Literature DB >> 34836617

Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?

Diego Alfonso López-Mora1, Ignasi Carrió2, Albert Flotats2.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique introduced in 1970s. Over the years, PET was used alone but is in 2000 when the first hybrid PET/CT device was clinically introduced. Since then, PET has continuously been marked by technological developments, being the most recent one the introduction of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) as an alternative to standard photomultiplier tubes used in analog PET/CT systems. SiPMs, the basis for the so called digital PET/CT systems, are smaller than standard photomultiplier tubes (enabling higher spatial resolution) and provide up to 100% coverage of the crystal area, as well as high sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution. SiPMs in combination with optimized acquisition and reconstruction parameters improve the localization of the annihilation events, provide high definition PET images, and offer higher sensitivity and higher diagnostic performance. This article summarizes the evidence about the superior performance of the state of the art digital PET and highlights its potential clinical implications. Digital PET opens new perspectives in the quantification and characterization of small lesions, which are mostly undetectable using analog PET systems, potentially changing patient management and improving outcomes in oncological and non-oncological diseases. Moreover, digital PET offers the possibility to reduce radiation dose and scan times which may facilitate the implementation of PET to address unmet clinical needs.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34836617     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of a CD13 and Integrin αvβ3 Dual-Receptor Targeted Tracer 68Ga-NGR-RGD for Ovarian Tumor Imaging: Comparison With 18F-FDG.

Authors:  Yu Long; Fuqiang Shao; Hao Ji; Xiangming Song; Xiaoying Lv; Xiaotian Xia; Qingyao Liu; Yongxue Zhang; Dexing Zeng; Xiaoli Lan; Yongkang Gai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Artificial intelligence-based PET denoising could allow a two-fold reduction in [18F]FDG PET acquisition time in digital PET/CT.

Authors:  Kathleen Weyts; Charline Lasnon; Renaud Ciappuccini; Justine Lequesne; Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont; Elske Quak; Bénédicte Clarisse; Laurent Roussel; Stéphane Bardet; Cyril Jaudet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Will ultra-extended field-of-view scanners be an expensive folly or the next clinical standard for PET/CT?

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks; Annick D Van den Abbeele
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.605

4.  Nuclear Imaging in Pediatric Cardiology: Principles and Applications.

Authors:  Maelys Venet; Mark K Friedberg; Luc Mertens; Jerome Baranger; Zakaria Jalal; Ghoufrane Tlili; Olivier Villemain
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.569

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.