Literature DB >> 34839039

Prevalence of Forceps Polypectomy of Nondiminutive Polyps Is Substantial But Modifiable.

David I Fudman1, Amit G Singal2, Mark G Cooper3, MinJae Lee4, Caitlin C Murphy5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The use of forceps for removal of nondiminutive polyps is associated with incomplete resection compared with snare polypectomy. However, few studies have characterized the frequency of forceps polypectomy for nondiminutive polyps or identified strategies to improve this practice. To address this gap, we estimated the prevalence and predictors of forceps polypectomy in clinical practice and examined the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to reduce inappropriate forceps polypectomy.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all colonoscopies with polypectomies performed at 2 U.S. health systems between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2019. We used a mixed-effects logistic regression model to examine the effect of a multicomponent intervention, including provider education and a financial incentive, to reduce inappropriate forceps polypectomy, defined as use of forceps polypectomy for polyps ≥5 mm.
RESULTS: A total of 9968 colonoscopies with 25,534 polypectomies were performed by 42 gastroenterologists during the study period. Overall, 8.5% (n = 2176) of polyps were removed with inappropriate forceps polypectomy. Inappropriate forceps polypectomy significantly decreased after the intervention (odds ratio [OR], 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.39), from 11.4% (n = 1539) to 5.3% (n = 637). Predictors of inappropriate forceps polypectomy included inadequate bowel prep (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.47), polyps in the right colon (vs left: OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.51), and number of polyps removed (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Inappropriate forceps polypectomy also varied by gastroenterologist (median OR, 3.43). In a post hoc analysis, the proportion of polyps >2 mm removed with forceps decreased from 50.0% before the intervention to 43.0% after it (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68).
CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate forceps polypectomy is common but modifiable. The proportion of nondiminutive polyps removed with forceps polypectomy should be considered as a quality measure.
Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal Cancer; Forceps; Polypectomy; Polyps; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34839039      PMCID: PMC9133266          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   13.576


  29 in total

1.  Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression.

Authors:  Klaus Larsen; Juan Merlo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Metachronous Neoplasias Arise in a Higher Proportion of Colon Segments From Which Large Polyps Were Previously Removed, and Can be Used to Estimate Incomplete Resection of 10-20 mm Colorectal Polyps.

Authors:  Jeffrey Adler; Dana Toy; Joseph C Anderson; Douglas J Robertson; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study.

Authors:  N Jewel Samadder; Karen Curtin; Thérèse M F Tuohy; Lisa Pappas; Ken Boucher; Dawn Provenzale; Kerry G Rowe; Geraldine P Mineau; Ken Smith; Richard Pimentel; Anne C Kirchhoff; Randall W Burt
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Younger Physicians and Longer Withdrawal Times Are Associated With Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in a Large Community Practice.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Amy A Gravely; Adam S Kim; Timothy R Church; John I Allen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps.

Authors:  M Efthymiou; A C Taylor; P V Desmond; P B Allen; R Y Chen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions-Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Tonya Kaltenbach; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Accuracy of endoscopists' estimate of polyp size: A continuous dilemma.

Authors:  Manhal Izzy; Muhammad Asif Virk; Avi Saund; Juan Tejada; Faraj Kargoli; Sury Anand
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

8.  Association between improved adenoma detection rates and interval colorectal cancer rates after a quality improvement program.

Authors:  Angela Y Lam; Yan Li; Dyanna L Gregory; Joanne Prinz; Jacqueline O'Reilly; Michael Manka; John E Pandolfino; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Underuse and Overuse of Colonoscopy for Repeat Screening and Surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Robert S Sandler; Janet M Grubber; Marcus R Johnson; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Assessing colon polypectomy competency and its association with established quality metrics.

Authors:  Anna M Duloy; Tonya R Kaltenbach; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  Blue Notes.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 13.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.