Maryam Dehghan1, S Hirin Shahbazi2, Mojdeh Salehnia3. 1. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Email: salehnim@modares.ac.ir.
The follicular apoptosis was tack placed in grafted
ovaries and it reduced the number of follicles within the
transplanted tissue. The ovarian apoptosis is mediated by
two main internal and external pathways that are involved
by some regulatory proteins such as BAX, BAD as pro-apoptotic and BCL2, as an anti-apoptotic protein (1).MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate
gene expressions and inhibit messenger RNA translation.
They have an important role in controlling apoptosis in
several cell types (2-10).Among the microRNAs, miR-22 plays an essential role in apoptosis
inhibition in several cell types; however, its involvement in regulation of ovarian
follicular apoptosis is not well-known (8-16). Real-time reverse transcription polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) assessment of miR-22 expression in healthy and
atretic follicles showed that its expression decreased during mouse follicular atresia. In
addition, it was suggested that miR-22 suppressed mouse granulosa cell
apoptosis and decreased Bax expression in these cells in
vitro (12).Apoptosis could be induced by physical conditions such as oxidative stress after
transplantation of ovarian tissues (17). Therefore, more attention has been focused on the
use of antioxidants, growth factors, and anti-apoptotic factors to improve the quality of
ovarian grafts (18-20). Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a small molecule (430-480 Da) that
has been detected in several tissues and biological fluids such as serum, follicular fluid,
and plasma. LPA is produced from the phospholipids of the cellular membrane by two enzymes,
autotaxin and phospholipase A. Ovarian cells, endometrial cells, mast cells, erythrocytes
and neurons produce LPA and it has physiological as well as pathological functions in these
cells (21). LPA regulates anti-apoptotic, differentiation and proliferation processes via
its G protein-coupled receptors (LPA1-6) on granulosa cells (22-24). LPA has been shown to
enhance oocyte maturation and follicular development in bovine, mouse and human (25-31).
Abedpour et al. (29, 31) reported that supplementation of
mouse ovary culture media with LPA
for seven days enhanced the developmental rate of follicles and LPA acted as an anti-cell
death factor. A similar effect was reported by Boruszewska et al. (25), when they added LPA
to bovine oocyte maturation media. Despite the increased interest in improving ovarian
follicle survival after transplantation, to the best of our knowledge no report has assessed
the effects of LPA treatment on the improvements in follicular development during the
pre-transplantation period (in vitro culture) and transplantation of mouse
ovaries. The aim of this study was to clarify several aspects of LPA supplementation, as an
anti-apoptotic factor, during in vitro culture and transplantation of mouse
ovaries. We investigated the following: i. Cell survival and normal follicular development
at the morphological level, ii. The incidence of BAX positive cells by immunohistochemistry
and the expressions of apoptosis related genes (Bax, Bad, and
Bcl2), and iii. The level of miR-22, as an inhibitory
factor of apoptosis, in transplanted ovaries in response to LPA treatment.
Materials and Methods
All materials were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich
(Dusseldorf, Germany) unless otherwise indicated.
Animals
The Ethics Committee for Animal Research at Tarbiat
Modares University (IR.TMU.REC.1395.530) approved
this experimental study. Three-week-old female NMRI
mice (n=114) comprised the experimental group and
six-week-old adult female NMRI mice (n=14) were
the control group. The mice were kept under controlled
conditions (20-24˚C, 12/12 hour light: dark cycle, and 40-
50% humidity) at the animal house of Tarbiat Modares
University, Tehran, Iran.
Ovary removal
The animals (n=114) were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injections of ketamine (50
mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg). The right ovary of each mouse was removed through a dorsal
horizontal incision and then cultured in vitro. The left ovary was left
intact.
In vitro culture of ovarian tissues
The right ovaries (n=114) were individually cultured on inserts (Millicell-CM, 0.4-µm
pore size, Millipore Corp, Billerica, MA, US) at 37˚C and 5% CO2 for 24 hours
in the presence (n=57) and absence (n=57) of LPA. The culture media consisted of 300 µl
α-MEM medium supplemented with 5% foetal bovine serum; 1% insulin, transferrin, and
selenium (Invitrogen, UK), and 100 mIU/ml recombinant follicle stimulating hormone
(Serono, Switzerland). The treated group had 20 µM LPA (INstruchemie, The Netherlands)
added to the culture medium (31).The cultured ovaries were observed under an inverted
microscope and some of the cultured ovaries were
considered for assessment of ovarian cell survival using
Calcein AM (n=6 for the LPA-treated group and n=6 for
the non-treated group) and for morphological analysis
with haematoxyline and eosin (n=5 for the LPA-treated
group and n=5 for the non-treated group). The other
cultured ovaries were encapsulated with sodium alginate
and then transplanted under kidney capsule (n=45 for the
LPA-treated group and n=45 for the non-treated group).
