Pamela Sarkar1, Juliana Redondo2, Kelly Hares2, Steven Bailey1, Anastasia Georgievskaya2, Kate Heesom3, Kevin C Kemp2, Neil J Scolding1, Claire M Rice1. 1. Clinical Neurosciences, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Department of Neurology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK. 2. Clinical Neurosciences, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 3. Bristol Proteomics Facility, Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cell-based therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS), including those employing autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are being examined in clinical trials. However, recent studies have identified abnormalities in the MS bone marrow microenvironment. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the secretome of MSC isolated from control subjects (C-MSC) and people with MS (MS-MSC) and explore the functional relevance of findings. METHODS: We employed high throughput proteomic analysis, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and immunoblotting, as well as in vitro assays of enzyme activity and neuroprotection. RESULTS: We demonstrated that, in progressive MS, the MSC secretome has lower levels of mitochondrial fumarate hydratase (mFH). Exogenous mFH restores the in vitro neuroprotective potential of MS-MSC. Furthermore, MS-MSC expresses reduced levels of fumarate hydratase (FH) with downstream reduction in expression of master regulators of oxidative stress. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are further evidence of dysregulation of the bone marrow microenvironment in progressive MS with respect to anti-oxidative capacity and immunoregulatory potential. Given the clinical utility of the fumaric acid ester dimethyl fumarate in relapsing-remitting MS, our findings have potential implication for understanding MS pathophysiology and personalised therapeutic intervention.
BACKGROUND: Cell-based therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS), including those employing autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are being examined in clinical trials. However, recent studies have identified abnormalities in the MS bone marrow microenvironment. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the secretome of MSC isolated from control subjects (C-MSC) and people with MS (MS-MSC) and explore the functional relevance of findings. METHODS: We employed high throughput proteomic analysis, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and immunoblotting, as well as in vitro assays of enzyme activity and neuroprotection. RESULTS: We demonstrated that, in progressive MS, the MSC secretome has lower levels of mitochondrial fumarate hydratase (mFH). Exogenous mFH restores the in vitro neuroprotective potential of MS-MSC. Furthermore, MS-MSC expresses reduced levels of fumarate hydratase (FH) with downstream reduction in expression of master regulators of oxidative stress. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are further evidence of dysregulation of the bone marrow microenvironment in progressive MS with respect to anti-oxidative capacity and immunoregulatory potential. Given the clinical utility of the fumaric acid ester dimethyl fumarate in relapsing-remitting MS, our findings have potential implication for understanding MS pathophysiology and personalised therapeutic intervention.
Cell-based therapy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has undergone rapid
translation from in vitro and in vivo studies to clinical trials. In neurological
disease, including MS, the potential of autologous cells isolated from a systemic
source and expanded ex vivo is particularly attractive given the limited capacity of
the central nervous system (CNS) for repair.
The protective properties of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) and
their secretome, in both in vitro and in vivo models of neurodegenerative disease,
mean they are widely regarded as one of the most promising cell types for use in
cell-based therapies.[2-5]If autologous cells are to be employed in cell-based therapies, it is important to
demonstrate that their therapeutic properties have not been compromised by exposure
to disease.
In MS, there is increasing concern that MSC isolated from people with MS have
altered functional properties. We have previously demonstrated that MSC isolated
from people with progressive with MS (MS-MSC) can be expanded in vitro and have the
expected cell surface phenotype and mesenchymal differentiation potential.
However, in subsequent, larger studies which take the effect of age into
consideration, we demonstrated that MS-MSC have reduced ex vivo expansion potential,
and failure or in adequate ex vivo expansion of autologous MSC was also
reported in approximately 5% participants in the MEsenchymal StEm cells for MS
(MESEMS) study (NCT01854957; A. Uccelli, ECTRIMS 2018).
Our previous investigations have also demonstrated that MS-MSC have an in
vitro phenotype consistent with premature ageing, with increased expression of
markers of senescence and accelerated telomere shortening.
Furthermore, we have also shown that the MS-MSC secretome offers reduced
neuroprotection in vitro,
and MS-MSC have increased susceptibility to nitrosative stress and display
dysregulated anti-oxidant responses including reduced secretion of a range of
trophic factors and anti-oxidants.
