Azam Kazemi1, Saeid Abroun2, Masoud Soleimani1. 1. Department of Haematology and Blood Banking, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Haematology and Blood Banking, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Email: abroun@modares.ac.ir.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a tumour of differentiated B
cells from the germinal centre, plasma cells, within 10% of all
haematologic neoplasms and is considered the second most
commonly occurring non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1, 2). Over
the last two decades, advancements in available treatments
have increased the median survival time of patients with MM
from three to six years. MM accounts for 2% of total cancer
deaths and more than 20% of deaths due to malignancies
(3). Although tremendous advancements have been made in
new healthcare strategies in the past decade, to a great extent,
this tumour is incurable and new therapies are required (4,
5). Despite the innovation and benefits of a new therapeutic
strategy such as proteasome inhibitors, the clinical outcome of
the patients aggravates and most patients with MM eventually
relapse and engenders drug resistance (1).The proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib (BTZ), is a crucial
Food and Drug Adminisration (FDA)-approved drug for
the treatment of MM, especially in patients diagnosed
with relapsed and refractory MM (6). Although BTZ has
a significant impact on MM treatment (5), drug resistance
or relapse are two major challenges and patients with BTZ
resistance have a poor prognosis (7, 8). Therefore, new
therapeutic methods are urgently required to prevent BTZ
resistance. In addition, a more profound molecular grasp
of this cancer’s pathogenesis is required to recognize new
molecular targets and present therapeutic agents suitable for
patients (9). There is developing evidence that MM stems
from the deregulation of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), which
include microRNAs (miRNAs) (1). Recent studies show that
MM is caused by interruptions in many different signalling
pathways driven by miRNAs that are a class of ncRNAs about
18-22 nucleotides (nt) in length. These miRNAs act as master
regulators of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level
via RNA interference pathways (6). miRNAs are involved
in many biological processes that include differentiation,
senescence, survival and apoptosis (3, 6). Disturbances in
miRNA regulation are accompanied by the pathogenesis
of diseases such as cancer, and miRNA expression profiles
have prognostic implications in numerous types of cancer (6).
Altogether, miRNAs play a fundamental role as an oncogene
and they operate as ‘oncomiRs’ if their targets are tumour
suppressor genes (1). Therefore, controlling oncomiRs may
be an effective treatment strategy.The miR-17-92 clusters located in chromosome
13q31.3, including miR-19a, were the first oncomiRs
discovered. Disturbances in the expression levels of miR-17-92 clusters result in malignant progression of MM
(4, 5). miR-19a, a crucial component of the miR-17-92
cluster, is directly involved in myeloma pathogenesis and
progression of MM (9). In addition, target genes of miR-19a are considered potential biomarkers of this disease
(10). Compared with normal plasma cells, miR-19a is
upregulated in patients with MM and in MM cell lines.miR-19a can adjust the expressions of proteins essential for myeloma pathogenesis and
include suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCSs). miR-19a targets
SOCS3, a potent regulator of the JAK-STAT pathway,
which is followed by a considerable reduction in SOCS3 mRNA together with
enhanced activation of the SOCS3 target, STAT3 (9). Based
on these findings, a strategy that can be developed to regulate aberrant expressions of
miRNAs in cancer is the inhibition of upregulated miRNAs (1). Therefore, we assume that the
use of mir-19a inhibitors (antagomir) could be a new treatment approach for MM.B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) is one of the anti-apoptotic members of the
BCL-2 family that interacts with these proteins and in response to drug
therapy, it determines cellular fate decisions and represents an attractive target for
therapy (11, 12). In vitro studies indicated that CDKN1A
might be an oncogene in lymphomas and plasma cell disorders, and these studies indicate that
CDKN1A can act as a molecular target for drug developments (13). Although
BTZ is used to treat MM, 60% of patients treated with BTZ experience resistance. Therefore,
we intend to investigate the impact of antagomiR-19a on improving responsiveness to BTZ. The
findings may show that miR-19a can be an effective biomarker for treatment response (9,
14).
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and cultures
In this experimental study, we purchased the RPM I8226 and U266 cell lines from Pasteur
Institute of Iran (IPI), Tehran, Iran. The cells were grown in suspension in RPMI 1640
medium (Bio-Idea, Bio Idea Group, Iran) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS,
Gibco-BRL, Germany), 100 mg/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine
(Bio-Idea, Bio Idea Group, Iran). The cells were maintained at 37˚C in an environment of
5% CO2 and 95% air, and were passaged twice per week.The present study was conducted with the approval of
the Ethical Committee of the Tarbiat Modares University
(IR.TMU.REC.1394.290).