Assessment of ovarian cell survival after in vitro culture
We evaluated and compared the survival rate of ovarian cells 24 hours after the
in vitro culture in the presence and absence of LPA. The cultured
ovaries (n=6 per group) were incubated with 3 mg/ml collagenase type I at 37˚C, washed
with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and passed through a filter that had a pore size of
40 μm. The collected cells were stained with double fluorescent labelling dyes with
Calcein AM and ethidium homodimer according to a live/dead viability kit (Live/Dead
Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit, Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Germany). Briefly, the
cells were washed with PBS and incubated in 1.6 µM Calcein AM and 5.5 µM EthD-1 for 30-45
minutes at 37˚C in the dark. Then, they were placed on slides and covered by a coverslip
and observed under a fluorescent microscope. The cells were reported as viable (stained
green) or nonviable (stained red). Photographs (n=5) of each sample were prepared and
imported into ImageJ software, then the mean percent of viable and nonviable cells were
counted per 1000 µm2 in each sample.
Encapsulation of in vitro cultured ovaries in sodium
alginate
The cultured ovaries were encapsulated in sodium alginate (n=92); briefly, the ovaries
were individually immersed into 5 µl droplets of sodium alginate at a concentration of
0.5% (w/v) in PBS (with or without LPA) at room temperature and then they were gently
transferred into a cross-linking solution (50 mM CaCl2 and 140 mM NaCl) for two
minutes (31). In the LPA-treated group, 20 µM LPA was added to the sodium alginate
solution. Finally, the encapsulated ovaries from both groups were individually
autotransplanted under kidney capsules as follows.
Ovarian transplantation into the kidney capsule
The ovaries were divided into the following four
experimental groups:Experimental group A: The right ovaries (n=14) were removed, cultured for 24 hours,
encapsulated in sodium alginate without any supplementation, and subsequently
autotransplanted into the right kidney capsule (LPA- / LPA-).Experimental group B: The right ovaries (n=5) were removed and cultured without LPA for
24 hours, then encapsulated in sodium alginate with LPA and autotransplanted under the
right kidney capsule (LPA- / LPA+).Experimental group C: The right ovaries (n=14) were removed and cultured in medium that
contained LPA for 24 hours, encapsulated in sodium alginate without any supplementation,
and subsequently autotransplanted into the right kidney capsule (LPA+
/LPA-).Experimental group D: The right ovaries (n=5) were removed and cultured in medium
supplemented with LPA for 24 hours, encapsulated in sodium alginate that contained LPA,
and autotransplanted into the right kidney capsule (LPA+ /LPA+).The left ovaries of the mice were intact in all of the
experimental groups.Prior to transplantation, the mice from the four
experimental groups were anesthetised with i.p. injections
of ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg). A dorsal
horizontal incision was generated and the right kidney
capsule was exposed. The cultured encapsulated ovary
was inserted under the kidney capsule through a tiny hole
by using watchmaker’s forceps. The body wall and skin
incision were closed and the mice were kept under aseptic
conditions until the healed ovaries were collected.
Vaginal cytology
Three weeks after the ovaries were transplanted, the
stages of the mice oestrous cycles were confirmed daily
by vaginal cytology under a light microscope at 400x
magnification. The stages of the oestrous cycle were
identified as prooestrus, oestrus, metoestrus, or dioestrus
by the presence or absence of nucleated epithelial cells,
cornified epithelial cells, and leukocytes.
Hormonal assay
We evaluated the endocrine function of the ovaries in
the experimental groups with lower (group A) and higher
(group C) follicular developmental rates. For this analysis
and prior to collection of the ovaries, we obtained blood
samples by cardiac puncture with a needle from the heart
without thoracotomy in mice. Then, the sera separated
and keep at -20˚C until hormonal analysis (n=3 for each
group). The concentrations of 17-β-estradiol (E2) and
progesterone (P4) were measured using a microplate
enzyme immunoassay kit (Biotest AG, Germany) that
had a sensitivity of 6.5 pg/mL. The sera of six-week-old
mice, as the intact control group (n=3), were collected and
analysed in the same manner as the experimental groups.
