Literature DB >> 34836533

Quantitative evaluation of retinal microvasculature and retrobulbar vessels after intravenous chemotherapy for retinoblastoma.

Xiuqian Yi1,2, Jie Sun1,2, Jiang Qian1,2, Jie Guo1,2, Kang Xue3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUD: To evaluate the changes in retinal microvasculature and retrobulbar blood flow, using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and Color Doppler imaging (CDI) after intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) in patients with retinoblastoma (RB).
METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative case control series involving 30 patients. Ten bilateral RB patients that had a preserved eye with extramacular tumours (group I), 10 unilateral RB treated with IVC that had a normal fellow study eye (group II), and 10 age-matched healthy controls. The macular retinal thickness, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, and the macular and peripapillary retinal vessel densities (RVD) were measured. The peak systolic and end diastolic velocities of the ophthalmic, central retinal and posterior ciliary arteries were determined. A comparison among the three groups was conducted.
RESULTS: Between the three cohorts, OCTA revealed no significant difference in FAZ area, superficial foveal and parafoveal RVD, deep parafoveal RVD and peripapillary RVD, (P > 0.05). By contrast, the mean deep foveal RVD, the full, inner and outer foveal and the parafoveal retinal thickness were significantly lower in group I compared with the controls, (P = 0.0329, 0.0153, 0.0311 0.0352, 0.0215). No significant difference in the blood flow velocities occurred in the retrobulbar circulation (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with retinoblastoma, OCTA did not detect significant changes of retinal thickness and vessel density in the eyes treated with IVC, but a slight reduction in retinal thickness and the deep foveal RVD seemed to occur in bilateral RB eyes. The retrobulbar blood flow parameters showed no measurable changes.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intravenous chemotherapy; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Retinoblastoma; Retrobulbar ocular blood flow

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34836533      PMCID: PMC8620235          DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-02170-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1471-2415            Impact factor:   2.209


Backgroud

Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common, primary, intraocular malignancy in children. The improvement in globe salvage is mostly related to the introduction of intravenous chemotherapy (IVC, chemoreduction) coupled with focal consolidation as the most commonly used strategy for RB worldwide [1, 2]. In recent years, advances in treatment options, such as highly selective intra-arterial have reduced the use of systemic chemotherapy [3]. Although there can be systemic toxicities associated with IVC, such as bone marrow suppression and hearing loss [4, 5], limited studies have reported on ophthalmic changes after IVC using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) [6] and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) [7]. OCTA is a novel, non-invasive method and its recent use, along with the split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm, permits the visualisation of the vascular system of the retina at the capillary level. It has also been used to study the microvasculature effects of benign and malignant intraocular tumours [8-10]. In the previous study, we demonstrated that intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) had a measurable effect on the retrobulbar blood flow [11]. However, there are limited reports in the literature about CDI changes of these vessels after IVC. In this study, we evaluated the effects of IVC on the retrobulbar and ocular blood flow parameters in patients with retinoblastoma via CDI and OCTA, to understand the underlying ocular toxicities in the paediatric population.

Methods

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board at Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents, caretakers, or guardians on behalf of all of the children.

Patients

The retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai, China, from January to December 2020. Consecutive patients with RB treated with IVC and enucleation performed earlier in life and currently between the ages of 7 and 15 years were enrolled in this study. The authors divided the eyes into three groups: bilateral RB patients that had a preserved eye with extramacular tumours, with the staging as Group A-C at diagnosis (group I, n = 10), unilateral RB treated with IVC that had a normal fellow study eye (group II, n = 10), and age-matched healthy controls (control group, n = 10). Subjects with any of the following were excluded: newly diagnosed RB cases and those with less than 1 year follow-up time following the complete stoppage of systemic chemotherapy and/or local therapy; patients who had received external beam radiotherapy (brachytherapy) and subconjunctival chemotherapy, intraarterial or intravitreal chemotherapy; with tumours affecting the macular and optic disc region (edge of tumour was less than 3 mm from fovea and optic disc boundary); or with macular subretinal fluid, cystoid macular edema, vitreous haemorrhage or cataract.