Reagents
BTZ (PS-341, Selleckchem.com, cat. no. S1013) was
dissolved in 0.2603 mL DMSO to prepare a 50 mM stock
solution and stored at -20˚C. The LentimiRa-off-has-miR-19a-3p vector (Applied Biological Materials, Inc., cat. no.
mh30299) that included a green fluorescent protein (GFP)
promoter, miRNA insert and kanamycin resistance gene was
transformed in a DH5α E. coli strain, then isolated with a
Qiagen plus Midi Plasmid Purification kit. The final product
was stored at -20˚C until further use.
In vitro cell culture and drug treatment
The human myeloma cell lines RPMI 8226 and U266 were cultured in RPMI 1640 and the stock
solution of BTZ was diluted in RPMI 1640 medium prior to use. RPMI 8226 and U266 cells
were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium, then seeded at a density of 5×103 cells in
96-well plates. These cells were treated with various working concentrations of BTZ, which
was obtained from a 50 mM stock solution, in order to determine the half maximal
inhibitory concentration (IC50) for each cell line.The concentrations of BTZ
were based on approximate concentrations noted in the cell assay part of the BTZ
datasheet, which were 0.5, 5, and 50 µM for U266 and 150, 450, 750, and 1050 nM for RPMI
8226. The BTZ concentrations and cells were mixed well in RPMI 1640 medium and 10% FBS,
and incubated for 48 hours.
We used a standard protocol to assess the inhibitory impact of BTZ on cell growth by the
3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Briefly, cells
from the 48-hour cultures were pulsed with 10 µL of 5 mg/ mL MTT in each well for at least
four hours of the 48-hour cultures, followed by 100 µL of isopropanol that contained 0.04
N HCl. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a spectrophotometer and the results were
expressed as the mean of three replicates, as a percentage of the control (100%). The
extent of cytotoxicity was defined as the relative reduction in optical density, which
correlated to the number of viable cells in relation to the control (100%). In order to
decide the optimum dosage of the drugs for further studies, the cell viability was plotted
in a graph and we calculated the IC50.
Cell viability analysis
The effect of transfection on cellular viability was assessed by flow cytometry using
propidium iodide (PI). PI can only pass through disordered areas of the membranes of
nonviable cells and intercalate with DNA of the nuclei, emitting a red fluorescence light.
PI solution was used with 1 mg/mL concetration by dissolving PI (Sigma, P 4170, Germany)
in dH2 O. The PI solution was added in a final concentration of 2 µg/mL to
1×106 cells in suspension, incubated in the dark for five minutes, then
analysed by flow cytometry with an Attune NXT flow cytometer.
Analysis of apoptosis
We assessed the level of apoptosis by annexin V/PI staining and flow cytometry with an
Attune NXT flow cytometer in transfected cells that were treated with BTZ and in the
untreated cells. The cells were washed in PBS and then in 1X binding buffer before they
were resuspended in 1X binding buffer at 1×106 cells/mL. Then, we added 5 µL of
FITC-conjugated annexin V to 100 µL of the cell suspension and incubated this suspension
for 10-15 minutes in the dark at room temperature. The incubated cells were washed with
binding buffer and resuspended in it. Next, we added 5 µL PI staining solution (Sigma, P
4170, Germany) and analysed the cells with flow cytometry.
Prediction of SOCS3 as a target of miR-19a
TargetScan (version 5) and PicTar were used to confirm
that SOCS3 is a target of miR-19a at its 3´UTR. TargetScan
predicted the biological targets of miRNA by searching for
the presence of conserved 7 and 8 base sites that match its
seed region.