Recovery of transplanted ovaries
The animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation during the prooestrus phase of the
first oestrous cycle. The transplanted ovaries were recovered and collected, first for the
morphological study, then for immunohistochemical and molecular analyses for apoptosis and
miR-22 expression.
Histological evaluation
For morphological analysis, the ovaries cultured in vitro (for 24 hours)
in the presence and absence of LPA and recovered tissue at first oestrus cycles (5 ovaries
in each group) were fixed in Bouin’s solution for 8 hours. They were embedded in paraffin
wax, serially sectioned at 5 μm and mounted on slides with 5th intervals and
stained with haematoxylin and eosin method. The same procedure was done for ovaries
obtained from six-week-old mice during the prooestrus phase, as the intact control group
(n=5).The tissue sections were studied under a light microscope
in order to determine the normal and degenerated follicles
at different developmental stages. The ovarian follicles
were classified as primordial (oocytes surrounded by
single layer of squamous pregranulosa cells), primary
(surrounded by single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells),
preantral (two or more layers of cuboidal granulosa cells),
and antral follicles with the antrum cavity (31). In order to
avoid counting follicles more than once, we only counted
follicles that were in the sections with visible oocyte
nuclei.
Immunohistochemistry
Another set of tissue sections from the experimental group that had lower (group A) and
higher (group C) follicular developmental rates were placed on coated slides and used for
the immunohistochemical studies. The tissue sections from each sample of the recovered and
control ovaries (n=3 ovaries in each group) were randomly deparaffinised, rehydrated in
descending ethanol solutions, and finally washed in PBS. Antigen retrieval was performed
by boiling the tissue slides in 10 mM citrate buffer (10 mM, pH=6) in a microwave oven for
10 minutes at 700 W. Then, they were cooled at room temperature and washed in PBS. The
sections were immersed in 0.3% Triton X100 for 30 minutes then washed in PBS, blocked with
goat serum (30 minutes) and incubated overnight at 4˚C in a humid chamber with the primary
antibody, anti-BAX polyclonal antibody, (Elabscience Biotechnology Co, Wuhan, China;
1:100). The tissue sections were washed, incubated with polyclonal goat anti-rabbit
antibody (Elabscience Biotechnology Co, Wuhan, China; 1:20) conjugated with FITC for 30
minutes, and washed in PBS. Then, the tissue slides were evaluated under a fluorescent
microscope at ×400 magnification. Photographs of each section were prepared and imported
into ImageJ software. Then, we counted the number of BAX positive cells per 1000
μm2 of ovarian tissue in three sections from each sample.
RNA extraction
Experimental groups A and C and the intact control
group were considered for molecular analysis (n=6 per
group). Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent
according to the manufacturer’s instructions in the
RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Briefly, the ovaries
were individually homogenized in 0.5 ml of TRIzol
reagent, then 0.2 ml of chloroform was added per one ml
of TRIzol and the samples were centrifuged at 12000 g
for 10 minutes. The upper colourless aqueous phase was
transferred to a fresh 1.5 ml microtube and 500 μl of
100% isopropanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was added,
then the samples were centrifuged at 12000 g for 10
minutes followed by the addition of 1.5 ml 70% ethanol per one ml of TRIzol reagent to the samples. The RNA
concentration was determined with a spectrophotometer
(Eppendorf, Germany).
cDNA synthesis
cDNA was synthesized with a cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Oligo (dT) was used for cDNA synthesis and
the reverse transcriptase reaction was incubated at 65˚C for 5 minutes and at 42˚C for 60
minutes. In order to evaluate miR-22 gene expression, cDNA was
synthesized using a commercial cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany).
Stem loop was used for cDNA synthesis and the reverse transcriptase reaction was incubated
at 16˚C for 30 minutes and at 42˚C for 60 minutes. After inactivation of the reverse
transcriptase enzyme at 70˚C for 5 minutes, the product was stored at -20˚C until
real-time RT-PCR assessment.
Primer-BLAST tool in NCBI was used to design primers for the apoptosis related genes that
included Bax, Bcl2, and Bad and the housekeeping
gene, β-actin, and for miR-22 and its housekeeping
gene (U6) (Table S1, See supplementary Online Information at www.
celljournal.org). Real-time RT-PCR was performed using a QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit
(Qiagen, Germany). The thermal program of real-time RT-PCR was set with the following
parameters: initial holding stage for 5 minutes at 95˚C; 40 cycles with cycling stages of
15 seconds at 95˚C, 58˚C for 30 seconds, and 72˚C for 15 seconds; and a melting curve
stage at 95˚C for 15 seconds, 60˚C for 1 minute, and 95˚C for 15 seconds. After completing
the PCR run, the melting curve was analysed using the amplicon.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were conducted with a minimum of
three replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using
SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Values are
written as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA and the post
hoc Tukey test were used to compare differences in
follicular count, BAX positive cells, mRNA expression,
and hormone levels. A P<0.05 was considered to be
statistically significant.