Others have reported reduced immunosuppressive function and altered cytokine
expression in MS-MSC[12,13] as well as reduced therapeutic efficacy of MS-MSC in a murine
model of MS (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, EAE).Here, we compared the composition of the MSC secretome when MSC were isolated from
people with MS or control subjects with the aim of identifying differences which may
contribute to the reduced neuroprotective potential of the MSC secretome and
dysregulated anti-oxidant responses previously reported.
Material and methods
MSC isolation and culture
Bone marrow aspirates were obtained from people with progressive MS (MS-MSC)
participating in the clinical trials ‘Repeat Infusion of Autologous bone Marrow
Cells in MS (SIAMMS-II)’ (NCT01932593; United Kingdom (UK) Research Ethics
Committee (REC) 13/SW/0255)
and ‘Assessment of Bone Marrow-Derived Cellular Therapy in Progressive
Multiple Sclerosis (ACTiMuS)’ (NCT01815632; REC 12/SW/0358).
Control MSC (C-MSC) were obtained from the discarded femoral head during
total hip replacement (REC 10/H102/69); donors were known to have
osteoarthritis, but were otherwise healthy and were not receiving drugs
associated with myelosuppression. None of the ACTiMuS participants had received
disease modifying therapy in the year prior to bone marrow collection although
some participants with secondary progressive MS had been exposed to disease
modifying therapy previously (see Supplementary Material). Not all samples were available for all
experiments; the number of biological replicates is specified in each experiment
and details regarding the cohort and which samples were used for each analysis
are presented as Supplementary Material.
Isolation of MSC and preparation of MSC-conditioned medium
MSC were isolated using a density gradient and were expanded in vitro as
previously described.
Cell surface phenotype and mesenchymal differentiation potential were
confirmed to be consistent with those expected of MSC.
MSC in the logarithmic phase of growth at second (p2) or third passage
(p3) were used to produce conditioned medium.
The culture flasks were washed twice with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium (DMEM; Sigma, USA), to remove any residual trophic effect from serum.
Minimal medium (MIN) was added to the flasks. This consisted of 48.25 mL DMEM,
500 µL Pen-Strep (Gibco Penicillin–Streptomycin, Ref 15140-122), 500 µL Sato
concentrate (containing 100 µg/mL of bovine serum albumin, 0.06 µg/mL
progesterone, 16 µg/mL putrescine, 0.04 µg/mL selenite, 0.04 µg/mL thyroxine and
0.04 µg/mL triiodothyronine),
500 µL holo-transferrin (Sigma-Aldrich, Ref. T0665) and 250 µL
L-glutamine (Sigma Aldrich, Ref. I5500). After 24 hours, conditioned medium was
collected from cultures of control MSC (C-MSCcm) or MSC isolated from patients
with progressive MS (MS-MSCcm), centrifuged, filtered and stored at −20°C.
Isolation of mitochondria
MSC mitochondria were isolated with a commercial kit used according to
manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma MITOISO2). Briefly, cells at p3 were
detached, washed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed on ice
for 5 minutes. Extraction buffer was added, and cells centrifuged at 600 ×
g for 10 minutes. Supernatant was collected and centrifuged
at 11,000 × g for 10 minutes to obtain mitochondrial pellet.
The pellet was resuspended in either storage buffer for mitochondrial activity
assay or CelLytic M cell lysis reagent with protease inhibitors for
immunoblotting.
Proteomics
At the University of Bristol Proteomics Facility, liquid chromatography–tandem
mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS) of C-MSCcm and MS-MSCcm was performed according to a
previously described protocol for tandem mass tagging (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Ready to use sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for mFH (human
mFH: Cusabio Catalogue No. CSB-EL008659HU) was performed on conditioned medium
from C-MSC and MS-MSC according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A standard
curve was prepared and absorbance read on a spectrophotometer at 450 nm (BMG
Labtech Fluostar Optima). Values were interpolated into the curve and multiplied
by the dilution factor to obtain the final concentration.