Cell transfection
The cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium without antibiotics prior to transfection. The
U266 and RPMI 8226 cell lines were transfected by a final concentration of 2 µg of the
pLenti-III-miR-Off-has-miR-19a-3p vector that contained GFP (Applied Biological Materials,
Inc., Canada). Transfection of cells was performed using UltraCruz® Transfection Reagent
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Germany). Briefly, before transfection, we prepared
transfection reagent and the vector in Opti-MEM I reduced serum medium (Gibco, Germany) in
accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The transfection reagent and plasmid were
prepared in OPTI-MEM I medium and incubated at room temperature. Next, we added the
plasmid reagent to the transfection reagent, vortexed it vigorously, and incubated the
mixture for 20 minutes. A total of 6×103 cells were added to the Eppendorf tube
and were poured above mix dropwise to the cells, then the solution was incubated in the
incubator for two hours. Each 30 minutes the tube was flicked by a fingertip. After the
incubation, the cells were transferred to a six-well plate and incubated for 24-72 hours,
followed by evaluation of GFP expression by an Attune NXT flow cytometer.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
assessment of miR-19a expression
Total RNA was isolated from the untransfected, transfected, and BTZ-treated RPMI 8226 and
U266 cells according to the TRIzol manufacturer’s protocol (InvitrogenTM, USA). A total of
2000 ng of RNA was reverse transcribed using specific miRNA stem-loop primers from Qiagen
for miR-19a to generate cDNA using a Hyperscript Reverse Transcriptase First-strand
Synthesis kit (GeneAll Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Korea). Snord47 was used as the internal
control for normalization of miRNA expression. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain
reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed with a SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ miRNA RT-qPCR Detection Kit
(Takara, USA, cat. no. RR820Q) using a Qiagen Rotor-Gene Q 5PLEX HRM Real-Time PCR. Table
1 shows the primer sequences used in this experiment. The PCR program cycling parameters
were: 95˚C for 15 seconds, 58˚C for 30 seconds, and 72˚C for 30 seconds for 45 cycles.
Data analysis was done by 2-ΔΔCT to calculate the fold change for relative
miR-19a expression compared to the untreated control.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis for the SOCS3,
STAT3, PTEN, BCL-2 and CDKN1A genes
Total RNA was isolated from the untransfected, transfected, and BTZ-treated RPMI 8226 and
U266 cells according to the TRIzol manufacturer’s protocol (InvitrogenTM, USA). A total of
2 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a Hyperscript Reverse
Transcriptase First-strand Synthesis kit with oligo-dT primers in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions (GeneAll Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Korea) for evaluation of the
SOCS3, STAT3, BCL-2, CDKN1A and PTEN genes.
β-Actin was used as the internal control. qRT-PCR was performed with
the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ miRNA RT-qPCR Detection Kit (Takara, USA, cat. no. RR820Q) using
a Qiagen Rotor-Gene Q 5PLEX HRM Real-Time PCR. The PCR program cycling parameters were:
95˚C for 15 seconds, 58˚C for 30 seconds, and 72˚C for 30 seconds for 45 cycles. Data
analysis was performed by 2-ΔΔCT to calculate the fold changes for the relative
expressions of the above genes compared to the untreated control.
Statistical analysis
Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. The
statistical analysis was performed with the Graphpad
prism 8.4.0 software The mean values of two groups or
multiple groups were compared by one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA). P<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. Flow cytometric assays were analyzed with
flowjo version 7.6.1.
Results
Determination of the IC50 for bortezomib in the U266 and RPMI 8226
multiple myeloma cell lines
We treated the RPMI 8226 and U266 cell lines with different concentrations of BTZ to
determine the optimal IC50 to treat the cell lines with proper concentrations
of BTZ throughout the analysis. The MTT assay and viability test with PI by flow cytometry
showed that the optimized concentration of BTZ for the U266 cell line was 5 µM and it was
150 nM for the RPMI 8226 cell line (Fig .1A-D).
Fig.1
IC50 evaluation of the U266 and RPMI 8226 cell lines to optimize the concentration of
bortezomib (BTZ). A, B. The U266 and RPMI 8226 cell lines were incubated
with increasing concentrations of BTZ (0 to 50 µM) and (0 to 1050 nM), respectively,
for 48 hours. Cell viability was assessed by the 3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,
5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) colorimetric assay. C, D. Treated
U266 and RPMI 8226 cells were incubated with propidium iodide (PI) and the percentage
of nonviable cells was assessed by flow cytometry.
IC50 evaluation of the U266 and RPMI 8226 cell lines to optimize the concentration of
bortezomib (BTZ). A, B. The U266 and RPMI 8226 cell lines were incubated
with increasing concentrations of BTZ (0 to 50 µM) and (0 to 1050 nM), respectively,
for 48 hours. Cell viability was assessed by the 3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,
5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) colorimetric assay. C, D. Treated
U266 and RPMI 8226 cells were incubated with propidium iodide (PI) and the percentage
of nonviable cells was assessed by flow cytometry.