Ophthalmological examination

All the children had a full history taken which included their age at the time of the present study, sex, age at the time of first presentation of RB, duration of follow-up, family history, modality of treatment used, number of IVC cycles, international classification of retinoblastoma (ICRB), number of tumours, distance to optic disc (mm) and to foveal (mm). All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations, which included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction measurement using auto refraction, spherical equivalence (SE) calculation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination and axial length (AL) measured with an optical biometry device (IOLMaster; Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany).

Optical coherence tomography angiography

OCTA was employed using a spectral domain system RTVue-XR Avanti (Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA). This system has an A-scan rate of 70 kHz per second with a light source centred at a wavelength of 840 nm and a bandwidth of 45 nm [12-14]. Two volumetric raster scans, including one horizontal priority (x-fast) and one vertical priority (y-fast), were obtained consecutively for each area and repeated again. The SSADA algorithm was employed to improve the signal-to-noise ratio by splitting the spectrum to generate multiple repeat OCT frames from the two original repeat OCT frames [15], and any motion artefacts were removed with 3-D orthogonal registration and the merging of the two scans. Macular (6 × 6 mm) and optic disc (4.5 × 4.5 mm) OCT angiography scans were acquired. The vessel densities in the foveal, parafoveal and peripapillary areas were assessed as follows. The foveal area was a 1 mm diameter circle centred on the fovea. The parafoveal area was defined as an annulus with an outer diameter of 3 mm and an inner diameter of 1 mm centred on the fovea. The peripapillary area was defined as a 700 μm wide elliptical annulus extending outward from the optic disc boundary. The retinal vessel densities of the specific areas were defined as the percentage area occupied by vessels in the corresponding segmented areas [13]. At the same time, the FAZ area and macular thicknesses were measured using the same OCTA system. The FAZ was automatically outlined and measured by built-in ImageJ software. The macular thicknesses, including the foveal and parafoveal area, were obtained using the retinal map protocol. The full retinal thickness was measured from the internal limiting membrane to the middle of the retinal pigment epithelium and the inner retinal thickness from the internal limiting membrane to the outer boundary of the inner plexiform layer. The retinal thicknesses of each area were automatically determined using the system’s software and were defined as the mean thicknesses of each area.

Colour Doppler imaging measurements

The HDI 5000 CDI (Philips Ultrasound, Bothell, Washington, USA) with a 7.5 MHz linear probe was used to evaluate the blood flow of retrobulbar vessels posterior ciliary artery (PCA), central retinal artery (CRA) and ophthalmic artery (OA)). The patients were placed in the supine position and examined by the same experienced sonographer. All processes were done in accordance with the CDI measurements protocol, as described previously [16]. The peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) in each vessel were measured. The pulsatility (PI) and resistance (RI) indices were calculated automatically by the scanner.

Statistical analyses

For the analyses of the data, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used, and the descriptive statistics included the standard deviations of the means for all of the variables. The categorical variables were compared using unpaired S tudent ‘s t-test, χ or Fischer’s tests, and the continuous variables between the groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Basic ophthalmic assessment

Overall, 30 patients (30 eyes) of three groups were included, with a mean age of 9.4 ± 2.2 years (range, 7–15 years). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the RB patients and healthy controls are summarised in Table 1. There was no significant difference between the three groups concerning their age, visual acuity and axial length (P > 0.05). In addition, the duration from last IVC to time of the exam and the number of IVC cycles were similar between group I and II (P > 0.05). The age at the time of the first presentation of RB was significantly younger in group I (P < 0.05).
Table 1