Fumarase activity assay
Fumarase activity was quantified using a commercially available assay according
to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma-Aldrich, Ref. MAK206). In addition to
MSC or mitochondrial lysate, wells contained 50 µL reaction mix which consisted
of 36 µL of fumarase assay buffer, 2 µL of fumarase enzyme mix, 10 µL of
fumarase developer and 2 µL of fumarase substrate. After adding the reaction
mix, the plate was protected from light and mixed using a horizontal shaker. The
results were measured using a BMG Labtech Fluostar Optima microplate reader at
450 nm, and MARS data analysis software (kinetic mode for 60 minutes at 37°C
with absorbance readings taken every minute). Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
and hydrogen (NADH) standards were read at the end of the incubation time. To
calculate fumarase activity, the absorbance for each well was plotted versus
time. Two time points were chosen (T1 and T2) in the linear range of the plot,
and the absorbance was determined. Background was corrected by subtracting the
measurement obtained for the blank standards. The change in absorbance from T1
to T2 was calculated, and the amount of NADH generated (nmole/well) was
obtained. Fumarase activity was ascertained by dividing amount of NADH (nmole)
between T1 and T2 by the reaction time multiplied by sample volume added to the
well, and the activity was reported as nmole/min/µL or milliunits/µL where one
unit of fumarase is the amount of enzyme that generates 1.0 µmole of NADH per
minute at pH 9.5 and 37°C.
Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting was performed as previously described.[11,20] Briefly, MSC were plated
at 5 × 104 cells per well in a six-well plate prior to lysis with
universal lysis buffer (Millipore). Protein quantification was performed with
Qubit Fluorometer and Quant-iT™ protein assay kit (Invitrogen) to ensure equal
loading of samples. Protein lysates were diluted 1:1 with 2 × Laemmli buffer and
denatured at 95°C, before loading on Tris HCl 4–20% ready gels (Bio-Rad). Gels
were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and subsequently blocked with 5%
bovine serum albumin (Sigma) or 5% milk in tris-buffered saline–Tween for 1
hour. Incubation with primary antibody anti-FH (Abcam, ab95950),
anti-nuclear-related (erythroid-derived 2) factor 2 (anti-NRF-2) antibody
(R&D, AF3925), anti-hypoxia inducible factor1α (anti-hypoxia inducible
factor1α (anti-HIF-1α; Abcam, ab51608)), anti-COX5 (Santa Cruz, SC-376907) and
anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Abcam, ab9484) was
performed overnight at 4°C. Amersham ECL Plus™ Western Blotting Detection System
(GE Healthcare) was used to visualise specific protein expression patterns by
chemiluminescence. The integrated density of bands was measured using ImageJ
(National Institute of Health, NIH), and values are expressed relative to GAPDH
loading control protein.
Neurotoxicity assays
Rodent cortical neuronal cultures, trophic factor withdrawal (exposure to MIN for
24 hours) and nitric oxide (NO) toxicity assays employing 0.4 mM DETANONOate
(Enzo Life Sciences) were established as previously described.[10,20] Survival
was assessed using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) assay.
Recombinant human FH was added as described in the relevant experiments
(Sigma-Aldrich, Ref. SRP6120).
Statistical analysis
GraphPad PRISM 5 (GraphPad Software) was used for graphical illustrations and
statistical analyses not employing multiple regression (*). Where stated,
multivariant analyses (#) were performed with STATA v12
(StataCorp).[8,10,11] Bar graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean and
regression lines were fitted with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Values of
p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Reduced mFH secretion in progressive MS is negatively associated with
duration of progressive phase of disease
Relative reduction in the concentration of mFH in the secretome of MS-MSC was
demonstrated by LC-MSMS (C-MSC: n = 4, MS-MSC:
n = 4; *p = 0.048) and reduced
concentration was confirmed by ELISA (C-MSC: n = 6, MS-MSC:
n = 15; *p = 0.042; Figure 1). Following analysis of the
quantitative ELISA data using the regression model to account for effects of
age, a statistically significant independent effect of progressive MS was seen
(#p = 0.041, CI = −4.614 to −0.097) and there
was a negative association with duration of progressive phase of MS (Figure 1; Pearson’s
r −0.568, CI = −0.837 to −0.079, *p =
0.027).
