| Literature DB >> 34839765 |
Conglin Wang1, Baojun Yu2,3, Ronglin Chen1,4, Lei Su1,2,5, Ming Wu6, Zhifeng Liu1,2,5.
Abstract
Patients with rhabdomyolysis (RM) following exertional heatstroke (EHS) are often accompanied by dysfunction of coagulation and acute kidney injury (AKI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between D-dimer and AKI in patients with RM following EHS. A retrospective study was performed on patients with EHS admitted to the intensive care unit over 10-year. Data including baseline clinical information at admission, vital organ dysfunction, and 90-day mortality were collected. A total of 84 patients were finally included, of whom 41 (48.8%) had AKI. AKI patients had more severe organ injury and higher 90-day mortality (34.1 vs.0.0%, p < 0.001) than non-AKI patients. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that D-dimer (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.7, p = 0.018) was an independent risk factor for AKI with RM following EHS. Curve fitting showed a curve relationship between D-dimer and AKI. Two-piecewise linear regression showed that D-dimer was associated with AKI in all populations (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5, p < 0.001) when D-dimer <10.0 mg/L, in RM group (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, p < 0.001) when D-dimer >0.4 mg/L, in the non-RM group (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.7-23.9, p = 0.005) when D-dimer <1.3 mg/L and D-dimer did not increase the incidence of AKI in the non-RM group when D-dimer >1.3 mg/L. AKI is a life-threatening complication of RM following EHS. D-dimer is associated with AKI in critically ill patients with EHS. The relationship between D-dimer and AKI depends on whether RM is present or not.Entities:
Keywords: D-dimer; acute kidney injury; exertional heatstroke; rhabdomyolysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34839765 PMCID: PMC8635537 DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.2008975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ren Fail ISSN: 0886-022X Impact factor: 2.606
Figure 1.Flow chart of all excluded and included patients.
Comparisons of clinical characteristics between non-AKI and AKI patients with RM induced by EHS.
| Non-AKI ( | AKI ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| APACHE II score, median (IQR) | 9.0 (7.0–14.0) | 17.0 (11.0–22.0) | <0.001 |
| SOFA score, median (IQR) | 3.0 (2.0–4.0) | 9.0 (5.0–11.0) | <0.001 |
| GCS score, median (IQR) | 12.0 (9.0–14.0) | 8.0 (6.0–12.0) | 0.006 |
| Age (years), median (IQR) | 21.0 (19.0–26.5) | 23.0 (20.0–28.0) | 0.056 |
| WBC (1 × 109/L), median (IQR) | 11.6 (8.9–14.3) | 12.0 (9.2–14.9) | 0.209 |
| Neutrophil (1 × 109/L), median (IQR) | 8.8 (7.0–12.5) | 10.0 (6.9–13.3) | 0.187 |
| Lymphocyte (1 × 109/L), median (IQR) | 1.1 (0.7–1.7) | 0.7 (0.4–1.7) | 0.759 |
| Monocytes (1 × 109/L), median (IQR) | 0.7 (0.5–1.0) | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 0.549 |
| Platelets (1 × 109/L), median (IQR) | 152.0 (89.0–199.0) | 80.0 (38.0–115.5) | <0.001 |
| Mean platelet volume, median (IQR) | 10.7 (10.0–11.5) | 10.8 (10.1–11.3) | 0.987 |
| Platelet distribution width, median (IQR) | 12.6 (11.1–13.6) | 12.5 (11.1–14.3) | 0.514 |
| TBIL (µmol/L), median (IQR) | 16.6 (12.4–25.8) | 24.4 (14.2–62.9) | 0.079 |
| ALT (U/L), median (IQR) | 54.0 (24.5–333.0) | 148.0 (57.0–1771.0) | 0.014 |
| AST (U/L), median (IQR) | 118.0 (64.0–483.0) | 290.0 (115.0–1587.0) | 0.014 |
| BUN (mmol/L), median (IQR) | 5.1 (4.2–6.1) | 7.8 (6.4–10.3) | <0.001 |
| Scr (µmol/L), median (IQR) | 93.0 (78.0–107.5) | 187.0 (151.0–263.0) | <0.001 |
| Cystatin C (mg/L), median (IQR) | 0.9 (0.8–1.0) | 1.2 (1.0–1.8) | <0.001 |
| CK (U/L), median (IQR) | 2434.0 (1462.5–4714.5) | 3506.0 (1614.0–7894.0) | 0.780 |
| CK-MB (ng/ml), median (IQR) | 63.0 (41.5–107.0) | 89.0 (56.5–209.5) | 0.040 |
| MB (ng/ml), median (IQR) | 466.0 (174.0–1000.0) | 1000.0 (979.8–1000.0) | <0.001 |