Results
Morphology of cultured ovaries under an inverted
microscope
Figure 1A, B shows the morphological characteristics
of the cultured ovaries in the presence and absence of LPA
under an inverted microscope. The follicles grew within
the cortical parts of the ovaries and the antral follicles had
a spherical shape with large, clear antral cavities.
The survival rate of cultured ovarian cells
Figure 1C, D shows images of a Calcein AM stained cell suspension obtained from the
ovaries cultured in vitro for 24 hours in the presence and absence of
LPA. The images in the figure show that the viable cells stained green whereas nonviable
cells stained red. A significantly greater (P<0.05) mean percentage of cells
survived in the LPA-treated group (90.17 ± 5.06%) compared to the non-treated group (76.08
± 4.01%, Fig .1E).
Fig.1
Phase contrast micrograph of cultured ovaries in the studied groups. A. Cultured
without any supplementation for 24 hours (LPA-) and B.
Cultured in the presence of LPA for 24 hours (LPA+). C.
Representative fluorescence microscopy images of isolated cells derived from cultured
ovaries that were stained with Calcein AM in the absence of LPA and D.
The LPA-treated group. The viable cells stained green and the nonviable cells stained
red. E. Comparison of the survival rates of ovarian isolated cells in the
studied groups. *; Significant difference with other group (P<0.05). F,
G. Light microscopic observation of haematoxylin and eosin stained tissue
sections of the ovaries cultured for 24 hours in LPA- group and H,
I. In LPA+ group. Representative photographs of transplanted
ovarian sections in the experimental groups are shown in the last row. J.
Experimental group A (LPA-/LPA). K. Experimental group B
(LPA- / LPA+). L. Experimental group C
(LPA+ /LPA-). M. Experimental group C
(LPA+ /LPA+). These assessments were done in five repeats in
the studied groups. LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid (scale bar: A, B: 300 μm, C, D: 50 μm,
F, H, G, I, J, K, L, M: 100 μm).
Morphological analysis of in vitro cultured ovaries
Representative light microscopy photograph of sections from the in
vitro cultured ovaries that were stained with haematoxyline and eosin after 24
hours are shown in Figure 1F-G. Follicles at different developmental stages had normal
structures in both of the studied groups.From the 482 total follicles counted in the non-treated
group, 99.21 ± 0.06% had normal morphology and out of
the 534 total follicles in the LPA-treated group, 99.69 ±
0.07% had normal morphology. This rate was significantly
higher in the LPA-treated group in comparison with the non-treated group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference
between these groups in terms of percentages of follicles at
the different developmental stages (Table 1).
Table 1
The percentages of normal follicles at different developmental stages in cultured mouse ovaries
Group
Total no. F
Normal F.
Degenerated F.
Primordial F.
Primary F.
Preantral F.
LPA-
482
478 (99.21 ± 0.06)
4 (0.79 ± 0.06)
239 (49.91 ± 1.18)
112 (23.50 ± 0.56)
127 (26.59 ± 0.65)
LPA+
534
532 (99.69 ± 0.07)a
2 (0.31 ± 0.07)a
262 (49.22 ± 1.16)
126 (23.72 ± 0.56)
144 (27.06 ± 0.63)
Data are presented as n (mean ± SD%). The percentages of follicles at different developmental stages in all studied groups were calculated according to
the normal follicles. These assessments were done in five repeats in the studied groups. LPA-; Untreated, LPA+; Treated with LPA, LPA; Lysophosphatidic
acid, F; Follicles, and a; Significant differences with the LPA- group (P<0.05).