Downregulation of miR-19a decreased cell viability
and prevented proliferation of the myeloma cell lines
We first evaluated the expression levels of miR-19a in the non-transfected (control) RPMI 8226 and U266 myeloma cell lines.
After transfection of these cell lines with the LentimiRa-off-has-miR-19a-3p vector, the efficiency of transfection was monitored by
GFP fluorescence as observed by fluorescent microscopy (Fig .2A,
Fig 3A) and flow cytometry (Fig .2B, Fig 3B). The expression levels of
miR-19a were determined in the transfected RPMI 8226 and
U266 myeloma cell lines by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figures 2C
and 3C, the expression level of miR-19a significantly decreased in
the transfected group compared with the un-transfected myeloma
cell line. The data showed that the antagomir-19a downregulated
expression of miR-19a, a previously-known oncomiR. After
transfection of the RPMI 8226 and U266 myeloma cell lines
with the LentimiRa-off-has-miR-19a-3p vector, we evaluated cell
viability after 72 hours with PI and the rate of viability was detected
by flow cytometry (Fig .2D, Fig 3D). The data confirmed the possibility
of the analyses of the cell lines within 72 hours after transfection,
and indicated a decrease in cell viability because of miR-19a
downregulation. When compared with the negative control group,
this finding suggested that miR19a suppression decreased cell
proliferation.
Fig.2
RPMI 8226 cells were transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. A, B.
The transfection efficiency was assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow
cytometry through GFP fluorescence. C. miR-19a expression was assessed by
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in the non-transfected RPMI
cell line (control), transfected RPMI cell line with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p
vector, treated RPMI cell line with bortezomib (BTZ) and treated RPMI cell lines with
BTZ after transfection with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector The ratios of
miR-19a were calculated relative to Snord47. Values are expressed as the mean ±
standard deviation of three independent experiments. D. Evaluation of
RPMI 8226 myeloma cell line viability at 72 hours after transfection. RPMI 8226 cells
were transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector, then incubated with
propidium iodide (PI). Cell viability was assessed by flowcytometry. *; P<0.05
vs. the control and ****; P<0.001.
Fig.3
U266 cells were transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. A, B. The
transfection efficiency was assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry
through GFP green fluorescence. C. Expression of miR-19a was assessed by
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in the non-transfected U266
cell line (control), U266 cell line transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p
vector, U266 cell line treated with bortezomib (BTZ) and U266 cell line treated with
BTZ after transfection with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. The ratios of
miR-19a were calculated relative to snord47. Values are expressed as the mean ±
standard deviation of three independent experiments. D. Evaluation of
U266 myeloma cell viability 72 hours after transfection. U266 cells were transfected
with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector then the cells were incubated with
propidium iodide (PI) and cell viability was assessed by flow cytometry after 72
hours. **; P<0.001 vs. the control and ****; P<0.0001.
RPMI 8226 cells were transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. A, B.
The transfection efficiency was assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow
cytometry through GFP fluorescence. C. miR-19a expression was assessed by
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in the non-transfected RPMI
cell line (control), transfected RPMI cell line with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p
vector, treated RPMI cell line with bortezomib (BTZ) and treated RPMI cell lines with
BTZ after transfection with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector The ratios of
miR-19a were calculated relative to Snord47. Values are expressed as the mean ±
standard deviation of three independent experiments. D. Evaluation of
RPMI 8226 myeloma cell line viability at 72 hours after transfection. RPMI 8226 cells
were transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector, then incubated with
propidium iodide (PI). Cell viability was assessed by flowcytometry. *; P<0.05
vs. the control and ****; P<0.001.