Figure 1.
MS-MSC secrete reduced mFH and secretion is negatively associated with
duration of progression in MS. (a) Secretion of mFH in C-MSC and MS-MSC
as determined by LC-MSMS. (b) Quantitative determination of mFH
secretion in MSCs as measured by ELISA. (c) Negative association of mFH
secretion with duration of progressive phase of MS.
MS-MSC secrete reduced mFH and secretion is negatively associated with
duration of progression in MS. (a) Secretion of mFH in C-MSC and MS-MSC
as determined by LC-MSMS. (b) Quantitative determination of mFH
secretion in MSCs as measured by ELISA. (c) Negative association of mFH
secretion with duration of progressive phase of MS.mFH: mitochondrial fumarate hydratase; C-MSC: control mesenchymal stromal
cells; MS-MSC: multiple sclerosis mesenchymal stromal cells.*p < 0.05, #p < 0.05
multivariant analysis.
FH activity in MS-MSC is preserved when adjusted for age
Under basal cell culture conditions, total fumarate hydratase (FH) activity was
reduced in MS-MSC (n = 9) compared with C-MSC
(n = 9; *p = 0.026; Figure 2). However, a statistically
significant effect was not observed when confounding effects of age were taken
into account; there was a strong trend towards an increase in FH activity with
age (p = 0.059) although the trend was less marked in MS-MSC
(Figure 2(b)).
There was no association between FH activity in MS-MSC with duration of disease
progression.
Figure 2.
MS-MSC have reduced endogenous FH activity, but effect is confounded by
differences in age between cohorts. (a) MS-MSC FH activity was reduced
in MS-MSC compared with C-MSC although the observed effect does not
persist following adjustment for age. (b) There was a strong trend
towards an increase in FH activity with increasing age, although this
effect was not seen in MS-MSC.
MS-MSC have reduced endogenous FH activity, but effect is confounded by
differences in age between cohorts. (a) MS-MSC FH activity was reduced
in MS-MSC compared with C-MSC although the observed effect does not
persist following adjustment for age. (b) There was a strong trend
towards an increase in FH activity with increasing age, although this
effect was not seen in MS-MSC.FH: fumarate hydratase; C-MSC: control mesenchymal stromal cells; MS-MSC:
multiple sclerosis mesenchymal stromal cells.*p < 0.05.A specific assay for mFH was not available, so that the FH activity assay was
used to determine FH activity in mitochondrial cell preparations isolated from
C-MSC and MS-MSC. To confirm successful fractionation of the cell preparations,
immunoblotting for COX5 was undertaken with equal loading (20 µg) of
mitochondrial protein, the cytosolic fraction (negative control) and
unfractionated MSC protein. As expected, COX5 expression was greater in the
mitochondrial fraction than in the unfractionated MSC lysate and was not
detected in the cytosolic fraction (Figure 3(a)). There was no significant
difference in FH activity in mitochondria isolated from MS-MSC
(n = 6) compared to those from C-MSC (n =
9; p = 0.73; Figure 3(b)).
Figure 3.
mFH activity is preserved in MS-MSC. (a) Immunoblot for COX5 confirms the
specificity of MSC mitochondrial fractionation. (b) No difference in mFH
activity was seen in mitochondria isolated from C-MSC and MS-MSC.
MSC: mesenchymal stromal cells; COX5: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5;
mFH: mitochondrial fumarate hydratase; C-MSC-Mito: mitochondria isolated
from control mesenchymal stromal cells; MS-MSC-Mito: mitochondria
isolated from multiple sclerosis mesenchymal stromal cells.
mFH activity is preserved in MS-MSC. (a) Immunoblot for COX5 confirms the
specificity of MSC mitochondrial fractionation. (b) No difference in mFH
activity was seen in mitochondria isolated from C-MSC and MS-MSC.MSC: mesenchymal stromal cells; COX5: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5;
mFH: mitochondrial fumarate hydratase; C-MSC-Mito: mitochondria isolated
from control mesenchymal stromal cells; MS-MSC-Mito: mitochondria
isolated from multiple sclerosis mesenchymal stromal cells.
