OBJECTIVE: The most important indication for EEGs is the investigation of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures. However, it is unclear whether EEG in the emergency depatment (ED) can be useful in managing other conditions. Our objective was to investigate the usefulness of EEGs in the ED. METHODS: We performed an observational, descriptive, retrospective study based on clinical records between 2018 and 2019. We evaluated patients admitted to our ED or hospital wards who underwent an EEG. We defined the EEG results as useful when they prompted changes in antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment or clinical management. RESULTS: We gathered information from 236 patients with a mean age of 59.23 years (SD ±22.6), of whom 47.9% were women. In patients with seizures, 18.2% were generalized, 27.1% were focal, and 18.6% were unknown. Overall, 25.8% of the EEGs were abnormal. However, in patients with a history of predisposing conditions for epileptic seizures or encephalopathies, the tracing was abnormal in 47.5%. The most frequent alteration on the abnormal EEGs was generalized slowing (18.2%). The EEG was useful in 76.7% of patients: AEDs changed in 8.4% and clinical management changed in 76.2% of patients. The usefulness of EEGs associated with acute ischemic lesions on CT (p = 0.023) and with the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Routine EEG is useful in the ED, even in patients with a normal CT or MR brain image, because it helps determine clinical management or AED changes.
OBJECTIVE: The most important indication for EEGs is the investigation of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures. However, it is unclear whether EEG in the emergency depatment (ED) can be useful in managing other conditions. Our objective was to investigate the usefulness of EEGs in the ED. METHODS: We performed an observational, descriptive, retrospective study based on clinical records between 2018 and 2019. We evaluated patients admitted to our ED or hospital wards who underwent an EEG. We defined the EEG results as useful when they prompted changes in antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment or clinical management. RESULTS: We gathered information from 236 patients with a mean age of 59.23 years (SD ±22.6), of whom 47.9% were women. In patients with seizures, 18.2% were generalized, 27.1% were focal, and 18.6% were unknown. Overall, 25.8% of the EEGs were abnormal. However, in patients with a history of predisposing conditions for epileptic seizures or encephalopathies, the tracing was abnormal in 47.5%. The most frequent alteration on the abnormal EEGs was generalized slowing (18.2%). The EEG was useful in 76.7% of patients: AEDs changed in 8.4% and clinical management changed in 76.2% of patients. The usefulness of EEGs associated with acute ischemic lesions on CT (p = 0.023) and with the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Routine EEG is useful in the ED, even in patients with a normal CT or MR brain image, because it helps determine clinical management or AED changes.
Authors: Allan Krumholz; Samuel Wiebe; Gary S Gronseth; David S Gloss; Ana M Sanchez; Arif A Kabir; Aisha T Liferidge; Justin P Martello; Andres M Kanner; Shlomo Shinnar; Jennifer L Hopp; Jacqueline A French Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M A King; M R Newton; G D Jackson; G J Fitt; L A Mitchell; M J Silvapulle; S F Berkovic Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-09-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Prakash Paliwal; Benjamin R Wakerley; Leonard L L Yeo; Khalid Mohammed Ali; Irwani Ibrahim; Einar Wilder-Smith; Tiong Beng Sim; Bernd Pohlmann-Eden; Rahul Rathakrishnan Journal: Seizure Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Daniel J Pallin; Joshua N Goldstein; Jon S Moussally; Andrea J Pelletier; Alexander R Green; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2008-06-05