Elham Samei1, Hossein Mozdarani2, Farhad Samiei3, G Holamreza Javadi1. 1. Department of Genetics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Email: mozdarah@modares.ac.ir. 3. Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers and
leading causes of death in women. The prevalence of BC in
Iran is increasing and affected people are relatively younger
compared to other countries (1, 2). About 80% of patients with
BC receive radiotherapy (RT) that involves the use of ionizing
radiation (IR). IR leads to cellular and molecular damages
via direct or indirect actions. Therefore, chromosomal
aberrations, cell death, alterations in the oxidation status
of cells and alterations in cellular haemostasis in tumours
as well as normal tissues are expected after irradiation (3).
Prominent effects of sparsely IR such as X-rays or gamma
rays include the formation of free radicals that interact with
nucleic acids and lead to DNA damage. IR produces a variety
of damages in DNA. From these, double-strand breaks are
most critical effects that lead to chromosomal aberrations
and two different modes of cell death termed mitotic or
clonogenic cell death and apoptosis (4). Patients with BC
show various biological reactions to RT that range from mild
to acute adverse effects and include skin erythema, fibrosis,
immunologic complications, or secondary cancers (5, 6).The results of studies have shown that about 40% of
patients with BC are sensitive to radiation (7-9). Therefore,
it is of utmost importance to reduce the radiation side effects
for these patients. To date, different naturally occurring or
synthetic agents have been used to countermeasure radiation
side effects. From various available agents, antioxidants
such as melatonin and famotidine are reported to effectively
reduce radiation induced cellular damages in normal tissues.The results of studies show that H2 receptor antagonists such
as cimetidine and famotidine, which are usually used to treat
peptic ulcers, can be potent hydroxyl radical scavengers (10,
11). The radioprotective effects of these agents on radiation
induced chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in mouse
bone marrow cells and human peripheral blood lymphocytes
have been reported (12-14). Famotidine was shown to reduce
radiation induced apoptosis in normal lymphocytes (15).Melatonin, an indolic compound, is secreted at night by the pineal gland. Hardeland et al. (16) have published a review of
the physiology and function of melatonin. Different studies
have been performed to determine the oncostatic properties
of melatonin against various tumours, including BC (17-19).
Melatonin and its metabolites were found to be a direct free
radical scavenger agent (20-22) that had the capability to
stimulate the production of anti-oxidative enzymes and reduce
the expression of pro-oxidative enzymes. Therefore, its use
as a radioprotector and anti-cancer agent has been proposed
(23). The anti-carcinogenic properties of melatonin and its
anti-oxidative and free radical scavenging activity have been
shown in different experimental models of carcinogenesis
induced by oxidative damage inducing agents, which indicate
the protective effects of melatonin (24-26).The aim of this study was to evaluate the antiapoptotic
effects of melatonin and famotidine alone or in combination
on radiation induced apoptosis on lymphocytes of normal
and BC individuals. BC patients have genomic instability
(3); therefore, a different response to radiation in BC
cells is expected compared to normal cells. To the best
of our knowledge, there is no report about the combined
treatment of famotidine and melatonin on radiation
apoptosis induced in peripheral blood leukocytes of BC
patients. Apoptosis was assessed by the neutral comet
assay (single cell gel electrophoresis). The comet assay
is reported to be a very reliable method for assessment of
apoptosis induced by DNA damaging agents (15, 27, 28).
Materials and Methods
DPPH assay
In this experimental study, the DPPH assay, with 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl was used to evaluate the antioxidant properties
of famotidine and melatonin in order to choose their optimum
concentrations when combined with radiation. This method is
an antioxidant assay based on electron-transfer that produces
a violet solution in ethanol. This free radical, which is stable
at room temperature, undergoes reduction in the presence
of an antioxidant molecule and gives rise to a colourless
ethanol solution. The DPPH assay was conducted according
to standard procedure (29). The DPPH solution was prepared
with 90% ethanol and we added various concentrations of
melatonin and famotidine to this solution.After 30 minutes, the
solution was read with an ELISA reader that had a 512 nm UV
spectrum (BioTek, Taiwan). The percentage of absorbance was
calculated using the following formula:
Blood sampling and drug treatment
The Ethical Committee at Natitional Institute for Medical
Research Development (NIMAD, Tehran, Iran), approved
this experimental study (IR.NIMAD.REC.1397.069).