Reduced expression of FH in MS-MSC
Comparison of total FH expression by C-MSC and MS-MSC was examined by
immunoblotting. Western blot analysis of MSC isolated from patients with MS
(n = 6) and control subjects (n = 12)
demonstrated reduced expression of FH protein by MS-MSC (**p =
0.004). This effect remained following adjustment with multiple regression for
age (##p = 0.002, CI = −0.4824343 to −0.1456443;
Figure 4(a) and
(b)). There was a
negative association between FH expression and increasing duration of
progression of MS (Pearson’s r = −0.897, p =
0.02, CI = −0.9888 to −0.3138; Figure 4(c)), but this effect did not persist following adjustment
for age. In the combined cohorts, there was no significant association between
FH protein expression and age although a negative effect of increasing age was
seen in MS-MSC (Pearson’s r = −0.872, p =
0.024, CI = −0.9859 to −0.2057). A trend towards a differential effect of age on
FH was seen depending on the presence of progressive MS (p =
0.069) with a decrease in FH expression with age being seen only in MS-MSC
(Figure 4(d)).
Figure 4.
Reduced expression of FH protein by MS-MSC. (a) Reduced expression of FH
protein was seen in MS-MSC and this effect persisted after adjustment
for age difference between the cohorts. (b) Representative
immunoblotting bands. (c) A reduction in relative FH expression was seen
with increasing duration of disease progression in MS, but this effect
was not statistically significant following adjustment for age
(Pearson’s r = −0.897, p = 0.02, CI =
−0.9888 to −0.3138; p > 0.05 following adjustment
for age). (d) A differential effect of age on FH protein expression with
age was seen between the cohorts; there was a significant negative
association in MS-MSC and a strong trend towards a positive association
in C-MSC.
Reduced expression of FH protein by MS-MSC. (a) Reduced expression of FH
protein was seen in MS-MSC and this effect persisted after adjustment
for age difference between the cohorts. (b) Representative
immunoblotting bands. (c) A reduction in relative FH expression was seen
with increasing duration of disease progression in MS, but this effect
was not statistically significant following adjustment for age
(Pearson’s r = −0.897, p = 0.02, CI =
−0.9888 to −0.3138; p > 0.05 following adjustment
for age). (d) A differential effect of age on FH protein expression with
age was seen between the cohorts; there was a significant negative
association in MS-MSC and a strong trend towards a positive association
in C-MSC.FH: fumarate hydratase; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
C-MSC: control mesenchymal stromal cells; MS-MSC: multiple sclerosis
mesenchymal stromal cells.**p < 0.01, ##p < 0.01
multivariant analysis.
Addition of FH to MS-MSCcm prevents neuronal loss under conditions of trophic
factor withdrawal and nitrosative stress
We have previously demonstrated reduced neuronal survival in the presence of
MS-MSCcm following trophic factor withdrawal and under conditions of nitrosative stress.
Given the observed reduction in FH concentration in MS-MSCcm, we examined
whether neuronal loss could be ameliorated by supplementation of MS-MSCcm with
FH. Optimum concentration of exogenous FH was determined by a dose response
curve which indicated that maximum neuroprotection was observed at
concentrations of FH between 500 and 700 pg/mL, and replicates were performed
with 500 pg/mL FH.Following supplementation of MS-MSCcm with FH, neuronal loss was not observed
under conditions of trophic factor withdrawal (Figure 5(a)) or nitrosative stress
induced by addition of DETANONOate (Figure 5(b)).
Figure 5.
FH supplementation of MS-MSCcm restores neuroprotective potential of
MS-MSCcm. (a) Under conditions of trophic factor withdrawal, reduced
neuronal survival is observed in the presence of MS-MSCcm
(n = 8) compared to minimal media (Kruskal–Wallis
with Dunn’s multiple comparison test). However, with administration of
exogenous FH to MS-MSCcm, neuronal loss is not observed. (b) Nitrosative
stress was induced by application of DETANONOate (NO) and a protective
effect of MS-MSCcm (n = 8) was seen only in the
presence of exogenous FH (Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison
test).