Reduction in miR-19a expression in the myeloma cell
lines after bortezomib treatment
We used qRT-PCR to evaluate the expression level of miR-19a after treatment with BTZ. Our data showed a reduction
in its expression in the treated cells compared to the non-treated cells. miR-19a expression was also evaluated in cells
transfected by the LentimiRa-off-has-miR-19a-3p vector. The
data showed a substantial reduction in miR-19a expression
after BTZ treatment compared to the non-treated and non-transfected controls (Fig .2C, Fig 3C). Cell viability evaluation
after 72 hours with PI using flow cytometry showed that it
was possible to evaluate every analysis on the transfected cell
lines 72 hours after transfection. On the other hand, viability
of the cell lines decreased due to downregulation of miR-19a
(Fig .2D, Fig 3D).U266 cells were transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. A, B. The
transfection efficiency was assessed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry
through GFP green fluorescence. C. Expression of miR-19a was assessed by
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in the non-transfected U266
cell line (control), U266 cell line transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p
vector, U266 cell line treated with bortezomib (BTZ) and U266 cell line treated with
BTZ after transfection with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. The ratios of
miR-19a were calculated relative to snord47. Values are expressed as the mean ±
standard deviation of three independent experiments. D. Evaluation of
U266 myeloma cell viability 72 hours after transfection. U266 cells were transfected
with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector then the cells were incubated with
propidium iodide (PI) and cell viability was assessed by flow cytometry after 72
hours. **; P<0.001 vs. the control and ****; P<0.0001.
Anti-miR-19a increased susceptibility to bortezomib-induced apoptosis
We investigated the effect of antagomir-19a on BTZ-induced apoptosis on the myeloma cell lines. The LentimiRa-off-has-miR-19a-3p transfected myeloma cells were
incubated for 48 hours with BTZ (5 µM for U266 and 150 nM
for RPMI 8226) followed by annexin V/PI staining and flow
cytometry analysis to determine the percentage of apoptosis.
The percentage of cells that underwent apoptosis increased
after transfection in the RPMI 8226 (23.5% vs. 68.2%,
P=0.0038) and U266 (25.2% vs. 96.4%, P=0.0006) cell lines
compared with the non-transfected cell lines and the negative
control (Fig .4A-D). The data showed that antagomir-19a
could increase myeloma cell susceptibility to drug-induced
apoptosis.
Fig.4
Evaluation of apoptosis by annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) staining and analysis by flow
cytometry in RPMI 8226 and U266 myeloma cell lines. A. Untreated and
nontransfected cell lines are the negative controls. B. After bortezomib
(BTZ) treatment. C. After transfection with the
LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. D. After treatment of the
transfected RPMI cell line with BTZ.
SOCS3 and STAT3 mRNA expression levels after
transfection of myeloma cell lines with the LentimiRa-off-has-miR-19a-3p vect
SOCS3 is a target of miR-19a. Therefore, we evaluated mRNA levels of
SOCS3 and its target, STAT3, in the myeloma cell lines
after transfection with the Lentini-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. There was an increase in
mRNA expression of SOCS3 and a decrease in STAT3 mRNA
expression compared with the non-transfected cell lines (negative control) (Fig .5A-D).
Fig.5
SOCS3 and STAT3 gene expression analyses at the mRNA level in
RPMI 8226 and U266 cell lines by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
(qRT-PCR). The RPMI 8226 and U266 cells were cultured and treated with bortezomib
(BTZ) (150 nM for RPMI 8226 and 5 µM for U266), transfected with the
LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector and treated with BTZ (150 nM and 5 µM,
respectively) after transfection. A, B. Expressions of
SOCS3 and STAT3 were examined in RPMI 8226 cells
after 48 hours of BTZ treatment and transfection with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p
vector and after 48 hours of BTZ treatment in the transfected cells. C,
D.
SOCS3 and STAT3 expressions were examined in U266
cells after 48 hours of BTZ treatment and transfection with the
LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector and after 48 hours of BTZ treatment in the
transfected cells. Untreated RPMI 8226 and U266 cells were used as the controls to
evaluate the relative gene expressions. The data are presented as mean ± SD of three
independent experiments. β-Actin was the control in the qRT-PCR
assessment. *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001, and ****;
P<0.0001 vs. the control.
Evaluation of apoptosis by annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) staining and analysis by flow
cytometry in RPMI 8226 and U266 myeloma cell lines. A. Untreated and
nontransfected cell lines are the negative controls. B. After bortezomib
(BTZ) treatment. C. After transfection with the
LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector. D. After treatment of the
transfected RPMI cell line with BTZ.SOCS3 and STAT3 gene expression analyses at the mRNA level in
RPMI 8226 and U266 cell lines by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
(qRT-PCR). The RPMI 8226 and U266 cells were cultured and treated with bortezomib
(BTZ) (150 nM for RPMI 8226 and 5 µM for U266), transfected with the
LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector and treated with BTZ (150 nM and 5 µM,
respectively) after transfection. A, B. Expressions of
SOCS3 and STAT3 were examined in RPMI 8226 cells
after 48 hours of BTZ treatment and transfection with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p
vector and after 48 hours of BTZ treatment in the transfected cells. C,
D.