All participants gave written informed consent for study
participation and completed a written questionnaire that
asked information related to their life- styles. All non-smokers
without viral infection, antibiotic consumption and X-ray at
least one month prior to sample collection were included in
the study. Table 1 lists the demographic information of the
study participants. Venous blood samples were collected in
heparinized vacutainers from 10 luminal A patients with BC
whose age ranged between 23 and 66 years (mean: 37.4 ± 11)
and 5 normal (control) individuals whose age ranged between
25 and 76 years (mean: 46 ± 13.9). Blood samples were divided
into two parts: i. Not exposed to radiation-the control group
that included untreated control, melatonin alone, famotidine
alone, and combined melatonin-famotidine samples and
ii. Exposed to gamma radiation, alone or in combination
with famotidine and melatonin. Whole blood cultures were
prepared by the addition of 0.1 ml blood to 0.4 ml RPMI-1640
medium (Gibco, BRL, UK) supplemented with antibiotics
(penicillin 100 IU/ml and streptomycin 100 µg/ml, Sigma,
USA), 10% L-glutamine (2 mM, Sigma, USA) and 15%
foetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco BRL, UK). Famotidine and
melatonin powder (Chemodaru Pharmaceuticals, Iran) were
dissolved in RPMI medium, then added to culture vessels
two hours prior to irradiation at concentrations of 80 µg/ml
(famotidine) and 800 µg/ml (melatonin).Study participants’ demographic informationBC; Breast cancer, P1-P10; Patient number, R/L; Right/left, ER; Oestrogen receptor, PR; Progesterone receptor, and SD; Standard deviation.
Irradiation
The culture vessels were irradiated with a therapeutic
Co-60 gamma ray source (Theratrone, 780-C, Canada)
at a dose of 4 Gy. The dose rate was 0.8 Gy/minute at
a source to sample distance (SSD) of 80 cm. Irradiation
was done at an ambient temperature (23 ± 2˚C). After
irradiation, the cells were incubated at 37˚C for up to 48
hours.
Neutral comet assay
The neutral comet assay was used to assess apoptotic
and non-apoptotic cells according to previously published
protocols (15, 30) with minor modifications. Briefly, the
previously incubated cells were centrifuged and the cell
pellets were mixed with 0.75% low melting agarose
(LMP, Fermentas, Germany) in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) and immediately covered with a coverslip. The
slides were kept at 4˚C for 15 minutes. After removal of
the coverslips, the slides were transferred to lysis buffer
that contained 2.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M EDTA, 10 mM Tris
base, 1% N-lauryl sarcosine, 1% Triton X-100, and 10%
dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO, all from Merck, Germany)
with a final pH of approximately 10. The slides were
kept at 4˚C in the dark for 30 minutes, then washed with
an electrophoresis buffer. After lysis, the slides were
placed in a horizontal electrophoresis chamber that was
filled with fresh electrophoresis buffer. Electrophoresis
was conducted at 20 Volts and 100 mA. The slides were
washed with distilled water for 5 minutes and then fixed
in ethanol for 5 minutes at room temperature. The air-dried slides were stained with an ethidium bromide
solution (20 μg/ml) and covered with coverslips. The
number of apoptotic and non-apoptotic cells were scored
using a fluorescent microscope (Nikon) equipped with an
excitation filter (510-550 nm) and barrier filter (590 nm)
at 400x magnification. Figure 1 shows typical normal and
apoptotic cells analysed under the microscope. A total
number of 500 cells were randomly assessed for each
slide.Typical photomicrographs of non-apoptotic and apoptotic neutral
comet assay results. Apoptotic cells show a very small head and a fan-like
tail. a; Non-apoptotic and b; Apoptotic (magnification: x400).
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using SPSS software (version 18,
SPSS Inc., USA). All data were first tested by using the
Kolmogorov Smirnov test for normal distribution. Then,
to compare the two groups, we used the Mann Whitney
non-parametric test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to
compare more than two groups. P<0.05 were considered
to be statistically significant. All figures were drawn
with the use of GraphPad Prism software, version 4.0
(California Corporation, USA).
Results
Famotidine
As seen in Figure 2, famotidine did not show any antioxidant
capacity. The higher dose of famotidine was more effective.
