Literature DB >> 34843291

Context matters: Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with increased disordered eating and earlier activation of genetic influences in girls.

Megan E Mikhail1, Sarah L Carroll1, D Angus Clark2, Shannon O'Connor3, S Alexandra Burt1, Kelly L Klump1.   

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests socioeconomic disadvantage may increase risk for eating disorders (EDs). However, there are very few studies on the association between disadvantage and EDs, and all have focused on individual-level risk factors (e.g., family income). Neighborhood disadvantage (i.e., elevated poverty and reduced resources in one's neighborhood) is associated with increased risk for anxiety/depression and poor physical health. To date, no studies have examined phenotypic associations between neighborhood disadvantage and disordered eating, or how any form of disadvantage may interact with genetic individual differences in risk for EDs. We examined phenotypic and etiologic associations between neighborhood disadvantage and disordered eating in 2,922 girls ages 8-17 from same-sex twin pairs recruited through the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Parents rated the twins on nine items assessing core disordered eating symptoms (e.g., weight preoccupation, binge eating), and neighborhood disadvantage was calculated from 17 indicators of contextual disadvantage (e.g., median home value, neighborhood unemployment). Puberty was measured using the Pubertal Development Scale to examine whether associations were consistent across development. At a phenotypic level, greater neighborhood disadvantage was associated with significantly greater disordered eating symptoms in girls at all stages of puberty (β = .07). Moreover, Genotype × Environment models showed that girls living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods exhibited stronger and earlier (i.e., during pre/early puberty) activation of genetic influences on disordered eating. Results highlight the critical importance of considering contextual disadvantage in research on etiology and risk for disordered eating, and the need for increased screening and treatment for EDs in disadvantaged youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34843291      PMCID: PMC8634784          DOI: 10.1037/abn0000719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  66 in total

1.  The Minnesota Twin Family Registry: some initial findings.

Authors:  D T Lykken; T J Bouchard; M McGue; A Tellegen
Journal:  Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)       Date:  1990

2.  The Women's Health Initiative: The food environment, neighborhood socioeconomic status, BMI, and blood pressure.

Authors:  Tamara Dubowitz; Madhumita Ghosh-Dastidar; Christine Eibner; Mary E Slaughter; Meenakshi Fernandes; Eric A Whitsel; Chloe E Bird; Adria Jewell; Karen L Margolis; Wenjun Li; Yvonne L Michael; Regina A Shih; Joann E Manson; José J Escarce
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?

Authors:  C G Fairburn; S J Beglin
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.861

4.  Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amy J H Kind; Steve Jencks; Jane Brock; Menggang Yu; Christie Bartels; William Ehlenbach; Caprice Greenberg; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Gonadal hormone contributions to individual differences in eating disorder risk.

Authors:  Megan E Mikhail; Kristen M Culbert; Cheryl L Sisk; Kelly L Klump
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.741

6.  Do neighborhood social processes moderate the etiology of youth conduct problems?

Authors:  S Alexandra Burt; D Angus Clark; Amber L Pearson; Kelly L Klump; Jenae M Neiderhiser
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 7.  A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Connor Gorber; M Tremblay; D Moher; B Gorber
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.213

8.  Neighborhood disadvantage, childhood adversity, bullying victimization, and adolescent depression: A multiple mediational analysis.

Authors:  Jeong-Kyun Choi; Tamrat Teshome; John Smith
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 9.  Risk and resilience: genetic and environmental influences on development of the stress response.

Authors:  Charles F Gillespie; Justine Phifer; Bekh Bradley; Kerry J Ressler
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.505

10.  Disordered eating and internalizing symptoms in preadolescence.

Authors:  Kai S Thomas; Marc O Williams; Ross E Vanderwert
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.708

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  What next for eating disorder genetics? Replacing myths with facts to sharpen our understanding.

Authors:  Laura M Huckins; Rebecca Signer; Jessica Johnson; Ya-Ke Wu; Karen S Mitchell; Cynthia M Bulik
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  Temperament and psychopathology in early childhood predict body dissatisfaction and eating disorder symptoms in adolescence.

Authors:  Sara J Bufferd; Cheri A Levinson; Thomas M Olino; Lea R Dougherty; Margaret W Dyson; Gabrielle A Carlson; Daniel N Klein
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2022-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.