FH: fumarate hydratase; C-MSCcm: conditioned medium from control
mesenchymal stromal cells; MS-MSCcm: conditioned medium from multiple
sclerosis mesenchymal stromal cells; MIN: minimal medium; MTT:
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; NO: nitric
oxide; NS: not significant.
**p < 0.01.
FH supplementation of MS-MSCcm restores neuroprotective potential of
MS-MSCcm. (a) Under conditions of trophic factor withdrawal, reduced
neuronal survival is observed in the presence of MS-MSCcm
(n = 8) compared to minimal media (Kruskal–Wallis
with Dunn’s multiple comparison test). However, with administration of
exogenous FH to MS-MSCcm, neuronal loss is not observed. (b) Nitrosative
stress was induced by application of DETANONOate (NO) and a protective
effect of MS-MSCcm (n = 8) was seen only in the
presence of exogenous FH (Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison
test).FH: fumarate hydratase; C-MSCcm: conditioned medium from control
mesenchymal stromal cells; MS-MSCcm: conditioned medium from multiple
sclerosis mesenchymal stromal cells; MIN: minimal medium; MTT:
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; NO: nitric
oxide; NS: not significant.**p < 0.01.
Nrf-2 expression is negatively associated with duration of progression in
MS
High levels of intracellular fumarate have been associated with a range of
downstream effects with potential implication for intracellular metabolic
signalling. To begin to explore these, we examined expression of HIF-1α and
Nrf-2; upregulation of both has been associated with loss of FH
function[22,23] and each has been identified as being of potential
importance in the pathophysiology of MS.[24,25]We have previously demonstrated that, although there is no difference in
Nrf-2 expression between C-MSC and MS-MSC, MS-MSC have
reduced expression of Nrf-2 protein under standard culture conditions and in
response to nitrosative stress.
Here, we demonstrated a negative association between Nrf-2 protein
expression and duration of disease progression in MS (n = 6,
Pearson’s r = −0.9819, p = 0.01, CI = −0.991
to −0.42; Figure 6). An
independent effect of age was not observed.
Figure 6.
Nrf-2 protein expression. Reduced expression of Nrf-2 protein expression
in association with increasing duration of disease progression in MS
(Pearson’s r = −0.9819, p = 0.01, CI =
−0.991 to −0.42).
Nrf-2 protein expression. Reduced expression of Nrf-2 protein expression
in association with increasing duration of disease progression in MS
(Pearson’s r = −0.9819, p = 0.01, CI =
−0.991 to −0.42).Nrf-2: nuclear-related (erythroid-derived 2) factor 2.
Reduced HIF-1α expression in MS-MSC
A strong trend towards reduced expression of HIF-1α protein in MS-MSC was noted
on immunoblotting (C-MSC: n = 3, MS-MSC: n =
6; p = 0.056), reaching statistical significance when the
effect of age was taken into account (##p = 0.001,
CI = −0.4105565 to −0.1046486; Figure 7(a)). An independent effect of duration of progression was
not observed.
Figure 7.
Reduced MS-MSC expression of HIF-1α. (a) HIF-1α protein expression is
reduced in MS-MSC when the difference in age between the cohorts is
accounted for. (b) Representative immunoblot.
Reduced MS-MSC expression of HIF-1α. (a) HIF-1α protein expression is
reduced in MS-MSC when the difference in age between the cohorts is
accounted for. (b) Representative immunoblot.GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HIF-1α: anti-hypoxia
inducible factor1α; C-MSC: control mesenchymal stromal cells; MS-MSC:
multiple sclerosis mesenchymal stromal cells.##p < 0.01 multivariant analyses.
Discussion
To investigate the reduced neuroprotective potential of MS-MSC in vitro, we examined
the MS-MSC secretome using LC-MSMS and noted reduced mFH secretion by MS-MSC. This
was of particular interest given that dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a fumaric acid ester,
is a licenced disease modifying therapy for relapsing–remitting MS and a putative
neuroprotective effect has been reported.
