Literature DB >> 34841477

Tools used to assay genomic instability in cancers and cancer meiomitosis.

Jennifer Gantchev1, Brandon Ramchatesingh1, Melissa Berman-Rosa2, Daniel Sikorski3, Keerthenan Raveendra4, Laetitia Amar3, Hong Hao Xu5, Amelia Martínez Villarreal1, Daniel Josue Guerra Ordaz1, Ivan V Litvinov6,7.   

Abstract

Genomic instability is a defining characteristic of cancer and the analysis of DNA damage at the chromosome level is a crucial part of the study of carcinogenesis and genotoxicity. Chromosomal instability (CIN), the most common level of genomic instability in cancers, is defined as the rate of loss or gain of chromosomes through successive divisions. As such, DNA in cancer cells is highly unstable. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. There is a debate as to whether instability succeeds transformation, or if it is a by-product of cancer, and therefore, studying potential molecular and cellular contributors of genomic instability is of high importance. Recent work has suggested an important role for ectopic expression of meiosis genes in driving genomic instability via a process called meiomitosis. Improving understanding of these mechanisms can contribute to the development of targeted therapies that exploit DNA damage and repair mechanisms. Here, we discuss a workflow of novel and established techniques used to assess chromosomal instability as well as the nature of genomic instability such as double strand breaks, micronuclei, and chromatin bridges. For each technique, we discuss their advantages and limitations in a lab setting. Lastly, we provide detailed protocols for the discussed techniques.
© 2021. The International CCN Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal instability; Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay; DNA damage; Genomic instability; H2B-GFP; Meiomitosis; Single-cell sequencing

Year:  2021        PMID: 34841477      PMCID: PMC8891418          DOI: 10.1007/s12079-021-00661-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal        ISSN: 1873-9601            Impact factor:   5.908


  175 in total

1.  Lagging chromosomes entrapped in micronuclei are not 'lost' by cells.

Authors:  Yun Huang; Long Jiang; Qiyi Yi; Lei Lv; Zheng Wang; Xiaoyu Zhao; Liangwen Zhong; Hanwei Jiang; Salma Rasool; Qiaomei Hao; Zongyou Guo; Howard J Cooke; Michael Fenech; Qinghua Shi
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 2.  Spectral karyotyping: an unique technique for the detection of complex genomic rearrangements in leukemia.

Authors:  Bo Guo; Xiaoping Han; Zhanhe Wu; Wanming Da; Hongli Zhu
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2014-04

3.  Genetic determinants of methotrexate responsiveness and resistance in colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Cristina Morales; Maria Ribas; Gemma Aiza; Miguel A Peinado
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Prenatal diagnosis of a mosaic extra structurally abnormal chromosome by spectral karyotyping.

Authors:  Y Ning; C H Laundon; E Schröck; P Buchanan; T Ried
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujiwara; Madhavi Bandi; Masayuki Nitta; Elena V Ivanova; Roderick T Bronson; David Pellman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Gamma-H2AX - a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Linda J Kuo; Li-Xi Yang
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Metabolic inhibitors block anaphase A in vivo.

Authors:  P K Hepler; B A Palevitz
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Acetylation of 53BP1 dictates the DNA double strand break repair pathway.

Authors:  Xiang Guo; Yongtai Bai; Meimei Zhao; Mei Zhou; Qinjian Shen; Cai-Hong Yun; Hongquan Zhang; Wei-Guo Zhu; Jiadong Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Detection of DNA Double Strand Breaks by γH2AX Does Not Result in 53bp1 Recruitment in Mouse Retinal Tissues.

Authors:  Brigitte Müller; N M Ellinwood; Birgit Lorenz; Knut Stieger
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Comprehensive analysis of structural variants in breast cancer genomes using single-molecule sequencing.

Authors:  Sergey Aganezov; Sara Goodwin; Rachel M Sherman; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Gayatri Arun; Sonam Bhatia; Isac Lee; Melanie Kirsche; Robert Wappel; Melissa Kramer; Karen Kostroff; David L Spector; Winston Timp; W Richard McCombie; Michael C Schatz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 9.438

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Contributions of Cancer-Testis and Developmental Genes to the Pathogenesis of Keratinocyte Carcinomas.

Authors:  Brandon Ramchatesingh; Jennifer Gantchev; Amelia Martínez Villarreal; Raman Preet Kaur Gill; Marine Lambert; Sriraam Sivachandran; Philippe Lefrançois; Ivan V Litvinov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.