SOCS3 and STAT3 expressions were examined in U266
cells after 48 hours of BTZ treatment and transfection with the
LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector and after 48 hours of BTZ treatment in the
transfected cells. Untreated RPMI 8226 and U266 cells were used as the controls to
evaluate the relative gene expressions. The data are presented as mean ± SD of three
independent experiments. β-Actin was the control in the qRT-PCR
assessment. *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001, and ****;
P<0.0001 vs. the control.
Anti-miR-19a induced downregulation of PTEN, BCL-2, and
CDKN1A in the bortezomib-treated myeloma cell lines
Transfection of the LentiviRal-off-has-miR-19a-3p vector caused a decrease in
PTEN, BCL-2 and CDKN1A mRNA expressions in the
BTZ-treated cell lines, which was consistent with downregulation of miR-19a after
transfection compared to the BTZ-treated non-transfected cell lines (Fig .6).
Fig.6
B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), PTEN and CDKN1
expressions at the mRNA level in the U266 and RPMI 8226 cell lines according to
quantitative real-time polymerase chian reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. The U266 and RPMI
8226 cells were cultured and treated with bortezomib (BTZ), 5 µM and 150 nM,
respectively, transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector and treated
with BTZ (5 µM and 150 nM, respectively) after transfection. A-C.
Expressions of BCL-2, PTEN and CDKN1 were examined
in U266 cells after 48 hours of BTZ treatment and transfection with
LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector, and after 48 hours of BTZ treatment in the
transfected cells. D-F. Expressions of BCL-2, PTEN and
CDKN1 were examined in RPMI 8226 cells after 48 hours of BTZ
treatment and transfection with LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector, and after 48
hours of BTZ treatment in the transfected cells. The U266 and RPMI 8226 cells treated
with BTZ were used as the controls to evaluate the relative gene expressions. The data
are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. β-Actin
served as the control for the qRT-PCR assessment. *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01,
***; P<0.001, and ****; P<0.0001 vs. the control.
B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), PTEN and CDKN1
expressions at the mRNA level in the U266 and RPMI 8226 cell lines according to
quantitative real-time polymerase chian reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. The U266 and RPMI
8226 cells were cultured and treated with bortezomib (BTZ), 5 µM and 150 nM,
respectively, transfected with the LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector and treated
with BTZ (5 µM and 150 nM, respectively) after transfection. A-C.
Expressions of BCL-2, PTEN and CDKN1 were examined
in U266 cells after 48 hours of BTZ treatment and transfection with
LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector, and after 48 hours of BTZ treatment in the
transfected cells. D-F. Expressions of BCL-2, PTEN and
CDKN1 were examined in RPMI 8226 cells after 48 hours of BTZ
treatment and transfection with LentimiRa-off-has-mir-19a-3p vector, and after 48
hours of BTZ treatment in the transfected cells. The U266 and RPMI 8226 cells treated
with BTZ were used as the controls to evaluate the relative gene expressions. The data
are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. β-Actin
served as the control for the qRT-PCR assessment. *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01,