The demographic and clinical data of the patients with RB and healthy controls

Group IGroup IIControlP value
Number of subjects101010
Age (years)9.7 ± 2.48.8 ± 2.39.6 ± 1.7
Gender, n
 Male546
 Female564
Tumor consolidation, n
 Cryotherapy800
 TTT900
 Cryotherapy + TTT700
BCVA (logMAR)000
Axial Length (mm)23.0 ± 1.122.9 ± 0.823.1 ± 0.7
First presentation time (mouth) (mouth)12.9 ± 7.730.1 ± 9.60.0003
Duration time (year)8.2 ± 2.47.3 ± 2.40.4127
IVC times6.5 ± 1.66.5 ± 1.61
Family history, n (%)1(10%)0

Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

BCVA Best-corrected visual acuity, logMAR Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, IVC Intravenous chemotherapy. Duration time Duration from last IVC to time of the exam

The demographic and clinical data of the patients with RB and healthy controls Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant BCVA Best-corrected visual acuity, logMAR Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, IVC Intravenous chemotherapy. Duration time Duration from last IVC to time of the exam

OCTA parameters, retinal thickness and retinal vessel densities (RVD)

Comparing group I with the control group, the retinal vessel densities in the deep foveal was significantly lower in group I (34.9% vs 39.3%, P = 0.0329). The full, inner and outer foveal and parafoveal retinal thickness were significantly thinning in group I (230.0 vs 250.7, P = 0.0153; 50.7 vs 56.4, P = 0.0311; 189.3 vs 206.0, P = 0.0352; 300.7 vs 325.7, P = 0.0215). However, there was no significant difference in the FAZ area, the RVD in the superficial foveal and parafoveal area, the RVD in the deep parafoveal area and the RVD in the peripapillary area (all P > 0.05) (Table 2) (Figs. 1 and 2).
Table 2

Retinal Thicknesses and Vessel Densities of three groups

GroupIIIControlsP value
I vs III vs CII vs C
Fovea thickness (μm)
 Full230.0 ± 19.5244.5 ± 15.5250.7 ± 14.70.0820.01530.3709
 Inner50.7 ± 4.353.8 ± 7.456.4 ± 6.40.26700.03110.4117
 Outer189.3 ± 21.2201.8 ± 10.0206.0 ± 9.40.10900.03520.3460
Parafoveal thickness (μm)300.7 ± 29.9321.8 ± 17.6325.7 ± 9.60.07040.02150.5461
Choroidal thickness266.4 ± 84.7288.3 ± 84.1312.6 ± 82.70.56900.23300.5230
FAZ area (mm2)0.257 ± 0.0880.247 ± 0.1330.237 ± 0.0580.84500.55590.8299
SCP (RVD, %)
 foveal21.4 ± 4.421.3 ± 7.823.1 ± 3.80.97220.36740.5201
 Parafoveal45.9 ± 5.449.5 ± 3.849.5 ± 3.30.10180.08881.0000
DCP (RVD, %)
 foveal34.9 ± 4.537.1 ± 9.439.3 ± 4.00.51290.03290.5045
 Parafoveal49.8 ± 5.851.5 ± 3.151.1 ± 2.80.42440.53130.7655
Peripapillary (RVD, %)50.7 ± 3.553.3 ± 1.952.5 ± 2.20.05370.18540.2910
pRNFL119 ± 32.1124 ± 12.0117 ± 12.40.65010.85620.2158

Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

RVD Retinal vessel density, SCP Capillary plexus, DCP Deep capillary plexus

Fig. 1

The example of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) image in three groups. En face image (6 × 6 mm) of the corresponding layer of the superficial (A) and deep (B) capillary plexuses, and the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) (C) was automatically calculated in Group I (0.445) (right eye, bilateral RB had a preserved eye with extramacular tumors). En face of the corresponding layer of the superficial (D) and deep (E) capillary plexuses, and the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) (F) in Group II (0.224) (left eye, unilateral RB with a normal eye). En face of the corresponding layer of the superficial (G) and deep (H) capillary plexuses, and the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) (I) in control Group (0.203) (left eye). Capillary density was calculated as percent of vessels per en face image for both plexuses. The mean superficial plexus capillary density did not demonstrate statistically significant difference in three groups. By contrast, mean deep plexus capillary density was significantly reduced in group I compared with controls