Morphological analysis in recovered transplanted
ovaries at the first oestrous cycle
The morphology of transplanted ovaries sections in
four experimental groups and the intact control group at
the proestrus phase is shown in Figure 1J-M. Follicles
from both study groups, which are grown at different
developmental stages, are visible in this figure. The
total number of follicles counted were 539 in the intact
control group. The total number of counted follicles in the
experimental groups were 415 (group A), 489 (group B),
525 (group C), and 529 (group D).The percentages of normal follicles at different developmental stages in cultured mouse ovariesData are presented as n (mean ± SD%). The percentages of follicles at different developmental stages in all studied groups were calculated according to
the normal follicles. These assessments were done in five repeats in the studied groups. LPA-; Untreated, LPA+; Treated with LPA, LPA; Lysophosphatidic
acid, F; Follicles, and a; Significant differences with the LPA- group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in terms of the
mean percentages of normal follicles between the
intact control group (99.76 ± 0.07%) and experimental
groups C (99.68 ± 0.08%) and D (99.70 ± 0.08%)
(Table 2, P>0.05). The mean percentages of primordial
and primary follicles significantly decreased and the
preantral and antral follicles increased in all four
experimental groups in comparison with the intact
control group (P<0.05). Among the experimental
groups, the lowest percentage of primordial follicles
and the highest percentage of antral follicles were seen
in experimental group C (P<0.05).
Table 2
The percentages of normal follicles at different developmental stages in the first oestrous cycle
Group
Total no. F.
Normal F.
Primordial F.
Primary F.
Preantral F.
Antral F.
Intact control(Six-week-old ovaries)
539
538 (99.76 ± 0.07)
280 (52.04 ± 0.60)
118 (21.93 ± 0.68)
117 (21.74 ± 0.63)
23 (4.29 ± 0.61)
Exp. A (LPA-/LPA-)
415
412 (99.27 ± 0.05)a
113 (27.38 ± 0.74)a
75 (18.17 ± 0.58)a
145 (35.24 ± 0.77)a
79 (19.21 ± 0.59)a
Exp. B (LPA-/LPA+)
489
487 (99.51 ± 0.08)ab
70 (14.33 ± 0.75)ab
58 (11.89 ± 0.63)ab
256 (52.65 ± 1.15)ab
103 (21.13 ± 0.56)ab
Exp. C (LPA+/LPA-)
525
523 (99.68 ± 0.08)b
53 (10.09 ± 0.72)ab
43 (8.24 ± 0.61)ab
289 (55.27 ± 0.74)ab
138 (26.40 ± 0.61)ab
Exp. D (LPA+/LPA+)
529
527 (99.70 ± 0.08)bc
70 (13.34 ± 0.80)abcd
50 (9.44 ± 0.63)abcd
284 (53.88 ± 0.88)abcd
123 (23.34 ± 0.55)abcd
Data are presented as n (mean ± SD%). The percentages of follicles at different developmental
stages in all studied groups were calculated according to the normal follicles.
These assessments were done in five repeats in the studied groups. LPA- ;
Untreated, LPA+ ; Treated with LPA, LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid, F;
Follicles, a ; Significant differences with intact control group
(P<0.05), b ; Significant differences with the LPA-
/LPA-group (P<0.05), c ; Significant differences with
the LPA- /LPA+ group (P<0.05), and d ;
Significant differences with the LPA+ / LPA-group
(P<0.05).
Immunohistochemistry for BAX
Figure 2A-C shows photomicrographs related to the immunohistochemistry of the recovered
ovarian sections in experimental groups A and C, and the intact control ovaries. The
number of BAX positive cells (green colour, Fig .2) was significantly higher in
experimental group A (3.20 ± 0.18 per 1000 µm2) in comparison with the intact
control (1.11 ± 0.11 per 1000 µm2) and experimental group C (1.37 ± 0.11 per
1000 µm2, P<0.05).
Fig.2
Photomicrographs of transplanted mouse ovarian sections immunostained for BAX antibody and
observed under fluorescent microscopy (first column) and by phase contrast microscopy
(second column). A., a. Intact control group, B., b.
Experimental group A (LPA- /LPA-), C., c.
Experimental group C (LPA+ /LPA- ). Green colour shows the
positive cell reaction (white arrow) for the BAX antibody, and D. A
comparison of the number of BAX positive cells/1000 µm2 in the studied
groups. *; Significant difference with the other groups (P<0.05). The
immunocytochemistry analysis was repeated three times. LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid
(scale bar: 100 µm).
Figure 3 shows the relative expression ratios of the apoptosis related genes to
β-actin. In the intact control group, the expression ratios were 5.128 ± 0.55
for Bax, 0.615 ± 0.04 for Bad and 1.116 ± 0.08 for
Bcl2. In experimental group A, they were 10.99 ± 1.14
(Bax), 1.376 ± 0.06 (Bad), and 0.747 ± 0.20
(Bcl2) and for experimental group C, the expression ratios were 6.239 ±
0.60 (Bax), 0.702 ± 0.02 (Bad), and 0.980 ± 0.06
(Bcl2). There were significant differences between experimental group A
and the two other groups in terms of the gene expressions (P<0.05).