| cTNI (pg/ml), median (IQR) | 60.0 (11.0–210.0) | 580.0 (195. 0–1103.5) | 0.018 |
| PT (s), median (IQR) | 16.3 (15.3–18.9) | 23.0 (17.1–36.9) | 0.017 |
| INR (median (IQR) | 1.5 (0.6) 1.3 (1.2–1.6) | 2.0 (1.4–3.7) | <0.001 |
| APTT (s), median (IQR) | 41.0 (36.5–46.8) | 49.9 (38.3–85.4) | 0.299 |
| TT(s), median (IQR) | 17.5 (16.6–23.4) | 21.8 (17.1–36.5) | 0.045 |
| FIB (g/L), median (IQR) | 2.6 (2.3–3.0) | 2.1 (1.4–2.6) | 0.002 |
| D-dimer (mg/L), median (IQR) | 1.1 (0.6–3.9) | 10.0 (3.7–14.4) | <0.001 |
| CRP (mg/dl), median (IQR) | 4.2 (3.2–7.7) | 3.4 (2.4–6.4) | 0.366 |
| PCT (ng/ml), median (IQR) | 2.5 (1.1–4.3) | 3.7 (1.6–6.8) | 0.734 |
| MB ≥ 1000 ng/ml, | 10/37 (27.0%) | 26/35 (74.3%) | <0.001 |
| Lymphocytopenia, | 16/43 (37.2%) | 21/40 (52.5%) | 0.161 |
| DIC, | 10/32(31.2%) | 24/32(75.0%) | <0.001 |
| AHI, | 31/41 (75.6%) | 29/39 (74.4%) | 0.897 |
| 90-day mortality, | 0/43 (0.0%) | 14/41 (34.1%) | <0.001 |
| ICU time (d), median (IQR) | 5.0 (3.0–7.5) | 7.5 (5.0–13.5) | 0.023 |
| Survival time (d), median (IQR) | 90.0 (90.0–90.0) | 90.0 (9.0–90.0) | <0.001 |
| Hospitalization costs (RMB), median (IQR) | 36 748.7 (22 408.4–64 406.8) | 113 013.1 (45 869.3–224 580.8) | <0.001 |
APACHE II: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; WBC: white blood cell; TBIL: total bilirubin; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; Scr: serum creatinine; CK: creatine kinase; CK-MB: MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase; MB: myoglobin; cTNI: cardiac troponin I; PT: prothrombin time; INR: international normalized ratio; APTT: activated partial thromboplastin time; TT: thrombin time; FIB: fibrinogen; CRP: C-reactive protein; PCT: procalcitonin. DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulation; AHI: acute hepatic injury.
Risk factors for AKI with RM induced by EHS.
| Univariate OR (95%CI) | Multivariate OR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| GCS | 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) 0.009 | 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) 0.972 |
| PT | 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 0.044 | 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) 0.671 |
| MB | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.003 | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.518 |
| D-dimer | 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) <0.001 | 1.3 (1.1, 1.7) 0.018 |
| Platelets | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.002 | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.837 |
GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; PT: prothrombin time; MB: myoglobin.
Figure 2.Curve fitting of D-dimer in predicting AKI in EHS.
D-dimer in predicting AKI with two-piecewise linear regression model in non-RM and RM patients.
| Total | Non-RM | RM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | |
| Model I | |||
| One linear regression coefficient | 1.1 (1.1, 1.2) <0.001 | 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) 0.114 | 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) <0.001 |
| Model II | |||
| K | 10 | 1.3 | 0.4 |
| <K regression coefficient 1 | 1.3 (1.2, 1.5) <0.001 | 6.4 (1.7, 23.9) 0.005 | 0.0 (0.0, 50.7) 0.285 |
| >K regression coefficient 2 | 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 0.849 | 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 0.591 | 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) <0.001 |
| Difference between the regression coefficient 2 and 1 | 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) <0.001 | 0.2 (0.0, 0.6) 0.006 | 147.3 (0.0, 872159.1) 0.26 |
| Predicted value of Y at K | 1.5 (0.6, 2.4) | 0.3 (−0.5, 1.1) | −1.5 (−2.5, −0.6) |
| Logarithmic LR test | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.267 |
K: Kurtosis; LR: logistic regression.
Figure 3.Curve fitting of D-dimer in predicting AKI between RM and non-RM in EHS.