There was no significant difference between the 20 µg/ml
and 40 µg/ml concentrations (P>0.05). However, there was
a statistically significant difference between the other doses
and the 80 µg/ml dose (P<0.05). Therefore, we used the 80
µg/ml dose for all of the radiation experiments.Percent absorbance of famotidine (F) as assayed with 2, 2-diphenyl-1-
picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and read by an ELISA reader with a 512 nm UV spectrum.
Error bars show standard deviation (SD) of mean values from triplicate repeats.
Melatonin
Figure 3 shows the results of the DPPH assay for
melatonin. There was a dose-dependent potent antioxidant
capacity with melatonin. A significant difference existed
between the 200 µg/ml dose and the 800 and 1200 µg/
ml doses (P<0.05). However, the difference between the
800 and 1200 µg/ml concentrations was not statistically
significant (P>0.05). Therefore, we used the 800 µg/ml
dose for all of the radiation experiments.
Normal individuals
Figure 4 shows the results of this assay. As seen, irradiation of whole blood leukocytes with gamma rays
induced a comparatively high percentage of apoptosis
compared to the control non-irradiated samples (P<0.01).
There were no significant differences between the drug
treatments whether used alone or in combination with
the control group (P>0.05). There was no significant
difference between radiation alone and in combination
with melatonin (P>0.05). However, there were significant
differences between radiation and famotidine alone and
between famotidine in combination with melatonin
(P<0.05).Percent absorbance of melatonin (M) as assayed with 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and read by an ELISA reader with a 512 nm UV
spectrum. Error bars show standard deviation (SD) of mean values from
triplicate repeats.Treatment with famotidine (Fam) and melatonin (Mel), alone or in
combination, prior to gamma irradiation of leukocytes from normal individuals.
NS; Non-significant and *; P<0.01 error bars indicate standard error of mean
(SEM).
Breast cancer patients
Figure 5 shows significant differences between the
radiation and drug treatment groups (famotidine and
melatonin), either alone or in combination (P<0.05).
A higher background frequency of apoptosis was
seen in the BC leukocytes (P<0.05). Radiation
induced significantly higher frequency of apoptosis
in leukocytes from BC patients compared to normal
individuals (P<0.05).A protective effect for radiation induced apoptosis was
seen for both normal and BC leukocytes when radiation
was combined with famotidine and famotidine plus
melatonin (P<0.05). The results indicated no significant
protective effect with melatonin combined with radiation
in leukocytes from normal individuals (P>0.05); however,
the effect was statistically significant for BC patients
(P<0.05).The comet assay results showed a significant increase in
apoptosis following irradiation and significant decrease in
the presence of combined melatonin and famotidine.Treatment with famotidine and melatonin, alone or in combination,
prior to gamma irradiation of leukocytes from breast cancer (BC) patients.
NS; Non-significant, *; P<0.01 error bars indicate standard error of mean
(SEM).
Discussion
RT is an efficient treatment modality for about 50% of
patients with malignant breast tumours. The direct and
indirect effects of IR potent inducers of DNA damage,
chromosomal instability and cell death in tumour and
normal tissues. Most patients can tolerate RT; however,
some suffer from severe adverse effects. This variability
in response may be caused by a genetic predisposition
and inherent radiosensitivity in BC patients (3, 31). The
cytotoxic reactions of normal tissues to IR limits the
efficiency of RT. Unfortunately, an appropriate protocol to
prevent or treat these side effects has not been developed.