We confirmed reduced secretion of mFH by MS-MSC by ELISA, and there was a
negative association with duration of progressive disease. Although reduced FH
activity was observed in MS-MSC, this effect did not reach statistical significance
after adjustment for differences in age between the cohorts and furthermore, no
difference was seen when FH activity was assessed in mitochondrial preparations from
MSC isolated from control subjects and people with progressive MS. However, reduced
expression of FH was seen in MS-MSC and a negative correlation with duration of MS
progression was observed. Exogenous application of FH was neuroprotective in vitro;
neuronal survival with exposure to MS-MSCcm under conditions of trophic factor
withdrawal and exposure to nitrosative stress increased. Although expression of both
Nrf-2 and HIF-1α, downstream targets of FH, are both reduced in MS-MSC, only Nrf-2
expression negatively correlated with duration of progressive MS.Fumarase deficiency (also known as fumaric aciduria) is a rare, life-limiting,
autosomal recessive disorder associated with encephalopathy, hypotonia and seizures.
Heterozygous germline mutations of FH are associated with
hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC). In addition to its role as
a tumour suppressor, reduced expression of FH has been implicated in hypertension,
type 2 diabetes
and diabetic kidney disease.
In mice, FH has been identified as a key regulator of metabolism in
haematopoietic stem cells and deficiency is associated with aberrant lymphoid differentiation.In the Krebs cycle, fumarate is catalysed to malate by FH. Intracellular accumulation
of fumarate in FH deficiency has a multitude of downstream metabolic consequences
and the effects are known to vary according to cell type, but include increased
oxidative stress and increased cellular senescence,
mitochondrial dysfunction and activation of both the pro-oncogenic HIF and
anti-oxidant Nrf-2 pathways.
The latter are known to be of relevance to pathophysiology in MS[33,34] and Nrf-2 has
been proposed to underlie putative neuroprotective effects associated with
DMF[32,35] which is
known to be of clinical benefit in relapsing–remitting MS.
In our studies however, reduced mFH expression was associated with reduced
Nrf-2 expression which may reflect a cell-specific or disease effect.In many cell types, reduced expression of Nrf-2 is associated with increased HIF-1α
and causes a shift to glycolysis. Although blocking aerobic glycolysis might be
predicted to be anti-inflammatory,
in MSC HIF-1α expression has been reported to promote MSC survival as well as
maintenance of differentiation potential and MSC-mediated immunosuppression.
Our finding of reduced HIF-1α expression in MS-MSC is therefore notable.The current study suggests that FH deficiency in MS-MSC contributes to a
dysfunctional bone marrow microenvironment in MS with potential significance for
metabolic status and immunoregulation that warrants additional investigation to
determine whether this is a disease-specific effect with potential for therapeutic
intervention.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-msj-10.1177_13524585211060686 for Reduced
expression of mitochondrial fumarate hydratase in progressive multiple sclerosis
contributes to impaired in vitro mesenchymal stromal cell-mediated
neuroprotection by Pamela Sarkar, Juliana Redondo, Kelly Hares, Steven Bailey,
Anastasia Georgievskaya, Kate Heesom, Kevin C Kemp, Neil J Scolding and Claire M
Rice in Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Authors: Gislane L V de Oliveira; Kalil W A de Lima; Amanda M Colombini; Daniel G Pinheiro; Rodrigo A Panepucci; Patrícia V B Palma; Doralina G Brum; Dimas T Covas; Belinda P Simões; Maria C de Oliveira; Eduardo A Donadi; Kelen C R Malmegrim Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Jennifer J Bara; Sarah Turner; Sally Roberts; Gareth Griffiths; Rod Benson; Jayesh M Trivedi; Karina T Wright Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 3.905
Authors: Rafael Contreras-Lopez; Roberto Elizondo-Vega; Maria Jose Paredes; Noymar Luque-Campos; Maria Jose Torres; Gautier Tejedor; Ana Maria Vega-Letter; Aliosha Figueroa-Valdés; Carolina Pradenas; Karina Oyarce; Christian Jorgensen; Maroun Khoury; Maria de Los Angeles Garcia-Robles; Claudia Altamirano; Farida Djouad; Patricia Luz-Crawford Journal: FASEB J Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 5.191