Fig.3
The relative expression ratio of pro- and anti-apoptotic genes to β-actin in
studied groups. The comparison of gene expression in transplanted mouse ovaries in
experimental groups A (LPA- /LPA-) and C (LPA+
/LPA-), and the intact control group are shown in parts A.
Bad, B. Bax, C.
Bcl2, and D. Bax/Bcl2.
E. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products of the genes related
to apoptosis. Lane 1; Bad, Lane 2; Bax, Lane 3;
Bcl2, and Lane 4; 50 bp ladder. These assessments were done in
three repeats in the studied groups. LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid and *; Significant
difference with the other groups (P<0.05), and PCR; Polymerase chain
reaction.
The relative expression ratio of miR-22 to U6 in the
intact control group was 3.702 ± 0.24, in experimental group A it was 1.804 ± 0.12 and in
experimental group C it was 3.323 ± 0.20. There was a higher expression ratio of
miR22 in experimental group C in comparison with the two other groups
(P<0.05, Fig .4).
Fig.4
The relative expression ratio of the miR-22 gene to U6 in studied groups.
A. The comparison of gene expression in transplanted mouse ovaries in
experimental groups A (LPA- /LPA-) and C (LPA+
/LPA-), and the intact control group. B. Agarose gel
electrophoresis of the PCR product of the miR-22 gene. Lane 1; 50 bp
ladder, Lane 2; U6, and Lane 3; miR-22. These assessments were done
in three repeats in the studied groups. LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid, *; Significant
difference with the other groups (P<0.05), and PCR; Polymerase chain
reaction.
Phase contrast micrograph of cultured ovaries in the studied groups. A. Cultured
without any supplementation for 24 hours (LPA-) and B.
Cultured in the presence of LPA for 24 hours (LPA+). C.
Representative fluorescence microscopy images of isolated cells derived from cultured
ovaries that were stained with Calcein AM in the absence of LPA and D.
The LPA-treated group. The viable cells stained green and the nonviable cells stained
red. E. Comparison of the survival rates of ovarian isolated cells in the
studied groups. *; Significant difference with other group (P<0.05). F,
G. Light microscopic observation of haematoxylin and eosin stained tissue
sections of the ovaries cultured for 24 hours in LPA- group and H,
I. In LPA+ group. Representative photographs of transplanted
ovarian sections in the experimental groups are shown in the last row. J.
Experimental group A (LPA-/LPA). K. Experimental group B
(LPA- / LPA+). L. Experimental group C
(LPA+ /LPA-). M. Experimental group C
(LPA+ /LPA+). These assessments were done in five repeats in
the studied groups. LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid (scale bar: A, B: 300 μm, C, D: 50 μm,
F, H, G, I, J, K, L, M: 100 μm).The percentages of normal follicles at different developmental stages in the first oestrous cycleData are presented as n (mean ± SD%). The percentages of follicles at different developmental
stages in all studied groups were calculated according to the normal follicles.
These assessments were done in five repeats in the studied groups. LPA- ;
Untreated, LPA+ ; Treated with LPA, LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid, F;
Follicles, a ; Significant differences with intact control group
(P<0.05), b ; Significant differences with the LPA-
/LPA-group (P<0.05), c ; Significant differences with
the LPA- /LPA+ group (P<0.05), and d ;
Significant differences with the LPA+ / LPA-group
(P<0.05).Photomicrographs of transplanted mouse ovarian sections immunostained for BAX antibody and
observed under fluorescent microscopy (first column) and by phase contrast microscopy
(second column). A., a. Intact control group, B., b.
Experimental group A (LPA- /LPA-), C., c.
Experimental group C (LPA+ /LPA- ). Green colour shows the
positive cell reaction (white arrow) for the BAX antibody, and D. A
comparison of the number of BAX positive cells/1000 µm2 in the studied
groups. *; Significant difference with the other groups (P<0.05). The
immunocytochemistry analysis was repeated three times. LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid
(scale bar: 100 µm).The relative expression ratio of pro- and anti-apoptotic genes to β-actin in
studied groups. The comparison of gene expression in transplanted mouse ovaries in
experimental groups A (LPA- /LPA-) and C (LPA+
/LPA-), and the intact control group are shown in parts A.
Bad, B. Bax, C.
Bcl2, and D. Bax/Bcl2.
E. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products of the genes related
to apoptosis. Lane 1; Bad, Lane 2; Bax, Lane 3;
Bcl2, and Lane 4; 50 bp ladder. These assessments were done in
three repeats in the studied groups. LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid and *; Significant
difference with the other groups (P<0.05), and PCR; Polymerase chain
reaction.
17-β-estradiol and progesterone levels
The concentrations of E2 and P4 in sera of the intact
control and experimental groups A and C are presented
and compared in Table S2 (See supplementary Online
Information at www.celljournal.org). Experimental group C had significantly higher levels of E2 and P4 compared
to the intact control and experimental group A (P<0.05).The relative expression ratio of the miR-22 gene to U6 in studied groups.
A. The comparison of gene expression in transplanted mouse ovaries in
experimental groups A (LPA- /LPA-) and C (LPA+
/LPA-), and the intact control group. B. Agarose gel
electrophoresis of the PCR product of the miR-22 gene. Lane 1; 50 bp
ladder, Lane 2; U6, and Lane 3; miR-22. These assessments were done
in three repeats in the studied groups. LPA; Lysophosphatidic acid, *; Significant
difference with the other groups (P<0.05), and PCR; Polymerase chain
reaction.
Discussion
In this study, in order to improve the quality of the transplanted ovaries, we first
examined the effects of LPA supplementation during an in vitro culture and
tissue transplantation. The results showed that the rate of follicular development in the
LPA-treated groups were significantly higher than the non-treated and intact control groups.
Follicular development is related to growth and proliferation of follicular cells and to
maturation of these cells and oocytes. A possible relation to these results is that LPA
might act as a growth factor to stimulate the proliferation of follicular granulosa and
theca cells; therefore, the expansion of follicular cells could shift the growth of
primordial and primary follicles to the preantral and antral stages. The action of LPA is
mediated directly by binding to its receptors on follicular cells (21, 23). Expressions of
LPA receptors were detected in mouse and bovine ovaries (28, 29). Similarly, the in
vitro expansion of bovine cumulus cells was also demonstrated in response to LPA
(25). Sinderewicz et al. (28) postulated that LPA enhanced the growth and development of
bovine follicles via expression of LPA receptors and autotaxin genes. On the other hand,
binding of LPA to its surface receptors could increase the expression of LPA receptor genes
and, in turn, have a positive feedback on the effects of LPA. In this regard, our group has
recently reported significant enhancement in the expression of LPAR1-4 receptor genes after
LPA was added to the culture media of mouse ovarian tissues (29).LPA may also act as a maturation factor. This effect
of LPA on oocyte maturation was shown in several
studies (25-32). Komatsu et al. (32) suggested that LPA
treatment promoted the nuclear maturation of mouse
oocytes during IVM through lowering intra-oocyte cAMP
levels. Jo et al. (30) demonstrated that addition of LPA
to culture media, especially at 30 μM, improved oocyte
maturation, fertilization and blastocyst formation in mice.
These researchers also reported that LPA stimulated
phospholipase C through the G protein on the surface of
cumulus cells and activated mitogen-activated protein
(MAP) kinase pathways. Addition of LPA to culture
media appears to increase oocyte mRNA amount that
is considered as a quality markers of oocyte. Also LPA
enhances oocyte maturation rates by stimulating the
expression of developmental competence-related factors
(25, 33). Zhang et al. (27) showed that LPA promoted
meiotic progression of porcine oocytes from the germinal
vesicle to metaphase II by stimulating the expression
of cyclin B1, a marker of cytoplasmic maturation, by
activation of the MAP kinase pathway. In addition, it was
suggested that LPA might indirectly interact with other
factors that stimulate and regulate follicular development.
However, this suggestion should be confirmed by more
analysis.However, we also observed significant enhancement
in the amount of E2 and P4 in the LPA-treated group.