Fig. 2

A comparison among the three groups was conducted, including the macular retinal thickness (a full foveal, b inner foveal, c outer foveal, d parafoveal), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, and the macular and peripapillary retinal vessel densities. As the retinal vessel densities (RVD) in superficial foveal (e) and parafoveal (f), the deep foveal (g) and deep parafoveal (h). By contrast, the mean deep foveal RVD, the full, inner and outer foveal and the parafoveal retinal thickness were significantly lower in group I compared with the controls, (P = 0.0329, 0.0153, 0.0311 0.0352, 0.0215)

Retinal Thicknesses and Vessel Densities of three groups Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant RVD Retinal vessel density, SCP Capillary plexus, DCP Deep capillary plexus The example of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) image in three groups. En face image (6 × 6 mm) of the corresponding layer of the superficial (A) and deep (B) capillary plexuses, and the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) (C) was automatically calculated in Group I (0.445) (right eye, bilateral RB had a preserved eye with extramacular tumors). En face of the corresponding layer of the superficial (D) and deep (E) capillary plexuses, and the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) (F) in Group II (0.224) (left eye, unilateral RB with a normal eye). En face of the corresponding layer of the superficial (G) and deep (H) capillary plexuses, and the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) (I) in control Group (0.203) (left eye). Capillary density was calculated as percent of vessels per en face image for both plexuses. The mean superficial plexus capillary density did not demonstrate statistically significant difference in three groups. By contrast, mean deep plexus capillary density was significantly reduced in group I compared with controls A comparison among the three groups was conducted, including the macular retinal thickness (a full foveal, b inner foveal, c outer foveal, d parafoveal), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, and the macular and peripapillary retinal vessel densities. As the retinal vessel densities (RVD) in superficial foveal (e) and parafoveal (f), the deep foveal (g) and deep parafoveal (h). By contrast, the mean deep foveal RVD, the full, inner and outer foveal and the parafoveal retinal thickness were significantly lower in group I compared with the controls, (P = 0.0329, 0.0153, 0.0311 0.0352, 0.0215) Comparing group I with II, and group II with the control group respectively, there were no statistically significant differences in the FAZ area, the RVD in the superficial foveal and parafoveal area, the RVD in the deep foveal and parafoveal area and the RVD in the peripapillary area. The full, inner and outer foveal and parafoveal retinal thickness were similar (P > 0.05; Table 2).

Retrobulbar blood flow parameters

The mean retrobulbar blood flow values of the OA, PCA, and CRA among the three groups are shown in Table 3. There were no statistically significant differences in all the parameters.
Table 3

Hemodynamic Doppler parameters in the OA, PCA, and CRA of Eyes After Intravenous Chemotherapy for RB

ParameterGroup IGroup IIControlsP value
I vs III vs CII vs C
Central retinal artery
 PSV (cm/s)11.28 ± 3.5211.52 ± 3.7311.72 ± 2.920.88400.76440.8953
 EDV (cm/s)3.82 ± 1.423.52 ± 1.643.71 ± 1.840.66710.88270.8102
 RI0.66 ± 0.070.69 ± 0.080.68 ± 0.090.38390.58590.7958
 PI1.12 ± 0.231.18 ± 0.211.15 ± 0.210.55000.76420.7531
Posterior ciliary artery
 PSV (cm/s)11.94 ± 3.0812.21 ± 3.2412.52 ± 3.430.85070.69540.8377
 EDV (cm/s)3.67 ± 1.183.84 ± 1.643.73 ± 1.480.79320.92130.8766
 RI0.69 ± 0.090.69 ± 0.100.70 ± 0.101.00000.81680.8256
 PI1.06 ± 0.231.04 ± 0.251.04 ± 0.220.85440.84471.0000
Ophthalmic artery
 PSV (cm/s)29.40 ± 6.6330.47 ± 5.6331.47 ± 5.60.70180.46040.6951
 EDV (cm/s)6.82 ± 2.627.11 ± 2.346.98 ± 3.120.79700.90250.9172
 RI0.77 ± 0.080.76 ± 0.090.78 ± 0.100.79580.80780.6439
 PI1.25 ± 0.381.24 ± 0.401.27 ± 0.430.95490.91350.8735

