressed-type lesions before treatment were associated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. Combining the macroscopic type and color can help detect high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. These findings could help clinicians determine the best therapeutic strategy for patients with smaller (≤ 5 mm) superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors in clinical settings.
BACKGROUND: An association between specific endoscopic findings and high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤ 5 mm in size has not been reported. We sought to identify the endoscopic findings associated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in patients with superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤ 5 mm. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the data of 84 patients (88 lesions; low-grade dysplasia: n = 35, high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma: n = 53) with superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors who underwent initial treatment at a single center (from July 2009 to April 2021). All the patients had lesions sized ≤ 5 mm. We assumed that the endoscopic findings were independently associated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma and determined the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of a combination of independent factors for diagnosing high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma and low-grade dysplasia. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression of significant factors in the univariate analysis revealed that lesions with depressed morphology (odds ratio: 23.9, 95% confidence interval: 2.8-204.2; p = 0.0037) and a reddish color (odds ratio: 175.7, 95% confidence interval: 11.4-2697.1; p = 0.0002) were independently associated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. McNemar's test revealed that combining the macroscopic type and color provided significantly higher sensitivity for diagnosing high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma than color alone (98.1%, 95% confidence interval: 90.1-99.7 vs. 71.7%, 95% confidence interval: 58.4-82.0; p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Reddish and depressed-type lesions before treatment were associated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. Combining the macroscopic type and color can help detect high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. These findings could help clinicians determine the best therapeutic strategy for patients with smaller (≤ 5 mm) superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors in clinical settings.