Literature DB >> 34837132

Optimal Region of Lymph Node Dissection in Distal Pancreatectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer Based on Tumor Location.

Hiroyuki Ishida1,2, Toshiro Ogura3,4, Amane Takahashi1, Ryoichi Miyamoto1, Shinichi Matsudaira1, Katsumi Amikura1, Minoru Tanabe2, Yoshiyuki Kawashima1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal lymph node (LN) dissection for left-sided pancreatic cancer based on tumor location has remained unknown. In particular, the efficacy of LN dissection around the common hepatic artery and the celiac axis for distal tumors has not been established. This study was designed to elucidate the frequency and prognostic impact of LN metastasis, focusing on tumor location.
METHODS: Data from 110 patients with invasive pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatectomy between 2007 and 2020 were collected. We used a quantitative value-the distance between the left side of the portal vein and the right side of tumor (DPT)-to define the tumor location. LN stations were divided into two groups: peripancreatic lymph nodes (PLN) and non-PLN. We then analyzed the frequency of LN metastasis based on the tumor location and prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Non-PLN metastasis was observed in 7.3% of patients. Non-PLN metastasis was found only in patients with a DPT < 20 mm. Patients with non-PLN metastasis exhibited a significantly worse prognosis than those with only-PLN metastasis (median survival time: 20.3 vs. 42.5 months, p = 0.048). Multivariate analysis for survival indicated that tumor size > 4 cm (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.23, p = 0.012) and metastasis in the non-PLN region (HR: 3.02, p = 0.015), and inability to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 2.81, p = 0.0018) were also associated with poor prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Dissection of the non-PLN region can be avoided in selected patients with DPT ≥ 20 mm.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34837132     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11108-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  14 in total

1.  Lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.

Authors:  A Nakao; A Harada; T Nonami; T Kaneko; S Nomoto; H Koyama; N Kanazumi; N Nakashima; H Takagi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Pattern of lymph node metastasis spread in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Tsutomu Fujii; Shunji Nagai; Yasuhiro Kodera; Akiyuki Kanzaki; Tevfik T Sahin; Masamichi Hayashi; Suguru Yamada; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Shuji Nomoto; Shin Takeda; Satoshi Morita; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Prognostic implications of lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.

Authors:  Tevfik T Sahin; Tsutomu Fujii; Mitsuro Kanda; Shunji Nagai; Yasuhiro Kodera; Akiyuki Kanzaki; Kazuo Yamamura; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Hideki Kasuya; Shuji Nomoto; Shin Takeda; Satoshi Morita; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Cancer Statistics, 2021.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  The implications of positive peritoneal lavage cytology in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ryuji Yoshioka; Akio Saiura; Rintaro Koga; Junichi Arita; Nobuyuki Takemura; Yoshihiro Ono; Junji Yamamoto; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; J Coleman; P K Sauter; R H Hruban; H A Pitt; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Reconsidering the Optimal Regional Lymph Node Station According to Tumor Location for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Taisuke Imamura; Yusuke Yamamoto; Teiichi Sugiura; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Ryo Ashida; Katsuhisa Ohgi; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Clinical implications of peritoneal cytology in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: positive peritoneal cytology may not confer an adverse prognosis.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Shin Takeda; Tsutomu Fujii; Shuji Nomoto; Naohito Kanazumi; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Hideki Kasuya; Yasuhiro Kodera; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Satoshi Morita; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01).

Authors:  Katsuhiko Uesaka; Narikazu Boku; Akira Fukutomi; Yukiyasu Okamura; Masaru Konishi; Ippei Matsumoto; Yuji Kaneoka; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Shoji Nakamori; Hirohiko Sakamoto; Soichiro Morinaga; Osamu Kainuma; Koji Imai; Naohiro Sata; Shoichi Hishinuma; Hitoshi Ojima; Ryuzo Yamaguchi; Satoshi Hirano; Takeshi Sudo; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Optimal Region of Lymph Node Dissection in Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer Based on Tumor Location: Should We Dissect Non-Peripancreatic Lymph Nodes for all Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer Patients?

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ishida; Toshiro Ogura; Amane Takahashi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Importance of an appropriate number of examined lymph nodes in patients with pancreatic cancer-the more the better?

Authors:  Toshiro Ogura; Hiroyuki Ishida; Amane Takahashi; Yoshiyuki Kawashima
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 8.265

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.