| Literature DB >> 34844562 |
Wojciech Makowski1, Aleksandra Królicka2, Barbara Tokarz3, Karolina Miernicka3, Anna Kołton3, Łukasz Pięta4, Kamilla Malek4, Halina Ekiert5, Agnieszka Szopa5, Krzysztof Michał Tokarz6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant transformation with rol oncogenes derived from wild strains of Rhizobium rhizogenes is a popular biotechnology tool. Transformation effects depend on the type of rol gene, expression level, and the number of gene copies incorporated into the plant's genomic DNA. Although rol oncogenes are known as inducers of plant secondary metabolism, little is known about the physiological response of plants subjected to transformation.Entities:
Keywords: Primary and secondary metabolism; Rhizobium rhizogenes; Rol genes; Transformation; Venus flytrap
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34844562 PMCID: PMC8628454 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03320-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Non-transformed (NT plants) and transformed clones (clones K and L) of Dionaea muscipula plants. Scale bar = 1 cm
Fig. 2Accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA) in non-transformed and transformed tissue of Dionaea muscipula clones. Different letters indicate significant differences between means at p < 0.05; the bar represents the standard deviation
Fig. 3Accumulation of proline in non-transformed and transformed tissue of Dionaea muscipula clones. Different letters indicate significant differences between means at p < 0.05; the bar represents the standard deviation
Activity of antioxidant enzymes: peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in non-transformed and transformed tissue of Dionaea muscipula clones. Different letters in columns – significant differences between means at p < 0.05, SD – standard deviation
| POD | CAT | SOD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NT plants | 24.32B ± 3.00 | 527.35A ± 151.01 | 111.22A ± 10.25 |
| clone K | 20.00A ± 0.83 | 428.76A ± 88.81 | 547.50B ± 78.21 |
| clone L | 21.85AB ± 0.61 | 811.56B ± 99.02 | 554.62B ± 24.19 |
Fig. 4Accumulation of glutathione in non-transformed and transformed tissue of Dionaea muscipula clones. a Oxidised glutathione (GSSG). b Reduced glutathione (GSH). c Total glutathione (GSH + GSSG). d Glutathione ratio (GSH/GSSG). Different letters indicate significant differences between means at p < 0.05; the bar represents the standard deviation
Fig. 5Accumulation of carotenoids in non-transformed and transformed tissue of Dionaea muscipula clones. Different letters indicate significant differences between means at p < 0.05; the bar represents the standard deviation
Accumulation of phenolic compounds in non-transformed and transformed tissue of Dionaea muscipula clones. Different letters in lines – significant differences between means at p < 0.05, SD – standard deviation
| Phenolic compound | NT plants | clone K | clone L |
|---|---|---|---|
| gallic acid | 31.14A ± 0.48 | 28.89A ± 1.58 | 53.73B ± 0.63 |
| protocatechic acid | 29.12B ± 0.63 | 26.18A ± 2.70 | 24.20A ± 0.57 |
| chlorogenic acid | 20.60A ± 0.26 | 18.83A ± 2.54 | 28.02B ± 0.48 |
| p-coumaric acid | 4.19B ± 1.53 | 1.09A ± 0.14 | 8.42C ± 0.28 |
| ferulic acid | 16.07A ± 1.32 | 39.05B ± 0.87 | 61.49C ± 13.39 |
| kaempferol | 58.56B ± 1.65 | 127.04C ± 2.83 | 18.30A ± 0.37 |
Fig. 6Semi-quantification biocomponents in non-transformed and transformed tissue of Dionaea muscipula clones, identified in ATR-FTIR spectra. a Total lipids. b Total triglycerides/total lipids. c Free fatty acids/total lipids. d Saccharose. e Starch. f Fructose + glucose. g Phenolic compounds. h Tyrosine. Different letters indicate significant differences between means at p < 0.05; the bar represents the standard deviation