| Literature DB >> 34843091 |
Tatiana Pushkarsky1, Adam Ward1,2,3, Andrey Ivanov4, Xionghao Lin4,5, Dmitri Sviridov6,7, Sergei Nekhai4, Michael I Bukrinsky8.
Abstract
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) is a term used to describe a variety of neurological impairments observed in HIV-infected individuals. The pathogenic mechanisms of HAND and of its connection to HIV infection remain unknown, but one of the considered hypotheses suggests that HIV infection accelerates the development of Alzheimer's disease. Previous studies suggested that HIV-1 Nef may contribute to HAND by inhibiting cholesterol efflux, increasing the abundance of lipid rafts, and affecting their functionality. Our comparative analysis of postmortem brain samples demonstrated a trend toward the decreased abundance of cholesterol transporter ABCA1 in samples from HIV-infected ART-treated individuals relative to samples from uninfected controls, and a reverse correlation between ABCA1 and flotillin 1, a marker for lipid rafts, in all analyzed samples. The brain samples from HIV-infected individuals, both with and without HAND, were characterized by the increased abundance of p-Tau217 peptide, which correlated with the abundance of flotillin 1. HIV-1 Nef was analyzed in samples from HAND-affected individuals by Western blot with 4 different antibodies and by LC-MS/MS, producing a Nef-positivity score. A significant correlation was found between this score and the abundance of flotillin 1, the abundance of p-Tau217, and the severity of HAND. These results highlight the contribution of Nef and Nef-dependent impairment of cholesterol efflux to HAND pathogenesis and support a connection between the pathogenesis of HAND and Alzheimer's disease.Entities:
Keywords: ABCA1; Cholesterol; HAND; HIV-1; Lipid rafts; Nef; p-Tau217
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34843091 PMCID: PMC8857174 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-021-02608-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Neurobiol ISSN: 0893-7648 Impact factor: 5.590
Fig. 1Analysis of pathogenic correlates of HAND. A Analysis of p-Tau217 in brain samples from uninfected individuals and HIV-infected individuals with and without HAND diagnosis. Data points for p-Tau217 adjusted to total protein were obtained using ProteinSimple Compass software and are presented as arbitrary units. Group comparisons were made by Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc Dwass, Steel, Critchlow–Fligner multiple comparison analysis adjustment for FWER (DSCF option in SAS NPAR1WAY procedure). B Simple linear regression analysis of p-Tau217 and flotillin 1 in HAND samples (data adjusted to total protein obtained using Compass software). C Simple linear regression analysis of ABCA1 and flotillin 1 in all samples (protein abundance adjusted to total protein was obtained using Compass software). r and p values were calculated by Prism v9 software. r and p values were calculated by Prism v9 software. D Analysis of ABCA1 in HIV-infected (HAND-positive and HAND-negative samples) vs. uninfected samples. Data points representing ABCA1 abundance adjusted to total protein were obtained using Compass and are presented as box and whiskers plot with p value calculated by Mann–Whitney nonparametric two-tailed t test
Fig. 2Analysis of Nef in brain samples. Brain lysates were assayed by the Western immunoblot using the 6JR mouse monoclonal anti-Nef antibody from Abcam. Samples were run on the ProteinSimple Jess instrument and analyzed by Compass software. Color-coded lines denote the group assignment of the samples
Results of Nef analysis in experimental samples
| Study ID | SN20 | 3D12 | EH1 | 6JR | LC–MS/MS | Nef score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAND 2 | − | − | − | − | − | 0 |
| HAND 3 | + | + | + | + | + | 5 |
| HAND 4 | − | − | − | − | − | 0 |
| HAND 6 | + | + | + | + | + | 5 |
| HAND 7 | + | + | + | + | + | 5 |
| HAND 11 | + | + | + | − | + | 4 |
| HAND 12 | − | + | − | − | − | 1 |
| HAND 13 | + | + | + | + | - | 4 |
| HAND 14 | − | − | + | − | + | 2 |
| HAND 15 | − | − | − | − | + | 1 |
| HAND 16 | + | − | − | − | + | 2 |
| HAND 17 | + | + | + | + | + | 5 |
| HAND 18 | − | − | − | + | − | 1 |
| HAND 25 | − | − | − | − | + | 1 |
| HAND 26 | + | − | − | − | ND | 1 |
| HAND 27 | − | − | − | − | ND | 0 |
| HAND 28 | − | − | + | − | ND | 1 |
| HAND 29 | + | + | + | + | ND | 4 |
| HAND 30 | − | − | − | − | ND | 0 |
| HAND 41 | ND | ND | ND | + | + | 2 |
| HAND 44 | ND | ND | ND | − | + | 1 |
| HAND 45 | ND | ND | ND | − | − | 0 |
| HIV 1 | − | − | − | − | ND | |
| HIV 5 | − | − | − | − | ND | |
| HIV 8 | + | − | − | − | ND | |
| HIV 9 | − | − | − | − | ND | |
| HIV 10 | + | + | − | − | ND | |
| HIV 19 | + | + | + | + | ND | |
| HIV 20 | + | − | − | − | ND | |
| HIV 24 | − | − | − | − | ND | |
| HIV 40 | ND | ND | ND | − | ND | |
| HIV 42 | ND | ND | ND | − | ND | |
| HIV 43 | ND | ND | ND | − | ND | |
| Uninf 21 | + | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 22 | + | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 23 | + | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 31 | + | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 32 | − | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 33 | ND | ND | ND | − | ND | |
| Uninf 34 | − | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 35 | + | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 36 | − | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 37 | + | − | − | − | ND | |
| Uninf 38 | − | − | ND | − | ND | |
| Uninf 39 | + | − | + | − | ND |
ND, not done; + , Nef detected; − , Nef undetected
Fig. 3Simple linear regression analysis of samples from HAND-diagnosed individuals. Simple linear regression analysis was performed between Nef score and pTau217 (A) and flotillin 1 (B), assessed using ProteinSimple Compass software, and presented as arbitrary units. C Linear regression between Nef score and HAND clinical scores. R squared and p values were calculated by Prism v9 software
HAND severity evaluation in donors of postmortem brain samplesA
| ID | Frascati score | AAN score | HAND score in the study |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAND 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 3 | 5 | 5 | |
| HAND 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| HAND 6 | 4 | 4 | |
| HAND 7 | 5 | 5 | |
| HAND 11 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 12 | 2 | 2 | |
| HAND 13 | 5 | 5 | |
| HAND 14 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 15 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 16 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 17 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 18 | 2 | 2 | |
| HAND 25 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 26 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 27 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 28 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 29 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 30 | 3 | 3 | |
| HAND 41 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| HAND 44 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| HAND 45 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
AHAND score used in the study was based on the Frascati score where available and the AAN score in other cases. Assuming a correlation between the Frascati and AAN scales [17], the HAND scores correspond to the following clinical classification established for the Frascati criteria: 0, neurocognitively normal, no significant impairment on NP testing; 1, asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment; 2, possible mild neurocognitive disorder; 3, probable mild neurocognitive disorder; 4, possible HIV-associated dementia; 5, probable HIV-associated dementia