This result revealed that LPA positively influenced the
function of granulosa and theca cells by production
of high concentrations of steroid hormones. Similarly,
Boruszewska et al. (34) demonstrated that LPA stimulated
the synthesis of E2 in bovine granulosa cells by converting
the androgens to E2 via cytochrome P450 aromatase
in granulosa cells. It has been suggested that LPA
participates in ovarian follicle growth and differentiation
by stimulation of E2 production, which may occur via
an increase in the expression of follicle stimulating
hormone receptor. LPA may be involved in autocrine and/
or paracrine signalling between oocyte and cumulus cells
during follicular development (23).We compared the follicular proportions at different developmental stages at the first
oestrus cycle in all transplanted groups to the intact control group. Our results showed the
percentage of large antral follicles in all grafted ovaries was significantly higher than
the intact control group. This phenomenon showed rapid development and early discharge of
ovarian reserve in the experimental groups, especially in experimental group C
(LPA+ /LPA-), which could affect longevity of the transplanted
tissue. Possibly, in the transplanted groups, an immediate lack of negative feedback after
grafting could facilitate the production of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH),
follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH), which improved follicle
growth in the grafted ovaries. This suggestion correlated with premature follicular
discharge observed in the transplanted groups in comparison with the intact control
group.Despite follicular loss after ovarian transplantation in terms of ischemia, we noted that
the integrity of the tissue was well-preserved in the LPA-treated groups, which was shown by
the high survival rate observed with Calcein AM staining, a high percent of normal
follicles, and low incidence of BAX positive cells in the LPA-treated group. These
observations suggest that LPA acts as a survival factor during in vitro
culture and encapsulation of tissue within sodium alginate. Hu et al. (35) have reported
that LPA is a survival and growth factor, which prevents spontaneous apoptosis through LPA
receptor activation of the anti-apoptotic protein AKT/PKB. McLaughlin et al. (36) have
indicated that the Akt pathway promotes cell survival by inhibiting pro-apoptotic proteins
such as BAD, BAX, forkhead, and p53 and by activating prosurvival proteins such as BCL2. A
similar effect of LPA is well-known in other cell types and the results of these studies
show that LPA, via its receptors, leads to cell responses that include protection from
apoptosis (22-24). At the molecular level, our results confirmed that LPA supplementation of
culture media had a positive effect on the decline in transcription levels of pro-apoptotic
(Bax and Bad) genes and an increase in anti-apoptotic
(Bcl2) gene expression. The Bax/Bcl2 ratio was lower in
ovaries cultured in the presence of LPA compared to the non-treated group. The ratio of
Bcl2 to Bax may be an indicator of the tendency of
ovarian cells and follicles toward survival or apoptosis (1). BAX, BAD and BCL2 are
regulatory proteins that control the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis; therefore,
follicular development competence in the LPA-treated group might be enhanced through
modulation of these apoptotic related gene expressions. This conclusion agreed with the
findings reported in other cell types or oocytes (26, 33). In these studies, LPA played a
role in cell survival by preventing apoptosis through activation of the anti-apoptotic
protein or by alterations in the anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic balance, which resulted in
a significantly lower Bcl2/Bax ratio (33). Zhou et al. (37) reported that
the anti-apoptotic effects of LPA involve inhibition of caspase and Bax,
and the activation of Bcl2. Treatment of porcine embryos with LPA resulted
in increased expression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl2 gene and decreased
expression of the pro-apoptotic Bax and caspase 3 genes
(27). Torres et al. (38) showed that addition of LPA to the culture media of bovine embryos
reduced Bax expression.In present study, for the first time, we investigated the expression of
miR-22 in correlation with apoptotic related genes and follicular
development in cultured and transplanted ovaries. Our results revealed that the higher
expression of miR-22 was associated with a decline in the incidence of BAX
positive cells and pro-apoptotic gene expressions in the LPA-treated group. The results of
several studies revealed that miR-22 played an essential role in regulation
of apoptosis in different cell types (12- 14). Overexpression of miR-22
inhibited cardiac myocyte apoptosis (39) and had a neuroprotective effect through reduction
in caspase activation (40). miR-22 might have a similar effect on other
cell types, including ovarian cells and follicles. Xiong et al. demonstrated that
miR-22 expression decreased during mouse follicular atresia and they
suggested that miR-22 suppressed mouse granulosa cell apoptosis in
vitro (12). Lv et al. (14) reported that miR-22 regulated cell
proliferation and inhibited cell apoptosis by targeting the eIF4EBP3 gene
in human cervical squamous carcinoma cells. miR-22 decreased BAX expression
in granulosa cells by targeting the silent mating-type information regulation 2 homologue 1
(SIRT1) gene (12).
Conclusion
LPA, as a survival factor, improves follicular development in transplanted ovaries by
providing a balance between anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic genes in association with an
increase in miR-22 expression.
Authors: Xiaojie Hu; Neil Haney; Dianne Kropp; Albert F Kabore; James B Johnston; Spencer B Gibson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Tangjun Zhou; Lin Du; Chen Chen; Chen Han; Xunlin Li; An Qin; Changqing Zhao; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao Journal: Cell Physiol Biochem Date: 2018-02-16