OA Ophthalmic artery, PCA Posterior ciliary artery, CRA Central retinal artery, PSV Peak systolic velocity, EDV End diastolic velocity

Hemodynamic Doppler parameters in the OA, PCA, and CRA of Eyes After Intravenous Chemotherapy for RB OA Ophthalmic artery, PCA Posterior ciliary artery, CRA Central retinal artery, PSV Peak systolic velocity, EDV End diastolic velocity

Discussion

Choroidal thinning and ischemic atrophy after the treatment of intraarterial chemotherapy in RB have been documented in vivo using EDI-OCT. [17] Our previous results suggested that some significant decreases in the blood flow velocities occurred in the retrobulbar circulation in some arteries after IAC [11]. Although IVC has been widely used in RB treatment for over 20 years, limited previous observations of ocular toxicities, including retinal ischemia after IVC, have been published. Shields et al [7] reported a slight reduction in capillary density of the deep capillary plexus in patients after IVC for RB without alterations in the central macular thickness or choroidal thickness. However, there are few reports in the literature about CDI changes of these vessels after IVC. In this study, we documented that the deep foveal RVD were significantly lower in the preserved eye with extramacular tumours, while the full, inner and outer foveal and the parafoveal retinal thickness were also significantly decreased. Standard IVC for RB includes vincristine and etoposide, and carboplatin, and the related toxicities are minimal. CRA and PCA, branches of OA, supply blood to the inner retina and choroid layer, respectively, through which the chemotherapeutic drugs enter the eyeballs. In our study, there were no measurable changes in the blood flow velocities in the PCA, CRA or OA. These drugs have not yet been observed to cause direct ocular toxicities in RB patients. Perhaps chemotherapy-induced micro-ischemia is below the threshold of causing blood flow velocity changes and visual acuity changes. Instead, IAC may trigger vascular toxicity through endothelial cell inflammation and leukostasis, leading to ocular and orbital vessel toxicity [18, 19]. IVC continues to have a safe ocular toxicity profile and work as a major treatment for early stage retinoblastoma. The current indications for IVC include patients with bilateral RB, confirmed germline mutation, familial retinoblastoma, aged 4 months or younger and high-risk histopathologic features [20, 21]. In this study, eyes without tumours that received chemotherapy (because of the opposite eye with the tumour [group II]) showed no signs of microischemia in OCTA or blood flow velocity changes in CDFI compared with the normal control. While the bilateral RB patients that had a preserved eye with extramacular tumours showed significantly decreased deep foveal RVD and alterations in the full, inner and outer foveal and the parafoveal retinal thickness. We interpreted this finding to represent an effect of focal consolidation or a tumour effect rather than a chemotherapy effect. The focal consolidation, including cryotherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT), might result in retinal and choroidal thinning and atrophy. Even the focal consolidation was conducted in the extramacular region, it might still have a measurable effect on the deep foveal RVD, and the mild subclinical retinal ischemia was detected only by OCTA. Azza et al. [6] proposed that retinoblastoma eyes, characterised by thinning of the central fovea, GCL, GCC compared with the control group, and the changes may be due to the genetic defects in RB. Our results proposed that the full, inner and outer foveal and parafoveal retinal thickness were significantly thinning in group I. Bilateral RB patients that had a preserved eye with extramacular tumours, which had genetic defects, and were consistent with the results of Azza. We also compared the vessel densities in the peripapillary area, resulting in no significant difference among the three groups, while RNFL thicknesses and peripapillary RVD were also similar in all three groups which has not been reported before. The vessels in the peripapillary area originate from two systems, the central retinal artery and the short posterior ciliary arteries. The chemotherapy might not have had a measurable vascular toxicity, since vessel densities and the RNFL remained unchanged when chemotherapeutic drugs entered the eyeballs. This study was not without certain limitations. First of all, we must mention that the number of participants included was limited to reach a statistically significant difference. Second, since the difference remained slight between the RB tumour and the control groups, a larger study may be required to validate this outcome. Additionally, OCTA with analyses is an examination that we could not perform in the supine position as it needs a patient’s cooperation. So far, therefore, it has not been possible to perform OCTA on patients under anaesthesia and on young infants, and the retinal thickness and vessel density before IVC treatment could not be detected. Finally, as IAC is more popular in the treatment of advanced Rb which seem to have more ocular toxicities, further study will be investigated on retinal microvasculature after IAC.