***; P<0.001, and ****; P<0.0001 vs. the control.
Discussion
Based on findings of previous studies (15), the first outcome of deregulated miRNA
expression in MM was reported by Löffler et al. (16) when they reported that miR-21 ectopic
expression made MM cells independent from IL-6 growth stimulus. Pichiorri et al. (17)
identified a miRNA signature associated with transformation of normal PCs to clinical MM via
monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and demonstrated that miR-32,
miR-21, miR-17-92, the miR-106b-25 cluster, and miR-181a/b upregulated in both MM cell lines
and primary tumours versus normal PCs. Among these, the miR-17-92 cluster was only highly
expressed in patients with MM. OncomiR-19a, one of the members of the miR-17-92 cluster,
plays a role in promotion of cell proliferation, migration, and induction of apoptosis, and
it is suggested to have a critical role in myeloma pathogenesis (10). Patients with low
levels of miR-19a in their sera have a better response and shortened progression-free with
downregulation of it obtained from others studies (18). Here, we evaluated the response of
two MM cell lines to Bof the JAK/STAT pathwayTZ in the presence of
antagomiR-19a in an attempt to avoid resistance to MM through targets of miR-19a. The
results of recent studies have shown that SOCS3 is a target of miR-19a and
a negative regulator of SOCS3 (19, 20), and showed that the molecule
beneath it, STAT3 is a significant promoter of cancers such as MM when
activated (5, 21, 22). STAT3, one of the components , acts as an oncogene
in human cancers (22, 23). Some miRNAs have close relativity with drug resistance; for
example, it has been shown that miR-181a expression is in consistence with MM tumour load
and could be a biomarker for treatment monitoring, as much as miR-20a, which is a potential
diagnostic biomarker (4, 6). BTZ is a proteasome inhibitor and an effective treatment for MM
in some patients; however, drug resistance is a major problem for 60% of these patients (8,
24). Our data primarily showed that antagomir-19a downregulated miR-19a expression. BTZ
inhibited miR-19a in a concentration-dependent manner and, in the presence of antagomir-19a
and BTZ, miR-19a efficiently downregulated in parallel with an increase in the proportion of
apoptotic cells following treatment with BTZ. On the other hand, our viability studies
showed that the ratio of proliferation of myeloma cell lines decreased after transfection
with the antagomiR-19a vector. The data supported the results of other studies where
miR-181a and miR-20a were inhibited by BTZ (6).We observed downregulation of STAT3 and upregulation of
SOCS3 at the mRNA level, which confirmed that miR-19a is a negative
regulator of SOCS3. This finding supported data from previous studies (19,
20). The oncogenic function of STAT3 has been previously reported (21, 22);
therefore, we could conclude that inhibition of miR-19a caused suppression of
STAT3. Our results showed that the expression level of
STAT3 in BTZ-treated cells highly decreased when used in parallel with
anatago-miR-19a. Thus, inhibition of miR-19a could be used to improve BTZ responsiveness in
myeloma cells. The results of another study showed that PTEN plays critical
roles in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, and a molecular study
identified PTEN as a downstream target of miR-19a, which was inversely
correlated with miR-19a expression in ovarian cancer tissues (10). We also assessed
BCL-2, which is an attractive target for therapy. In this context, there
is a drug that targets BCL-2 in BCL-2-dependent
haematologic malignancies, such as chronic lymphoid leukaemia and mantle cell lymphoma (11,
25). In a recent study, miR-19a promoted drug resistance of myeloma cells to
chemotherapeutic agents by upregulation of BCL-2 (11). A previous study
indicated that CDKN1 is an oncotarget in Burkitt lymphoma and MM.
Currently, CDKN1 is more broadly considered to be a regulator of
fundamental cell-fate decisions such as proliferation, differentiation, and senescence
(13).In accordance with these studies, our data showed that inhibition of miR-19a by the
antagomiR-19a and BTZ treatment of cells increased the expression levels of PTEN,
BCL-2, and CDKN1. However, their expressions decreased in
myeloma cell lines treated with BTZ after induction of antagomiR-19a. The results supplement
the findings that miRNAs are differentially expressed in BTZ-resistant myeloma cells.
miR-19a could be a possible prognostic biomarker for responsiveness to BTZ in MM patients.
In order to overcome resistance and improve the level of responsiveness to BTZ, miR-19a
targets such as SOCS3 and STAT3 could be tracked. We faced
some restrictions in our studies that must be adverted. They include the use of other MM
cell lines and myeloma cells obtained from MM patients, and evaluation of targets at the
protein level expression and downstream molecules, which could have helped us to generalize
our results.
Conclusion
Overall, our data indicated that induction of antagomir-19a in myeloma cell lines resulted
in downregulation of mir-19a and enhanced responsiveness to BTZ treatment. On the other
hand, the ratio of apoptosis in the BTZ-treated cell lines was drastically more effective in
the presence of mir-19a inhibition. Thus, mir-19a could be a potential prognostic biomarker
in MM treatment. Downregulation of the PTEN and CDKN1
oncogenes due to inhibition of oncomiR-19a following BTZ treatment would most likely lead to
a better treatment response.
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Bart Barlogie; James Berenson; Seema Singhal; Sundar Jagannath; David Irwin; S Vincent Rajkumar; Gordan Srkalovic; Melissa Alsina; Raymond Alexanian; David Siegel; Robert Z Orlowski; David Kuter; Steven A Limentani; Stephanie Lee; Teru Hideshima; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Michael Kauffman; Julian Adams; David P Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Aideen S Collins; Claire E McCoy; Andrew T Lloyd; Cliona O'Farrelly; Nigel J Stevenson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 3.240