Literature DB >> 34840512

Effectiveness of Screening and Brief Alcohol Intervention at the Workplace: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial at Five Japan-Based Companies.

Yuki Kuwabara1, Aya Kinjo1, Maya Fujii1, Ruriko Minobe2, Hitoshi Maesato2, Susumu Higuchi2, Hisashi Yoshimoto3, Maki Jike4, Yuichiro Otsuka5, Osamu Itani5, Yoshitaka Kaneita5, Hideyuki Kanda6, Yoneatsu Osaki1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence regarding the effectiveness of screening and brief interventions for excessive alcohol use in primary care, these tools are not a part of routine practice. It has been suggested that using these tools at the workplace may be critical to alcohol-associated harm; however, evidence for this claim is unclear. The aim of this article is to develop a study protocol which evaluates the effect of brief alcohol intervention at the workplace to reduce harmful alcohol drinking.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial involving employees (aged 20-74 years) of five Japan-based companies who were screened "positive" by Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) is on-going. Participants were randomized into "Patient Information Leaflet" (control group), "Brief Advice and Counselling," and "Five-minute Brief Advice" groups. A self-administered questionnaire was used to assess alcohol consumption, lifestyle behavior, health status, work performance, and consequences of alcohol use. Data of laboratory markers were collected from routine health checkups.
RESULTS: A total of 351 participants were randomized into Patient Information Leaflet (n = 111), Brief Advice and Counselling (n = 128), and Five-minute Brief Advice (n = 112) groups. Participants were mostly men with a median age of 49 years. Median AUDIT score and weekly alcohol consumption were 11 points and 238 g/week, respectively. Two-thirds of the participants were manufacturing workers.
CONCLUSION: This study protocol developed the first trial in Japan to investigate the effect of brief alcohol intervention combined with a recommended screening tool at the workplace. Our findings can provide evidence on the effectiveness and relevance of these tools to occupational health. ©2021 Tottori University Medical Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brief intervention; excessive alcohol drinking; prevention; workplace

Year:  2021        PMID: 34840512      PMCID: PMC8612880          DOI: 10.33160/yam.2021.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonago Acta Med        ISSN: 0513-5710            Impact factor:   1.641


  34 in total

1.  The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ).

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Catherine Barber; Arne Beck; Patricia Berglund; Paul D Cleary; David McKenas; Nico Pronk; Gregory Simon; Paul Stang; T Bedirhan Ustun; Phillip Wang
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.

Authors:  Cora L Craig; Alison L Marshall; Michael Sjöström; Adrian E Bauman; Michael L Booth; Barbara E Ainsworth; Michael Pratt; Ulf Ekelund; Agneta Yngve; James F Sallis; Pekka Oja
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  A procedure for reducing errors in reports of life events.

Authors:  L C Sobell; T Toneatto; M B Sobell; R Schuller; M Maxwell
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of health care utilization outcomes in alcohol screening and brief intervention trials.

Authors:  Jeremy W Bray; Alexander J Cowell; Jesse M Hinde
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers. A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  M F Fleming; K L Barry; L B Manwell; K Johnson; R London
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A cross-national trial of brief interventions with heavy drinkers. WHO Brief Intervention Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Japan: alcohol today.

Authors:  Susumu Higuchi; Sachio Matsushita; Hitoshi Maesato; Yoneatsu Osaki
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Optimal cutoff values of WHO-HPQ presenteeism scores by ROC analysis for preventing mental sickness absence in Japanese prospective cohort.

Authors:  Tomoko Suzuki; Koichi Miyaki; Yasuharu Sasaki; Yixuan Song; Akizumi Tsutsumi; Norito Kawakami; Akihito Shimazu; Masaya Takahashi; Akiomi Inoue; Sumiko Kurioka; Takuro Shimbo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ultra-brief intervention for problem drinkers: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John A Cunningham; Clayton Neighbors; Cameron Wild; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.

Authors:  Eileen Fs Kaner; Fiona R Beyer; Colin Muirhead; Fiona Campbell; Elizabeth D Pienaar; Nicolas Bertholet; Jean B Daeppen; John B Saunders; Bernard Burnand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.