Therefore, the inherent radiosensitivity of normal cells
might be considered a serious problem in management
of RT for BC. The use of radioprotectors has been
proposed to reduce normal tissue radiotoxicity. To date,
no appropriate single radioprotector has been introduced
for this purpose. The combined regimen of chemical or
naturally occurring antioxidants might be useful for BC patients. The application of famotidine and melatonin two
hours prior to irradiation led to a significant reduction in
the frequency of radiation induced apoptosis. A similar
observation was made with leukocytes from BC patients,
although there was a higher frequency of apoptosis. The
combination of famotidine and melatonin was more
effective than melatonin alone, but not as effective as
famotidine alone. The DPPH assay results and results from
other studies show that melatonin is potent antioxidant
(32, 33). The radioprotective potential of melatonin is
shown by different investigators using different end
points such as protection of lymphocytes against gamma
rays, reducing frequency of chromosomal aberration and
micronuclei, and reducing radiation induced cytotoxicity
in normal tissue (24-26, 34).Melatonin might reduce DNA damage, because of its
direct radical scavenging actions of free radicals induced
by IR (35). Melatonin and most of its metabolites have the
capability to scavenge free radicals and reactive nitrogen
species (20). Moreover, melatonin stimulates the activities
of antioxidant enzymes to remove ROS before damaging
DNA and assists the mechanisms involved in DNA damage
repair (36). Therefore, melatonin, as a potent antioxidant,
exerts a radioprotective effect. Furthermore, besides
being a potent antioxidant, melatonin is a potent inducer
of apoptosis. It was shown that melatonin increased
frequency of the programmed cell death induced by ROS
generated by arsenic trioxide, activation of the p38/JNK
pathways, and by upregulation of Redd1 expression in
human BC cells (37).The synergistic effect of melatonin has been shown
with anti-cancer drugs, which led to effective anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activities in colon
cancer cell lines by activating the cytochrome c/caspase
signalling pathways (38). These observations might
explain why the radioprotective effects of melatonin
on normal lymphocytes did not significantly differ with
radiation alone. Melatonin has been shown to enhance
the radiosensitivity of cancer cellsthrough inhibition of
proliferation, promotion of cell cycle arrest, and inhibition
of proteins involved in DNA double-strand break repair
(39).Famotidine led to a considerable decrease in the
frequency of gamma irradiation induced apoptosis. The
results of previous studies showed the radioprotective
potency of famotidine against gamma ray induced
chromosomal and micronuclei induction (12, 14) as
well as radiation induced apoptosis in normal cells (15).
Ching et al. (10) previously reported that antagonists of
the histamine H2 receptor such as cimetidine, famotidine
and ranitidine are not only good inhibitors of histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion, but also are potent
radical scavengers. Although the antioxidant potency of
famotidine has not been assessed as much as for melatonin,
the reduction in frequency of radiation induced apoptosis
by famotidine is much more considerable compared to
melatonin. This observation is consistent with findings
from other H2 receptor antagonists, cimetidine alone or
in combination with famotidine, on gamma ray induced
micronuclei in mouse bone marrow (13, 40). Famotidine
is effective against radiation induced apoptosis via OH
radical scavenging and an intracellular antioxidant
mechanism (15). The combination of famotidine and
melatonin used with radiation led to a protective effect
that was similar to famotidine alone. The mechanism by
which famotidine reduces radiation induced apoptosis is
not clearly understood, but it may be due to its antioxidant
properties and is not measurable by the DPPH assay.
Conclusion
The results imply that melatonin, despite its potent
antioxidant property, does not significantly affect radiation
induced apoptosis in leukocytes derived from normal
individuals. However, a moderate significant protection
is induced in leukocytes derived from BC patients. When
used with radiation, it might not intervene with the RT
regimen for BC cancer patients. Famotidine, on the other
hand is a good radioprotector for normal tissue, but if it
accumulates in tumour tissues, it might reduce the efficacy
of RT.
Table 1
Study participants’ demographic information
Normal control
Mean age ± SD
# 5
37.4 ± 11
Luminal A
Age (Y)
Age at onset (Y)
R/L
Type
Grade
Stage
ER
PR
Her2
Ki67
BC patients
P1
47
46
R
D
2
1A
70
70
N
25
P2
47
46
L
D
2
2A
100
100
N
25
P3
45
44
R
L
2
2A
80
80
N
12.5
P4
26
26
R
D
2
3A
100
100
N
13.5
P5
76
75
L
D
2
2B
100
100
N
11.5
P6
42
41
L
D
1
2A
100
90
N
7.5
P7
42
41
R
D
1
2A
90
90
N
5
P8
44
43
R
D
1
2A
100
90
N
13.5
P9
45
44
R
D
1
1A
95
70
N
2
P10
46
45
R
D
2
1A
100
100
N
4.5
Mean ± SD
46 ± 11.58
45.1 ± 11.41
93.5 ± 10.01
89 ± 11.36
12 ± 7.54
BC; Breast cancer, P1-P10; Patient number, R/L; Right/left, ER; Oestrogen receptor, PR; Progesterone receptor, and SD; Standard deviation.
Authors: M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Carmen Rodriguez; Juan C Mayo; Rosa M Sainz; Isaac Antolín; Federico Herrera; Vanesa Martín; Russel J Reiter Journal: J Pineal Res Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 13.007