Conclusion

In summary, our results suggested that in retinoblastoma patients, OCTA did not detect significant changes of the retinal thickness or vessel density in eyes treated with IVC, but a slight reduction in the foveal and parafoveal retinal thickness, and deep foveal RVD seemed to occur in bilateral RB eyes. These changes might be due to the effect of focal consolidation or the genetic defects in RB. No measurable changes in the blood flow velocities occurred in the retrobulbar circulation after IVC with a long-term follow-up.
  21 in total

1.  Agreement among three examiners of colour Doppler imaging retrobulbar blood flow velocity measurements.

Authors:  Panayiota Founti; Alon Harris; Domniki Papadopoulou; Petros Emmanouilidis; Brent Siesky; Vassilis Kilintzis; Eleftherios Anastasopoulos; Angeliki Salonikiou; Theofanis Pappas; Fotis Topouzis
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  DIFFERENTIAL MACULAR FEATURES ON OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY IN EYES WITH CHOROIDAL NEVUS AND MELANOMA.

Authors:  Alicia Valverde-Megías; Emil A T Say; Sandor R Ferenczy; Carol L Shields
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Macular perfusion in healthy Chinese: an optical coherence tomography angiogram study.

Authors:  Jian Yu; Chunhui Jiang; Xiaolei Wang; Li Zhu; Ruiping Gu; Huan Xu; Yali Jia; David Huang; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Enophthalmos and choroidal atrophy after intraophthalmic artery chemotherapy for retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Brian C Tse; Sue C Kaste; Rachel Brennan; Brent Orr; Matthew W Wilson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  PARAFOVEAL MICROVASCULAR FEATURES ON OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY IN EYES WITH CIRCUMSCRIBED CHOROIDAL HEMANGIOMA.

Authors:  Kareem Sioufi; Emil A T Say; Sandor C Ferenczy; Carol L Shields
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Carboplatin-associated ototoxicity in children with retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Johnnie K Bass; Jianrong Wu; Catherine A Billups; Amy W Wozniak; Thomas E Merchant; Barrett G Haik; Matthew W Wilson; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  ALTERED PARAFOVEAL MICROVASCULATURE IN TREATMENT-NAIVE CHOROIDAL MELANOMA EYES DETECTED BY OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY.

Authors:  Yafeng Li; Emil A T Say; Sandor Ferenczy; Meghana Agni; Carol L Shields
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Retinoblastoma: treatment and survival in Great Britain 1963 to 2002.

Authors:  A MacCarthy; J M Birch; G J Draper; J L Hungerford; J E Kingston; M E Kroll; C A Stiller; T J Vincent; M F G Murphy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY FINDINGS OF DEEP CAPILLARY PLEXUS MICROISCHEMIA AFTER INTRAVENOUS CHEMOTHERAPY FOR RETINOBLASTOMA.

Authors:  Kareem Sioufi; Emil A T Say; Sandor C Ferenczy; Ann M Leahey; Carol L Shields
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Quantitative OCT angiography of optic nerve head blood flow.

Authors:  Yali Jia; John C Morrison; Jason Tokayer; Ou Tan; Lorinna Lombardi; Bernhard Baumann; Chen D Lu; Woojhon Choi; James G Fujimoto; David Huang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.